PS
348 posts


Super thrilled to appear on @zerodha 's In the Money podcast, where we talk about all things AI, and a few things finance: youtu.be/Q8Hj-AP1cx4?si… Oh, and the quality of production is something else from everything else I've appeared on! Thanks @bebhuvan and @mysandz


I shouldn't have to say this but never buy a quant strategy or course. By the time a strategy appears in a course or paper, its edge is GONE. Courses teach you frameworks, not alphas.


Just got this and I am reading. It’s excellent. The 10 books of the integral edition are too much for me. $16. Still, 900pp. If you don’t want to read it, the “Mahabarata” by Peter Brook (a movie) is free on the Internet Archive. Great. Still, 5hrs of a movie. Ok: read the Bhagavad-Gita. Be Oppenheimer a bit… In sum: get some Mahabarata. Top Ten in universal literature ever, everywhere. Dramatically underrated by non-Indians.


Thoughts on the Cowen debate: 1) I think Cowen looked at the world in the aughts and realized “I can be a normal economist or the world’s most influential blogger” and he clearly chose the latter. This was a good choice, and has led him to great heights. 2) Breadth is its own sort of depth, and the world has great need of generalists who actually do the reading 3) One reason #2 matters: most public intellectuals of a certain stature—the stature where they are invited to dinner parties with fancy people—are reduced to publicly recycling the opinions of the other dinner guests. There are lots of reasons why that happens but one obvious one is that the pundits in question don’t actually have the breadth of experience or reading to reflect on dinner party opinion. Tyler is this one of the few public intellectuals whose opinions are reliably made better because of his access to the high and mighty. 4) There is probably no academic in America who has a larger number of mentees; I cannot think of any academic who has jump-started more careers than Cowen has. It was only possible because of reasons 1-3. This is a significant achievement. It will be his greatest legacy. Full disclosure: I have received grants from Cowen myself so I am biased in the ways you would expect.


Having done tons of coding, cloud engineering, as well as covering the software sector as an equity analyst over the last 15+ years, I'm really not seeing a software disruption here. Jensen is focused on boosting the productivity of his workforce, which can easily result into an economic value of >$100 billion for his company, as opposed to doing a set of highly risky and complicated software transitions that might save him $500 million. And other enterprises are doing the same going through recent earnings calls. All the sudden experts in software underestimate gravely how complicated it is to rip out and replace an ERP, database, CAD, supply chain management, or other core tool that runs the backbone of a business. These are complicated 2-4 year projects with mixed results of success, frequently resulting into earnings warnings and failed projects. The real value currently is to insert as much AI into your business as possible and boost productivity. And the easiest way to do is having AI leverage your core tools. We're currently using all our software tools more than ever before, as now our AIs are also using them as well. So, we're spending more on AI and software and this continues to accelerate. Where's the money coming from? We're spending less on human services as we can do more ourselves now. So, we'd be bearish on companies that provide services such as consulting, IT services, freelancing etc. However, for key software tools, revenues and EPS will accelerate from here in our view, as these names are typically building AI agents into their current tooling. From everything we're seeing, enterprises are very keen to lever these AI capabilities. It's not like enterprises - and especially SMBs - have a deep pool of AI talent to build this themselves. Free open source software also has been available for decades, illustrating that price is not the key factor in selecting a tool. It's about security, reliability, and network effects around software tools. techinvestments.io/p/the-bull-cas…




Here’s how to slash sugar spikes from pasta — and make it healthier. Scientists discover that cooling cooked pasta for 24 hours transforms its starch into a gut-friendly fiber that slashes blood sugar spikes. When you cook pasta and then cool it for at least 24 hours, the starch molecules undergo a process called retrogradation. This molecular reorganization transforms digestible starch into "resistant starch," which functions more like fiber than a simple carbohydrate. Instead of being rapidly absorbed in the small intestine and causing a sharp rise in glucose, it travels to the large intestine where it feeds beneficial gut bacteria as a powerful prebiotic. This simple kitchen hack not only supports a healthy microbiome but also encourages the production of short-chain fatty acids that help reduce internal inflammation. Beyond gut health, this transformation provides a significant advantage for metabolic wellness by slowing sugar absorption and improving insulin response. Perhaps most surprisingly, these health benefits remain largely intact even if you choose to reheat the pasta before eating. By simply planning ahead and refrigerating your noodles overnight, you can effectively lower the caloric impact of your meal while maintaining more stable energy levels throughout the day. This game-changing strategy allows you to enjoy favorite comfort foods while prioritizing long-term health and better blood sugar control. Source: Bullen, A. (2022). Is Reheated Pasta Actually Better for You? Cleveland Clinic Health Essentials.












