Armyant77

@Voyager4IR @chainlink If the revenue is used to pay for sevices, then how can it be put into a reserve to sell later? Not FUD, just a serious question. It doesn’t make sense, does it?

@armyant77 @chainlink And the reserve is Chainlink literally using revenue earned to buy back their token. This is a good thing get somehow people like to create FUD. It’s so crazy.

Would be nice if @chainlink could address this question about $LINK. All it takes is a little communication…

@Voyager4IR @chainlink I couldn’t care less about other projects or what their valuations is or isn’t. And I’m not sure why they’re lack of communication should have anything to do with Chainlink

@armyant77 @chainlink Have you considered asking why other projects are valued at their current valuations? Do they seem to be in a better position than Chainlink to you? All this scrutiny is directed at the best project available, while others receive no such attention. It’s quite amusing.

@Voyager4IR @chainlink If someone like the quoted poster is asking this question the blog is insufficient It also isnt affecting price Also the explanation is troubling. Serious question: Why does money that is paid for services go to a reserve that Chainlink Labs gets to sell at a mater date?

@armyant77 @chainlink These services are not free. Developers that use Chainlink’s services via AWS pay and this gets (1) converted to link via abstraction and (2) used to buy back LINK into a reserve. It’s all discussed in many official blog posts on chain.link.

@stakedotlink Better not be messing with me 🥲

Staking.

@knilniahc @Mintcondish369 @McPampDMD @chainlink 👀

@Mintcondish369 @McPampDMD @chainlink Historically speaking... This has never happened with any of my staking posts, so uh... Yeah, we're gonna fucking send. It's happening guys! 👀 RETAIL NOT NEEDED!!!

historically speaking $LINK is lining up for a pretty massive jump here do with this information what you will @chainlink 🦆🦆

1950 GDP: $300 billion 2026 GDP: $32 trillion Yet happiness levels are 1/2 of what they used to be ... has technology REALLY made our lives better?

Many well known $LINK marines blocked me after this post, even though there's no lies in it. But most didn't. Projects encouraging yes-man cultures peril 10/10 times, but @chainlink & its community think critically & love objectiveness. Says a lot. Bullish + Clarity Act coming

@TheLinkPanda Firstly I don’t care at all about Solana Second, it’s completely different anyway. Not to mention it’s on a completely different level of magnitude Theres no double standard here

@armyant77 Double standards all the time. That's our issue with some of you.

Wow... imagine that Fuddies. Solana has had the same price fluxuations... It must be a $LINK problem

@LinkBoi777 Off base. You can’t claim to generate hundreds of millions of dollars and then get upset when people ask for a certain level of transparency about it. Also, who do you think is buying if not retail? It’s not public corporations according to disclosures - so retail needed for now

Chainlink does not Care about retail investors buying $LINK and that's the truth. They used the $LINK token to raise capital and build the Company we know today. They always wanted the $LINK token to become the currency of the protocol and secure the network. Retail investors are not part of this idea. So why try to convince People to buy the token as An investment. They want the $LINK token to be led by network effects and not by speculation. This does not make it less of an investment but the truth is @chainlink won't hold your hand and try to convince you to invest in the token. If you aren't so caught up in the price and just study the fundamentals you soon will realise you are sitting on a golden egg but it might take some time to hatch. The most assymetrical opportunity in the history of capital markets. $LINK

@ARCRaidersNews The game is dead to me until PvE is an option

Aleksander Grøndal, executive producer at Embark Studios, revealed that 30% of players mainly focus on PvP. According to figures he shared with The Guardian, roughly 30% stick to PvE, 30% go pure PvP, and 40% mix both. Solid split. Surprisingly, 95% of players in ARC Raiders use proximity chat — that's nearly every single player in the game.

@ChainlinkLoad @chainlink People like that aren’t worth the time. Better to just let it go at this point and wish him a good rest of his life

This is a grown man 😂 Who felt the need to respond this way for asking questions. Who also, mind you, is a face for $LINK on X. What a wonderful community the $LINK marines must be! Colorado really makes them look based!! @Chainlink

@TheLinkPanda @ChainlinkLoad Gosh, I have so many question of you now - DMs open haha Would love to hear more of what was mentioned And this is exactly what we are asking for. We aren’t all lovable pandas and get to have our questions addressed Can you see how that would feel from our perspective?

The discussion was private, but the questions of the community which I asked for were mentioned. The team knows what they are doing and are creating an economy that works for everyone. They have the same goals as we have, and they are equally invested, not to say even more. But that's all I know, and all we'll know until more clarity comes I'm afraid.

As wise as RTJ is, his ego screams emo 15 year old teenager. He can’t handle any objective criticism to his project - YIKES 😬 Maybe someday he’ll stop reading technical papers and learn something about socializing and human interaction.

@TheLinkPanda @ChainlinkLoad Can you pls link me to the discussion, I must have missed it I’m also in the camp that usage alone won’t do anything to the price (just a forced buy followed by a sell to USD). We need staking and revenue share to move it - or at least the expectation of that being implemented

Would it? I mean Chainlink already has a big treasury, I can imagine they could run this for the next 10 years without any issue now. And I can also imagine revenue picking up as soon as SWIFT and the DTCC start moving to production, which is in the next couple of months according to their websites. There was a conversation and this is what was told. They know the concerns, but their goals is to win together with us. x.com/TheLinkPanda/s…

@TheLinkPanda @ChainlinkLoad I refuse to pay for checkmark, so it’s too hard to write out a long post haha Suffice it to say there’s a more reasons than I just listed in the space available to me This internet frog is going back to his lily pad now

@TheLinkPanda @ChainlinkLoad Partially agree, but I think it’s a bit more tenuous than many think First, no one is asking for full transparency, just basic communication (and they’ve already done it in the past so…. Second, if retail demand craters who buys token? it would also hurt rev during qtrly sales

@TheLinkPanda @ChainlinkLoad I can understand and respect that - I’m just an anon internet frog after all I have a different take and think that the questions are only growing louder and will get to the point of them having to address it in some manner They cant be ignored much longer without harm

To be honest I haven't seen your messages, so that comment wasn't particularly directed to you. All I know is that some of the conversations or the posts lately have been kind of annoying and they won't change anything about the transparency of chainlink and the legal side of things. It sucks, but for now, we're going to have to wait.

@TheLinkPanda @ChainlinkLoad Heyfren Genuinely asking Panda, which of my post(s) come across as childlike cries? Ive always maintained respectful dialogue. Check my profile, I’m no fudder I also don’t particularly care about other projects or feel the need to use what they do/don’t do as a measuring stick

Don't you guys see the other side of this? I mean calling the kettle black. He's more aware of everything than you guys are and he's been educating you all in his free time to then get this childlike cries for attention and information that no other crypto project in the world shares. Have a little respect and you'll get more back.

@colorado_crypto Insulting marines for asking legit questions Interesting strategy

Sounds like something a libtard would say. 🤣 $Link