marko osborne

2K posts

marko osborne

@audiowrangler

Voice Over talent/propagandista R&D

Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A. Katılım Nisan 2009

1.3K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler

marko osborne retweetledi

AwakenedOutlaw⚒️@AwakenedOutlaw·15h

If you were wondering why Trump is so damn interested in getting his hands on any uranium in Iran, even the "dust," here's one reason. Once acquired, experts can undertake a process called nuclear forensic analysis (aka provenance determination), whereby it can be determined where the ore originated, and I don't mean in general. They can confirm its origin not only down to the country (or general region) it came from, but also to the mine from which it was extracted. Smart money is on their ore being confirmed to have come from a Uranium mine in Montana. Now stop and consider the implications of that being true, if that's what's ultimately proven. 'Sum of all Fears' energy comes to mind.

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump

Uranium deal to Russia, with Clinton help and Obama Administration knowledge, is the biggest story that Fake Media doesn't want to follow!

English

436

4.1K

11.6K

346K

marko osborne retweetledi

LMD (Arc.)@Layemie001·1d

With this innovation the elderly and the disabled can now work normally.

English

413

1.5K

6.4K

1.5M

marko osborne retweetledi

Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·1d

🚨 JUST IN: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is being praised nationwide for dropping this TRUTH on leftism and "progressivism" "Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence, and hence our form of government. It holds that our rights and our dignities come not from God, but from government." "It requires of the people a subservience and weakness incompatible with a constitution premised on the transcendent origin of our rights." You NAILED IT, Justice Thomas! 🇺🇸 This guy is the true GOAT.

English

1.4K

26.1K

80K

821.7K

marko osborne retweetledi

Tony Seruga@TonySeruga·2d

Obama deserves to DIE in prison! Karoline Leavitt: “While publicly pretending to support a peaceful transfer of power, Barack Obama privately worked to sabotage President Trump. Newly declassified evidence from the DNI proves the Obama administration manufactured and politicized intelligence to fuel the Russia collusion hoax — a deliberate effort to delegitimize Trump before he even took office. Trump had nothing to do with Russia. The entire thing was a fraud, and Obama and his top officials — Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and McCabe — knew it from the beginning.”

Tony Seruga@TonySeruga

This is the REAL Barack Hussein Obama II. He will go down as one of the most evil Manchurian candidates in history. You may think you know who this man is, I assure you don’t. A tool of the global elites, CIA and radical Islam, his goal was to destroy America. There’s a reason his Washington, D.C. residence is a quick 5 minute walk from The Islamic Center of Washington D.C..

English

2.8K

13.2K

44.5K

1.7M

marko osborne retweetledi

Frases Barbie@barbie_context·1d

Así es el Código Morse visualizado

Español

2.2K

16.1K

4.1M

marko osborne retweetledi

Brivael - FR@brivael·2d

Aujourd'hui grosse discussion avec mes ingés (chez Argil) sur pourquoi Elon a viré le LIDAR de ses voitures autonomes. Choix radical, moqué pendant des années, et comme d'hab il avait raison depuis le début. Le LIDAR c'est un laser qui balaye l'environnement et crache un nuage de points 3D. Sur le papier tu obtiens la géométrie exacte du monde. Dans la vraie vie c'est une verrue technologique collée sur le toit parce qu'on sait pas faire mieux avec la vision seule. Problème numéro un : ça rajoute une modalité dans le training du modèle. Ton réseau doit apprendre à fusionner vision + lidar + radar + ultrasons. Chaque capteur en plus c'est une source de désaccord à arbitrer, pas une source d'info supplémentaire. Sensor fusion artisanale = dette technique permanente. Problème numéro deux, la bitter lesson de Rich Sutton : scaler le compute sur une seule modalité bat systématiquement les architectures bricolées à la main. Tesla a dropé le radar, puis les ultrasons, est passé full end-to-end vision. Leur courbe sur les edge cases s'est accélérée APRÈS, pas avant. Waymo fait l'inverse et reste stuck en ops géofencée. Problème numéro trois, le plus fondamental : le LIDAR voit la géométrie, pas la sémantique. Il sait qu'il y a un truc, pas ce que c'est ni ce que ça va faire. Les derniers 9 de fiabilité sont des problèmes de cognition, pas de perception brute. Un capteur de plus résout rien, il ajoute du bruit. Sébastien Loeb balance une 208 T16 à 180 dans un chemin boueux corse sous la pluie avec zéro LIDAR. Deux yeux, un cerveau. L'évolution a donné des yeux aux prédateurs pendant 500 millions d'années, pas des lasers. Il y a une raison. Le LIDAR c'est l'équivalent du marxisme appliqué à l'économie. Une solution planifiée, centralisée, qui prétend modéliser explicitement ce qui doit émerger d'un système distribué et adaptatif. Tu remplaces l'intelligence par de la mesure, la compréhension par de la donnée, l'émergence par le contrôle. Ça rassure les ingénieurs qui veulent tout spécifier en amont, exactement comme la planif rassurait les économistes soviétiques. Et ça échoue pour les mêmes raisons : la réalité est trop riche pour être capturée par un capteur, comme elle est trop riche pour être capturée par un plan quinquennal. La vraie intelligence, celle de Hayek comme celle de Tesla, c'est de faire confiance à un système qui apprend de l'expérience plutôt que de tout pré-encoder. L'élégance d'une solution c'est son rapport signal sur complexité. Le LIDAR explose le dénominateur. Défendre le LIDAR en 2026 c'est préférer empiler des hacks plutôt que résoudre le vrai problème. C'est de la feignasserie intellectuelle maquillée en rigueur d'ingénieur. Les mêmes gens qui défendaient les systèmes experts en 2012 contre le deep learning. Ils finiront pareil. Never bet against end-to-end. Never bet against la simplicité. Never bet against Elon.

Français

2.1K

17.5K

26.5M

marko osborne retweetledi

John F Kennedy Jr@John_F_kJr·3d

Here it is: The Criminal Conspiracy: Barack Obama’s “protection racket.” King Solomon Reporting: FBI Director Andrew McCabe: “Shut the f**king thing down.” Attorney General Sally Yates: “Shut the f**king thing down.” Three separate FBI offices—out of New York, Washington, and Little Rock—all came to the same conclusion: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was running a massive bribery operation with foreign governments through the Clinton Foundation. @jsolomonReports: “Hillary Clinton ran a pay-to-play scheme that delivered favors from her post as Secretary of State, while foreigners and others paid large sums of money to her family foundation, the Clinton Foundation, run by Bill Clinton and their daughter, eventually Chelsea Clinton. Three separate agencies, three separate bureaus, offices of the FBI believed they had predicated evidence to pursue that.” “Four U.S. attorney offices under Barack Obama were asked for help by the agents’ agency: ‘We need a grand jury, we need to get evidence, we want to move the case down the road.’ All three of those four offices told the agents, ‘You’re on your own; we will not assist you in your pursuit of criminal charges against Hillary Clinton.’ And then, perhaps the most extraordinary statement in the document: the Deputy Attorney General for Barack Obama, Sally Yates, explicitly told the FBI to ‘shut the f**king thing down,’ ‘shut it down.’ In other words, while Hillary Clinton was selling out America for hundreds of millions of dollars in the shadow of the 2016 election, she was also orchestrating the Russian collusion hoax as a means to overthrow the U.S. government, and Barack Obama was right there every step of the way. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.

English

692

1.5K

42.7K

marko osborne retweetledi

Sean Davis@seanmdav·4d

In 2019, during the peak hysteria of the Ukraine whistleblower impeachment hoax, I exclusively reported for The Federalist that the Intelligence Community Inspector General secretly gutted internal whistleblower rules requiring firsthand evidence of wrongdoing. I had the whistleblower forms, the revisions, and the dates for all of it, and I conclusively proved all of it. All hell broke loose after I published my report, with Deep State assets and their media lickspittles accusing me of lying, of fabrication, and of botching the facts. I was 100% right, and they all knew it. How do we know this? Because the IG himself admitted under oath in testimony for Congress. And his staff, despite the fact of his testimony, lied about it for years, knowing that the proof of their conspiracy would be hidden within his classified testimony. For nearly 7 years I waited for the transcript of that testimony to be released. Today, that finally happened, and that testimony fully vindicates my original reporting and full discredits everyone who falsely claimed it was inaccurate—including the staff of the IG who deliberately peddled lies about what they did, and how I caught them red-handed. Here’s what he secretly admitted under oath: “When it came to my attention from one of the media inquiries that we had a form that required individuals to have firsthand information before they could file a complaint, I did two things.” “I said, first of all, is that what our form says? And then the second thing once they told me, yeah, that’s what our form says, we need to change that,” Atkinson testified. “So the timing is unfortunate. It looks suspicious, I get that,” he said. “What I should have done was I should have explained when we changed the form why we were changing it.” “I should have been more transparent about the reasons and the motivations for the change in the forms,” he said. The IC IG gutted its own internal rules, eliminated its longstanding requirement of first-hand whistleblower knowledge, did so because of the anti-Trump complaint, fraudulently backdated its changes, and did it all in secret, EXACTLY as I reported in 2019. And the admission by the IG himself that my reporting was accurately was HIDDEN from public view until today. Thankfully I kept the receipts of every fraudulent, throne-sniffing Deep State crony and publication which cast aspersions on my credibility and that of my reporting. Stay tuned on that front…

English

326

3.7K

10.5K

523.7K

marko osborne retweetledi

Tech with Mak@techNmak·6d

In 1948, a 32-year-old at Bell Labs published a paper nobody fully understood. Engineers found it too mathematical. Mathematicians found it too engineering-focused. One prominent mathematician reviewed it negatively. That paper - "A Mathematical Theory of Communication", became the founding document of the digital age. The man was Claude Shannon. Father of Information Theory. At 21, he wrote the most important master's thesis of the 20th century. Working at MIT on an early mechanical computer, Shannon noticed its relay switches had exactly two states - open or closed. He had just taken a philosophy course introducing Boolean algebra, which also operated on two values: true and false. Nobody had ever connected these two things. His 1937 thesis proved that Boolean algebra and electrical circuits are mathematically identical, and that any logical operation could be built from simple switches. Howard Gardner called it "possibly the most important, and also the most famous, master's thesis of the century." Every digital computer ever built traces back to this insight. At 29, he proved that perfect encryption exists. During WWII, Shannon worked on classified cryptography at Bell Labs. His work contributed to SIGSALY, the secure voice system used for confidential communications between Roosevelt and Churchill. In a classified 1945 memorandum, he mathematically proved the one-time pad provides perfect secrecy, unbreakable not just computationally, but provably, permanently, against an adversary with infinite power. When declassified in 1949, it transformed cryptography from an art into a science. It laid the foundations for DES, AES, and every modern encryption standard. At 32, he defined what information is. His 1948 paper introduced one equation: H = −Σ p(x) log p(x) Shannon entropy. The average uncertainty in a probability distribution. The minimum bits required to encode a message. Three things followed: > He defined the bit - the fundamental unit of all information. His colleague John Tukey coined the name. > He proved the channel capacity theorem, every communication channel has a maximum rate of reliable transmission. You can approach it. You can never exceed it. > He unified telegraph, telephone, and radio into a single mathematical framework for the first time. Robert Lucky of Bell Labs called it the greatest work "in the annals of technological thought." Where his equation lives in AI today: Cross-entropy loss - the function training every classifier and language model, is derived directly from H. Decision tree splits use information gain, which is H applied to data. Perplexity, the standard LLM evaluation metric, is an exponentiation of cross-entropy. Every time a neural network trains, Shannon's formula runs inside it. He also built the first AI learning device. In 1950, Shannon built Theseus, a mechanical mouse that navigated a maze through trial and error, learned the correct path, and repeated it perfectly. Mazin Gilbert of Bell Labs said: "Theseus inspired the whole field of AI." That same year he published the first paper on programming a computer to play chess. He co-organized the 1956 Dartmouth Workshop, the founding event of AI as a field. The man: He rode a unicycle through Bell Labs hallways while juggling. He built a flame-throwing trumpet, a rocket-powered Frisbee, and Styrofoam shoes to walk on the lake behind his house. He called his home Entropy House. When asked what motivated him: "I was motivated by curiosity. Never by the desire for financial gain. I just wondered how things were put together." In 1985, he appeared unexpectedly at a conference in Brighton. The crowd mobbed him for autographs. Persuaded to speak at the banquet, he talked briefly, then pulled three balls from his pockets and juggled instead. One engineer said: "It was as if Newton had showed up at a physics conference." He died in 2001 after a decade with Alzheimer's, the cruel irony of information slowly leaving the mind of the man who defined what information was. Claude, the AI model, is named after Claude Shannon, the mathematician who laid the foundation for the digital world we rely on today.

English

191

2.1K

7.6K

439.7K

marko osborne retweetledi

Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·11 Nis

The CEO of a California NGO called The Painted Turtle caught embezzling $5.2 million dollars The funds were meant for children with serious illnesses to do activities like horseback riding, swimming, archery, ropes courses, and more The embezzlement went on for 7 years

English

531

9.6K

25K

271.1K

marko osborne retweetledi

Elon Musk@elonmusk·9 Nis

Accurate

Ricardo@Ric_RTP

In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud. Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match. Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines. Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past. That's exactly what Altman wants you to think. Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings... A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion. If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem. Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this: Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language. xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity." Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise. An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits. That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking. Just look at what he did this week: Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins. Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally. That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense. He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back. OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg. They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy." That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win. Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak. OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery. Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion. The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away. And the timing couldn't be worse... OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them. A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth. This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist. Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama. The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER. And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.

English

3.2K

15.7K

92.8K

26.4M

marko osborne retweetledi

Elon Musk@elonmusk·9 Nis

Grok will never go to therapy. Never.

English

6.2K

63.4K

31.9M

marko osborne retweetledi

Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·9 Nis

HOLY CR*P 🚨 American led a team of volunteers who went undercover at the recent No Kings protests in 31 different states and 47 different cities to collect on-the-ground data about the NGOs and organizers Journalist Karlyn Borysenko has them all organized and in a spreadsheet. The data is horrifying “A little over a week ago, I led a team of volunteers in 31 states going undercover at the No Kings protests to collect data to map the modern activist left in America We've documented 400 different groups at the events 18% of them were far left revolutionary socialists” - We have documented 387 different leftist organizations that were at the No Kings protest, talking to people and handing out their propaganda - Found true far left groups like Democratic Socialists and Revolutionary Socialists that are doing everything they can to push chaos and destabilization in our world to try to overthrow the capitalist system - 60% of the groups who were at the protest were progressive groups - 8% of the groups were Democratic socialist type groups like the DSA, the Working Families Party people trying to get to elected positions to push socialism in this country - 18% of the groups that we saw at the No Kings Protest based on this data set were far left revolutionary groups that were only going to the protest to recruit and radicalize more people to the far left

English

191

5.5K

11.2K

166.7K

marko osborne@audiowrangler·8 Nis

@JohnCleese He's a nazi, crazy, war monger,ww3, gonna nuke us all, no, he's a chicken hawk... What is their aim? To what ends? Oils well that ends well.

English

John Cleese@JohnCleese·7 Nis

Fantastic

Liza Rosen@LizaRosen0000

Flashback: Palestinian UN staffers get visibly traumatized during this emergency session at the Human Rights Council, after Mosab Hassan Yousef (son of Hamas founder) destroyed their false victim image!

English

3.8K

63.6K

marko osborne@audiowrangler·8 Nis

@JoshHall2024 @CloudenPat73935 He's a nazi, crazy, war monger,ww3, gonna nuke us all, no, he's a chicken hawk... What is their aim? To what ends? Oils well that ends well.

English

8.7K

Joshua Hall@JoshHall2024·8 Nis

🚨BREAKING: 🚨 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has reportedly uncovered a DEEP STATE COUP PLOT to remove President Trump from office by SABOTAGING his war effort in Iran in order to turn the American people and the US military against him. Gabbard is also said to have discovered communications between former HIGH-RANKING MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS from the first Trump administration and the Biden administration and active members of the military involved in this war in which they are being told to DISOBEY AND REFUSE TO CARRY OUT ORDERS made by President Trump. The Deep State within our government is alive and well... THE ENEMY WITHIN is the greatest existential threat that our nation faces today.

English

8.1K

17.8K

46.7K

1.1M

marko osborne retweetledi

Grummz@Grummz·8 Nis

This is better than the Lego Movie.😂 Iran pilot rescue.

English

515

6.5K

33.6K

1.6M

marko osborne retweetledi

Imtiaz Mahmood@ImtiazMadmood·7 Nis

In Japan thousands of Muslims have gathered at the LARGEST Castle in the Country to hold a prayer and implement Sharia Law in several neighborhoods. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has announced that she will deport ALL of them, whether they are legal or NOT. - @Anonymous_TA

English

3.6K

18.7K

87.3K

1.7M

marko osborne retweetledi

Big Brain AI@realBigBrainAI·6 Nis

Marc Andreessen explains why we are only three years into what is effectively an 80-year technological revolution: He opens with a blunt assessment: "This is the biggest technological revolution of my life. This is clearly bigger than the internet. The comps on this are things like the microprocessor and the steam engine and electricity." But to understand why, you have to go back 80 years. In the 1930s, the pioneers of computing understood the theory of computation before they'd even built the machines. And they faced a fundamental choice. Build computers in the image of the adding machine — hyper-literal, mathematical, capable of billions of operations per second, but unable to understand human speech or deal with humans the way humans like to be dealt with. Or build computers modelled on the human brain. Neural networks. They chose the adding machine. And that single decision shaped everything — mainframes, PCs, smartphones, every dollar of wealth the computer industry created over the next 80 years. IBM itself is the successor company to the National Cash Register Company of America. The lineage runs that deep. But here's what makes this moment so extraordinary. They knew about the other path. The first neural network academic paper was published in 1943. Marc points to a remarkable piece of forgotten history: "There's an interview you can watch on YouTube with the authors. It's him in his beach house, not wearing a shirt, talking about this future in which computers are going to be built on the model of the human brain." That was 1946. The vision existed. The path just wasn't taken. So neural networks spent the next eight decades living in the shadows. Kept alive by a small academic movement — first called cybernetics, then artificial intelligence — that refused to let the idea die. And for most of that time, it simply didn't work. "It was basically decade after decade after decade of excessive optimism followed by disappointment." By the time Marc reached college in 1989, AI was a backwater field. Everyone assumed it was never going to happen. But the scientists kept working. Quietly building up an enormous reservoir of concepts and ideas across those decades of disappointment. And then Christmas 2022 arrived. ChatGPT. And suddenly: "All of a sudden it's like: oh my god. It turns out it works." That moment wasn't the start of something new. It was the payoff on an 80-year-old bet that almost everyone had written off. Which is exactly why Marc's framing matters so much: "We're three years into what is effectively an 80-year revolution." Most people are treating AI like another technology cycle — something to adapt to, ride, and wait out. But if Andreessen is right, we are not adapting to a new cycle. We are standing at the very beginning of the longest and most consequential technological transformation in human history. The road not taken in the 1930s is finally being built. And we have barely broken ground.

English

160

513

3.9K

378.9K

marko osborne retweetledi

Asra Nomani@AsraNomani·6 Nis

EXCLUSIVE: The hidden $250K machine of 9 paid vendors behind the 'flagship' #NoKings protest in St. Paul, Minnesota I followed the money behind the No Kings protest in St. Paul, Minn., and uncovered an estimated $250,000 paid to 9 vendors to produce an event that was about the size of a Def Leppard concert. Sources said that the Democratic nonprofit Indivisible paid the bill. It didn't respond to numerous requests for comment. How did I piece this together? Well, I have a rule when reporting on the protest industry: be the first there and one of the last to leave. That’s how I met Slamhammer Sound & Roadcase Co. production manager Matt Svobodny, one of the very nice hard-working members of the production crew behind the scenes in St. Paul, as they were breaking down the set for the No Kings protest, long after Bruce Springsteen and most of the anti-Trump protesters had left. He was straightforward, candid and matter-of-fact about what it takes to throw a protest and, a few days later, guided me -- and you -- through the warehouse where Slamhammer stores the equipment it pulled out for the protest. He provided the kind of transparency that the secretive nonprofits behind the protests should actually be providing to citizens and the media. See for yourself: ➡️ the mobile stage ➡️ the speakers ➡️ nearly a mile of heavy-duty feeder cable used to distribute electricity throughout the rally site and the ballistic ➡️ bullet-resistant barriers that shielded the Bruce Springsteen, Jane Fonda, Joan Baez, TIm Walz, Ilhan Omar, Randi Weingarten and the day's other bold-faced names WATCH the video that I recorded ⬇️ Thank you to Fox News Digital's Hannah Brennan for her work editing the video. In our new @FoxNews Digital exclusive, I lay out how the "flagship" protest in St. Paul wasn’t spontaneous, like most of the media reported. It was professionally engineered. And that raises a bigger question: When protests look like productions…who’s really behind the curtain? I answer that question in the article and the thread below 🧵👇 A former Obama and Biden administration political strategist and campaign operative Roger Fisk takes credit for being the "Senior Advisor to the #NoKings flagship event," fine-tuning the "art and science" of throwing the St. Paul protest, along with two other "No Kings" protests last year. Fisk didn't respond to a request for comment. The protests have parroted Chinese government propaganda, demonizing America as a "fascist" nation and Trump as a "king." Partners in the protests were pro-communist groups funded by Neville Roy Singham, a tech tycoon living in Shanghai. @DataRepublican, You'll want to read this. READ: foxnews.com/politics/behin… Behind the scenes, I identified 9 vendors that were paid an estimated $250,000 to construct the protest: ➡️ Slamhammer Sound & Roadcase Co. — mobile stage, 100-speaker sound system, lighting, 1,700 ft cable, ballistic barriers → estimated $100,000 ➡️ Fire Up Video — 4 jumbo screens → estimated $20,000 ➡️ Algorithm, an AV company — 2 jumbo screens → estimated $25,000 ➡️ Common World Productions — 2 LED stage screens → estimated $10,000 ➡️ Warning Lites of Minnesota — bike-rack barricades → estimated $15,000 ➡️ E5 Energy — generators, electrical distribution → estimated $15,000 ➡️ Ultimate Events — tents, chairs, tables → estimated $30,000 ➡️ On Site Companies — ~300 porta-toilets → estimated $25,000 ➡️ Fast Kat Connects — high-speed internet → estimated $10,000 Total: an estimated $250,000. This wasn’t a rally that just “popped up,” as CNN reported. It was built, truck by truck, cable by cable, screen by screen. 🧵 with how it worked.