my blue check is bigger than yours

252 posts

my blue check is bigger than yours banner
my blue check is bigger than yours

my blue check is bigger than yours

@austrianaviator

standing on the shoulders of giants, so blasé - social media is flat, supported by …. all the way down…

London Katılım Temmuz 2009
254 Takip Edilen21 Takipçiler
Rory Sutherland
Rory Sutherland@rorysutherland·
The problem in France is that when there is a heatwave, about 30,000 people die. That's almost three Agincourts (to use the universally accepted metric for dead French people).
Porkchop Express@Porkchop_EXP

The weirdest thing about the “europoor no AC” discourse is that there is AC everywhere in Southern and Eastern Europe so this is obviously not a financial issue. It is an ideological issue in Northwestern Europe, which is admittedly even funnier.

English
40
45
755
158.2K
Rory Sutherland
Rory Sutherland@rorysutherland·
Various reasons. The French have a weird fear of draughts, bordering on superstition. Try opening a window on a hot day in a French rural train - someone will close it again within five minutes. There is also something weird about their electricity charging, which may discourage it..
English
4
0
23
3.9K
Chahuapa
Chahuapa@Chahuapa·
@BartGonnissen Nobody in the collective West seems to adhere to it. That was my point.
English
1
0
1
94
Bart 🌊⚓️
Bart 🌊⚓️@BartGonnissen·
Does Iran have the legal right to create checkpoints in the Strait of Hormuz? According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, they do not. However, Iran signed but never ratified UNCLOS 1982, similar to the United States. As a result, Iran reverts to UNCLOS 1958. The key difference between the two conventions is that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 designates the Strait of Hormuz as an international strait, allowing for "transit passage." In contrast, UNCLOS 1958 refers to international straits with "innocent passage." The term "innocent passage" permits foreign vessels to navigate through a coastal state's territorial waters without prior authorization, provided their passage is considered "innocent," meaning it does not threaten the peace, good order, or security of the coastal state. Under the rules of UNCLOS 1958, Iran can enforce its domestic laws in the Iranian part of the Strait concerning: - Safety of navigation - Pollution prevention - Security and surveillance Iran asserts that the United States cannot enjoy the rights of "transit passage" as defined in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), arguing that the U.S. only has the right of "innocent passage" since it never ratified UNCLOS 1982. In response, the U.S. dismisses this claim, stating that "transit passage" has become a principle of "customary law." This means that if all countries adhere to a particular practice for decades, it becomes legally binding, regardless of whether the treaty has been ratified.
Bart 🌊⚓️ tweet media
English
86
54
229
57.3K
Paul Graham
Paul Graham@paulg·
There's a vintage watch dealer in London (Somlo) that always has watches in amazing condition. 60 year old watches that seem unworn. I asked the owner how he does it. He said they've been around a long time and always pay promptly, so they get first look.
English
66
17
1.8K
278.3K
Shine
Shine@ShineInactive·
@infraexplained Yes in this case very much so, unless it's like cutting huge obstacle or difficult terrain then it's worth
English
1
0
2
290
Infrastructure explained
Infrastructure explained@infraexplained·
Austria is now so good at building tunnels that will build a 16,5 km tunnel that literally only goes under fields to appease the nimbys, instead of just building a normal at grade rail line This is longer than any rail tunnel in North America
Infrastructure explained tweet media
English
30
26
705
36.3K
Yaroslav Trofimov
Yaroslav Trofimov@yarotrof·
NATO countries are naked compared to GCC when it comes to air defense. A barrage of several hundred missiles and thousands of drones would lay waste to European infrastructure.
Eduardo Zaltzmann@e_zaltzmann

@shashj Iran and proxies have decent accuracy ordance up to 400-500km, that's not a secret. The lack of preparadness is a perennial problem with Arab armies. I think the issue here is more cultural and a NATO country would not fall into the same trap.

English
10
76
398
88.1K
my blue check is bigger than yours
my blue check is bigger than yours@austrianaviator·
@PeterRNeumann Könnte auch von Dönitz anno dazumal sein: „Solange die Kriegsmarine auch nur gelegentlich Handelsschiffe im Atlantik versenkt, bleibt unsere Drohung glaubwürdig. Kaum ein Reeder wird seine Schiffe über den Atlantik schicken - egal welche Zusicherungen die Alliierten geben!“ 🙄
Deutsch
1
0
0
89
Peter R. Neumann
Peter R. Neumann@PeterRNeumann·
Solange der Iran auch nur gelegentlich Tanker in der Straße von Hormuz trifft, bleibt seine Drohung glaubwürdig. Kaum ein Reeder wird seine Schiffe durch die Meeresenge schicken – egal welche Zusicherungen Amerika gibt. 👇
Arieh Kovler@ariehkovler

@MarineTraffic A cargo ship was hit, probably by Iran, while transiting the Straits of Hormuz today.

Deutsch
8
20
82
6.9K
James Clark 📈📉¯\_(ツ)_/¯
An observation: Because of the success of Iron Dome in Israel, Western populations have become cultured to believe that all incoming missiles can be "easily" shot out of the sky. A consequence of this is a *bizarre* degree of complacency about what it means when one country launches attacks on another country.
English
25
79
1.5K
95.8K
Janis Kluge
Janis Kluge@jakluge·
Rule of thumb in the short term: A 1% drop in oil supply leads to a 10% increase in the oil price (short term demand elasticity ~0.1). Strait of Hormuz is 20% of supply.
English
26
223
2.8K
156.2K
Felix Krause
Felix Krause@KrauseFx·
I don't understand if it's worth getting the MacBook M5 Pro/Max. I still have my Apple M1 Max 10‑Core CPU, 32‑Core GPU, 16‑Core Neural Engine (whatever this means exactly) 32GB memory It costs at least 3k to reach the same performance, and 4k to be slightly above?
English
19
0
40
12.7K
Yves Steiner
Yves Steiner@Yves_Leser·
@austrianaviator @nicolange_ Um den Krieg in die Länge zu ziehen. Das schadet Trump, wenn über die nächsten Monate immer wieder Raketen gestartet werden und vorallem auch den arabischen Länder, wo die Touristen ausbleiben.
Deutsch
1
0
4
107
tedfrank
tedfrank@tedfrank·
The reason this makes no sense is because Lloyd’s isn’t a singular entity. It’s a market of member syndicate underwriters that compete with one another. Intelligence can’t leak to Lloyd’s, because there’s no one to call up to disseminate.
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

This is potentially the biggest Iran story nobody is talking about: the global insurance market may be heading toward a systemic crisis. Here’s why… Most people don’t realize London isn’t just a financial center it’s THE center of global insurance. Lloyd’s underwrites ~40% of the world’s marine cargo. Ship sinks, port gets bombed, canal gets blocked the bill lands in London. This is why the UK punches above its weight. Not the Royal Navy. Not diplomacy. Insurance. Control insurance, control trade. And London doesn’t just control the 90% of global trade that moves by sea. Lloyd’s and the London market are major insurers of almost everything skyscrapers, factories, ports, satellites, entire supply chains. You can’t participate in public markets or raise large amounts of capital without insurance. Now, the normal playbook for war risk is repricing, not cancellation. Canceling coverage entirely is a massive escalation in underwriting posture. It signals something beyond risk, it signals uncertainty so deep the underwriter can’t even price it. The question everyone should be asking: why? Why not just jack up premiums and make a fortune off the crisis like they did in the Black Sea off Ukraine? To answer that, you have to understand WHY London has maintained a stranglehold on global insurance while losing nearly submarket related to ships. The answer: better intelligence. It is no coincidence that MI6 headquarters sits directly across the Thames from the @IMOHQ, the world’s maritime regulator & a short distance from Lloyd’s itself. I have no proof of a direct pipeline, but it has long been speculated in the industry that intelligence flows from MI6 to Lloyd’s. Having the best intel in the world would be the single greatest competitive advantage any insurer could possess: the ability to price risk that competitors can only guess at. Here’s the problem: the majority of MI6’s intel doesn’t come from its own agents. It comes from Five Eyes the alliance comprising the US, UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. And within 5Eyes, the dominant partner is obvious. The CIA, NSA, NRO, etc generate the lion’s share of intel. So if Lloyd’s pricing advantage flows from MI6, and MI6’s best intelligence flows from the US… what happens when that data pipeline gets throttled? All indications are that @Keir_Starmer was blindsided by the size and scope of the US/Israel strikes on Iran this weekend. That alone tells you something about the current state of transatlantic intelligence sharing. And we know there has been serious anger in Washington over the UK’s decision to sell Diego Garcia, home to America’s most strategically important base in the Indian Ocean, to Mauritius. It is not a huge leap to conclude that the submarine cables linking Langley to London have gone dark, or at minimum have been significantly throttled. What this means for UK national security is a question for the Brits. But what it means for EVERY company globally that’s insured through the London market has massive implications for the entire financial system. Because most large insurers worldwide don’t do independent intelligence work. They index off Lloyd’s rates. If you’re insuring a skyscraper in Tokyo, a semiconductor fab in Taiwan, or a port in Argentina you get a Lloyd’s quote, then shop that price around. Other insurers see Lloyd’s number and assume the diligence was done. They price accordingly. This means if London is suddenly flying blind it’s not just Lloyd’s policyholders at risk. It’s the entire global reinsurance chain. The cancellation of war risk coverage on ships isn’t the crisis. It’s the canary. If this hypothesis is correct, we could be looking at a systemic repricing event across global insurance markets…. the kind of cascading uncertainty that defined 2008 and COVID. Watch Lloyd’s. Watch reinsurance spreads. What Five Eyes. That’s where this story, and possibly Wall Street, breaks. CC @BillAckman

English
11
9
165
29.9K