
@0xPolygon Our seed round was co-led by @a16zcrypto, @1kxnetwork, and @hack_vc.
azeem
16.4K posts

@azeemk
Cofounder @0xMiden l Contributor @ForbesCrypto

@0xPolygon Our seed round was co-led by @a16zcrypto, @1kxnetwork, and @hack_vc.


The Cari announcement sparked a debate about institutional blockchain infrastructure. Much of it focuses on technical architecture. But first, consider the business case of proprietary vs. open standard. Governance of proprietary networks like Canton or Tempo is going to be controlled by a small group with disproportionate voting weight. It's "permissionless", but to join you have to submit a Google Form with opaque admission criteria. It's unclear who decides. Over time, the most influential participants will set the terms of access and pricing. If you're a bank evaluating this today, you recognize the pattern from SWIFT and Visa: early incumbents locking in structural advantages while late joiners absorb the cost. This is what we hear from banks. Everyone wants to build their own SWIFT-killer. Nobody wants join someone else's SWIFT-killer. Ethereum is the only settlement layer where that dynamic can't take hold, because no single entity can capture it. It's the only place where every participant can permanently trust that no future coalition will rewrite the rules against them. That's what makes Ethereum the only game-theoretical equilibrium as a global settlement layer for institutional finance that works long term.

I built an AI dev toolkit for @0xMiden. gave it to 11 people, most with zero Miden experience. what they shipped in ONE DAY: → sealed-bid auctions with private bids → corporate wallets with cryptographic spending caps → time-locked capsules where nobody sees inside until unlock → oracle pools, on-chain games, battleship the agent wrote the contracts. the agent wrote the tests. the agent wrote the frontend. they just said what to build. building on Miden just went from weeks → hours.





so you see tempo launched a “permissionless” mainnet that’s actually a soft-permissioned validator set but like it’s framed as a payments-maximalist design constraint so it’s fine. and there’s this new thing called machine payments protocol which is basically agents paying agents but only after the humans in the loop say it’s okay. and technically anyone can build but not everyone can validate so it’s like permissionless frontage with curated consensus vibes. and there’s a whole camp saying this is the pragmatic turn for payments infra, optimized for UX, compliance, throughput, whatever it takes, while another camp is like wait this is literally how you re-invent banking rails with extra steps. and somehow both sides are calling it cypherpunk. and the funniest part is everyone agrees “money should be neutral” but we’re still debating who gets to run the nodes that move it. so now we have this dual-state chain where it’s permissionless if you’re building, permissioned if you’re securing, and aspirationally decentralized in the roadmap. and you can feel the subtext: payments first, decentralization later. maybe. money?

this week's column is for all my taste bros out there












