
Mr. Burraaq Karraayyuu!
23.1K posts

Mr. Burraaq Karraayyuu!
@ballamii
Itiyyophiyyaan lafa, ilmoo namumma fi ulfina keenya nurra fuute wadaroo morma keenyatti nuuf keessa nu fannifnu. Jaalala wadaroo qabu Itiyyophiyya haa ijaaru.



Anthropic CEO (Dario Amodei): "Coding is going away first, then all of software engineering." What do you think about this?




Why Elon Musk is RIGHT to fight South Africa’s racist rules blocking Starlink? Imagine this: Long ago, South Africa had very unfair laws called apartheid. They treated Black people badly and kept them from good jobs and money. When those bad laws ended, the country made new rules (called B-BBEE) to help Black people get a fair share of business. The idea was good – like a big helping hand. But now? For companies like Starlink to sell fast internet, they MUST give away 30% of their business to Black partners. Just because of skin color. Elon Musk was born in South Africa. He left as a teen to chase big dreams. Today, his company SpaceX wants to bring Starlink – super fast satellite internet – to South Africa. But the rules say no unless they give up part of the company. Elon said it right: “Starlink is not allowed because I’m not Black.” SpaceX promised to spend about $30 million (that’s 500 million rand!) to give FREE high-speed internet to 5,000 rural schools. That helps over 2.4 MILLION kids every year learn better, get jobs later, and have a brighter future. Real help for the people who need it most! Starlink already works in about 24 other African countries. Villages there now have internet for school, doctors, and business. South Africa’s villages are missing out because of these racist rules. Elon isn’t asking for special favors. He just wants fair play so Starlink can connect everyone fast. Internet = education, jobs, hope. Why hold back millions of kids over rules that pick by race and color?






"[In order to get the Japanese to surrender], we dropped two atomic bombs." Mark Levin is continuing to urge Trump to use nuclear weapons against Iran—all while insisting he's not. Levin opened his show tonight by urging Trump not to negotiate a "deal" w/ Iran but a "surrender." He then had Dr. Brian Cox on to ask him if using nuclear weapons is "legal today under the laws of war." "I'm taking that as a possible yes," Levin says after Cox (who is a big Israel defender) suggests it may be. "I think it would be very helpful to go back and read the terms of surrender from the Japanese…because the Japanese were dug in, even after dropping two atomic bombs, and it took a lot of pressure—even after that—to get them to surrender," he says to end the show.

“Fourth, carry out a final barrage of leadership strikes, eliminating the Iranian officials who had been spared for the purpose of negotiations. Iran’s leaders must be made to understand that their lives literally depend on reaching a negotiated settlement to Trump’s liking. If they refuse to do so, they will be killed.”washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/…












