Haakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS

5.9K posts

Haakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS banner
Haakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS

Haakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS

@bitnorbert

I like Bitcoin. I code. Occasional court reporter. Founding board member of Bitcoin Policy Norway. PGP: 84EA 8254 1F47 C4A7

Norway Katılım Mart 2019
429 Takip Edilen8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Haakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS
This faketoshi cryptocult leader is back to launch an altcoin. He's picked up some tricks from Craig Wright, such as the three-piece suit and getting angry when asked to sign. Will you allow him to be your arch angel?
Haakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS tweet mediaHaakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS tweet media
English
43
9
102
21.6K
Bitcoin Carl 🚀🚀🌎🌍
You do not need to run your Bitcoin node all the time. Just connect when needed and sync to the latest block height!
English
11
4
42
12.4K
Haakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS retweetledi
calle
calle@callebtc·
If you're a Bitcoiner then you might be lucky enough to receive two whole shitcoin airdrops this year. Here is what you need to know, including a few warnings and how you can stay safe. This year, two of the most eccentric Bitcoiners who couldn't succeessfully change Bitcoin even if they sold their mother, will finally fork off and find out how it feels to be a shitcoiner with your own chain: - Paul Sports, the BIP300 guy who hates Lightning more than I hate shitcoins, and - Luke Dashjr, the BIP110 guy who eats cats and can't stop thinking about CSAM. Strange characters, great to see them go their own way. What does that mean for you? If you have say 1 BTC to your name, you will now also have 1 Paul-BTC and 1 Luke-BTC. Even if your own Bitcoin is stored on a hardware wallet, you will now also have two shitcoins that are also secured with the same keys as your real Bitcoin. Do I have to do anything? No. This all happens automatically. You don't need to do anything, you wouldn't even notice anything has happened. After all, what do you care whether some dude has forked Bitcoin and decided to become a shitcoiner. You can chill. What if I want to dump it? Obviously both of these shitcoins will be worthless and will go to zero so you might be tempted to sell them. Many of us never played with shitcoins so this is a real temptation. In the most likely case, there won't even be an exchange where you can sell these coins because both are going to be pretty small and pathetic, unlike previous attacks on Bitcoin that tried to fork (Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Gold, ...). If you decide to move these shitcoins to an exchange (and assuming there will be wallets that help you do so), a few things are important to keep in mind: - There will be wallets that help you move your forked shitcoins. These wallets might ask you for your hardware wallet's seed phrase and pretend to be nice but will actually steal all your BTC. NEVER AND IN NO CIRCUMSTANCE ENTER YOUR HARDWARE WALLET'S SEED PHRASE INTO A COMPUTER. Wait for reputable wallets to appear that have been audited and thread extremely carefully. Even if you're a "pro Bitcoiner" you can lose your life savings if you mess this up. I repeat: If you enter your seed phrase into a malicious wallet, you could lose all of your REAL Bitcoins, not only that fake shit. - If you successfully moved your shitcoins off your wallet, you might be tempted to sell them on an exchange, assuming there will be one. Note that WHICHEVER SHITCOIN UTXO YOU DOXX (i.e. connect with your identity), ALSO DOXXES YOUR REAL BITCOIN. If you deposit your Luke-shitcoin to an exchange, that exchange WILL ALLSO SEE YOUR REAL BITCOIN on the real blockchain. If you send all your shitcoins to a random guy on the internet, that random guy will also see your entire real bitcoin stack. This is because the fork mirrors Bitcoin's history. So the summary is: - wallets will be released that appear to help you to move your shitcoins but they actually want to steal your Bitcoin. Dangerous. - if you move your shitcoins and connect them to your identity, then you also doxx your real bitcoins. Dangerous. - If you don't do anything, you're safe. Basically "play stupid games, win stupid prizes". Stay safe. Reject shitcoins.
English
67
164
1K
53.3K
Bitcoin Lebowski⚡
Bitcoin Lebowski⚡@DudeJLebowski·
@bitnorbert Why the smug arrogance? It's typical in this debate, unfortunately, but I'm keen to understand what you gain from it.
English
1
0
0
21
Bitcoin Lebowski⚡
Bitcoin Lebowski⚡@DudeJLebowski·
Op_return was simply the line in the sand. Left unchecked, corporate interests will destroy everything that makes Bitcoin Bitcoin. If you want Bitcoin to succeed, you have to fight for it. Their strength is capital and marketing, our strength is numbers, and morals.
English
8
36
188
3K
Bitcoin Lebowski⚡
Bitcoin Lebowski⚡@DudeJLebowski·
@bitnorbert That's right, nobody who opposes this bollocks has any idea how Bitcoin works. Do you really believe that? Come on now, I know you're an intelligent fellow and it might be a convenient fallback, but really? 🤦‍♂️ Such a shit argument.
English
1
0
2
49
Rob Hamilton
Rob Hamilton@Rob1Ham·
Do you still have your Bitcoin Cash airdrop?
English
21
2
29
10.1K
MacronautBTC
MacronautBTC@Macronaut_·
If you support Bitcoin BIP110, please answer the poll as to how long you have been in #bitcoin:
English
51
4
35
3.8K
BitcoinBuddha
BitcoinBuddha@THBitcoinBuddha·
@bitnorbert Like I thought then. But when I grab a few blocks and check there's basically 0 inscriptions and all the "spam" is Runes. I remember the 70% spam in blocks @Arthur_van_Pelt and others talked about and this is not getting blocked by bip110 at all then.
English
1
0
2
42
BitcoinBuddha
BitcoinBuddha@THBitcoinBuddha·
Can someone confirm if bip110 is going to block Runes? My dumb feeling is it doesn't. Which is weird since basically the only "spam" in blocks are Runes.
English
2
0
0
687
Steve Barbour
Steve Barbour@SGBarbour·
BIP110 supporters want to fire Core yet none of them support real alternative projects like Libbitcoin. Hmm.
English
22
1
68
5.3K
Dathon Ohm / BIP-110
Dathon Ohm / BIP-110@dathon_ohm·
@BlueDavid Indeed. The BIP-110 rules fall into 4 categories: 1) Default policy on all nodes now 2) Default policy on all nodes before Core 30 3) Commonly abused formats (most of which occurred post-2022) 4) Contiguous fields larger than 256 bytes
English
1
10
48
967
David Noriega
David Noriega@BlueDavid·
What Lyn seems to be missing is that BIP110 is not a protocol change, but a correction to fix the mess that Core has done. We are getting Bitcoin to be how it was in 2022.
Natalie Brunell ⚡️@natbrunell

"The current proposal still lets those things into Bitcoin - it just slightly increases the cost of doing so." The protocol debate is heating up and the messaging around BIP 110 has gotten harsh and confusing so I asked @LynAldenContact for her honest take. What's actually being debated, why she's wary when changes get pushed fast, and whether any of this is an existential threat to Bitcoin.

English
17
22
171
4.9K
mike
mike@mike_4131·
@AdamSimecka false. every single Bitcoin node runner supports unlimited sized OP_RETURNS
English
1
0
1
63
Adam Simecka
Adam Simecka@AdamSimecka·
BIP110 has more support than 100KB OP_RETURN did.
English
38
61
430
13.3K
Haakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS retweetledi
light 📜
light 📜@lightcoin·
As someone who contributed to the public analysis¹ of BIP-148 UASF and correctly predicted how that was going to turn out, and later contributed to the public analysis² and creation³ of Libre Relay and correctly predicted how that was going to turn out...
English
1
28
122
29.1K
Haakon Nilsen aka Norbert ⚡️ Activate CTV + CSFS retweetledi
l0rinc
l0rinc@L0RINC·
🚀 LFG 🚀 @andrew_s_toth’s parallel input prevout fetcher was just merged into Bitcoin Core for the upcoming v32 - after 2+ years and 1000+ review comments. IBD is getting *even* faster \:D/ Thank you for the persistence, Andrew: this is what open-source collaboration should look like! github.com/bitcoin/bitcoi…
l0rinc tweet media
English
10
32
148
49.1K