Bojans04

@TahiBlue @daniellismore So your argument is 'look-freaks!' Thanks for replyng to this thoughtful and nuanced assesment of why Rowling is wrong with such a clever response! My mind has been changed!

@daniellismore The 'vulnerable' guys Daniel defends. Why don't u write about these 'vulnerable' folks? Why don't u tell their stories? Do u focus on JK so much cos you know she is right, and you can't defend your vulnerable fellas?

J.K. Rowling’s Case Against Trans People Falls Apart Under Basic Scrutiny J.K. Rowling’s writing on her site presents itself as cautious, evidence based and protective of women. It is none of those things in any reliable sense. It is a political essay built out of selective fear, anecdote, conflation and repeated framing tricks that turn a small and vulnerable minority into a public threat. Once the central claims are checked against mainstream psychological definitions, clinical guidance and the better available reviews, the structure gives way very quickly. The first problem is basic description. Rowling writes as though trans identity is a fashionable belief system imposed on reality. That is false. Major professional bodies continue to define gender identity as a person’s internal sense of gender and distinguish it from biological traits, expression and sexuality. That does not mean every clinical pathway is simple or that every policy question has one easy answer. It means the existence of trans people is not a fiction created by slogans or websites. It is a recognised human phenomenon described across medicine and psychology for years. Her second move is more political than scientific. She repeatedly folds trans women into a category of male risk and then treats that association as common sense. That is the engine of the piece. It asks readers to accept that recognition itself is dangerous. The trouble is that this is not evidence. It is suspicion dressed up as safeguarding. A rights claim by one group does not become invalid because another group can imagine its misuse. That logic would destroy the basis of civil protection in every direction. She also leans heavily on the idea that affirming trans people means suppressing women or erasing sex. That is another false construction. Recognising gender identity does not abolish sex based medicine, sex based data collection or serious discussion of violence against women. Clinical guidance and professional standards continue to treat sex related health needs as real while also recognising transgender patients as deserving of competent care. The claim that one can only defend women by rejecting trans people is not a medical conclusion. It is an ideological choice. On healthcare her essay suggests that trans identification is being irresponsibly indulged and that medicine has surrendered to fashion. The actual evidence base is more careful than either side’s loudest slogans. For adults, established clinical standards and recent reviews continue to support access to gender affirming care with assessment, informed consent and monitoring. Reviews published in 2024 and 2025 report that gender affirming interventions are associated overall with improved mental health, body satisfaction and quality of life, while also noting that evidence quality varies and further research is needed. That is a long way from the picture of mass delusion that Rowling promotes. For children and adolescents the picture is more contested and the honest position is narrower. The Cass Review in England and later NHS England work show that the evidence for some youth interventions remains limited and that services need stronger assessment, clearer pathways and better long term research. That supports caution and reform. It does not support broad hostility to trans people, nor does it justify using uncertainty in paediatric care as a weapon against trans adults or against social recognition itself. Rowling’s essay repeatedly makes that jump. It is a political jump, not a scientific one. She also gives the reader the impression that transition is commonly regretted and that medicine is running ahead of human reality. The best known systematic reviews do not support that picture. Regret after gender affirming surgery appears low in the published literature, including systematic reviews and more recent follow up work. That does not mean regret never happens or that every clinic gets

@MuckerWes I've see women in the mens lots of times since the lines for the ladies at the theatre or at rest stops on trips become to long. It's just a toilet. Everyone has privacy in their cubicle. Many places have unisex bathrooms. Rowling really lives outside of reality completely.

JKR told her followers to sexually harass people you THINK might be transgender in the bathroom. If you caught them in a stage of undress, this would also be encouraging revenge porn. Transgender folks are 1% of the population, so who gets sexually harassed most for being trans, especially in person? Majority: Cis women. Transphobia is a danger to ALL women because it's misogyny. Cis women often cannot meet the standard of beauty that misogynists and TERFS set for all women because of masculine traits being deemed "manly."

@Monika47384 @ThomasWillett9 you need help

@bojans04 @ThomasWillett9 Men CAN and DO defend themselves. That is in their nature. Their design works that way. 🤣🤣😂😂 Throughout history of humankind. They needed THE LAW to tell them NOT TO attack women and to punish them for crossing the line. Sit down, ''man''. Bye.

TERFs push to exclude trans women from spaces, and still get mad when they build safe spaces of their own. The underlying aim isn’t inclusion or safety; it’s erasure and the denial of trans people’s right to exist in public life.

@Monika47384 @ThomasWillett9 is this a real question because even the dumbest person in the world can figure out the answer in a second

@ThomasWillett9 WHY would men need safe spaces? Safe from whom? ''Trans'' people does NOT exist. Not even one single human in this world was, is nor will ever be ''trans''. Not even one changed their sex and transitioned. NOT EVEN ONE. SINGLE ONE. EVER. 🤣🤣😂😂😅😅 Men have THEIR OWN bathrooms.

@NINETIESWITCH the only explanation I can think of is that Emma was on drugs because why on Earth would she say that

I wish Angelica Ross didn’t give up acting but I hope she’s doing well in her personal and political endeavours… she was fabulous in AHS 1984 as well as Pose with the rest of that talented cast! Its a reminder of how we still have so far to go when it comes to awareness honestly

@_Mindchatter_ @sycawah ok but why if not because of fear

@sycawah A phobia is a unreasonable fear of something. We don't fear you we just want to not have to salute you for your lifestyle and display your sexuality flags at the white house.

homophobia is a disease.

Pride matters. Rest in peace.

@owenjonesjourno @ContraPoints this suggests that the solution for the dilemma is choosing the worse option which is exactly the stupidity she is pointing out

@ContraPoints This is your priority right now? Making your whole personality punching left? What a cliché. The Democrats imposed a terrible moral dilemma on their natural voters by facilitating the crime of crimes, genocide. If your anger isn’t at them for that, you’re not a serious person.

Seriously where are the revolutionaries? Are they at brunch?

i do not care if Trump's comments result in nothing tonight. no one who even thinks of saying the phrase "a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again" should be allowed to operate an ice cream stand, nevermind the most powerful office on the planet

This is a threat of genocide and merits removal from office. The President’s mental faculties are collapsing and cannot be trusted. To every individual in the President’s chain of command: You have a duty to refuse illegal orders. That includes carrying out this threat.

@exnickifan girl shut up

rankin all regular us drag race winners 1.Jinx 2.Yvie 3.Willow 4.Onya 5.Colby 6.Nynphia 7.Bebe 8.Raja 9.Jaida 10.Symone 11.Velour 12.Bianca 13.Bob 14.Violet 15.Aquaria #DragRace18

@OhioNooo @ContraPoints I would bet my life that she talks to more actual people than you do.

@ContraPoints You wouldn't know since you don't talk to actual people and are stuck on your high functioning alcoholic YouTube micro-influencer delusion

Well I was told we didn’t need to vote because there would be a revolution if things got bad. So, I assume that’s happening? Any minute now.

Transphobia is a mental illness btw

@inspidernz @terrafically @AgainHibiscus79 girl you are sooo obsessed

@terrafically @AgainHibiscus79 How did you get lady gender? Were you 'born in the wrong body'? Is it because you have a womanly soul? Is it because you think girly thoughts? What is lady gender anyway, and how do you know you possess one? Can you answer any without being religious, sexist or contradictory?

according to terfs im a gay man who transitioned to not be gay but also a straight man trying to invade womens spaces. but they also say "cut t from lgb" because being trans has nothing to do with sexuality but also trans people dont exist. truly the brightest minds at work here.

@Pappypizzaman @PunishedAG @ShadowRaven850 what the fuck are you talking about for real are you a bot?

@PunishedAG @ShadowRaven850 Nah, we can disregard your opinion and still reserve the opportunity to call you a retard. Only one kind of person has ever wanted to put sexual material in front of children. They're called pedophiles. Every single LGBT "teacher" who does is a pedophile.

the fact that they think this is how it went proves we don't live in the same reality

@upuntil_dawn I'm glad there's a switch up that means Ru will FOR SURE crown Myki she loves to do that shit

I feel like switch up on Myki this past week after Jane left is very indicative of the drag race fandom being a bunch of contrarian ass holes tbh lol

@Store1980s @novilunars @JulianKJarboe you would call the overall reaction on the internet 'praise'? do you know what grooming is? seems you don't because you are saying a picture can groom a person.

@bojans04 @novilunars @JulianKJarboe letting minors know that you can post nudes pictures on the internet and get praise for it is a bad thing btw. this is the actions of a groomer, but because its drowned in sepia we have to pretend its art. this is the same person with the "legalize incest" shirt yeah? fkn yikes.

I looked at the Ethel Cain IG post to see what you were all talking about. They are soft focus very pretty boudoir photos. Everyone upset is allergic to fun, beauty, and thinks a flaccid penis is literally a gun pointed at their head.

@NathanMoorborn @peach_leasline do you follow Ethel Cain on insta?

both cis women and cis men post similar artisitc nudes all the time, and no one says anything. but the tranfeminizied body is an object of sexualization and disgust. it cannot be neutrally artistic in the same way. it must be a spectacle for gay trans men to call her a disgusting

@sarahwaters420 but also Ethel's picture on insta can be seen only if you FOLLOW Ethel and people who follow her and listen to her music are nit on here perlclutching. This is just transphobia.

tbh one of capitalism’s most sinister inventions is the perception of nudity as a “private” act that is traumatizing to witness

I just don't think any of you truly care about having to see an artistic nude with a person's genitalia present as much as you all are pretending to, it's that you consider a trans woman's nudity inherently perverse that's making you go ballistic.