Matthew Dooley 🤦🏼‍♂️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💯💪

🇺🇸🇺🇸💯💯💯

Yep, for sure!

Deceased anti gravity researcher Amy Eskridge said this of missing and dead scientists in 2021 Eerie given that her name is being floated in the conversations around missing scientists, even by people like Congressman Eric Burlison “Plot twist - most of these "dead scientists" aren't physicists, although some of them are. But a complete list of mysteriously dead scientists includes biologists, climatologists, virologists, chemists, material scientists, agricultural scientists etc etc. Killed by random drive by shootings, cars exploding, sudden unexplained illnesses that kill them within a matter of days, home entries where nothing is stolen but they end up dead anyway, getting hit by a car as they walk down the sidewalk, disappearing and being found in the river, etc etc etc. Most of them told someone that they were scared shortly before they died of these random events of violence. None of these cases are provably traced back to intentional assassination, due to a clean getaway or lack of evidence. Future information certainly helps you figure out how to get away with it. But it seems like scientists tend to die of random acts of violence more often than the general population, and the dead are not all UAP physicists, in fact most of them aren't. Many of them are people like the former NASA Biology personnel who became professors at UAH only to get freaking massacred as a group years later. If you really wanna understand the objectives of the timeline war, then you need to figure out which scientists are dying off in the early or mid stages of their careers, and WHY. You can figure it out just by reading the prior papers of these randomly violently dead people and by extrapolating where their research may have led to ten or 20 years in the future if they had lived. You know how these things are. You know a hit when you see one, even if you can't prove it. Those deaths that just don't make any sense at all, even as random acts of violence. Those seemingly random tragedies that just happen to be occurring over and over and over again within pretty specific communities of study. That is a very large fraction of how the unconventional warfare of this conflict is being carried out.”

BOOM! Couldn't have said it better myself🤣 Kill the Kill Switch!

I won't be buying any new vehicle with this 4th Amendment Commie AI feature. Republicans voted for this too...Uniparty at its worst. I look forward to a SCOTUS ruling on this anti-American tech soon. This is why Congress has a favorability rating lower than used toilet paper.

WOW 🚨 The Republican Party is protecting Ilhan Omar from accountability Rep Nancy Mace “I tried to subpoena her immigration records, her brother husband's immigration records, and IT WAS REPUBLICANS that killed my motion” It’s a Uniparty. One Big Club.

Automobile kill-switches are coming soon to car dealerships near you. I teamed up w/ Scott Perry & Chip Roy to defund this Orwellian mandate, but too many colleagues (Republican & Democrat) voted against us, so the federal mandate for every new car after 2026 is still in place.

@_tradespotting Nothing on LPSN deal?????

A minute of trading lessons you’ll hold for lifetime

$HURA The biggest shareholder just put $50 million of his own money in as a loan AND took a royalty on future sales. That’s the loudest possible signal of confidence you can send. He’s not just an investor anymore — he’s a lender, shareholder, AND future royalty recipient. Bullis

This is what I love to see! This routine traffic stop turns into a moment of pure humanity. Gotta love cops like this. Instead of a ticket, she got patience, understanding, and the hug she desperately needed. In a world full of negativity, these moments remind us that kindness still wins. God bless the good officers who show up with heart every single day.

O’Keefe journalists are all over the United States. If you are lying, stealing, cheating, or committing wrongdoing against the American people, we are recording you. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

💰 This guy says you should start taking Social Security at age 62. He walks through the real math on claiming at 62 vs 67 vs 70 using a clear example: roughly $18k/year at 62, $24k at full retirement age (67), or $36k at 70. He shows the break-even points and reminds us that the average life expectancy here in the US is 79 years old. It’s not just about getting the bigger monthly check — it depends on your health, how long you live, and your personal situation. It’s such a practical reminder that these big decisions need to be run with your own numbers, not just generic advice. It’s also wise to run this past a financial adviser. Would you claim Social Security early (at 62), at full retirement age, or wait until 70? What’s your reasoning? When the time comes, I’ll be collecting it at 62.

do you understand what happened to JetBlue.. they accidentally told the entire internet their biggest secret A man's ticket jumped $230 overnight while trying to fly to a funeral. JetBlue replied: "Try clearing your cache and cookies or booking with an incognito window. We're sorry for your loss" "Try incognito mode" is not customer service.. It's a confession. If incognito = cheaper price, you are being tracked.. Airlines denied this for years - until this tweet. "We're sorry for your loss" - sent to a man going to a funeral.. Nobody read his tweet before responding. Then they deleted it.. The delete only confirmed they knew exactly what they admitted. Your browser history is not just data. It's leverage. Your browser history is not just data. It's leverage..

SPLC funded a large number of false flag “right wing” organizations and events. Total scam.

🚨 BREAKING: Democrat Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick is RESIGNING from Congress, effective immediately, just moments before a House Ethics Committee was set to announce sanctions against her. The Florida congresswoman, who called the probe a "WITCH HUNT," is accused of stealing millions in FEMA coronavirus disaster relief funds to finance her own campaign. | @AmericaRpts

For 12 years, every major winner of McDonald's Monopoly was a fraud. The game was rigged by the one man hired to prevent rigging. > McDonald's Monopoly launched in 1987. > Peel a game piece off your fries or drink. Match the right properties. Win up to $1 million. > The promotion was massive. Tens of MILLIONS of game boards distributed in magazines alone. > McDonald's poured massive marketing behind it. > By law, McDonald's couldn't run its own contest. > A third party company called Simon Marketing handled the game pieces. > The man in charge of security at Simon Marketing was Jerome P. Jacobson. > Former cop. Everyone called him Uncle Jerry. > His job was to make sure nobody stole the winning pieces. > He stole the winning pieces. > Starting in 1989, Jacobson figured out how to swap the high value game pieces during transit. > He would duck into an airport bathroom stall, break the tamper proof seal on the case, pocket the winners, and reseal it. > He got away with it because a supplier accidentally sent him a sheet of the tamper proof seals directly. > That mistake gave him 12 years. > At first he gave the pieces to friends and family. His step brother. His nephew. People he trusted. > Then it grew. > Jacobson started selling winning pieces to strangers for a cut of the prize. > His network eventually included mobsters, strip club owners and a members of the Colombo crime family. > One family connected to Jacobson's network claimed three separate $1 million prizes plus a Dodge Viper. > Jacobson apparently even anonymously mailed a $1 million winning piece to St. Jude Children's Hospital. > McDonald's honoured it and paid out the full amount over 20 years. > The total stolen was over $24 MILLION in cash and prizes across 12 years. > In 2000, the FBI got an anonymous tip about a man called "Uncle Jerry" rigging the contest. > They looked at the winner list. Almost every major winner lived within 25 miles of Jacobson's house. > The FBI convinced McDonald's to run the contest one more time. Wiretapped Jacobson's phone. > Intercepted the name of the next $1 million winner before he even claimed it. > Then they posed as a McDonald's film crew and interviewed the fake winner on camera. Let him tell his entire made up story about how he found the piece. > Three weeks later, Jacobson was arrested in an early morning raid. > The trial began September 10, 2001. The next day was 9/11. > One of the biggest corporate fraud cases in fast food history got buried under the biggest news story of the century. > Over 50 people convicted. Jacobson got 37 months. He was the only one who served more than a year. > Every time you peeled a game piece off your fries and lost, the fix was already in. The winning pieces were in Uncle Jerry's pocket before the food hit the tray.

A woman who smells like the rain is the evidence of a failed covering. A man is built like an umbrella. He is made to take the hit, dry off fast, and keep the storm away from the home. But even the best umbrella is useless if it’s left on the floor. It can only do its job if it is held up and positioned over what needs protection. A woman’s spirit breaks when she has to face a mess she wasn’t built to handle. A man’s strength only works when he is put in the right spot. If his leadership is heavy, it takes a strong woman to hold him up. When she points him toward the rain and keeps him steady at home, the partnership becomes unbreakable. He takes the storm, she keeps the peace.

In 1901 a chemist in St Louis founded a small company to manufacture saccharin. He called it after his wife's family name. Monsanto. Over the next 120 years, the company that bore his wife's name would produce, in chronological order: PCBs, DDT, Agent Orange, Roundup, Roundup Ready genetically modified seeds, recombinant bovine growth hormone, and dicamba. Each product was, at the time of launch, marketed as safe. PCBs, manufactured at the Anniston, Alabama plant from 1929 to 1971, were dumped into local waterways at industrial volumes. The town's waters and soils are now among the most contaminated in the United States. Internal Monsanto documents, later released in litigation, show the company knew the chemicals were toxic by the 1930s and continued production for thirty more years. DDT, the insecticide they helped commercialise, was eventually banned in 1972 after Rachel Carson documented the collapse of bird populations across North America. Agent Orange, the dioxin-laced defoliant Monsanto manufactured for the US military, was sprayed across 4.5 million acres of Vietnam. It caused, by conservative estimates, 400,000 deaths and 500,000 birth defects. Monsanto eventually paid a $180 million settlement to American veterans. The Vietnamese received nothing. Roundup, launched in 1976 with glyphosate as the active ingredient, became the most widely used herbicide on earth. Marketed as harmless. Marketed as biodegrading on contact with soil. Marketed as safe enough that a Monsanto executive famously offered to drink a glass of it on French television to prove the point. In 2015 the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic to humans. By 2020, Bayer (the German chemical conglomerate that had acquired Monsanto in 2018, and which had previously been a constituent of IG Farben) had paid out over $10 billion to settle approximately 100,000 lawsuits from people who had developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma after Roundup exposure. By 2026 the figure had climbed past $11 billion. Another 65,000 cases are pending. A further $7.25 billion settlement is awaiting court approval. Roundup Ready seeds, the genetically modified crops engineered to survive being doused in glyphosate, transformed global agriculture. Monsanto's seed patents now control roughly 80% of the corn and soy planted in the United States. Farmers who attempt to save seeds for replanting, as humans have done for ten thousand years, are sued. The company is no longer called Monsanto. The brand was so toxic that Bayer retired it within a year of the acquisition. The products, however, remain. The glyphosate is in the wheat, the oats, the corn, the soy, the cotton, the sugar beet. It is in the breakfast cereal. It is in the bread. It is in the beer. It is in the urine of approximately 80% of Americans tested. The 75% reduction in global crop genetic diversity since 1900 is, in significant part, a Monsanto legacy. The bee population collapse, driven in significant part by glyphosate's effect on pollinator gut microbiomes, is a Monsanto legacy. The cancer epidemic in agricultural communities across the American Midwest is a Monsanto legacy. The 192,000 plaintiffs who have, to date, sued the company are a Monsanto legacy. You will not see the name on the supermarket shelf. The name has been removed. The company is in your food anyway. It is in approximately 90% of the processed food sold in any Western supermarket. It is in the wheat that was sprayed with glyphosate as a desiccant before harvest. It is in the soy that was engineered to be sprayed with it. It is in the meat from the animals that were fed the soy. It is in your blood now. It is in your children's blood. The company that put it there has changed its name twice and continues to operate, in 2026, as the world's largest agrochemical concern. The cathedral remains, in Lavenham, as the receipt for what wool built. The cancer registries remain, across the American Midwest, as the receipt for what Monsanto built. Both are public records. Read them.

In 1900, John D. Rockefeller controlled approximately 90 percent of all petroleum refining in the United States. He was, by some calculations, the richest private individual who had ever lived. He had a problem. Scientists were discovering that compounds derived from coal tar, a petroleum byproduct, could be used as synthetic medicines. Aspirin, derived from coal tar, had been launched by Bayer in 1899. The petroleum waste stream Rockefeller had previously had to dispose of could now be sold back to the public as medicine at a markup of roughly 10,000 percent. He had another problem. American medicine in 1900 was a competitive ecosystem of homeopaths, herbalists, naturopaths, osteopaths, midwives, and traditional doctors who used food, plants, water, and lifestyle as the primary tools of healing. Approximately half of all American medical schools taught some form of natural or alternative medicine. Rockefeller bought into the German pharmaceutical industry, eventually taking a substantial stake in IG Farben, the conglomerate that included Bayer, BASF, and Hoechst. He then commissioned a report. The report was written by Abraham Flexner, an educator with no medical training, funded by the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations, and published in 1910. It declared that natural and alternative medical schools were unscientific quackery. It recommended the closure of more than half of all American medical schools and the standardisation of the rest around medicine based on synthetic patented drugs. Congress acted. Half of American medical schools closed within a decade. The remainder accepted Rockefeller and Carnegie funding on the condition that their curricula be reorganised around pharmaceutical treatment. Nutrition was removed. Herbal medicine was removed. Lifestyle intervention was removed. The doctor's job was redefined: diagnose the symptom, prescribe the drug. The drugs were petroleum-derived. The petroleum was supplied by Rockefeller-controlled refineries. The medical schools were funded by Rockefeller. The journals were funded by Rockefeller. The AMA was supported by Rockefeller. The hospitals were funded by Rockefeller. By 1925, the American medical system was a vertically integrated extension of the petroleum industry, operating under the marketing slogan that it was scientific. This is the system that exists today. The pharmaceutical industry generates approximately $1.5 trillion in annual revenue. The American population, 4 percent of the global total, consumes approximately 50 percent of all pharmaceuticals manufactured. The system was not designed to make people healthy. The system was designed to manage symptoms in a way that produces lifetime customers. A healthy patient is a former customer. A managed patient, who takes the pill every day for the rest of their life, is an annuity. The objective has always been to keep you in that profitable corridor between healthy and dead. Long enough to keep buying. Not so well that you stop. The doctor who advises you to fix your metabolism by changing your diet is, from the point of view of the system that trained him, a defective product. The doctor who prescribes you a statin, a metformin, an antidepressant, and a blood pressure medication for life is performing exactly as designed. The system was designed by an oil baron who needed to sell the waste products of his refineries. It still functions, 116 years after the Flexner Report, exactly the way he designed it. You are the customer. The corridor is where you live.

The satisfying restoration of a rusty cordless iron. 👀

A community college professor taught the same study skills lecture for 30 years, and the video quietly became one of the most watched educational recordings on the internet. His name is Marty Lobdell. He spent his career as a psychology professor watching students fail not because they were lazy, but because nobody had ever taught them how their brain actually works under the pressure of learning something hard. The lecture is called "Study Less Study Smart." Over 10 million views. Passed around in Reddit threads, Discord servers, and university study groups for over a decade. And the core insight buried inside it has been sitting in cognitive psychology research for years, waiting for someone to explain it in plain language. Here is the framework that completely changed how I think about effort. Your brain does not sustain focus the way you think it does. Studies tracking real students found that the average learner hits a wall somewhere between 25 and 30 minutes. After that, efficiency doesn't just decline. It collapses. You're still sitting at your desk, still looking at the page, but almost nothing is going in. Lobdell illustrated this with a student he knew personally. She set a goal of studying 6 hours a night, 5 nights a week, to pull herself out of academic probation. Thirty hours of studying per week. She failed every single class that quarter. She wasn't failing because she lacked effort. She was failing because she had confused time spent near books with time spent actually learning. The 25-minute crash hit her at 6:30pm every night. She spent the next five and a half hours sitting in the wreckage of her own focus and calling it studying. The fix sounds almost too simple. The moment you feel the slide, stop. Take five minutes. Do something that actually gives you a small reward. Then go back. That five-minute reset returns you to near full efficiency. Across a six-hour window, the difference is not marginal. It is the difference between thirty minutes of real learning and five and a half hours of it. The second thing he taught destroyed something I had believed about how memory actually works. Highlighting feels productive. Going back over your notes and recognizing everything feels like knowing. But recognition and recollection are two completely different cognitive processes, and your brain is very good at making you confuse them. You can see something you've read before and feel completely certain you understand it, even when you couldn't reconstruct a single sentence from memory if the page were blank. He proved this live in the room. He read 13 random letters to his audience. Almost nobody could recall them. Then he rearranged the same 13 letters into two words: Happy Thursday. The whole room got all 13 without effort. Same letters. Same count. The only thing that changed was meaning. The brain stores meaning. Not repetition. The moment new information connects to something you already understand, the retention changes entirely. This is what the cognitive psychology literature calls elaborative encoding, and it is the mechanism underneath every effective study technique. The third principle was the one that hit me hardest, and the one almost nobody applies. Lobdell cited research showing that 80 percent of your study time should be spent in active recitation, not passive reading. Close the material. Say it back in your own words. Teach it to someone else, or to an empty chair if no one is around. The struggle of retrieval is where the actual learning happens. Reading your notes again is watching someone else do the work. His parting line has stayed with me longer than almost anything else I have read about learning. He told the room that if what he shared didn't change their behavior, they hadn't actually learned it. It would just live in their heads as something they had heard once and felt good about. He was right. And most people leave every lecture exactly like that. The students who remember everything aren't putting in more hours. They stopped confusing the feeling of studying with the fact of it.