Eibhlín

@FischerKing64 The bigoted haters MUST to learn to have better experiences!

Karen Bass is the perfect example that ‘experience’ is not a good thing in itself. If your ‘experience’ is all bad experience, overseeing dysfunction and decay - then it’s a negative, and the guy without this ‘experience’ is the superior choice.

@Timkellogg2012 @Rudy6uqd @DrNeilStone Are you the guy I just saw on another app? That’s what brought me here 👍

@Rudy6uqd @DrNeilStone I’ll post it when that cunt Dr Neil Stone requests it. I’m not sharing it with you cocks

Does anyone believe this is a job offer I do not

@brivael Elon’s endless and growing supply of money in your story is a metaphor for the power of love of humanity.

Americans in the replies, yes I'm French, yes I escaped the 57% GDP socialist gulag with only my keyboard and a baguette. If this thread saved you from one Bernie podcast, the tip jar is open. Every dollar = one French bureaucrat short-circuiting. buymeacoffee.com/brivael

Elon Musk avait dit un truc qui m'avait marqué sur l'allocation de ressources. En substance : passé un certain niveau de richesse, l'argent n'est plus de la consommation, c'est de l'allocation de capital. Cette phrase change tout. L'économie, dans le fond, c'est juste un problème d'allocation. Tu as des ressources finies et des usages infinis. Qui décide où va quoi ? Imagine une cour de récré. 100 enfants, des paquets de cartes Pokémon distribués au hasard. Tu laisses faire. Très vite, un ordre émerge. Les bons joueurs accumulent les cartes rares, les collectionneurs trient, les négociateurs trouvent des deals. Personne n'a planifié. Et pourtant chaque carte finit dans les mains de celui qui en tire le plus de valeur. Le système maximise le bonheur total de la cour. C'est ça, la main invisible. Maintenant fais entrer la maîtresse. Elle trouve ça injuste. Léo a 50 cartes, Tom en a 3. Elle confisque, redistribue, impose l'égalité. Trois effets immédiats. Les bons joueurs arrêtent de jouer, à quoi bon. Les mauvais n'ont plus de raison de progresser, ils auront leur part. Les échanges s'effondrent. La cour est égale, et morte. Elle a maximisé l'égalité, elle a détruit le bonheur. Le problème de la maîtresse, c'est qu'elle ne peut pas avoir l'information que la cour avait collectivement. C'est le problème du calcul économique de Mises, formulé en 1920. L'URSS a essayé de le résoudre pendant 70 ans avec le Gosplan. Résultat : pénuries, queues, effondrement. Pas parce que les Soviétiques étaient bêtes, parce que le problème est mathématiquement insoluble en mode centralisé. Quand Musk a 200 milliards, il ne les consomme pas, il les alloue. SpaceX, Starlink, Neuralink, xAI. Chaque dollar est un pari sur le futur. Et lui a un track record. PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX. Il a démontré qu'il sait identifier des problèmes immenses et y allouer des ressources avec un rendement spectaculaire. L'État aussi a un track record. Hôpitaux qui s'effondrent, éducation qui décline, dette qui explose, services publics qui se dégradent malgré des budgets en hausse constante. Le marché identifie les bons allocateurs, la politique identifie les bons communicants. Le profit n'est pas une finalité, c'est un signal. Il dit : tu as alloué des ressources rares vers un usage que les gens valorisent suffisamment pour payer. Plus le profit est gros, plus la création de valeur est grande. Quand Starlink est rentable, ça veut dire que des millions de gens dans des zones rurales ont enfin internet. Quand un ministère est en déficit, ça veut dire qu'il consomme plus qu'il ne produit. L'un crée, l'autre détruit, et on appelle ça redistribution. Dans nos sociétés il y a deux catégories d'acteurs. Les entrepreneurs et les bureaucrates. L'entrepreneur prend un risque personnel pour identifier un problème, mobiliser des ressources, créer une solution. S'il se trompe il perd. S'il a raison, ses clients gagnent, ses employés gagnent, ses fournisseurs gagnent, l'État collecte des impôts. Il est la cellule de base du progrès humain. Le bureaucrate ne prend aucun risque personnel. Son salaire est garanti. Au mieux il maintient une rente existante. Au pire il la détruit par excès de réglementation, mauvaise allocation forcée, incitations perverses qui découragent ceux qui produisent. Mais dans aucun cas il ne crée. Regarde les 50 dernières années. iPhone, internet civil, SpaceX, Tesla, Google, Amazon, Stripe, mRNA, ChatGPT. Toutes des inventions privées, portées par des entrepreneurs, financées par du capital risque. Pas un seul ministère n'a inventé quoi que ce soit qui ait changé ta vie au quotidien. La France est devenue le laboratoire mondial de la dérive bureaucratique. 57% du PIB en dépenses publiques, record absolu. Une administration tentaculaire, une fiscalité qui pénalise la création de richesse. Résultat : décrochage face aux États-Unis, à l'Allemagne, à la Suisse. Fuite des cerveaux. Désindustrialisation. Dette qui explose. Et le pire c'est que la mauvaise allocation s'auto-renforce. Plus l'État prélève, moins les entrepreneurs créent. Moins ils créent, moins il y a de base fiscale. Plus l'État s'endette et taxe. Boucle de rétroaction négative parfaite. La maîtresse pense qu'elle aide, et chaque année la cour produit moins. Dans nos sociétés, ce sont les entrepreneurs, toujours, qui font avancer la civilisation. Les bureaucrates au mieux maintiennent une rente, au pire la détruisent. Aucune société n'a jamais progressé en taxant ses créateurs pour subventionner ses gestionnaires. La question n'est jamais qui a combien. C'est qui alloue le mieux la prochaine unité de ressource pour maximiser le futur de l'humanité. La réponse depuis 200 ans n'a jamais changé. Ce ne sont pas les fonctionnaires.

@Fairyhardcastle @bhweingarten @seanmdav @DrJohnEastman Lawyers defend mass shooters, too. Disbar them as well?

@bhweingarten @seanmdav @DrJohnEastman He said Trump had a correct interpretation at Jan 6

What was the nefarious behavior that @DrJohnEastman, a former Supreme Court clerk, university law school dean, and public interest litigator allegedly engaged in? Effectively, in the eyes of the bar and California’s highest court, his thoughtcrime, punishable with professional destruction, was “lawyering for MAGA.” @FDRLST I write on the travesty of justice that is Dr. Eastman’s disbarment — and the imperative for the Supreme Court to overturn it or create a tragedy for the rule of law and all Americans thefederalist.com/2026/04/23/if-…

@QuoteNietzsche Sounds peaceful!

In heaven, all the interesting people are missing.

@trollinglibsez @mongoosetoyour1 @timberx111 @waseemshoukat92 @elonmusk Just like Hillary’s server that was wiped with a cloth.

@mongoosetoyour1 @timberx111 @waseemshoukat92 @elonmusk He can’t

SPLC funded a large number of false flag “right wing” organizations and events. Total scam.

@Polymarket Funny what happens when you’re tossed out of the “breaking news” cycle.

BREAKING: Ukrainian officials urge Russia to extend Easter ceasefire & restart peace talks.

@SaraHigdon @RealJamesWoods @mrddmia “I see white people.”

@RealJamesWoods I don't think he will walk free. I actually agree with what @mrddmia said here, that he will never walk free, and if it is because his diagnosed schizophrenia, that they will drug him and force him to be competent. x.com/MarioNawfal/st…

Yea, I read the article, and I fully comprehend your very valid point. That said, I will happily gamble that he will walk among us once again.

@Caldos_Matar @SaraHigdon @RealJamesWoods So are we to assume this opens the door to allowing anyone who commits a hate crime to live out their last days in a mental hospital?

@SaraHigdon @RealJamesWoods Great. This sounds like a win to me.. let him die in a mental hospital...

He allegedly stated, “Got that white girl,” or words to that effect, according to witness accounts. So, was he competent enough to lie in wait, plan an ambush attack, and also select a racially profiled target? So it seems, but he is not competent enough to be held accountable? You know who is capable of being held accountable? The activist judges dancing from the strings of their Democrat puppet masters. For the record I support only legal means of “accountability.” I do, however, fear vigilantism, and have repeatedly and consistently warned against it on this site. It is a subtly and powerfully growing cancer, in the very gut of our nation, and outrageous decisions by activist courts like this one are feeding it daily.

@DeFiTracer Obama was well into his first term.

@JaniceEdens2 @Dearme2_ I came on here to say Elton John. 👍

@Dearme2_ Van Morrison or Allman Brothers or Elton John or The Lumineers or the Dixie Chicks. Anything I can sing along with.

5 hour drive, and you can only listen to one artist. Who's that artist?

@RonPaul 2026 Ron Paul R3VOLUTION? 👀

We look forward to seeing you, Marjorie! Thank you.

@mazemoore @Spartan10256 @joekent16jan19 @marklevinshow Some of us “people” supported and voted for Trump three times. We are not idiots so stop talking down to people who despise Lindsay Graham and Mark Levin, to name a few.

@Spartan10256 @joekent16jan19 @marklevinshow I shilled for Israel by not posting videos of Joe Kent contradicting himself on his positions. You people are the dumbest people to ever be on the internet.

It’s taking @marklevinshow 20 minutes to warm up, apparently he needs to work himself into a frenzy before he can let me talk.

@newstart_2024 Was present during the sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick for my son and was in the presence of the Holy Spirit. We are known to it and loved completely by it.

Died on operating table... felt zero pain, watched doctors panic, then enveloped in incredible peace & love. Jim Caviezel: "I saw the whole thing. They brought me back. It was calm, like when I first met God. That's the peace and love waiting for us—so many don't have it." Out-of-body during surgery (doctors Gill/Griffin witnessed); no hurt until return—pure peace beyond the chaos. From Hollywood star to testimony: Death showed him life's true anchor. Ever had a moment (NDE, crisis, or quiet) where you felt overwhelming peace/love? What changed for you? Your stories 👇

@shipwreckedcrew That would have opened the door for him to ask if Palestine has a right to exist.

She should have pivoted to the “right” of the US to exist — however he wanted to define the word. And then if the same applied to Israel.

@CryptoLawyerz @MrLeadslinger @TuckerCarlson The interviewer is the one using word games.

@MrLeadslinger @TuckerCarlson I feel it was very basic. A simple yes or no would have answered it-no qualifications or suppositions needed. I believe it’s intellectually dishonest to watch that video clip and not see the word games Tucker was attempting to play. But that’s what he does for a living now.

I’m saying it’s legitimate to question what someone means by a specific statement or phrase when they ask you if you agree with it or not. It’s like asking someone if they believe people have a right to life or a right to health care or a right to education etc. People use terms like that to justify all kinds of actions or policies you may or may not agree with so it would only make sense to ask them what precisely they mean when they say that before you decide whether you agree with it in the context they’re using it.

@CryptoLawyerz @MrLeadslinger @TuckerCarlson Why is that question not asked in relation to any other country on the planet? In this interview southern Lebanon is used as an example.

@MrLeadslinger @TuckerCarlson Are you honestly saying he didn’t know what the question meant?

Embarrassing for @TuckerCarlson. He believes he is the smartest person in the room. He uses tactics to avoid answering the question and reframing to repeat generalities of common acceptance. It’s like a bad deposition.

@pfk19834 @Rightanglenews I’d rather the people that destroyed the candy go broke than the offspring of its inventor.

@Rightanglenews Brad Reese is my cousin, peculiar he only brings this up when it’s rumored he’s broke again. I guess better than getting a real job

BREAKING - Months after the grandson of the creator of Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup came forward claiming Hershey is cutting corners and using cheap oils, consumers are now reporting major quality issues, including a viral video showing a Hershey chocolate bar bending like rubber.

@DanielLMcAdams @marklevinshow @RonPaul Trump was sounding an awful lot like Ron Paul in the beginning. That’s how he got my votes in all three elections and both primaries.

@marklevinshow If you are interested in @RonPaul , check out his Institute for Peace and Prosperity: ronpaulinstitute.org

Thomas Woods is an anarchist not a libertarian. Certainly not a constitutional conservative, not MAGA, not Trump, not Reagan, all of whom and which he has condemned directly and indirectly. Woods is a Tom Massie/Ron Paul diehard.  He jumps in on behalf of Joe Kent and the Woke Reich, lying about our outreach to Kent about my interviewing and Kent ignoring our follow up, to create confusion and hostility, because his agenda is to bring down the system, undermine the war effort and Trump presidency.  Kent is his latest project. I’ve ignored him for many, many years but he cannot let go. Another crackpot.

@AmericaJoJo @Silverback4295 @overton_news So why was Trump shot? And Charlie Kirk?

@Silverback4295 @overton_news He did neither. Understanding why it happened is his stance.

After REPEATED attacks from Senator Rand Paul, Senator Markwayne Mullin finally stopped him cold with a BRUTAL truth bomb: “Sir, I get it. It’s about character assassination for you. That’s the way this game is played.” PAUL: “Do you think fighting as a resolution for political difference is a good example for the men and women of ICE and Border Patrol?” MULLIN: “As you can notice over my shoulder, here is my good friend Sean O’Brien. Both of us have had conversations. Both of us have shaken hands, and both of us agreed we could have done things different.” “Sean is someone that has become a close friend. We talk all the time. I’ve been on his podcast. We’ve talked through this. That’s how you handle your differences. Not like this chairman.” PAUL: “I’m glad you guys are friends now and that you’ve reconciled. But really, it doesn’t get to the real point, whether or not you think violence is the way we settle things.” “In the days after the fight you said, and I quote, sometimes people just need to be punched in the face.” “Is that still your opinion that political disputes can sometimes and often only be resolved by violence?” MULLIN: “No, I don’t I don’t always agree with that. I don’t believe in political violence. I’ve made that very clear. But sometimes people do need…” PAUL: “Unless it’s perpetrated on me.” That’s when Mullin fired back. MULLIN: “Sir, I get it. It’s about character assassination for you.” “That’s the way this game is played. I understand it, and you are making this about you, which is fine, but that doesn’t keep me as Secretary of Homeland Security.”