Crypto relief

@krugermacro @justinsuntron @scottmelker crime is legal though

@justinsuntron @scottmelker Sounds illegal

This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down. I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close.  The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever. In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent? II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process. I am not alone. A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began. This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain. The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever. III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI. Let me emphasize — anonymous. This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community. The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO. IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first. But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency.  While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces. V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights. In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets? This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections. Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights. Conclusion I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation. Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote. This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized. I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.

@financialjuice genius

US Treasury Secretary Bessent: Middle East counterparts say they can start shipping oil as soon as the Strait of Hormuz opens.

@Beav53 @Steffan0xd @BitcoinArchive no, it will dump a good amount and then go to infinity, but there will be a fork anyway, so you can buy the saylor btc and see both options play out

@crypto_relief @Steffan0xd @BitcoinArchive It will be the end of the experiment then , BTC will go sub $1

Cypherpunk Jameson Lopp and other Bitcoin developers propose BIP-361 to freeze quantum vulnerable wallets. This could lock dormant BTC like Satoshi Nakamoto’s 1.1M coins, now worth $74B, before quantum computers can steal them.

@Beav53 @Steffan0xd @BitcoinArchive yes

@Steffan0xd @BitcoinArchive As opposed to letting hacker seal and dump 100s of billions of BTC into the open market?

@klos @JohnVandivier @nikoferro @Steffan0xd @BitcoinArchive yes

@JohnVandivier @nikoferro @Steffan0xd @BitcoinArchive Do you mean the choice to donate your coins to quantum hackers?

@crypto_notte barely? on the payout date, super good for the ponzi

$STRC 'depegged' ?

@worldlibertyfi based, whoever bought it deserves it

For early supporters: All 17,043,666,558 locked early supporter tokens move to a 2-year cliff followed by a 2-year linear vest. Full allocation retained. Zero burn. Holders who do not affirmatively accept the new schedule remain locked indefinitely under existing terms.

We’ve just posted a governance proposal to the forum for community discussion, and we believe it represents one of the strongest long-term governance alignment signals in DeFi. Here's what it does 🧵

@WazzCrypto Its working though. 20-30 fake news per day and s&p is 8k

incredible

@adamscochran Iran International is primarily headquartered in London, UK

Right, except we know that’s not true because both Iran and the US have told us: * The US had a final offer that was maximalist * The two parties were no where close on the core issues of enrichment or the Strait

@DeItaone axios?

🚨 *IRAN MULLS PAUSING ITS HORMUZ SHIPPING TO AVOID DERAILING TALKS

@Pluto_0x @thedefivillain no brother, iran can win, us can be finished and market can still go up, these arent connected

@crypto_relief @thedefivillain Not at all The reason why people are surprised and blame some “mysterious manipulation” is because they fail to see the broader picture and they cant admit to themselves that they were completely wrong Nothing worse than being wrong and also poor

"Trump is so trapped, he's desperately looking for a way out asap, the market is forcing his hand" ok dawg

@Pluto_0x @thedefivillain both can be true

@thedefivillain It has been hilarious seen people repeating non-stop for 40 days : “Iran is winning” “US is over” And then later being surprised and ask : “why market is not lower ?” “who is manipulating the market ?” Ironic really

@RunnerXBT selling 1$ of btc i agree, but i dont think stopping div does much, just rugs some retards and life goes on

if Saylor were to - stop div payments - sell a single Satoshi that invalidates the whole ponzi/thesis and is easiest -30% short of our lifetimes on unlimited size possible on BTC and -70% on everything else in crypto id almost argue its worse than Quantum fears

@skeptic_humble @FirstSquawk yes, thats the only thing we get these days, 24/7 fake news, but its working for them, they got oil futures down 20$ on only that

@FirstSquawk In other words, there are no further ceasefire talks, or an agreement to continue the ceasefire, and all we have heard since the Monday open is lies.

PAKISTAN FOREIGN MINISTRY: NO DATE OR TIME HAS BEEN SET FOR THE SECOND ROUND OF US-IRAN NEGOTIATIONS

@CryptoParadyme @RunnerXBT i just saw his interview on bankless, he said he just wont pay it out

@RunnerXBT I still don't understand where he gets the money to pay the interest.

for every $1b of BTC purchased via STRC from @saylor he owes $115,000,000 in dividend payment, per year

@RunnerXBT dev literally owes 700m per year in interest and has no revenue, and also keeps adding more supply

dev talking about price

@DeItaone americans actually learned something from this war, u never have to base any statements on reality if market doesnt care

TRUMP: YESTERDAY SAW HIGHEST NUMBER OF SHIP TRANSITS SINCE CLOSURE BEGAN

@RunnerXBT nah, goes up on the fake news, and then retraces 20% of it later, rinse and repeat

jews say X > market rallies Iran denies within hours > full retrace this war from the perspective of trading

its April 13th 2026, Monday, and markets still trust anything Jewish media says regarding War in Iran by Jewish media, I mean Axios Jesus Christ

@WazzCrypto looks like job isnt even finished, lul

They crimed $RAVE to $5 BILLION FDV Incredible work

@Rory_Johnston oil dumping on the news

doubly concerning because Trump's 'soon' was already pretty suspect