R2D2

@FlintDibble All I know about you is that you came off as a douche. Do better if you ever get the chance again.

"Joe Rogan Allegedly Ran A Campaign To Discredit Critic Of Leading Pseudoarchaeologist" Yeah, in my opinion Graham and Joe organized such a campaign against me, and their idiot underlings repeated it as often as they could I'm still standing. Fuck em rudevulture.com/joe-rogan-alle…

@BrysonGray You are calling 18 centuries and 99% of all Christians of history demonic. Go pound sand.

This is demonic

@NedPerkypal @newstart_2024 Good point. Being gay is probably not a "hardware" issue but a "software" issue.

@newstart_2024 And yet there’s no correlation between lower testosterone and being a gay as a man. And gay men who have high testosterone levels aren’t any more likely to be interested in women. Huh.

Carole Hooven laid out a clear biological reality on Joe Rogan: When natal females take high doses of testosterone, their sexuality often changes dramatically and rapidly. They experience something very similar to male puberty: a sharp surge in libido, intense and frequent sexual thoughts, and a noticeable shift in how they view women — seeing them more as sexual objects with a strong drive for release. Orgasms change as well. The female body is highly sensitive to testosterone. Even modest increases trigger significant effects: increased muscle mass, facial hair, deeper voice, and this powerful rewiring of sexual desire. Hooven noted this pattern appears consistently in both her interviews with trans men and the broader scientific literature on hormone transitions. It’s a straightforward example of how sex hormones shape behavior and perception at a deep level. Does this description of testosterone’s effects on female sexuality align with what you’ve observed or read, or does it contradict common assumptions?

@5Solas2 Plot twist. Read the Lutheran's and Catholic joint statement on justification by grace.

Lutherans are some of the best on justification by faith, IMO.

@TrmptVc @5Solas2 He appropriately submitted to the Church.

@5Solas2 Jerome didn't even want to include them in his vulgate.

@5Solas2 I guess the Septuagint was not read by the early church? What are you smoking?

@GBNCOC Funny, you wouldn't have a bible without them

What are some reasons NOT to be a Roman Catholic? Watch to find out.

@David_Khait Jesus is the temple. Jesus is Israel. That's why. It may be interesting for archeology but that's it.

I never understand why some Christians mock other Christians for this. This is a tangible part of the Second Temple. Both Jews and Christians believe that Gods presence rested in the Temple. Which is why it’s significant to both Jews and Christians

@Atomsmade The materialism is strong with this one...

I don’t care whether he existed or not; my point is what’s actually attributed to him doesn’t match how the real world works. You’ve got stories of healing blindness with mud and spit. In real life, blindness is a medical condition with causes like nerve damage or eye defects, you don’t fix that with dirt and saliva. You’ve got claims that people can handle snakes or survive poison if they believe enough. But venom doesn’t care about belief, biology reacts the same way every time. Then there’s the idea that if your eye makes you sin, you should cut it out. But human behavior doesn’t come from body parts like that. You don’t solve desire or thoughts by removing an organ. Mental illness and sickness were often blamed on demons, but now we know epilepsy is brain activity, infections come from microbes, and disorders have neurological causes, not spirits. And then the big miracle claims: walking on water, stopping storms instantly, raising dead people. These don’t match physics or biology. Water doesn’t support human weight, storms don’t pause on command, and death after certain biological limits isn’t reversible. So the pattern is simple: it reflects an ancient understanding of how nature works, not modern science. And when you compare it to what we actually know today, it doesn’t hold up as literal reality. Jesus's story shows that Bible writers didn't know shit about science.

@ProtPhilosopher You didn't answer the question...

How many times does the phrase "apostolic succession" appear in the Bible? And what specifically does the Bible say about "apostolic succession"?

@MethodMinistry Is reading a work? Is using your mental faculty to comprehend the gospel a work?

Rome is wrong: your works don’t save you. Salvation is by grace alone. Through faith alone. In Christ alone.

@BibleInContext1 Proof the Bible cannot bring about unity in the truth

I’m no longer Catholic because after reading the Bible and comparing it with Catholic theology and history it becomes very obvious that Roman Catholicism is a man-made cult that counterfeits Christianity!

@_OKJ__ He still shows up sometimes

Why didn’t jesus appear to pontius Pilate and Caiaphas after his resurrection tho? If Jesus Christ truly rose from the dead and remained for 40 days, the most decisive way to confirm this would have been to appear to the very authorities who condemned him….namely Pontius Pilate and Caiaphas. These were the individuals with both the motive to verify the claim and the power to publicly document and disseminate it. Instead, the resurrection appearances were very suspiciously reported exclusively among his own followers…people already predisposed to believe in him. This is a serious evidential asymmetry… the claim rests on insider testimony, while those in the best position to critically verify or falsify it are absent from the record. If the goal of the resurrection was to provide clear, public confirmation of his divine status, then failing to appear to neutral or hostile authorities is very dubious and suspicious. Think about it, A verified appearance before Roman and Jewish leadership would have produced independent records and dramatically altered the history of the day. The absence of such accounts makes the resurrection narrative look less like a publicly confirmable event and more like a belief dubiously sustained within a committed group… any rational mind is justified in disbelieving the story.

@LucifersTweetz Hi! Jesus loves you. It's called Pascha (Pâque in French), for Passover. He is risen!

My favorite part of the Bible is the verse where Jesus commands us to celebrate His resurrection on a day named after a pagan fertility goddess, complete with bunnies and eggs.

@Styx666Official God's love you.

Three kinds of people will enter a church today. Fools, usurious charlatans and the nostalgic. Happy pagan fertility day Catholics transmogrifier to convert others.

@WellsJorda89710 Jesus is Israel. Those who reject Jesus are not the Israel of God.

Jesus is a Jew. The Bible is a Jewish book. God’s covenants with Israel are unbreakable. That’s why I stand unashamedly with the Jews and the nation of Israel. 🇮🇱

@redeemed_zoomer They don't even agree on baptism and the Lord supper.

I believe Mainline Protestantism (a formal global communion of over 300 Million Christians) is the true Church, properly speaking, and that all other Christians are separated brethren

@marklevinshow Watch your own hands, they are drenched in blood you ghoul.

Deeply upsetting

@BibleInContext1 Jesus is Israel. Jesus is the vine. Always was.

Replacement theology? The Church does not take the place of Israel in God‘s redemptive plan and praise God that it doesn’t! Let’s take a quick look at Galatians 6, Romans 11 and Romans 9!

@_Revelation_20 Jesus is Israel. Jesus is the vine. Read your Bible.

The Church does not replace Israel; Gentile believers are grafted into the promises while waiting for God to finish His specific work with His ancient people (Rom. 11:25-26).