Dan Costinescu

@nntaleb @quant_____ @nntaleb time for a shrink visit 😂?

@quant_____ FUcking retard, it didn't hit you that I expand on that in formal published technical writing? Do you want me to pack everything in a tweet? Retard.

This doesn’t mean anything. Legitimately no actual substantive argument.

@JaokooMoses Another clickbaiter

CONFIRMED: The US joint Chiefs of staff Air Force Gen. Dan Caine stormed out of an emergency meeting with Trump. Insiders indicate that Trump wanted to invoke the nuclear codes as a deterrence against Iran but Caine refused and invoked the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice.

@georgesimion @george Georgica fi penibil !😂

Congrats, Peter Magyar. Glad that you had FairPlay elections — we lack this in 🇷🇴. For the record: I’ve never danced on your people’s graves, I don’t have Zsolt’s moves. We both are marathon lads, so a friendly advice: Keep an 👁️ on taking your country’s money from Ursula!

@TheGriftReport Memo: Buddy , George is in a 10x worse state than Biden. Reset and grift again 😊

So, George Soros just got elected in Hungary

@citrinowicz @citrinowicz wow impeccable logic: this campaign to early , wait till their capabilities stronger and then hit them. Elementary logical reasoning would tell they should have hit them earlier not later .

“Crying Wolf” on the Iran Issue A. While the ultimate outcome of this conflict remains uncertain, one trend is already becoming clearer: the likelihood of a sustained, large-scale U.S. military re-engagement in the Gulf is diminishing. This reflects the growing costs borne by the United States, the broader impact on the global economy, and potential shifts in domestic political priorities in Washington. B. For Israel, there is a real risk that this campaign, particularly if the Iranian regime endures will prove to be a double-edged sword, potentially undermining both the legitimacy and feasibility of future military action against Iran. C. If the conflict ends with the regime intact, Iran will almost certainly seek to rebuild its conventional capabilities and may, at a minimum, reassess the benefits of advancing toward a nuclear weapons capability. D. This raises a critical question: what will be the future capacity for coordinated U.S.-Israeli action in a renewed confrontation? At present, while Iran’s conventional military buildup constitutes a serious challenge, it does not amount to an existential threat. Moreover, there is no clear indication that Iran has crossed the nuclear threshold even under Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and in the aftermath of the 12 days war. E. It is therefore possible that this joint campaign has come too early. Should Iran, under future leadership, decide to accelerate its nuclear weapons, it may prove significantly more difficult to mobilize U.S. support for another military effort aimed at preventing nuclearization. #IranWar‌

@nntaleb Sure everyone cites your work. And almost all are retards of course. Pathetic

To repeat, Bessent is a naive retard AND doesn't know he doesn't know anything abt history & dynamics. This is the most stupid analogy, particularly for someone who cites my work. Wars almost NEVER reduce uncertainty. The Great War was supposed to be a couple of weeks of war for a permanent peace, later assumed to end all wars, etc.

@isjainteressant @PM_ViktorOrban @ZelenskyyUa He spot on 😄! Parroting RL

To make it absolutely clear: there is not a single point of the EU accession criteria that Ukraine will fulfill in the next 50 years. Period. No matter how often Zelenskyy begs for it or how long the war lasts. A war for which he bears partial responsibility and which could have ended 3.5 years ago. He should have resigned long ago and thus spared his country immense suffering.

Dear Volodimir @ZelenskyyUa, Thank you for yet another campaign speech in support of Ukraine’s accession to the European Union. It will greatly help Hungarians see the situation more clearly. There is, however, something you misunderstand: this debate is not about me and it is not about you. It is about the future of Hungary, Ukraine, and Europe. This is precisely why you cannot become a member of the European Union.

@MegynKellyShow @megynkelly @MegynKellyShow more clickbait from Megyn. So sophisticated

"I know I'm supposed to feel sorry for Alex Pretti but I don't. You know why I wasn't shot by Border Patrol this weekend? Because I kept my ass inside and out of their operations." - @megynkelly

@elonmusk @elonmusk keep living in your bubble. X is good but not alpha and omega . Your aggressive PR won t convince the middle grounders (which you claim to be)

@LindseyGrahamSC @LindseyGrahamSC You re the biggest sellout ever. McCain must be doing lots of graveturns

I fully expect to be Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2027 after Republicans retain control of the U.S. Senate. As Chairman, my top priority will be to pass legislation that once and for all ends sanctuary city policies that lead to massive rip offs of the taxpayer and much worse – if it is still an issue in 2027. For the sake of the country, I hope it will not be. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

@MarioNawfal @GuntherEagleman @MarioNawfal wow, you re fully locked into your Maga followers crowd. Respect!

🇺🇸 Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara's basically begging the protesters' forgiveness in a presser. But why, though? His officers finally felt the need to do something regarding protesters and hit 'em with tear gas. Source: @GuntherEagleman, Fox News

@megynkelly @realDonaldTrump Doesn t get smarter than this post Megyn

.@realDonaldTrump should pull ICE out of MN today & announce that there will be no more immigration enforcement in MN at all. All illegals in the US are encouraged to move there. And if any illegal is found outside of MN & gets deported, they can never apply for re-entry.

@kadmitriev @kadmitriev how about stopping shilling on new year s eve. Ah and congrats for your huge followers base 😂. Well done

Almost true — except it’s not just that land. Ukraine is going to lose that land… and more of the other land too.

@kadmitriev Troll in chief . Inexhaustible 💪

Belgium 🇧🇪, Hungary 🇭🇺, Czech Republic 🇨🇿 and Slovakia 🇸🇰 protected property rights—and Europe’s financial & legal system—saving EU from investor exodus. They exposed the incompetence of the EU warmonger elites who pushed illegal actions, spent political capital & failed

@kadmitriev Glad tot see you re a diligent student. Lavish praise every day (kissing axx constantly) . Job well done 👏

Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are Grand Peacemakers—working tirelessly to implement President Trump’s peace plan. 🕊️

@remiranda_42 @DataChaz It s X who blocks the link!

@DataChaz Can’t you post the original link?

Still can’t believe @karpathy released this 3.5-hour free deep dive on how ChatGPT actually works for free. If there’s one AI video to watch in 2025, this is the one

@DavidSacks Praise to the point of …bleah…the visionary who s clueless about AI after you managed to convince him to sign an EO you wrote yourself David S(marts)

ONE RULEBOOK FOR AI I wanted to share a few thoughts on AI preemption and address some of the concerns. First, this is not an “AI amnesty” or “AI moratorium.” It is an attempt to settle a question of jurisdiction. When an AI model is developed in state A, trained in state B, inferenced in state C, and delivered over the internet through national telecommunications infrastructure, that is clearly interstate commerce, and exactly the type of economic activity that the Framers of the Constitution intended to reserve for the federal government to regulate. In the absence of preemption, 50 different states will assert their jurisdiction, creating a patchwork of 50 different regulatory regimes, often in contradiction with each other. Indeed this is already happening. Over 1,200 bills have been introduced in state legislatures, and over 100 measures have already passed. For example, states like Colorado, California and Illinois have made AI developers liable if their models contribute to “algorithmic discrimination,” which is defined as having a “disparate impact” on a protected group. Colorado's list of protected groups even includes English language proficiency, so presumably it’s against the law for an AI model to criticize illegal aliens. This type of ideological meddling is how we ended up with “black George Washington.” This can’t be allowed. AI models should strive for the truth and be ideologically unbiased. Only a federal framework can achieve this goal. The attempts of Red States to protect conservatives from bias and discrimination (a worthy goal) will have limited effectiveness when Blue States like California have the most market power and nexus to AI development. At best, we’ll end up with 50 different AI models for 50 different states – a regulatory morass worse than Europe. This will stymie innovation, especially by small startups who can’t afford the compliance burden. Meanwhile, China will race ahead. We can’t afford this. As President Trump truthed today, we need One Rulebook for AI. But what about the 4 C’s? Let me address those concerns: 1. Child safety - Preemption would not apply to generally applicable state laws. So state laws requiring online platforms to protect children from online predators or sexually explicit material (CSAM) would remain in effect. 2. Communities - AI preemption would not apply to local infrastructure. That’s a separate issue. In short, preemption would not force communities to host data centers they don’t want. 3. Creators - Copyright law is already federal, so there is no need for preemption here. Questions about how copyright law should be applied to AI are already playing out in the courts. That’s where this issue will be decided. 4. Censorship - As mentioned, the biggest threat of censorship is coming from certain Blue States. Red States can’t stop this – only President Trump’s leadership at the federal level can. In summary, we’ve heard the concerns about the 4 C’s, and the 4 C’s are protected. But there is a 5th C that we all need to care about: competitiveness. If we want America to win the AI race, a confusing patchwork of regulation will not work. As President Trump wrote today: “There must be only One Rulebook if we are going to continue to lead in Al. We are beating ALL COUNTRIES at this point in the race, but that won't last long if we are going to have 50 States, many of them bad actors, involved in RULES and the APPROVAL PROCESS.” To this end, President Trump has indicated that he will sign an Executive Order this week. This Order will provide the tools necessary for the federal government to push back against the most onerous and excessive state regulation. At the same time, the Administration will continue to work with Congress to define a federal framework that can be enacted through legislation. Thank you to President Trump for his extraordinary vision and leadership on AI and for looking out for the interests of the entire country, as the Framers of the Constitution intended and as only the President of the United States can do.

@elonmusk @elonmusk Propaganda found a new figurehead ?

The tyrannical, unelected bureaucracy oppressing the people of Europe are in the second picture

@davidsacks47 Abolish the EU 😂. Makes sense, right @DavidSacks ?

@georgesimion @EU_Commission @X Gata s a activat papagalul. Vino și tu cu o temă așa 1% originală baremi Georgica

#DSA is the @EU_Commission's tool for mass censorship and control, the greatest threat to freedom of expression today. “Transparency obligations” – what a sinister joke! @X was punished for not obeying the totalitarian establishment. DSA should be abolished ASAP!