Debunktivism

The relentless attacks on Candace are not actually attacks on Candace. They are attacks on your perception of reality. They are meant to make you feel ashamed for supporting or even bringing up Candace's name. They are meant to falsely label you and frame you as a "low IQ".

@lisaknows429 @htwt453636 @baroncoleman Added clarification? You stupid cunt, get your FALSE post down. You haven't debunked shit!

@htwt453636 @baroncoleman I already added clarification to the thread idiot.

🚨 BARON COLEMAN DEBUNKED! @baroncoleman caught lying about Erika Kirk again!! He posted this cropped photo of Erika while claiming she didn't go home to her children after 5 days of preliminary hearings and instead flew to VA to examine evidence with the FBI. This is entirely untrue! The original full version of the photo is from Amfest 2023! Erika shared similar photos from the event on her own Instagram! Here is the full uncropped version of the photo along with the Instagram post from Erika in 2023!

@lisaknows429 @Mini_111111 @baroncoleman Wow, someone cropped a photo of someone accused of someone else for not being at home. You really are onto something here! 🤣🤣

@Mini_111111 @baroncoleman Says the lady who cropped a photo that is completely unrelated. 🤣

Insane show for you guys today! -We receive a shocking clue regarding the unidentified object in the back seat of Charlie’s SUV -Blake Neff says he can’t remember the morning of 9/10. -Andrew Kolvet finally tells the truth about Charlie declining Bibi Netanyahu. youtube.com/live/X3VKJVJ7c…

@BenShapiroShow OBSESSED, DERRANGED and CRINGE AF! Whoops, it doesnt look good on you mate, you are a danger to society!!!

Whoops.

@ParodyAoc @baroncoleman @AndrewKolvet First of all, it is not his claim. It is the person in the video's claim. What sort of contortionist are you?

@baroncoleman @AndrewKolvet You’re free to back up your claim about “the staff at Cowboy’s” while also posting whatever fact you’re claiming “the staff at Cowboy’s” contradicted. Otherwise it’s just more vague verbal promises.

Hey, @AndrewKolvet, do you believe the staff at Cowboy's Smokehouse who place Tyler Robinson in Panguitch just before 10p on Sept 10? If not, why not? If so, how do you explain the alleged text messages Tyler sent Lance saying he was watching a cop in Orem before midnight? Panguitch is three hours away. Easy question if the case is as airtight as you say.

@draebeard @OwenBenjamin How about getting off the meds dude?

@OwenBenjamin Let's take back the word "gay"; it means light hearted and carefree. Most homosexuals are not gay. In fact most of the homosexuals I have known, including my late uncle Dickie, have been profoundly unhappy people. The word "gay" is an inversion. I use "queer" instead.

Fact it’s why I’ve always loved Down syndrome people. 0 are gay

@TheModerateCase Wrong! You don't get to determine my options. Whoever tf you are. ~from whoever you "think" I am.

The Candace cult has 2 options: 1. Admit you were misled and move on. 2. Double down, invent even more absurd theories, and make an even bigger fool of yourself because your ego is too large to admit you got played. Reality doesn’t bend to accommodate your pride.

@Trillion0x Well we "knew" in the first 3h "Bibi didn't do it" from Bibi himself, so I thought this might help answer your question. It's overwhelmingly crystal clear that it wasn't Bibi. 🤡🤡🤡

Who, according to Baron Coleman, actually assassinated Charlie Kirk? Not Tyler, got it - who? Despite the hundreds of episodes, none of you can answer this question. Baron cannot answer the most important question either. Anyone else see the issue here?

@conceptbuffet @KaySu00 🤣

@KaySu00 The WIDOW is unburdening what has been!

Erika Kirk IS Kamala Harris 😭

@Moms9lives @canncon @RealCandaceO You're right for the half way. It sounds crazy and if it sounds crazy, you're an insane clown.

@canncon Just so people understand why @RealCandaceO and her comrade social media simps are trying to protect their narrative, it's because they are being paid by leftists trash to help get Tyler Robinson off. Sounds crazy right? But not as crazy as what these idiots have been posting!!!

🚨There was a THIRD leak of the footage from the "ENHANCED" shooting on the Losee Building. The State, once again, had a computer screen open on Day 2 when the Judge and witness exclusively saw Exhibit 12.1 in its "ENHANCED" format. This is the "DEFINITELY TYLER" footage of the shooting on the roof. You don't actually see the shooter, however, you can see the "shooter" jumping off the roof (he's a pixel) and you can understand that there was NO "ENHANCED" footage. Just zoomed in. Like anyone with half a brain could have done on their own. CourtTV's Day 2 of the hearing, around 1:15:00 mark.

@49erjunky @canncon Wdym Candace asked for "the beginning" of this footage? I can't recall. Help me. Show a clip of Candace asking for "the beginning of the footage of the guy jumping off roof" The beginning of what? Of him jumping off? We all saw that in September. I'm waiting! 🤡

@canncon Hey idiot, answer this question please. Do remember Candace and her clown show asking for the beginning of the footage of the guy jumping off roof ? Well they have it so now what?

@BlondBomb5 @canncon Wdym not even from the same day you fool? Different days in court, same FUCKING footage. You clowns need to log off...

@canncon That’s 💯 NOT the video they’re referencing. Not even close. It’s not even from the same day 😂 Sorry, you’re just incorrect on this one.

@AndrewKolvet Provide context you clown. What's false? The emoji?

This is false.

Anyone have any idea what happened to that Venezuelan president we kidnapped 7 months ago?

@Joshua_the_car Mormon inserting himself in the spiritual war. Nothing strange here.

Wouldn’t it be nice if the prosecution could just… make up evidence like this?

Let's expose the fraud playbook TPUSA's structure follows, one person at a time. First up, Tyler Bowyer. Fraud within organizations, especially when dealing with executives, is more often than not, structural. The goal isn't to steal a lump sum, it's to build a system where money moves constantly among related entities so that no single document ever shows the whole picture, insider pay is relabeled as arm's-length business expense, and the ultimate recipient is hidden behind a layer. You don't write yourself a check. You'd design exactly what I have been seeing across all TPUSA entities. Here's what Tyler Bowyer's playbook looks like: 1. On his own charity's return, Bowyer is the Chief Operating Officer AND its #1 outside “vendor”. $288,255 for “COO SERVICES,” invoiced from his house. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a salary gets audited and a vendor invoice doesn't. Executive pay triggers board sign-off, comparability studies, reasonableness tests, an excise tax. A “purchased service” melts into the expense pile. So you stop being an employee getting paid and start being a company getting hired by yourself. Billing it from your house is the tell: there's no firm on the other end. It's you, writing invoices to a charity you run.... 2. His pay is split across three entities. $288K from the charity, $88K from the political arm, $0 from TPUSA. Total: ~$376K. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: everyone who might catch you pulls one filing at a time. Put the whole number on one return and it draws the excess-comp tax and the headline. Slice it across three affiliates and each piece looks modest. You're not hiding the money, you're hiding the total, and betting nobody cross-references three separate 990s. They usually don't, which is why it's one of the first things I do. 3. His public role is politics, he's COO of Turning Point Action, the (c)(4) political arm. Yet the tax-deductible (c)(3) charity pays him roughly three times what the political arm does. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: charity money is the cheapest money in the building. It's tax-deductible, so it's easier to raise and comes in bigger amounts. If a person's real work is political and you load that salary onto the charity, you're paying for work the charity is legally barred from doing, with subsidized dollars, and the donors wrote off politics on their taxes without knowing it. You push every cost onto the entity with the cheapest money and the least scrutiny for that line. Whether this split reflects real charitable work or a misallocation is exactly what an audit would settle, and it's the first thing I'd pull his time records for. 4. The charity paying him takes 100% of its money as grants from TPUSA, spends nearly all of it, and holds nothing. In its 2023 return it booked $3.7 million in salaries against zero employees on its federal wage form. The next year it reported 124. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a satellite entity is a second set of books you fully control. Money leaves the closely-watched flagship as a "grant", which looks charitable, lands in a smaller entity nobody audits hard, and gets spent there on payroll and insiders with a fraction of the oversight. And millions in salaries booked against zero reported employees is the classic ghost-employee signature, wages to people who may not exist, or to insiders dressed as staff. Maybe 2023 was a filing error. That's the innocent read. But a swing from zero to 124 is the exact anomaly a forensic examiner reconciles first, because it's also how payroll fraud hides. 5. Within a few months of Charlie Kirk's assassination, as control of a nine-figure network changed hands, Tyler Bowyer opened five companies all within 54 days of one another. Four are anonymous Wyoming LLCs using one Cheyenne "mailbox". One is named “Vote LLC.” One is “Tyler Bowyer Inc.,” at the same address he already invoices the charity from. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: the entire purpose of an anonymous LLC is that no one can prove YOU got paid. Send money to “Victory Advisors LLC” and the trail dead-ends at a mail drop. Stand up a personal corporation at your billing address and your fees now flow through a company with one more wall between the cash and your name. And you build the pipes before the money moves, right when the org is in transition and everyone's looking at the funeral instead of the filings. 6. He co-owns Resolute Media, run out of a building on the charity's campus, and chairs Superfeed, the for-profit the movement pays, with Erika Kirk's own mother on the board. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: self-dealing is invisible when the counterparty wears a different name. You don't embezzle from the nonprofit, you sell to it, at your price, through a company you own. The charity pays “Superfeed” or “Resolute,” it reads as a normal vendor, and the profit lands with the same people who run the charity. 7. On their signed federal returns, TPUSA and Turning Point Action both answered "No" to the question regulators scan for self-dealing: any business transactions with an officer, or with a company an officer controls. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: that box is the one you most need blank, because a "yes" invites the audit you're avoiding. And here's the defense they'll reach for, so let me get ahead of it. They'll say the "No" is technically correct: officer pay gets reported elsewhere, and this schedule only captures a company an officer owns more than 35% of. Fine. But that's exactly the problem. Those thresholds are the exits. Officer comp is excluded. A 34% stake is excluded. So a person can be paid by the charity, own a slice of the vendors it hires, and chair a company it does business with, and still, truthfully, check "No." The schedule built to expose insider dealing has doors an insider can walk right through. A "No" here doesn't mean there's nothing to see. It means the only way to see it is the one thing they haven't handed over: the ownership percentages and the payment records. That, again, is the audit. The pattern: Every one of these findings align to what someone committing fraud would do and reveals a behavioral pattern: to make the money harder to see, the recipient harder to name, and the total harder to add up. Real fraud isn't loud. It's a hundred small, individually-defensible decisions that all lean the same way, toward the insiders and away from the light. One of these could be considered a "quirk", but all seven, across every entity, for years, it is a design. I can't prove intent from a tax form. Intent lives in the bank records and the operating agreements, and those aren't public. But every structural choice here is the one a person with something to hide would make. That is the reason to open the books. Tyler Bowyer (and all of TPUSA, but I'll get there in the following parts) needs a real forensic audit, by the IRS, by the Arizona AG, by anyone with the subpoena power to pull what a 990 will never show you. They built the structure betting nobody would read the filings or pay attention. I'm paying attention. Part 2 coming next. Who do you want? Erika Kirk or Andrew Kolvet?

@KanekoaTheGreat @RealCandaceO @AndrewKolvet Using a photo shared by Candace Owens, obtained by her, as an alleged alibi? A clear photo of his facial features such as chin, nose, lips, ears, etc. Something that the prosecution team failed so far to provide. Your stupidity amazes us every day!

I have to sincerely thank @RealCandaceO. In ten months, she never produced a shred of evidence that Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French Legionnaires, or TPUSA killed Charlie Kirk. But this week she finally produced evidence that Tyler Robinson did. The photo she released shows Robinson at a Dairy Queen a few minutes from campus, the evening of the shooting — wearing a white-logo Hurley hat. The same white-logo Hurley hat the shooter is seen wearing on campus. The same white-logo Hurley hat Agent Davis described in his testimony. Robinson has worn Hurley hats in photos since his teens. Usually the dark logo. But that day: white logo. On campus. At the Dairy Queen. And the following night, when he turned himself in to police. Ten months of devoting yourself to defending Charlie's accused killer — and the first real evidence you ever produced puts Tyler Robinson near the scene, hours after the murder, in the shooter's hat. Thank you for your service, Candace.

@nosoup4knowles Where is she going? 🤣

ERIKA KIRK: "So you have the internet coming after you. You have them slandering your name. You have them saying all this trash about you. And what do you do? You wake up that next morning. You put on the armor of God and you keep going!" Amen, Erika. Amen

@knubeltierli @AndrewKolvet are we moving onto CGI shared by a no one who also shares a no one even smaller? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

"Side-by-side comparison: Tyler Robinson vs. the suspected shooter on the UVU campus before the assassination of Charlie Kirk. T. Robinson matches the alleged shooter in facial features, height, and posture exactly -even the way he carries the rucksack! He is the shooter!