Anonymous Observer

38.1K posts

Anonymous Observer banner
Anonymous Observer

Anonymous Observer

@dougarmi

Trust in God, trust and be true to yourself and every little thing will be alright 👍. oh and if you're some random bot please don't follow me.

Katılım Kasım 2016
514 Takip Edilen400 Takipçiler
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Mindset Shift
Mindset Shift@MindsetShift247·
State took his Land for pipeline. Pipeline Never Built, Won’t Give the land back
English
48
622
2.4K
50.2K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Centrum Usług Prawnych
Centrum Usług Prawnych@cuprwarszawa·
🇺🇦 Była szefowa ukraińskiego urzędu ds. walki z korupcją: Zełenski posiada 6 nieruchomości w Hiszpanii, 14 w UK, 21 we Francji, 8 we Włoszech, 34 w ZEA. Oto wasze europejskie pieniądze. #Zełenski #Korupcja
Polski
380
5.8K
10.6K
149.1K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Kevin Kijewski
Kevin Kijewski@KevinKijewski·
Pure Extortion: DTE Energy is holding Michigan families hostage with yet another $474 million electric rate hike, promising to slow the annual shakedown ONLY IF the MPSC approves their lucrative data center deals. This is the fifth nine-figure demand from DTE in just seven years. Simple answer to DTE: It’s a NO. We see this monopolistic abuse for exactly what it is: corporate strong-arming that prioritizes utility profits and big tech over affordable energy for hardworking families. Michigan families deserve real leaders who will fight to deliver real rate relief. Let’s make Michigan safe, normal, and affordable again! 🇺🇸 @MIGOP @MI_Republicans @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @stevegrubershow @MrJustinBarclay @DaveBondyTV @Th_Midwesterner @RapidResponse47 @MINewsSource @mifairelections @gatewaypundit @downi75 @TruckerRandy
Kevin Kijewski tweet media
The Midwesterner@Th_Midwesterner

DTE seeks ANOTHER rate hike — offers to ‘slow’ annual nine-figure requests if MPSC approves data center deals themidwesterner.news/2026/04/dte-se…

English
42
213
506
17.4K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
WOAH 🚨 The taxpayer money laundering must be INSANE “The Federal Reserve has revealed that US NGOs have more in assets than the combined 2025 GDP estimates for Japan, Germany and India combined — The combined assets held by US NGOs equals $14.2 trillion of your tax money” “India and Japan's GDP each just over $4 trillion, Germany $5 trillion, about $13.5 trillion together. Guess what? The combined assets held by US NGOs equals $14.2 trillion of your tax money and that of your children and grandchildren and great-great-great-great-great grandchildren. Ever wonder why everything is so absolutely unaffordable today? It's not actually rocket science. Government has forgotten the fundamental reasons for which it was formed to serve and protect our civil liberties. It has inverted the entire formula and decided that we are the ones here to serve, to work, and through our individual labors to support their desires and the behemoth of a bureaucracy that has emanated from those desires.” As of 2025, United States nonprofits held about $13.4–14.1 trillion in total assets. Including cash, investments, real estate, etc It has grown from $7 trillion a decade ago This is based on Federal Reserve data
English
1.2K
7.9K
13.7K
218.8K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Ian
Ian@Iwendtster·
Is this the cognitive Wild West? See the comments for the answer. Almost like this is what they want. But I’m just a conspiracy theorist.
English
321
1K
2.7K
110.2K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Luce
Luce@lucyshow11·
This makes me so nostalgic 😌💕
English
112
499
2.8K
90.3K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
redpillbot
redpillbot@redpillb0t·
Journalist: “You've said that Russia should repay for reconstruction of Ukraine. Do you believe Israel should repay for reconstruction of Gaza?” EU chief spokesperson: “I have no comment at this stage.” *Days later, the journalist is fired*
English
456
19K
80.5K
943K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Peter Bernegger
Peter Bernegger@PeterBernegger·
This chart should alarm every American! A glitch does not alphabetize voters, clone them in groups, and leave matching mathematical signatures across states. Two counties. Two states: Texas, now Utah! Two different election systems. Yet the data shows the same fingerprint: real voters used as “anchors,” fake clone records created, impossible numbers inserted, and structured math patterns that do not look random. In Bexar County Texas, the red flag was fractional voter ID numbers. See my tweets of Feb. 28th, 26th, 30th, Mar 5th on how KnowInk poll books were used to cheat just two months ago. Now found in Utah, it was fractional and negative house numbers, plus voter IDs tied to real voters. ➡️Ban computers in our elections. See more details of this election fraud in Dr Paquette's post retweeted here. Subscribe to his substack to help out defray the expenses. @ZarkFiles
Peter Bernegger tweet mediaPeter Bernegger tweet media
Art@ZarkFiles

Two months ago I found mathematically proven election fraud in Bexar County, Texas. Fake voter records, generated by an algorithm, injected into the official poll book. Not suspected. Not alleged. Proven — arithmetically, irreducibly, in the file the county was legally required to hand over. Criminal intent visible in the structure of the data itself. Last night I found the same algorithm in Utah. I need to be precise about what "same algorithm" means because this is not a pattern-matching claim or an inference. Same alphabetical anchor selection from the complete voter file. Same uniform arithmetic spacing with a perfect integer closure proof. Same IEEE 754 floating-point fingerprint — the machine-level signature of the same arithmetic loop executing in the same alternating forward-and-reverse pass architecture. Same base-11 clone group structure. Same class of implementation failures at edge cases that expose the underlying code. The only differences between the two are which fields were targeted and the parameter values. Everything underneath is identical. Utah is actually worse than Texas in one critical respect. In Texas, the fake records carried fractional voter ID numbers — impossible values placed in an empty void in ID space. Detectable if you knew to look. In Utah, the fake records carry real voter ID numbers. Numbers stolen from real, named, registered voters, camouflaged inside the normal populated ID range. And when you cross-reference those IDs against the voter history sheet — the official government record of who voted and when — 78% of them show up. Attached to completely different names. Ballots were cast under these IDs. This is not a registration anomaly. It is a voting record. So here is the question. Texas and Utah. Different counties. Different databases. Different fields targeted. Same algorithm running underneath both. What do they have in common? In Bexar County, Texas, KnowInk poll pads were used, and those poll pads connect to the ePulse server. That is a confirmed, documented fact. As for Utah: @wdaugherity confirmed to me today that while a small number of Utah counties do not use e-pollbooks, and Kane County uses ES&S ExpressPoll, all the remaining Utah counties do use KnowInk. ePulse is a server-based system — not software isolated on a county computer. If malicious code were running on that server, it would not need a conspiracy between Texas and Utah to appear in both places. It would just need to run. That is not an assertion that such code is running there. It is a statement about what the architecture makes possible, and why the common infrastructure is the right place to look. ePulse operates across 29 states. I want to be careful about one further point. My earlier peer-reviewed research documented a structural preference for repunit numbers — 1, 11, 111, 1,111 — in New York voter roll algorithms, and the same base-11 architecture appears in both Texas and Utah. That recurrence across three states is notable and warrants investigation, but New York is a stylistic similarity, not an identical forensic signature. Texas and Utah share the same algorithm. New York shares a mathematical preference that may reflect the same design philosophy or the same hand. The distinction matters. When identical fraud appears across multiple independent client systems, you do not start by looking for a conspiracy among the clients. You start with the common infrastructure. That is not a conclusion. It is the correct first question.

English
119
3.8K
6.9K
105.2K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Art
Art@ZarkFiles·
Two months ago I found mathematically proven election fraud in Bexar County, Texas. Fake voter records, generated by an algorithm, injected into the official poll book. Not suspected. Not alleged. Proven — arithmetically, irreducibly, in the file the county was legally required to hand over. Criminal intent visible in the structure of the data itself. Last night I found the same algorithm in Utah. I need to be precise about what "same algorithm" means because this is not a pattern-matching claim or an inference. Same alphabetical anchor selection from the complete voter file. Same uniform arithmetic spacing with a perfect integer closure proof. Same IEEE 754 floating-point fingerprint — the machine-level signature of the same arithmetic loop executing in the same alternating forward-and-reverse pass architecture. Same base-11 clone group structure. Same class of implementation failures at edge cases that expose the underlying code. The only differences between the two are which fields were targeted and the parameter values. Everything underneath is identical. Utah is actually worse than Texas in one critical respect. In Texas, the fake records carried fractional voter ID numbers — impossible values placed in an empty void in ID space. Detectable if you knew to look. In Utah, the fake records carry real voter ID numbers. Numbers stolen from real, named, registered voters, camouflaged inside the normal populated ID range. And when you cross-reference those IDs against the voter history sheet — the official government record of who voted and when — 78% of them show up. Attached to completely different names. Ballots were cast under these IDs. This is not a registration anomaly. It is a voting record. So here is the question. Texas and Utah. Different counties. Different databases. Different fields targeted. Same algorithm running underneath both. What do they have in common? In Bexar County, Texas, KnowInk poll pads were used, and those poll pads connect to the ePulse server. That is a confirmed, documented fact. As for Utah: @wdaugherity confirmed to me today that while a small number of Utah counties do not use e-pollbooks, and Kane County uses ES&S ExpressPoll, all the remaining Utah counties do use KnowInk. ePulse is a server-based system — not software isolated on a county computer. If malicious code were running on that server, it would not need a conspiracy between Texas and Utah to appear in both places. It would just need to run. That is not an assertion that such code is running there. It is a statement about what the architecture makes possible, and why the common infrastructure is the right place to look. ePulse operates across 29 states. I want to be careful about one further point. My earlier peer-reviewed research documented a structural preference for repunit numbers — 1, 11, 111, 1,111 — in New York voter roll algorithms, and the same base-11 architecture appears in both Texas and Utah. That recurrence across three states is notable and warrants investigation, but New York is a stylistic similarity, not an identical forensic signature. Texas and Utah share the same algorithm. New York shares a mathematical preference that may reflect the same design philosophy or the same hand. The distinction matters. When identical fraud appears across multiple independent client systems, you do not start by looking for a conspiracy among the clients. You start with the common infrastructure. That is not a conclusion. It is the correct first question.
Art tweet media
English
243
2.7K
6.6K
171.1K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
AmericanPapaBear™
AmericanPapaBear™@AmericaPapaBear·
SHOCKING: Predator Teacher at Elite All-Girls School R*PED Students for DECADES! School Knew and Did NOTHING! This is why I call it like I see it, folks. Another “trusted” teacher-coach at a fancy Massachusetts girls’ boarding school just got slammed with r*pe charges. Matthew Rutledge groomed and abused students for decades, starting when they were 16. School knew, had reports, and buried it all until the victims forced their hand. Parents, wake up: Big tuition doesn’t buy safety. These elite schools preach empowerment while shielding predators. A 64-year-old man in power over teenage girls should never get a loophole. Huge respect to Hilary Simon and Melissa Fares for fighting back. Protect our daughters first and always! The grooming ends when we stop tolerating it. What say you?
English
145
4.5K
9.6K
143.1K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Dog
Dog@Dog66515910·
The Vatican's Secret Contract That Shaped the Modern World. Few people know that centuries ago, the Vatican made a secret contract with the King of England. One that still influences global power today.
English
26
345
647
18K
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
Karen Cochran
Karen Cochran@kacochran·
ZXX
1
4
24
644
Anonymous Observer retweetledi
IRISH PATRIOT
IRISH PATRIOT@irishpatriot91·
Judge Mark Turner has dismissed the Jury in the case of the homosexual couple accused of orally raping Baby Preston Davey to death. He refused to give a reason why under legal grounds. Interesting his wife is a Solicitor to Sir Elton John, another homosexual who adopted male children. Source - @UnityNewsNet
IRISH PATRIOT tweet mediaIRISH PATRIOT tweet mediaIRISH PATRIOT tweet mediaIRISH PATRIOT tweet media
IRISH PATRIOT@irishpatriot91

The pure evil no one wants to confront!! 13-month-old Preston Davey was allegedly sexually tortured, beaten with 40+ injuries, and smothered to death after just 4 months with adoptive parents Jamie Varley & John McGowan Fazakerley.

English
326
2.8K
5.1K
94.6K