Girardism@Girardism
“What seems to me most striking about Paul is that he found himself faced with the same problem in dealing with Peter that many people, in all ages, have found themselves faced with in dealing with [the Church]. Paul was more radical than Peter. He lectured Peter, and often strongly disapproved of him. But, in the end, Paul always gave in to him because he knew that Christ had wanted Peter to speak for him. Paul went right to the heart of the matter in everything, and he recognized the authority of tradition — a tradition that had only been in existence for a quarter-century! And it is because he was perfectly aware of what was at stake that he acted as he did. If he hadn't, Christianity would never have survived; it would have fallen apart at once. To understand Christianity and orthodoxy, one must think of Paul. Paul was indeed stronger than Peter, better educated, more cosmopolitan, but he always yielded to Peter's primacy.”
— René Girard