
Dr. Drew Dellinger
75.5K posts

Dr. Drew Dellinger
@drewdellinger
Advisor, World House Project. Scholar-in-Residence, King Institute—Stanford, '20-22. Book: Love Letter to the Milky Way. Next book: The Ecological King




THIS STORY JUST GOT WEIRDER A clip from retired Admiral Robert Harward’s Fox News interview today is going VIRAL. He appears to be wearing a face mask on the image on the RIGHT which is the interview from today. Compare it to his appearance using the image on the LEFT from an interview from three days ago and the man looks COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. Compare the faces for yourself. My fun guess is it is Stephen Miller under the mask if it is a mask…

Berkeley law has introduced a new, much stricter AI policy law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/upl…




@jamesetta_w @samstein Insane. It’s nowhere close.



I am getting tired of reading 'experts' like LeCun repeatedly claiming that our AIs are nowhere near human-level intelligence. Let us look at the evidence. US universities rank students based on standardized tests like the SAT. Current AIs achieve near-perfect SAT scores. They also beat tests like the GRE. A few years ago, it was notable when early ChatGPT scored ~120 on an IQ test, a common measure of human intelligence. An IQ of 120 is well above average. Current AIs reportedly have IQ scores similar to those of leading scientists. It is not just in tests. I can ask an AI to produce a science paper that looks undistinguishable from what a PhD level student could do. I just have to give it the data. Better yet, from a prompt, agents can run the experiments and collect the data, and then write the papers. Those of us who try to get work done with AI know what is possible. You can't possibly just say 'this is nowhere near human-level intelligence'. In software, good AIs show a greater mastery of, say, C++, than your average software engineering professor. You could just build a formal test to prove it. The difficulty is that the professors would refuse to take your tests. At this point point, someone will object 'yeah, but your AI can't do this simple thing that we can all do'. Fine. These AIs do not have *human* intelligence. They are very much not human beings. They are something like alien intelligence. They can code straight in assembly language, but have trouble counting characters in words. But that's the result of trade-offs. A dog or a monkey can solve some problems faster than you can. But let us be fair. As a species, these AIs have definitively 'human-level intelligence'. You can't spend decades setting up cognitive tests for human beings, have these AIs beat us in these tests and then say 'well, that's not real intelligence'. Come on !














