Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒

91.6K posts

Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒 banner
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒

Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒

@droid1963

Sarcasm and whiskey aficionado. Free speech and firearms rights are the bedrock of a functioning society.

On the roof in a clown suit. Katılım Ekim 2008
5.4K Takip Edilen4.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒
May 1, 2020 will be remembered as the day that the government of Canada under Justin Trudeau killed one of the basic tenets of our justice system: the presumption of innocence. This must be fought by every legal means. #cdnpoli
Justin Trudeau@JustinTrudeau

Assault-style firearms designed for military use have no place in our communities. That’s why we banned 1,500 of them today. Get the details here: pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-r…

English
36
80
257
0
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒 retweetledi
L. Wayne Mathison
L. Wayne Mathison@WayneMathison·
Rod, spare me the civics lecture. The CRTC may be structured as an independent commission, but it exists under federal law, follows federal broadcasting policy, and operates inside the regulatory framework created by Parliament and cabinet. Pretending it floats above politics like some sacred neutral cloud is childish. The Liberals created the policy environment. The CRTC is now trying to squeeze streaming services under that same framework. Canadians are allowed to object when unelected regulators start reaching deeper into what people watch and what companies must fund. Pierre understands the issue perfectly: this is another cost layered onto consumers in the name of “Canadian content,” bureaucracy, and cultural control. Call it a levy, contribution, fee, or tax. Same old Ottawa game. Rename the burden and hope people stop noticing. So no, the problem is not that Canadians “do not understand how Canada works.” Or Pierre. The problem is that too many people understand exactly how it works: politicians pass vague laws, regulators do the dirty work, and taxpayers get told it was all independent.
English
4
21
125
697
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒 retweetledi
Jon Fraser
Jon Fraser@JonFraserTF·
This is reprehensible. Moise shouldn't have been given a penny of taxpayer money. His behaviour was abhorant and he should have to pay the full cost of his defence. This guy has to go in the next election. ctvnews.ca/toronto/politi…
Toronto, Ontario 🇨🇦 English
16
60
264
3K
Public Safety Canada
Public Safety Canada@Safety_Canada·
Emergencies can have a greater impact on persons with disabilities. A power outage may disrupt elevators, transportation, and communication. Be prepared and learn how you can support others so everyone stays safe during an emergency: canada.ca/en/services/po…
Public Safety Canada tweet media
English
3
7
9
757
Howard Anglin
Howard Anglin@howardanglin·
The Americanisation of Canadian law continues. Here, the judge gives the game away up front. "In my view," he says, "the time has come that homelessness should be recognized as an analogous ground for the purposes of s.15 of the Charter." "In my view the time has come.” The rest of the reasoning could be lifted from an activist brief (and may well have been). For a trait to be covered by s.15 of the Charter, it must be an immutable characteristic. The classic examples are race and sex. Here, the judge decides that homelessness is an "immutable" trait despite the fact that, as he also acknowledges, it is mutable. Here is the judge's "reasoning": “The transitory nature of homelessness does not prevent this status from being considered an immutable characteristic. It is one of those characteristics that, while they last, are considered beyond an individual's conscious control.” So being homeless is an unchangeable fact ... but also transitory. Permanent, but temporary. Unchangeable, but changeable. This is not law. It's activist sophistry.
Diana Chan McNally@DianaCMcNally

BIG news out of Kitchener-Waterloo: the Ontario Superior Court has ruled that homelessness is an analogous ground for discrimination under s.15 of the Charter. This is a BIG step toward recognizing homeless people as an equity-seeking group under the law. Governments take note!

English
71
169
811
77.3K
Mario Zelaya
Mario Zelaya@mario4thenorth·
INSANE A corrupt mayor in Laval stole millions from his city. He pleaded guilty in 2016. $7M was recovered from his Swiss bank account. The CRA then sent a $1 million bill for unpaid taxes. Now Ottawa is paying that bill with federal tax dollars. Our taxes are paying the tax on the money a corrupt mayor stole. And the Minister of Finance authorized this.
Mario Zelaya tweet media
English
256
1.8K
3.9K
57.9K
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒 retweetledi
Yossi BenYakar
Yossi BenYakar@YossiBenYakar·
Denmark just released official crime statistics broken down by origin. The groups with the highest crime rates are from Somalia, Palestine, and Morocco. For years, European leaders denied any connection between mass immigration from certain countries and rising crime. Now the data is becoming impossible to ignore. How much longer will they keep pretending this isn’t happening?
Yossi BenYakar tweet media
English
144
2K
3.9K
72.6K
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒 retweetledi
Tracey Wilson
Tracey Wilson@TWilsonOttawa·
Just like in Alberta, Saskatchewan’s Firearm office exists to support their citizens and the safe, legal use of firearms while at the same time developing good public safety policy. I know you’ll never get it, but we aren’t the enemy. 🇨🇦
PolySeSouvient / PolyRemembers@Polysesouvient

Can't get more biased that this: Both current and former Saskatchewan Firearms Commissioners headlining #GunLobby Annual General Meeting: "important to connect with 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲"

English
6
56
376
8.5K
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒 retweetledi
JamesMc | 🇨🇦 🇬🇧
Public Safety Canada—the department running the Liberal government’s firearms confiscation compensation scheme—has no analysis, no evidence, and no data to show the program will make anyone safer.
English
3
6
56
743
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒 retweetledi
SanchoPanza on Dapple
SanchoPanza on Dapple@PanzaOnDapple·
@Safety_Canada Provincial governments and police leaders have spoken load and clear: this is BAD PUBLIC POLICY. This silly, ideologically motivated approach needs to be reversed. Please park this nonsense. Public Safety Canada has way better things to spend its finite resources on.
English
0
1
5
77
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒 retweetledi
Calibre
Calibre@Calibremag·
Damn, bro. Randomly going back to the mic on an unrelated question to also say, "gun owners, protect your guns. Simple as that. Don’t ever give them away," while standing like three feet from one of the Liberal cabinet's gun ban champions? You gotta love it.
English
133
352
2.1K
43.4K
Tovarisch ĐⓇØιD🕐🕘🕕🕒 retweetledi
Tim Thielmann
Tim Thielmann@timthielmann·
@TaraArmstrongBC Wow, look at all the Elbozos in these replies triggered by the concept of alleviating the debt and tax burden of young people.
English
20
2
50
1.2K
Tara Armstrong
Tara Armstrong@TaraArmstrongBC·
Boomers came of age in the most prosperous era in history: cheap homes, high wages, and abundant jobs. But Gen Z and Millennials have inherited none of those fruits. I'm proposing a 50% tax cut for anyone under 40 to provide relief for past generations' reckless spending.
English
760
167
1.7K
102.5K
Amy☀️
Amy☀️@therealamy86·
Shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, tits. Only the cool kids won’t need to look this up.
English
1.5K
192
6.3K
301.4K
altheboss
altheboss@AlTheBoss03·
Name a player who NEVER wore another jersey. One team. One city. One legacy. Go. 🔒
English
4.8K
55
1.1K
3.2M
Super 70s Sports
Super 70s Sports@Super70sSports·
Name a sports figure who wore glasses in competition. I’ll start:
Super 70s Sports tweet media
English
977
31
954
141.7K
Sailor Park Boy
Sailor Park Boy@fantail49834087·
@droid1963 @ForgotWeapons Millions of Cooeys were produced sans serial numbers. Since Cooey OEM'd for dozens of brands, they'd be unserialized too. Imagine putting a sticker on a gun to distinguish it from millions of other identical ones. You could move the sticker to another gun and no one would know
English
1
0
2
58
Forgotten Weapons
Forgotten Weapons@ForgotWeapons·
A note to FFLs: While it is illegal to remove a serial number, guns made prior to 1968 are not legally required to have them. You don't need to make one up. A Remington Berthier does not actually have serial number "87654".
English
25
56
1.7K
45.4K