Ed Tarleton

995 posts

Ed Tarleton banner
Ed Tarleton

Ed Tarleton

@edtarleton

Royal Academy of Engineering Senior Research Fellow in Materials Modelling for Fusion Energy @uniofoxford Supernumerary Fellow @StAnnesCollege

Oxford, England Katılım Aralık 2017
511 Takip Edilen785 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
Our latest paper will hopefully be useful to people new to crystal plasticity and explains our code starting from the fundamental equations. Code, examples and paper are open access. OXFORD-UMAT: An efficient and versatile crystal plasticity framework doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso…
English
0
2
12
19.9K
Ed Tarleton retweetledi
Derek Pederson 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇻🇪
Science fiction nerds are gonna hate me for saying this but the Great Filter is that interstellar travel is probably more or less impossible and there is no reason to come up with any other explanation for that.
English
459
88
4.8K
334.4K
Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell
INTERNATIONAL BLOCK THE BULLOCKS DAY - MAY 23 Since dropping the movie SLEEPING DOG, I’ve been watching. Watching how certain government factions and their IC-adjacent operatives respond when truth reaches the public. What I’ve confirmed is no longer theory. It’s documented. And honestly? It’s weaksauce. Here’s what I now have hard confirmation on… Certain government initiatives have been LEGALLY deploying coordinated bot networks and paid sockpuppet accounts to flood UAP news stories with disinformation. This isn’t speculation. Just 10 days ago 13 MAY, CIA Senior Operations Officer James E. Erdman III (@Jerdman2005) testified before the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee about exactly this kind of internal corruption. Look it up. I’ve kept my comments open for years - deliberately. It was an investigative choice. To observe how they operate. Let them reveal their playbook. Let them think they’re winning 😉 They did. They weren’t 🥋 And I’ll say this plainly. I expected more. The tactics are unsophisticated. The bots are clumsy. The narratives are recycled and lazy. The people running these operations either fundamentally underestimate the American public - or they’ve simply never had a real conversation with one. Either way, they miscalculated - on a monumental level. And that’s fascinating! Patience has a season. That’s over. Today I’m doing something simple and clarifying. I’m blocking approximately 50 accounts - bots, paid shills, and regime-serving noise rustlers - who’ve been weaponizing my platform, your platform, our platform… to muddy the waters on UAP disclosure. When I’m done, see who I blocked. That’s what a state-adjacent influence operation looks like up close. Unimpressive. Outmatched. Exposed. Let me be direct about who is getting blocked. These are not skeptics. These are not critical thinkers. These are not even worthy adversaries. These are people who sold their intellectual credibility - if they ever had any - to run interference on the single most important truth-seeking conversation in human history. They are less perceptive than the average American asking honest questions at their kitchen table. They got paid to be blind. To the IC professionals doing the right thing - you already know what I’m referencing. Check your own systems. The JWICS. You know the operation. You know the memo - the one where @CIA outlined how to “shape the emerging UAP narrative.” I’ve read it. I’ve reported it. @G_Knapp knows too. The people with integrity inside these institutions know EXACTLY what I’m talking about. Don’t capitulate. To everyone else, my WEAPONIZED family… you were never as fooled as they needed you to be. You were never as passive as they counted on. And you are not going to stop now. ONE battlefield is social media - and we can use that against them. But the REAL battlefield? It’s simpler and older and more powerful than any algorithm they’ve ever built. It’s your voice. In your kitchen. At your job. With your family. On your street. Unfiltered, unmanaged, and pointed directly at the truth. They can manipulate a feed. They cannot manipulate a conversation between two people who have decided to stop being quiet. So here’s the move… BE LOUD. TAG PEOPLE. SAY WHAT YOU MEAN. MEAN WHAT YOU SAY. FOLLOW THROUGH. Nothing disrupts a perception management operation faster than millions of clear-eyed people talking to each other without permission. Today, 23 MAY is International Block The Bullocks Day. Clean your house. Block the noise. Make room for the real fight. Because serious, rigorous, legitimate debate on UAP is not only welcome here - it is necessary for what comes next. The public deserves that debate. The truth demands it. The Gremlins getting starved now - no more feeding them 🐺👾 “Let’s light this candle.” - Alan Shepard (First American in space / 5 MAY, 1961) Your brother in this fight, always, Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell (aka 5Name) GO GO UFO!!! 🛸🥷
English
75
75
425
25.8K
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@RedPandaKoala Trust me bro! I’ve had like eight missed calls from my girlfriend who is real and not made up on the spot.
English
0
0
2
409
Red Panda Koala
Red Panda Koala@RedPandaKoala·
Eric Weinstein was approached by people within the government regarding UFO disclosure following his American Alchemy episode with Eric Davis “The thing that you saw with Jesse Michaels in American Alchemy, boy, did that get a response inside the government from that particular episode. I had a lot of people who had stopped talking to me about UFOs who suddenly, you know, I had like eight calls immediately after it aired ‘Hey, Eric, just thought I'd catch up with you’ I was like ‘oh, okay.’ There was a huge discussion inside and the first uh without getting into particulars, the first official outreach, like really official outreach, the checks in the wake of that episode. And I'm not under any NDAs.”
English
18
33
374
36K
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@AshtonForbes On slide 1 they define a gauge potential phi then the standard field tensor F_ij the problem is if phi is the gradient of a scalar then F_ij = 0 as mixed partial derivatives commute. The equations as written appear to define a field tensor that mathematically cancels itself out.
English
0
0
1
76
Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes@AshtonForbes·
I guarantee you not a single person will correct this math. No one wants the math. None of them understand it. That's just something stupid people yell to sound smart. "Hurr durr show me the math." Okay, here it is.
Ashton Forbes tweet mediaAshton Forbes tweet mediaAshton Forbes tweet mediaAshton Forbes tweet media
English
47
14
135
7.9K
Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes@AshtonForbes·
Here's the math for free energy. Physicists missed an entire dimension. There are no closed systems. When physics found out zero point energy was real experimentally via Casimir effect, lamb shift, etc, they calculated the energy density and found it to be practically infinite. That's the math, and they hated it, so they renormalized it to nothing. Do you still want to debate the math of zero point energy? I'm ready. We don't have a math or science problem, we have a psychology problem.
Abderrahim AOURIR@aourirabderahim

Some gold nuggets from old @AshtonForbes videos on Free Energy ● Video 1: youtube.com/watch?v=J9D-3A… 1:31:18 ● Video 2 and 3: youtube.com/watch?v=AixitH… > 1:37:48 > 2:13:50

English
49
72
373
19.6K
Math Guy TFL
Math Guy TFL@MathGuyTFL·
Solve the integral.
Math Guy TFL tweet media
English
19
8
144
12.9K
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@Science_TechTV Follow the radar reflection. How hard can it be? It shows how difficult things are if you go back to first principles.
English
0
0
2
1.2K
World of Science
World of Science@Science_TechTV·
Guided missile of early 1960. Note how much electronics you need when there is no Microprocessor available
World of Science tweet mediaWorld of Science tweet media
English
18
74
963
79.8K
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@ProofofMaro Personal choice. I never had any interest in making money. There are far my interesting things in life. Some of my friends I studied physics with have made a lot of money though.
English
0
0
2
105
maro
maro@ProofofMaro·
If physicists are so smart why haven’t they figured out how to make any money yet
English
221
30
496
1.4M
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@JamesMelville This looks like the worst place to put them!! I’m very worried vibrations from passing trains will generate fatigue cracks in the panels destroying their efficiency!
English
0
0
1
48
James Melville 🚜
James Melville 🚜@JamesMelville·
Switzerland 🇨🇭 Solar panels on train tracks. A hell of a lot more logical than plastering over prime farmland.
James Melville 🚜 tweet media
English
1.3K
7.6K
37.8K
1.8M
Alexey Petrov
Alexey Petrov@AlexeyPetrov·
This tape contains Paul Dirac’s lecture (yes, that Paul Dirac, one of the founders of quantum mechanics) at the University of South Carolina. This tape is also legendary; it has been missing for the past 32 years! And guess what: Prof. Frank Avignone found it today!
Alexey Petrov tweet media
English
97
321
3K
76.9K
Martin
Martin@martinmrmar·
Just ordered this used book from Amazon for $6... I remember using a 3rd edition of this textbook for my Linear Algebra course 20 years ago...
Martin tweet media
English
3
7
122
3.2K
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@skdh @DrBeaVillarroel @Rizstanford It sounds like defects in the photographic emulsion rather than UFOs. Old glass plates are fragile, small scratches, dust specks, missing emulsion etc could create spots. Has that been ruled out?
English
5
0
2
678
Sabine Hossenfelder
Sabine Hossenfelder@skdh·
Astrophysicists have found evidence of UAPs in old photographic plates. Something seems to have been orbiting around our planet before we had satellites! This finding has been independently confirmed. Still, scientists are afraid to speak out. @DrBeaVillarroel @Rizstanford
English
332
920
6K
469.8K
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@ReadySetBrian That’s impressive. My solution was trivial in comparison! I’ll give you a hint: it’s impossible to solve just by looking at the numbers in the series…
English
0
0
0
19
TimWhatley
TimWhatley@ReadySetBrian·
Ah, I had a complicated solution. It figured it was like a triplet Fibonacci thing. T1 = (2, 3, 5) T2 = (4, 5, 9), delta from T1 = (+2, +2, +4) T3 = (3, 3, 6), delta from T2 = (−1, −2, −3) T4 = (4, 3, 7), delta from T3 = (+1, 0, +1) equals (+2,+2,+4) + (−1,−2,−3) So every triplet is a+b=c. Every delta vector satisfies a+b=c. And consecutive deltas sum to the next delta. So like a Fibonacci within a Fibonacci sorta thing.
English
1
0
1
103
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
If you solve this, you’re different. Can you solve it? 2, 3, 5, 4, 5, 9, 3, 3, ?, ?
English
1
0
1
170
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@ReadySetBrian That’s not the solution I was looking for but I’m curious to see your workings… my solution is very simple. There are only two more terms. It terminates after that.
English
1
0
0
48
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@carl_stein_ @FoxNews Your intuition is correct.
Mick West@MickWest

This is stupid. The 10 people represent vastly fewer deaths and missing people than you'd expect from the population represented by those 10 people, whichever way you slice it. Doocy's framing is "access to classified nuclear or aerospace material." The relevant population is the cleared workforce in those sectors. Conservatively: - Los Alamos National Laboratory: ~16,000 employees and contractors - Sandia National Laboratories: ~17,000 - Lawrence Livermore: ~8,000 - NASA (full agency + contractors): ~60,000 - Kansas City National Security Campus: ~7,000 - Air Force Research Laboratory and associated contractors: ~10,000+ - Aerospace defense contractors with nuclear/classified aerospace roles (Lockheed, Raytheon, Northrop, Boeing, Aerojet, etc.): several hundred thousand A conservative minimum for "access to classified nuclear or aerospace material" is at least 500,000 people. The actual figure using Doocy's framing is arguably closer to 1–2 million if you include all cleared aerospace and defense contractor personnel. Expected deaths over ~2 years The ages of the 10 average around 59. For educated US professionals aged 45–70, annual all-cause mortality runs roughly 0.7–1.0% per year. Using 500,000 people at 0.8% per year over 2 years: Expected deaths = 500,000 × 0.008 × 2 = 8,000 Even in a far more restricted population of 50,000 the expected deaths are 800. Finding 10 is not anomalous — it is a near-invisible fraction of expected mortality. Expected homicides US homicide rate is approximately 6 per 100,000 per year. In 500,000 people over 2 years: Expected homicides = 500,000 × 0.00006 × 2 = 60 The list contains at most 2 genuine homicides (Loureiro and Grillmair) with identified perpetrators and no UAP connection. That is below the expected rate. Expected missing persons Roughly 600,000 people are reported missing in the US annually — about 0.18% per year. In 500,000 people over 2 years: Expected missing = 500,000 × 0.0018 × 2 = 1,800 The list contains 5 missing persons. Again, well within expectation. You can restrict the calculation to just "scientists"; it does not change anything. It's just cherry-picking some cases from the expected thousands and calling it a pattern.

English
1
0
2
58
Carl Stein
Carl Stein@carl_stein_·
@FoxNews What % of population go missing nationally? What % of scientists gone missing? I bet you it's roughly the same ratio towards scientists going missing less % than the general population.
English
4
1
2
2.4K
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
BREAKING: President Trump vows to look into the 10 scientists who have gone missing or turned up dead: "I hope it's random, but we're going to know in the next week and a half." "I just left a meeting on that subject." "Pretty serious stuff... Some of them were very important people, and we're going to look at it over the next short period." @pdoocy
English
1.2K
5.2K
23.4K
2.3M
Bob Golen
Bob Golen@BobGolen·
H₂O is the formula for water. The formula for ice is H₂O³
English
188
475
10.8K
755.1K
Deivon Drago
Deivon Drago@DeivonDrago·
@edtarleton @DrJavierDeLaHe1 There literally is a bit in his main write up where he puts forward a “dog ate my homework” type of excuse for not providing evidence for a few key points.
English
1
0
1
50
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@UAPFilesPodcast A fellow Brit! Mate the problem is Lazar doesn’t have scarce expertise! When he talks about physics it’s very clear he hasn’t studied physics and doesn’t understand physics! He’s like those fantasists that buy medals on eBay and claim to have been in the SAS!
English
1
0
2
71
UAP Files
UAP Files@UAPFilesPodcast·
There is a common theme among skeptics around Bob Lazar’s education: whether he made up or exaggerated it, or “beefed up” his CV and that, if true, the rest of his story is therefore compromised. I want to explore this a little and explain how it’s actually entirely consistent with U.S. intelligence operations and recruitment practices during that era. And I’m going to provide documented cases, not speculation. Not only are there various documented examples, but in many operations 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙩, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧. So I’d ask those skeptics who use a (possible) fake degree as a prerequisite for “no chance they’d recruit him bro” to take a look at the following examples: The U.S. brought over 1,600 German scientists, including some with Nazi affiliations, to work on the V-2 rocket program, early space programs, and military research (Wernher von Braun, for example). Literally Nazis. Operation Paperclip. MK-Ultra involved not only unsuspecting subjects, but also compromised collaborators. They used morally compromised actors and researchers. CIA recruitment and cooperation with the mafia over plots against Fidel Castro. Flipping smugglers, traffickers, hackers, and arms dealers. Think Iran-Contra. Sidney Gottlieb recruited external academics to test hypnosis, LSD, and mind-control techniques on many unsuspecting subjects. What are the chances these individuals all had pristine degrees, completed their manual handling “bend at the knees” employment courses and fully traceable HR records? Ewen Cameron conducted “psychic driving,” extreme electroshock, and drug experiments, secretly funded by the CIA. Again, do you think these individuals all had rock-solid clearances and neatly traceable diplomas? Would they be recorded in the disclosable FOIA records (if such things existed at the time, of course) @ddeanjohnson’s mind would be blown with the lack of paper trail at this point. Stargate Project included Ingo Swann, essentially an artist - zero psychological training, working with the intelligence community on remote viewing and training. Physicist Jack Sarfatti, who is documented as being involved in related work, stated categorically to me twice, that he wasn’t asked to sign any NDAs. They were “hippies” with “chaotic” lifestyles. Jack Parsons, an early rocket program founder, was involved in occult practices, lost his security clearance, and sparked documented discussions about security vs. talent trade-offs. Ring any bells? Edwin Wilson, a CIA-linked operative, recruited engineers and technicians into covert work involving explosives training in Libya (he was later convicted). When the core mission is military or technological superiority, scarce expertise outweighs ethical concerns often - the greater good yada yada yada. Right now, intellegence services and police forces across the globe (including USA & UK) can and have recruited children as covert sources. That’s not conspiracy, it’s legislated for, UK: “Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Juveniles) Order 2000/Regulation of Investigatory Police Powers Act” There is even a section specifically for children as covert human sources and how “handlers” and “controllers” work. “Section 29C is now the primary statutory provision specifically about juvenile Covert Human Intelligence Sources in the Act itself.” So if you’re a skeptic and you think there’s no way they’d recruit someone like Bob Lazar, the guy known locally as the “rocket car man” to work on solving a problem as important as this… Do you really think: 1.They’d gaf if he had a degree? 2.They don’t have a very long history of doing exactly this?
UAP Files tweet media
English
48
28
190
19.9K
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@DrJavierDeLaHe1 @DeivonDrago It’s too mathematical for me to follow all the details but I know enough physics to see GU is incomplete and missing the technical details needed to properly evaluate it. It’s like he wrote a few plot notes but goes around claiming to have written a best selling novel!
English
1
0
2
36
Javier De La Hera
Javier De La Hera@DrJavierDeLaHe1·
@DeivonDrago I really dislike the way he presents his ideas and is dismissive of people that disagree reasonably with him. I'm not qualified to evaluate his geometric unity theory so I won't comment on it
English
2
0
2
155
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
@AlchemyAmerican Lazar sounds credible to the public but to anyone who has actually put the work in to get the credentials Lazar claims (eg degrees in physics and engineering, staff scientist posts at national labs etc) it’s clear Lazar is lying. He doesn’t understand advanced physics/Engineering
English
1
0
2
131
Jesse Michels
Jesse Michels@AlchemyAmerican·
Bob Lazar says that he can recreate the exotic, gravity-altering force used by the UFO he worked on with his personal lab equipment.
English
179
278
4K
301.4K
Ed Tarleton
Ed Tarleton@edtarleton·
🚨Fully funded PhD with Rolls-Royce at Oxford: dislocation-informed crystal plasticity modelling of hydrides in zirconium alloys. Critical work for nuclear materials. UK security clearance required. DM me for further info. Details here: findaphd.com/phds/project/d…
English
0
0
2
143