Street Fighta

396 posts

Street Fighta

Street Fighta

@eek4436

☦️

Katılım Nisan 2025
9 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler
Street Fighta
Street Fighta@eek4436·
@JesuitJunkrat Don't expect conceptual engagement from the texts with him. He throws things out to see what sticks, sadly. Seemingly not a serious engager.
English
1
0
5
149
Shawn Rev Reads Willson
Shawn Rev Reads Willson@RevReads289·
Why do I deny the imputation of Adam's guilt? It's wrong to condemn someone for a sin they did not commit. Why do I accept the imputation of Christ's righteousness? It's glorious to give someone grace and mercy that is underserved.
English
11
5
36
1.3K
Street Fighta
Street Fighta@eek4436·
@MarkMacdonald75 @rootcausesleuth @mpdesmond @ReformedCaio Also, why would you want an earned righteousness that's had by Christ obeying the law in your place? Why not have God's actual righteousness whereby he's righteous? x.com/i/status/20235…
Street Fighta@eek4436

@dgh5391 @jesserandolph_ To receive the uncreated righteousness of God the Word. "To declare His righteousness. What is declaring of righteousness? Like the declaring of His riches, not only for Him to be rich Himself, but also to make others rich, or of life, not only that He is Himself living,

English
0
0
1
74
Caio Rodrigues
Caio Rodrigues@ReformedCaio·
There are three imputations involved in salvation. 1. The imputation of Adam’s first sin. 2. The imputation of sins to Christ such that He bears their guilt and punishment. 3. The imputation of Christ’s full satisfaction and perfect obedience.
English
7
0
27
1.4K
ZZZZZZIFFSTER
ZZZZZZIFFSTER@IFFFMEISTER·
@EddyEkofo if Anglicanism is just popery, then St. Augustine was a papist - is that fair to say?
English
2
0
7
674
Jessica
Jessica@swamthetiber25·
Quick question: How did God the Father look upon God the Son on the Cross?
English
11
3
14
2.8K
Street Fighta
Street Fighta@eek4436·
Therefore when we treat of the merit of Christ, we do not place the beginning in him, but we ascend to the ordination of God as the primary cause, because of his mere good pleasure he appointed a Mediator to purchase salvation for us.
English
0
0
0
10
Street Fighta
Street Fighta@eek4436·
He who made him (without any antecedent merit in his will) of the seed of David a righteous man never to be unrighteous, also converts those who are members of his head from unrighteous into righteous” and so forth.
English
1
0
0
37
Street Fighta
Street Fighta@eek4436·
Christ rightly and properly said to have merited grace Institutes 2.17.1 1. A question must here be considered by way of supplement. Some men too much given to subtilty, while they admit that we obtain salvation through Christ, will not hear of the name of merit,
Street Fighta tweet media
English
1
0
0
52
Jessica
Jessica@swamthetiber25·
I abhor reformed theology more than just about anything else on Earth. Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) is problematic because it can imply a division within the Trinity, portraying the Father as punishing the Son rather than acting in perfect unity of will and love. It frames forgiveness as dependent on satisfying divine wrath through violence instead of as a free act of mercy, and can suggest God is bound by an external standard above Himself of retributive justice. It also raises coherence issues, such as how Christ’s finite suffering could satisfy an eternal penalty, and moral concerns about punishing the innocent when guilt cannot be transferred. Biblically and historically, PSA is difficult find as well.
𝕄𝕚𝕤𝕤𝕪@yesiwetmyplants

Either Christ bore your punishment, or you will. When Jesus hung on the cross, it wasn’t an example of just love only, it was substitution. He was wounded for transgressions that weren’t His. He was crushed for sins He never committed. That’s why the cross matters. If Jesus didn’t actually take the wrath you deserve for your sins, then that wrath still stands against you. God’s justice doesn’t disappear. Sin must be punished. The only question is, was it punished in Christ, or will it be punished in you?

English
185
16
169
51.8K