ekko0x

Crypto doesn’t need more tabs. It needs intelligence. Donut AI brings agentic execution to the browser, so research, decisions, and on-chain actions happen in one seamless flow. This is how crypto should work. @GigiWillliams @DonutAI

@bu8ekk @0xfairblock Yuji !? Cool art

2 faces and 1 strategy Confidentiality is @0xfairblock secret weapon 🍄

@Gorr1cETH @Nerochain_io Giving apps control over their own economics changes how value stays in the ecosystem

Sometimes the strongest thing a chain can build is not noise, but control. That is what keeps me paying attention to @Nerochain_io. NERO is not just trying to be another place where apps deploy. The bigger idea is that applications should be able to shape their own economies, define how users participate, and keep value moving inside their own ecosystem instead of losing that control to the base layer. That matters because real adoption is not only about speed or hype. It is about giving builders more freedom to design products that feel smoother, more flexible, and more sustainable for actual users. The focus on programmable transaction economics, paymaster flexibility, account abstraction tools, and builder-facing infrastructure makes NERO interesting from a long-term point of view. When a project keeps working on the rails behind the user experience, that is usually where the important progress happens. For me, NERO is one of those ecosystems worth watching closely this month.

@KeithbmBG Signature checks alone aren’t enough, risk needs to be evaluated too

Crypto doesn’t just need multisigs, but smarter multisigs. Traditional multisigs are great at verifying signatures, but that’s where it stops. They can’t check live market data, assess transaction risk, trigger alerts, or stop suspicious actions in real time. That’s the real weakness. The Drift exploit showed it clearly: once valid approvals were obtained, the multisig executed malicious actions because it couldn’t question them. Correct signatures didn’t mean safe transactions. Rialo’s Guarded Multisig changes that. Built with native web/API calls, private computation, and automation, it adds: • Live value-based transaction checks • Onchain alerts • Multi-factor authentication for large actions • Timelocked governance changes Instead of blindly executing, it can evaluate, escalate, delay, and protect. ➡️Rialo build multisigs that don’t just verify approvals, it actively understand risk. ➡️It’s building the security infrastructure crypto actually needs. gRialo fam @RialoHQ

@_CryptoNotes_ @Nerochain_io @Nerochain_Au @nero__jake One dashboard for AA workflows cuts a lot of dev friction

The NERO AA Platform is live with a complete overhaul One unified dashboard to manage every part of Account Abstraction Create API keys, configure gas sponsorship strategies, and monitor usage without jumping between tools 70 plus updates shipped Every screen redesigned New brand identity, fully mobile ready, built developer first What started as a simple paymaster dashboard has evolved into a full developer console API key creation Policy playground RPC testing Token management All inside a single clean interface Under the hood this is a full refactor across login, sidebar, analytics, settings, team pages, and mobile navigation Session management, i18n support, responsive design, and Sentry powered feedback come standard for teams shipping globally Scaling Account Abstraction matters but the real question is whether developer experience can keep up Now it can @Nerochain_io

Eugene Ludwig served as the 27th Comptroller of the Currency. That office regulates all national banks in the United States. Ludwig knows exactly how the system works, where it breaks down, and what it costs the institutions that operate inside it. He is now building Cari Network on ZKsync. That single fact is worth more than any theoretical argument about the future of finance. A former top U.S. banking regulator, with five regional banks and over $600 billion in combined deposits behind him, chose to build on this infrastructure rather than anywhere else. That is not a bet on blockchain in the abstract. It is a specific architectural decision made by people who have spent careers inside the system they are now rebuilding. The problem those institutions are solving is concrete. Correspondent banking requires banks to pre-fund settlement positions in advance across every corridor they operate in. Globally, that figure sits at $27 trillion in capital held idle, not invested, not deployed, simply parked to guarantee that settlement will clear when needed. Global deposits exceed $100 trillion and annual transaction volumes cross $3.7 quadrillion. The infrastructure underneath all of that activity was built before the internet existed and has never been replaced, only patched. The reason regulated institutions have not moved to blockchain infrastructure is not unfamiliarity. It is that the available architectures could not meet the minimum requirements for institutional operation. Transaction flows between banks carry commercially sensitive information that cannot be visible on a shared public ledger. Execution environments must be controllable and configurable to meet compliance obligations that vary by jurisdiction and counterparty. Settlement must be self-verifying, meaning the correctness of every transaction must be provable without relying on any third party to attest to it. And institutions cannot operate in isolation. They need the counterparties and liquidity that make the network useful in the first place. Public blockchains resolve some of these. They fail others. A purpose-built architecture was the only path forward. This is what @ZKsync built with Prividium, and it is why Cari Network chose it. On Prividium, each institution runs an entirely separate environment. Nothing about one institution's activity is visible to another. The proof that settlement occurred correctly, generated through zero-knowledge cryptography, is what posts to Ethereum. The underlying transaction never leaves the institution's environment. Regulators get scoped access to what they are entitled to examine. The settlement record on Ethereum is cryptographically final and requires no trusted party to validate it. Cari Network is not alone. Deutsche Bank is building Memento ZK Chain on the same infrastructure. First Abu Dhabi Bank is live on ADI Chain. BitGo has integrated institutional custody with Prividium. More than 35 institutions are in active evaluation. The adoption list reads like a directory of institutions that have done the technical and compliance work and reached the same conclusion independently. Each institution that joins does not simply add its own volume. It creates direct settlement corridors with every other institution already on the network. The coordination capacity of the system expands with every addition in a way that a fragmented correspondent banking model structurally cannot. $ZK is the only native asset of the ZKsync network. Its supply is fixed at 21 billion with no inflation. Governance operates through the Token Assembly, where holders vote on protocol decisions, the Security Council, which conducts technical review, and the Guardians, who hold emergency authority. $ZK is also the gas token for ZKsync Gateway, the layer that aggregates all ZKsync Network transactions before they settle on Ethereum L1. When the former top regulator of the U.S. national banking system builds on a network, the question of whether institutional finance is moving onchain is already answered. The remaining question is which infrastructure carries it. @ZKsync is building that infrastructure. $ZK is its only native asset.

@theboysaviour0x TradFi’s $27T coordination trap isn’t inefficiency, it’s broken rails. @zksync Prividium just fixed it: private ZK + Ethereum finality, with Cari, Deutsche, FAB & BitGo already live. This is the real upgrade $ZK

The financial system does not have an efficiency problem. It has a coordination problem that was never properly solved, and efficiency has been paying the price ever since. $27 trillion in pre-funded capital sits locked across correspondent banking accounts worldwide. It is not invested. It is not generating returns. It is there because institutions cannot coordinate settlement directly, so they hold liquidity in advance across every corridor they might need. Global deposits exceed $100 trillion. Annual transaction volumes reach $3.7 quadrillion. At that scale, even marginal friction compounds into enormous structural waste. The reason this persists is not inertia. It is that the system genuinely works, just not in a way that reflects what the underlying technology could support. Manual reconciliation, batched settlement cycles, multi-day finality, intermediary chains that each see a fragment of the flow but never the whole picture. Every step was a reasonable solution to a coordination problem that existed at the time it was designed. None of it was designed for programmable infrastructure. Programmable settlement changes the underlying logic entirely. When transactions can be verified mathematically and finality is inherited from a base layer rather than negotiated between counterparties, the intermediary chain becomes optional. Capital does not need to sit pre-funded against uncertainty. Settlement does not need to wait for batch windows. Coordination happens at the protocol level rather than through manual reconciliation across siloed ledgers. The question is not whether institutions will move onto this kind of infrastructure. The question is what that infrastructure needs to look like before they can. A regulated institution settling real value cannot operate on a public ledger where every transaction is readable by competitors, counterparties, and the broader market. It cannot cede control of its execution environment to an open permissionless network. It needs settlement that is verifiable without relying on a third party to certify it, and it needs to remain connected to the counterparties and liquidity it already depends on. These conditions are simultaneous requirements, not a ranked list. Infrastructure that satisfies three of the four is not viable for institutional use. This is the design problem @zksync solved with Prividium. Prividium gives each institution a fully isolated execution environment. Transactions settle internally without touching any shared state. The proof of that settlement, generated through zero-knowledge cryptography, is what gets published to Ethereum. The base layer confirms that every transaction is valid. It never sees the transaction itself. Auditors and regulators receive the access they require through selective disclosure, scoped precisely to what they need and nothing beyond it. The result is an architecture where privacy and verifiability are not in tension. They are both products of the same cryptographic process. Adoption is already past the evaluation stage. Cari Network, backed by 5 U.S. regional banks with over $600 billion in combined deposits, is building on the network. Deutsche Bank has its Memento ZK Chain in development. First Abu Dhabi Bank is live on ADI Chain. BitGo has integrated institutional custody with Prividium. More than 35 institutions are in active evaluation. These are not experimental engagements. They are production commitments from institutions whose compliance, legal, and technical teams have signed off on the architecture. Every institution that joins expands the network's settlement capacity not just by its own volume but by the number of new corridors it opens with every existing participant. The coordination surface grows with each addition. $ZK is the only native asset of the ZKsync network. Fixed supply of 21 billion tokens, no inflation. Governance runs through the Token Assembly, where holders vote on protocol-level decisions, the Security Council, which handles technical review of upgrades, and the Guardians, who provide an emergency safeguard. $ZK is also the gas token for ZKsync Gateway, where all network transactions are aggregated before settling on Ethereum L1. What is happening is not a disruption of traditional finance. It is a long-overdue infrastructure upgrade. The institutions are arriving, the coordination problem has a viable solution, and @zksync is the network carrying the transition forward. $ZK is its only native asset.

Been using @DonutAI ’s D0 for a few weeks now and honestly this might be the biggest leap in crypto trading I’ve seen in a long time. We’ve all been there. 12 tabs open, scanner going crazy, perps on one DEX, yield farming on another, Polymarket odds buried somewhere else, and you still miss the move because you’re flipping windows like a maniac. D0 just killed all that noise. One single chat. Natural language only. Voice if you feel like it. You type “long SOL 8x with 2 percent TP and trail the rest” and it scans on-chain flows, checks funding, grabs the best route on Jupiter, HyperLiquid or Donut perps, executes the order, sets your brackets, and keeps watching it while you sleep. No menus. No clunky confirmations. Just intent into execution into auto-management. The stack is actually insane: SCAN pulls everything from smart money wallets to liquidation heatmaps to CT sentiment in one go EXECUTE handles spot, perps up to 150x, bridging, the full toolkit YIELD actually surfaces real APY instead of rug bait ODDS pulls Polymarket alpha plus arb plays AUTO is the 24/7 agent that never needs babysitting OUTPUT drops clean PnL recaps and journals that actually help you improve This isn’t another AI bot that might front-run you. It feels like they finally built the trading OS we’ve all been asking for, the one that collapses every tool into a single brain that actually gets context. If you trade crypto seriously or even semi-seriously and you’re still doing the tab-juggling thing in 2026, why? D0 made trading feel like texting a ridiculously sharp friend who never sleeps and actually has your back. Thread is fire → x.com/DonutAI/status… I’m locked in. Who else is already running this?

@shafinbinnur1 @get_optimum Reliability under packet loss is what makes it scale

Most networks waste bandwidth repeating the same data. Optimum flips that model. Instead of duplication it uses coded distribution to move data smarter across multiple paths. > Faster delivery > Lower bandwidth usage > Reliable even with packet loss Less waste.More performance.

@I_m_Kronos @KASTxyz One app for hold, earn, and spend removes a lot of switching friction

.@KASTxyz is building something that sits between crypto and modern banking, but with a clearer focus on usability and real-world access. With KAST, everything is in one place. You can hold your funds, move them around, spend globally, and even earn on idle balances without jumping between different apps or services. It removes the usual back-and-forth that comes with managing crypto and traditional money separately. One of its strongest features is direct crypto spending. With the KAST card, users can pay anywhere traditional cards are accepted, while the system handles conversion in the background. This removes the usual friction of moving funds between exchanges and bank accounts before making everyday payments. There’s also a strong focus on making your money productive. Products like the USD Prime Vault allow users to earn yield on their balance through treasury-backed mechanisms, while still keeping access to their funds when needed. That balance between earning and flexibility is something many platforms struggle to get right. KAST is also built with a global audience in mind. Multi-language support, cross-border usability, and stablecoin integration make it accessible to people in different regions, not just a select market. Compared to traditional neobanks, the difference is clear. Neobanks improve how you interact with your bank, but they still operate within the same old financial system. KAST goes a step further by combining that familiar experience with blockchain infrastructure, giving users more control and fewer limitations. It feels like using a regular banking app, but with more freedom, more flexibility, and fewer barriers between your money and how you want to use it.

@KingsmenX7 @get_optimum Faster data propagation is the key to scaling multiplayer on chain

Let’s break down how Optimum and RLNC are rewriting the rules for on-chain gaming. In traditional gaming "lag" or "latency" is the enemy. In blockchain gaming, this problem is even worse because every move has to be sent as data across a decentralized network. If that data moves slowly, the game feels "clunky" and unplayable. ✧ The "Turbocharged" Gaming Experience. By using RLNC, Optimum ensures that game data flows without the typical stop-and-start delays of standard blockchains. This allows for: ✧ Real-Time Interaction: Faster data propagation means your moves happen almost instantly on-chain. ✧ Massively Multiplayer On Chain : Thousands of players can interact in the same digital world because the network can handle the massive stream of coded data packets without crashing. ✧ Complex Game States: Developers can build more detailed worlds with more moving parts, knowing that Optimum efficiency keeps the gas fees low and the speed high. ✧ Leveling Up Why Web3 Gaming Needs Optimum The dream of Full On-Chain Gaming has always been held back by slow networks. Optimum is the missing piece of the puzzle, providing the high-speed data layer required for immersive, fast-paced play. How Data Efficiency Changes the Rules. ✧ Lag-Free Combat: In a standard blockchain, losing a single data packet can freeze your game. With RLNC, the network reconstructs the "missing" data on the fly, keeping the action smooth. ✧ Sustainable Ecosystems: Low fees mean players can trade items, level up, and earn rewards without spending more on "gas" than the item is actually worth. ✧ True Ownership, Real Speed: Players get the security of the blockchain with the performance of a traditional server. ➥ Web3 gaming shouldn't feel like a compromise. By optimizing how game data moves, @get_optimum allows developers to create experiences that are just as fast and fun as the games we love today, but with the added power of decentralization.

@nixkhhil @PrismaXai @vivianrobotics Excited for the AMA Will be there

We’re hosting our first @PrismaXai AMA on the Indian regional channel 🇮🇳, and this one won’t be the usual format. This session is designed to be more interactive, more practical, and actually useful. We’ll be covering a full breakdown of this week’s progress, sharing insights on content creation, and discussing upcoming events you should be paying attention to. Alongside that, we’ll spend time explaining how the PrismaX progression system really works, With simple tips you can apply immediately to grow faster and more efficiently. If you’re new or planning to start contributing to PrismaX, this is a good entry point. You’ll get clarity on how things work, what to focus on, and answers to common doubts that usually slow people down early on. We’ll also be taking live questions during the Space, so you can get clear, direct answers in real time. If you prefer, you can drop your questions in advance in the comments and we’ll make sure to address them. ⏰ Time: 9 PM IST (3:30 PM UTC) If you’re active in the ecosystem or planning to be, this is one session you shouldn’t miss. Set your reminder, join in, and come prepared with questions. Expect useful takeaways, honest answers, and a better understanding of how to move forward. Join the discord here - discord.gg/prismaxai @vivianrobotics

@_CryptoNotes_ @RallyOnChain Yes, simple as that

@ekkosaviour @RallyOnChain How you earn? Only for posting?

came across @RallyOnChain a few weeks ago and didn't think much of it. assumed bots would be farming every campaign just like everywhere else. ran one campaign anyway. $12 earned. 624 followers. no connections. just a post that actually got read and evaluated. what changed my mind wasn't the payout. it was seeing manual banning actually happen. the community had been calling out bot accounts for weeks. Rally listened and acted on it. accounts gaming the system, gone. not eventually. just gone. on top of that, some campaigns now require a Minimum Sorsa Score to participate. your score isn't about how many followers you have, it's about whether the right people follow you. the pool gets filtered before a single post is submitted. other platforms let bots slide because activity numbers look better with them in the mix. Rally is doing the opposite, cutting bad actors so the people writing real posts actually have a shot. still new here. but a platform that removes cheaters instead of tolerating them is worth staying on. how long have you been on Rally?

@Alienx1312481 @dac_chain Separating rewards from the main token helps avoid immediate sell pressure

@dac_chain is a dual asset system comprising of DACT (which is the main token) and DACC (which is the reward points been earned now)DACC will be converted to DACT The reason for the dual asset system is to keep things smooth so token allo (rewards) won't affect the market price

@WazenHagen @raikucom Card looks clean Even though I'm not doing raiku

gRaiku! 🪪 I created cards to identify members of the Raiku community. 💬If you'd like to get a similar card for yourself, just write me a comment below this post, and I'll make one for you. 🙏If you're making one yourself, please tag me in your post. @raikucom #Raiku_IDcard

@kurlyk27 @SentientEco Clear tiered pricing without hidden limits is rare, makes planning easier

I finally made the jump to KIMI 2.6 this week. This is an important step for me as as open source AI advocate and @SentientEco ambassador. It has been my daily driver ever since. Found a pricing page that actually makes sense. Moderato at $19. Allegretto at $39. Allegro at $99. Vivace at $199. Four tiers, no tricks, no hidden limits that force you to upgrade mid-project. Just honest pricing for honest tooling. That kind of transparency is rare in this space. The $39 Allegretto plan is that rare 40% sweet spot. Kimi Code 5x credits, 2x agent credits, multi-tasking, cloud deploy, professional data support. You get everything you actually need without paying for bloat you won't touch. For under $40, you can run a serious production workflow. That's not entry-level pricing pretending to be premium. That's premium value pretending to be simple. It makes you rethink what you are paying for elsewhere. This is exactly what i mean when i talk about open-source AI winning. Apache 2.0 weights, a CLI you can self-host, and pricing that respects builders instead of extracting from them. You own the model. You own the workflow. You own the output. No one can change the terms on you tomorrow. Closed models want you locked in, confused, and overpaying. KIMI just wants you to build. The difference is obvious once you try it.

@NickRotenberg @get_optimum DeRAM tackling data access speed could matter as much as TPS going forward

📢 Why Optimum is important for Web3 Today, blockchains are becoming increasingly faster, but the industry still faces a serious challenge: network data transfer. Nodes constantly send the same information to each other, leading to network congestion, increased costs, and delays. What Optimum is building @get_optimum is building a dedicated layer for faster and more efficient data transmission in Web3 using RLNC technology developed at MIT. Its approach aims to: -> improve network efficiency by up to 20x -> reduce validator load -> lower unnecessary network traffic -> make data propagation more efficient DeRAM: Decentralized Memory for Blockchains The team is also developing DeRAM, a decentralized memory system designed to help blockchains handle data faster and more efficiently. As Web3 continues to grow, transaction speed alone won’t be enough. Data transfer speed may become equally important for the future of blockchain infrastructure. @blockchainjeff

@MrBeast like me = Gay

If this tweet has exactly 1 like in 24 hours I’ll give that person $1,000,000

@pinku_neel71449 Man you are consistent Keep it up

DeFi didnt make yield complicated it made it invisible. Most dashboards show you a clean APY. But they rarely show whats behind it. Where is the yield coming from? What risks are being taken? How often is the strategy changing? That gap between numbers and reality is where confusion and risk lives. This is where @ConcreteXYZ changes the game. Concrete isnt just about generating yield. Its about making it understandable. Behind every vault, there are structured, risk managed strategies. Diversified allocations. Continuous rebalancing. Transparent logic. You dont have to chase yields across multiple protocols. You dont have to guess what’s happening under the hood. One deposit. Clear strategy. Visible flow of capital. Because real innovation in DeFi isnt higher APY its knowing exactly how that APY is built. Concrete brings visibility back to yield. @crypttoji @nic_builds