Jane

@BBCLondonNews @JaniceM22974422 There are 3 ponds that include men. Men's pond Mixed pond Women's pond. There is NO pond for women to swim and change without men. This is direct sex discrimination.

@CraigMurrayOrg “Men are men” is not an extremist position. “Men are women” however, is.

This is an extremist position in the trans rights/women's rights debate. There seems an unhelpful rush to extremist positions on both sides.

Trans inclusion requires universal success in doing one of two things: 1.) Brainwashing every 11-year old girl into believing that a boy is a girl when he claims to be one and thus having no qualms about sharing a bed with him or 2.) Punishing and stigmatizing that girl as a hateful oppressor if she persists in correctly observing that claiming to be a girl doesn't turn a boy into a girl until she is too afraid to state her discomfort with sharing a bed with him aloud. The Democratic party, which has declared that forbidding any women or girl from drawing a boundary between herself and any man or boy who claims to be a woman is the Civil Rights Movement of the 21st Century is attempting to do both things: they are brainwashing every child to believe that any boy can be a girl by claiming to be one, and they are treating 11-year old girls who don't want to share intimate spaces with boys as the New Bull Connor who must be subject to punishment and repression and consigned to the dustbin of history. I predict that neither strategy can be made to work universally in any society that remains liberal, pluralistic, democratic, and free.

The 1% regret rate in gender medicine is the biggest red flag of all. The strongest possible indicator that research in the field is garbage. Activists expect us to believe that a man having his penis inverted, which creates an open wound that must be dilated for the rest of his life, has a 1% regret rate. That women who have appendages made out of their forearms sewn onto their groins — a surgery with astronomically high complication rates — has a 1% regret rate. That adolescent girls having medically unnecessary bilateral mastectomies at an age when the desire to be a mother and breastfeed is incomprehensible has a 1% regret rate. Absolutely impossible. Precisely zero chance this could ever be true. The explanation is multi-fold. First, no one loses all their friends and gets death threats for saying that they regret knee surgery. Second, "gender affirming" clinicians do precisely zero follow-up. Just chop off healthy body parts and disfigure genitals and then send the person off on their way. No concern for what comes of them. Then, there's the psychological factor. The power of irrevocability. When a decision cannot be undone, we are powerfully motivated to keep telling ourselves it was the right one. The self-deception is strong. The Dutch noted this in their follow-up study of the first wave of men to partake in this experiment. In a 1988 paper, they observed that the men reported being happy even though no actual change in their life situation was observed. This led the researchers to consider the possibility that in an effort to reduce cognitive dissonance, the participants “simply cannot accept the notion that all has been in vain. The self-reported happiness may have been distorted wishful thinking.” But this wasn't enough to end the experiment. In fact, the failures noted in this study are what caused the Dutch to turn their attention to children in the hopes of producing more pleasing cosmetic results.

STOP saying “tomboy.” That’s from the Biblical name Thomas. The native English word would be “knightmaiden,” from Old English cneht (“boy”) + mæġden (“girl”).

En hane som kastreras blir inte en hona, han blir en kastrerad hane.

Sverige behöver journalister som vågar tala sanning. Det här är inte en story om en ovanlig typ av kvinna som inte tillåts byta om tillsammans med vanliga kvinnor, utan om en man som vill klä av sig naken och titta på kvinnor som klär av sig nakna i damernas omklädningsrum.

Every video is better than the last.

What get erased when calling a someone a ‘trans person’ instead of simply ‘a man’ is how the rights of women and girls and homosexuals are being rendered meaningless Eg: “A trans person convicted of r-ping two women is placed in a women’s prison” reads very different from “A man convicted a r-ping two women is placed in a women’s prison” Which is exactly the reason the word ‘trans’ is used - to hide the truth ‘Trans’ is a big fat lie

Personally, I think it would have been far more powerful to refer to Scott honestly as a woman. The impact of seeing what was done to her in the impossible pursuit of denying her sex so successfully that everybody else would go along with it is powerful. Many people reading Jeff's dishonest pay about her will assume she's a man based on the pronouns he's used for her. And that dulls the seriousness of the harms that are being done by the privileges of Gender and Trans.

I don’t know the origins of this, but whoever wrote it nailed it.

Women who call themselves trans rely on their sex based rights as much as all women do, as it’s how they play sport & get pregnancy protections. “Trans rights are human rights” is actually just about the MEN who call themselves trans getting access to women’s spaces & sport.

Sexuality isn’t just about genitals. I as a gay man am attracted to other men, as in I’m attracted to male bodies. Male proportions, male pheromones, and yes, male genitalia. No amount of hormone therapy or surgical body modification can turn a female body into one that I would ever be attracted to. These entitled, predatory women need to stay the fuck away from us gay men. We are not validation objects for their dissociative cross-sex identity disorders.

This cracks me up lol- a man in woman face discovers he is not gay, and that calling another man “she” doesn’t change that

@Tea94852859 @WomenReadWomen @MTV Now I can’t unsee it

@WomenReadWomen @MTV Is it me, but that doodle of his looks like head of p*nises on top of each other. 😬

Pretttiestt girl in the whole world! 📍 Hunter Schafer at the #MetGala

Hunter Schafer's deleted Instagram post from 2018 is so disturbing that The Daily Mail once mistook it for a school shooter's manifesto. "My gender was so influenced by a need to be used by men." "My sexual orientation was not gay, it was not straight, is an attraction, always to misogyny." "Not feeling femme enough w/o being a victim of r*pe... The idea of being eaten used to arouse me."

The only coherent difference between “c1sgender” and “transgender” is sex. No one has ever clearly explained the supposed “gender” difference between a man (a so-called "c!s" man) and a man who identifies as a woman (a so-called "trans 'woman'"), or between a woman and a woman who identifies as a man. If the distinction between 'c1s' and 'trans' is not sex, then what is it? What trait do all people of one “gender” share that distinguishes them from everyone of another “gender”? So far, we know it's 'gender,' but not what 'gender' attributes are supposedly categorically definitive of both c1s and trans men and women. We're only told what it's not. Not sex. Not stereotypes. Not clothes. Not feelings. Not sexual orientation. Not personality. Not social roles. But, not what "woman gender" actually is and how it is different from "man gender." Until the question of what it actually is can be answered coherently, “gender identity” cannot be accepted as a mechanism that overrides women’s rights, boundaries, language, spaces, or political organizing. Feminism is for women. Feminism that cannot exclude male people from female-only spaces is not liberation from male subjugation. It is the abandonment of women’s right to organize as a distinct class of human being and a organization of women into a secondary class that prioritizes a man's right to identify as a woman over the rights of actual women. Presentation, paperwork, pronouns, hormones, surgery, and identity claims may describe how a man wants to be perceived or treated. Those are not meaningful category differences. They do not make him female, and they do not distinguish him from actual men or any other man. The only consistent difference between a man and a man who claims to be a woman is his claim. That claim may be meaningful to him and women who recognize themselves in his portrayal. It is meaningless to me and most women who do not recognize any similarity. It does not oblige women to believe him nor to agree his degrading presentation of our humanity represents women.

A sane man who claims to be female is not honest. An honest man who claims to be female is not sane.

There is no "basic right" to be legally recognized as something you are not -- only an imperious demand that state power be deployed to coerce the whole world into falsifying reality