Fatalution

@Darrenstwitter @MisterSpace3 @deltasyn That’s correct. Yet, NVIDIA initially claimed DLSS 5 is aware of the in-scene geometry, lighting and other in-engine variables and takes all of them into account when in work. You don’t need anything other than the frame to upscale. ALTERING the frame requires more data though.

@fatalution @MisterSpace3 @deltasyn Every frame displayed is technically 2d TV screens are flat after all, that's also how all scaling works it buffers the frame then runs it though an algorithm and creates the extra pixels.

Same crowd screaming “#DLSS5 is AI slop that ruins art” praises games with heavy motion capture of real actors for faces, bodies & dialogue TLOU, God of War, SpiderMan, all called “lifelike masterpieces” But DLSS 5 adds photoreal lighting & materials (dev-controlled) and suddenly it’s “uncanny garbage”? Outrage or hypocrisy? You tell me

@MisterSpace3 @Darrenstwitter @deltasyn You wrote: NVIDIA Didn't Lie. Jensen Huang called it the fusion of controllable graphics (structured data) with neural rendering (generative AI). The truth: DLSS 5 is a filter that only has an image and motion vectors as inputs. There are no “controllable” graphics to be found.

@fatalution @Darrenstwitter @deltasyn maybe if one is stupid and not even able to comprehend what he's reading... he should not waste my time?

@MisterSpace3 @Darrenstwitter @deltasyn Eat your own words. What you wrote is pure blatant lie. NVIDIA has now confirmed that DLSS 5 takes a 2D rendered frame plus motion vectors as input Source: VideoCardz.com videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-co…

@fatalution @Darrenstwitter @deltasyn x.com/MisterSpace3/s…

@MisterSpace3 @Darrenstwitter @deltasyn DLSS 5’s lighting has nothing to do with “realistic”. This slop overexposes everything and places every character it sees under inexistent studio lights, ignoring the actual scene’s light sources. Moreover, this filter doesn’t know about the scene as it only works with 2D frame

@Darrenstwitter @deltasyn Exactly mocap gives the hyperreal performance data no hand-keyframing alone could match, then animators tweak. DLSS 5 does the same for lighting/materials on the exact assets devs created. Both push beyond pure hand-craft. The hypocrisy stands!

@nimlot26 Eat your own words videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-co…

@Kneckt @TakGoUp @wccftech I advise you to obtain a new pair of eyes

@TakGoUp @wccftech You’re genuinely proving the post right lol. You can see the same shape in the first image, except it’s covered by multiple shadows and areas that aren’t lit the same way. Keep coping and crying

"Most people bashing DLSS 5 are on the peak of ignorance" Veteran game artist shows exactly how much of a difference lighting can make. 🔗 wccf.tech/1k1l4

@NGGJimmy @WrestleDemon @beyond_fps Because it’s an AI filter that you can tweak

@WrestleDemon @beyond_fps If it runs purely on NVIDA GPU though driver (or external software), why Nvidia is releasing SDK and put it in the Streamline branch for devs to use and integrate?

So ... turns out that those studios that "made" those DLSS 5 clips didn't know anything about it, either. It was obviously Nvidia, hence why they all look the same.

@compusemble “Same model. Same geometry”. Sure

Great comparison here. DLSS 5 off vs on. Same face model. Same geometry. Better lighting.

@Pixel452 @coolingreviews @GamersNexus A “bit” off? I’m sorry, but DLSS5 in this example - which NVIDIA cherry picked proudly put on display as one of the best, by the way - totally ruined the character and just changed him. “Oh they can fine tune” - no, bud. It’s gen AI. It simply can’t be a substitute for render

@fatalution @coolingreviews @GamersNexus I disagree, I think the image quality is better in many aspects. I'm not saying it's perfect or that the faces don't look a bit off in some cases, but it's a far cry from being shit.

DLSS5 makes this look like an AI generated dating profile picture used to scam an old person in another country. Just looks like every other AI generated image of a "person." No character or soul to it. Art loses what makes it impressive when it all looks like generated slop.

@Pixel452 @coolingreviews @GamersNexus No, my friend. I have no problem with AI per se. I use AI tools daily, including gen AI. What I do have problem with is AI slop substituting actual creativity and being sold as something “better” than actual creative work. It looks like shit - plain and simple.

@fatalution @coolingreviews @GamersNexus You don't know, you see AI and you start whining. I'd like to know more about how this tech works and behaves. Leon looks amazing, Grace seems a bit different, but it might be the lighting. Let's not jump to the guns with almost zero info.

Send your best NVIDIA DLSS5 memes so that I can smash them into a video about this dumpster fire. I'll start.

@Pixel452 @coolingreviews @GamersNexus Aiming to be photorealistic is not the same as “please make this image more real” prompt in any genAI garbage chatbot. But it’s exactly what we have displayed here.

@fatalution @coolingreviews @GamersNexus RE9 clearly aims at be photorealistic and does a good job at that.

@GamersNexus Couldn’t have put it better

The problem, and I know this is hard to follow, is that it... looks like shit If you smeared dog shit on a camera lens, lit someone's face up with about $8,000 of studio-grade 5500K lighting, and then added some lipstick, you get DLSS5. It looks like shit. It's that simple.

@coolingreviews @GamersNexus NVIDIA is only now announcing this technology. Game devs have not touched it. Their message about devs having control over it is for the future autumn release. The demos you have seen right now are pure AI slop bullshit. Just look at how Indiana Jones face was changed

@fatalution @GamersNexus Oh sweet summer child, the developers chose this DLSS5 implementation. Maybe do some basic research before spouting nonsense?

@coolingreviews @GamersNexus And who the hell told you that RE9 creators designed the character to look “reaslistic”? Creative intent and visual style is something that will always look “unrealistic”. It’s not something that needs “fixing”. Otherwise - why play games? Go ahead and watch YT videos

@GamersNexus Oh come on now, that's hyperbole. I'll have to see more examples in action, but this looks decent IMHO. Heck, I'd argue that the "original" face has more of a model look. The DLSS 5 version looks more realilstic.

@kandideerraver @bapples367 If “almost all” assets you use have to be unpacked to function, that says more about the assets than VRC. That’s not normal, never was normal - and just indicative of the very poorly made asset.

@bapples367 ita stupid that VRC as a whole has this as an option because almost all the assets you use for it have to be unpacked to even function sometimes

this popup annoys me

@Atriox_ @ScreamerRSA @VideoCardz And the initial comment was talking about GPU fans only. Because it’s…a GPU driver…?

@fatalution @ScreamerRSA @VideoCardz I already said that I read the thread in my tweet responding to you and that this only affects GPUs. Love the irony.

(Driver) NVIDIA GeForce Game Ready 595.59 videocardz.com/driver/nvidia-…

@Atriox_ @ScreamerRSA @VideoCardz Bro, just…read

@fatalution @ScreamerRSA @VideoCardz Are you blind? Re-read my tweet. Pompous asshole.

@Atriox_ @ScreamerRSA @VideoCardz Are you blind?

@fatalution @ScreamerRSA @VideoCardz I have been googling it and I found nothing. That thread says that the only fans affected are GPU fans too.

@VideoCardz Fan control and hardware monitoring is broken thanks to this. NVIDIA AI shitfest continues