
Giovanni Ciriani
212 posts

Giovanni Ciriani
@gciriani
Managing Partner GSHT





We now have the first accuracy results from the largest-ever existential risk forecasting tournament. In 2022, we convened 80 experts and 89 superforecasters for the Existential Risk Persuasion Tournament (XPT), which collected thousands of forecasts in 172 questions across short-, medium- and long-term time horizons. We now have answers for 38 short-run questions covering AI progress, climate technology, bioweapons, nuclear weapons and more. Here’s what we found out: 🧵



“Forecasters who use ambiguous language ... don’t get clear feedback, which makes it impossible to learn from experience. They are like basketball players doing free throws in the dark.” - Tetlock & Gardner in Superforecasting. goodjudgment.com








Nice article in Financial Time where I explain that Auto-Regressive LLM are insufficient to reach human-level intelligence (or even cat-level intelligence). But alternative architectures that I call "objective driven" may reach human-level intelligence one day. They use world models based on JEPA (Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures, which are not generative). With this, we may have systems that 1. understand the physical world 2. have persistent memory 3. can reason 4. can plan, perhaps hierarchically. Four essential characteristics necessary for intelligent behavior, which humans and many animals exhibit.



Now fourth, and hopefully last, problem, subtly different from the first three: Imagine standing at the North Pole of the Earth. Walk in any direction, in a straight line, for 1 km. Now turn left so as to face East. Walk towards the East for as long as it takes to pass near the point where you turned. Not counting the initial 1km, have you walked; 1. More than 2xPi km 2. Exactly 2xPi km 3. Less than 2xPi km 4. I never came close to my starting point. Think about how you tried to answer this question and tell us whether it was based on language.


Can someone explain to me with rational arguments why Americans prefer iMessage over WhatsApp?










@Appyg99 Anyone who says either "the US is superior" Or "Europe is superior" is just engagement baiting. There are a hundred reasons you might prefer the US to France or vice versa, all legit. As for social mobility though, you are statistically wrong, along with many Europeans:








