
The pitch reads well. The math underneath does not. The PMS fee sits on top of the mutual fund expense ratio, not in place of it. All-in: 1.1 to 2%. A direct MF portfolio does the same job at 0.5 to 1%. Tax pass-through is a feature of mutual funds, not the PMS wrapper. The moment the PMS rebalances between schemes, the demat books a redemption and tax follows. Profit sharing without a hurdle rate is not alignment. The manager keeps 20% of the upside and bears none of the downside. Investors pay carry for beating zero. A HNI with 50 lakh can buy 4 to 6 direct funds, pay an RIA a flat fee, and keep most of what the wrapper would have taken. The structure pays the provider better. Not the investor.








