henning

6.6K posts

henning

henning

@henningberz

Berlin, Germany Katılım Mayıs 2020
176 Takip Edilen139 Takipçiler
henning
henning@henningberz·
@embodiedthinkr @the_no_mind Do your thing,I’m not trying to talk you out of it. If it helps, fair enough (placebo is real). But biology sets limits: the mechanisms here don’t work that way, and supplementation can’t override them
English
1
0
0
26
Meditation Teacher
Meditation Teacher@embodiedthinkr·
@henningberz @the_no_mind I truly believe you're putting a glass ceiling over your own life by believing everything without peer reviewed evidence does nothing, or that anything above 100%RDV is bad.
English
1
0
0
28
no.mind
no.mind@the_no_mind·
Dr. Zane R. Kime, wrote a book called Sunlight in 1980. He dedicated a whole chapter to vitamin D supplementation. He called it: "Sunlight & the Vitamin D Mania." He was arguing against vitamin D supplementation. "It seems only sensible to recommend that vitamin D be obtained from sunlight or ultraviolet light exposure, as the body has built-in safety mechanisms to prevent a toxic build-up. This would eliminate the medication of the total population with a possibly toxic substance intended originally for the protection of a small minority suffering from rickets." What he found: The University of Tromsø: long-term vitamin D intake slightly above 400 IU may stimulate heart attacks. Excessive vitamin D causes magnesium deficiency in heart tissue. Vitamin D has been identified as an angiotoxic substance — it irritates the lining of blood vessels. The British Medical Association (1950), Canadian Bulletin on Nutrition (1953), and American Academy of Pediatrics (1963) all recommended vitamin D not be supplementally added to food. And this was before the 5,000-10,000 IU megadosing trend (quite recent phenomenon). Today if you question high dose vitamin D supplementation it's somehow controversial. Not if you look at history. Vitamin D supplementation fails the Lindy filter. Getting Vitamin D directly from the sun does not. Read the chapter below. Decide for yourself.
no.mind tweet mediano.mind tweet mediano.mind tweet media
English
18
66
257
15.9K
henning
henning@henningberz·
@embodiedthinkr @the_no_mind Vitamin D supplements don’t directly bind VDR, they must be converted to calcitriol first, which is tightly regulated. So effects aren’t androgenic or potent; they’re mostly corrective in deficiency, not performance-enhancing
English
1
0
0
58
Meditation Teacher
Meditation Teacher@embodiedthinkr·
@henningberz @the_no_mind Vitamin D Receptors VDR have some pretty important role in muscle growth, vit d is a myostatin inhibitor, vit d upregulates dopamine receptors. Very androgenic over all.
Català
1
0
3
72
henning
henning@henningberz·
@IamTheTrashMan @AGoldfire123 @ProjectGokuu It must be very very bad research - since its 30 years old - that was always what research is about - not about quality - its about how recent you have published - i see your point ;)
English
1
0
0
24
trash
trash@IamTheTrashMan·
@henningberz @AGoldfire123 @ProjectGokuu Oh wow. A study that’s 30 years old done in vitro. Any actual human trials in the past 30 years? It would really be convincing. Also, when you send peer reviewed evidence, try including the actual citation or PMID. I still have no idea what this article is about.
English
1
0
0
20
Goku
Goku@ProjectGokuu·
Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light causes skin cancer. He says the proof is in how we treat people with severe burns. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who says when burn surgeons or doctors treat burn victims, they use blue light directly on the wound. "You put blue light on a burn victim, you know what it does? It stimulates the skin to grow faster." That same mechanism is exactly what makes blue light dangerous under normal conditions. Cancer is uncontrolled cell growth. Blue light triggers rapid cell division. On a burn wound that's helpful. On healthy skin every day for years, it's a problem. • Your laptop emits blue light • Your phone screen emits blue light • The LED bulbs in your ceiling emit blue light Kruse says incandescent bulbs naturally offset this because they contain UV and red light alongside the blue. Those bulbs are being banned completely by 2028. The frequency that causes cancer is in every room you enter. The frequency that counteracted it is being legislated out of existence. — Dr. Jack Kruse (@DrJackKruse) on the Danny Jones (@JonesDanny) podcast PS: If interested in content like this, follow me as I continue sharing unconventional health insights you won't find anywhere else on X.
Goku@ProjectGokuu

Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light hijacks the dopamine reward pathways in your brain. Your phone, laptop, and TV are all running on a light that keeps your dopamine low by design. He says this was engineered on purpose. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who traced where this blue light display technology came from: 1) In the 1950s, DARPA funded IBM to develop liquid crystal displays using blue light. Side note: DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. They build military technology. The internet started there. 2) In 1995, DARPA gave the search algorithm to two Stanford students who founded Google along with this technology 3) Today, Meta and Google own the patents on how this light is delivered through every screen you use. Kruse asked one question no one in tech has answered. Why does every screen on Earth default to blue light? You need third-party software just to get red light on your own device. Kruse says the reason is simple. Blue light at specific frequencies makes screens addictive. It lowers dopamine over time. It makes users more compliant and easier to influence. DARPA wants it sticky so people can be programmed through the content they consume. He says 55% of the American population has already been affected by screen technology in exactly this way. The blue glow on your face right now isn't accidental. According to Kruse, it never was. — Jack Kruse (@drplebjack) on the Danny Jones (@JonesDanny) Podcast

English
6
189
557
68.1K
henning
henning@henningberz·
@the_no_mind Vitamin D supplementation is my go-to example of why most supplements fail. The real benefits in large studies come from sunlight: NO release, POMC cleavage, melanin & melatonin. A pill can’t replicate that. Meta-analyses show little to no benefit
English
1
0
2
174
henning
henning@henningberz·
@embodiedthinkr @the_no_mind Serious question - why would you do that - I mean whats your goal? The benefits of sun exposure mainly are due to NO release, POMC, Melanin and Melantonin etc. - the pill cannot do that and studies have shown that even 100k a day do not show any benefits
English
1
0
0
31
Meditation Teacher
Meditation Teacher@embodiedthinkr·
@the_no_mind Been taking 50,000IU for 10 years almost every day. With no problem. I once took 1,000,000IU (weighed on scale and measured) and was fine. I'm doubtful that 400 IU is when the downsides start.
English
2
0
1
246
John Campise
John Campise@ReptileRaised·
@the_no_mind Sun exposure can produce up to 20,000 iu equivalent daily dose of vitamin D intake. That’s the upper limit. How is that different from “mega dosing”?
English
3
0
3
481
Sandeep Palakodeti, MD MPH
To my athlete/fit friends with slightly elevated HgbA1c I get this question from you a lot: “My fasting insulin is low, lean/thin, adequately muscled, TG/HDL ratio < 1, ApoB <90 But, A1c in the 5.6 - 6% range Should you be concerned? Most likely not. Here are 2 reasons:
English
11
2
73
42.4K
henning
henning@henningberz·
@tkp_at Ich gebe immer etwas Kokosöl in meinen smoothie dazu, dafür ist es prima. Auch für die Zahnpflege (Ölziehen). Nur zum braten passt es nicht so gut - hier fährt man mit Ghee glaube ich deutlich besser.
Deutsch
0
0
0
22
TKP - Blog für Science und Politik
Die etablierte Ernährungs-„Wissenschaft“ hat uns jahrzehntelang belogen. Während uns die Mainstream-Medien und die Pharmaindustrie eintrichtern, dass gesättigte Fette der pure Tod seien und Cholesterin die Arterien verstopfe wie ein verstopfter Abfluss, zeigt eine tiefgehende Analyse der Fakten das genaue Gegenteil. tkp.at/2026/04/12/kok…
Deutsch
1
6
30
621
Bonanza36
Bonanza36@ClearedAsFiled·
@bschermd Finally some sanity. These Drs are test pilots trying to land a plane in winds that exceeds crosswind limits.
English
1
0
8
818
Bret Scher, MD
Bret Scher, MD@bschermd·
1/ I kicked a hornets' nest. All I had to do was suggest we need to learn more about the relative contribution of LDL and ApoB to heart disease, and some parts of Twitter lost their minds. Let me bring this back into focus, although this might just kick the nest more. 🧵
English
17
21
239
37.8K
henning retweetledi
Emma Richter
Emma Richter@politerei·
Übrigens kann man Länder auch ohne Krieg und Bomben zurück in die Steinzeit befördern. Man schickt ihnen einfach @Die_Gruenen vorbei.
Deutsch
250
1.3K
9.9K
60.2K
henning
henning@henningberz·
@AlpacaAurelius Taking into account that 91% reported to be smokers in general that means - smooking brings you to grave early
English
0
0
1
17
Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙
In this study, 67% of centenarian men smoked regularly and 54% of them drank regularly. 0% of them went keto, cold plunged, or used peptides. Important reminder that you dont need to do crazy biohacks to live a long healthy life.
Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙 tweet media
English
10
8
165
13.9K
Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙
Skin cancer rates are going up while sunscreen use is increasing and time spent in the sun is going down. Must be the sun.
English
18
116
1.2K
26.2K
henning
henning@henningberz·
@Chiara_831 @AlpacaAurelius You can get used to those conditions - you can train your skin - I live in the canary islands we have uvi 12 in summer most of the time - no problem at all with trained skin
English
1
0
1
29
Chiara
Chiara@Chiara_831·
@AlpacaAurelius When you travel to Thailand, you'll understand how incredibly strong the sun is there; without sunscreen, your skin will get sunburned.
English
1
0
0
117
henning
henning@henningberz·
@Fitness_diet01 @AlpacaAurelius Its not true - large studies like the swedish one done by Pelle Lindqvist who followed up on swedish people for more than 20 years clearly showed that the highest sun exposure group had the best health outcomes. Skin cancer rates were almost the same between the groups
English
0
0
2
22
Nurse Micheal
Nurse Micheal@Fitness_diet01·
@AlpacaAurelius Cancer doesn't usually happen overnight. Most cases diagnosed today are the result of UV damage from decades ago long before daily sunscreen use was the norm. We’re essentially seeing the bill come due for generations that didn't have modern protection.
English
3
0
3
377
henning
henning@henningberz·
@IamTheTrashMan @AGoldfire123 @ProjectGokuu Exactly—that’s the mechanism. Isolated UV studies show strong cancer correlations. But large epidemiological data (e.g. Lindqvist 2016, Weller 2024) show the opposite: those with the highest sun exposure are often the healthiest, with the lowest cancer rates.
English
1
0
3
36
trash
trash@IamTheTrashMan·
@AGoldfire123 @ProjectGokuu Got it. Blue light by itself causes cancer but if you are exposed to blue AND red light at the same time then you’re protected. That makes sense.
English
2
0
4
76
henning
henning@henningberz·
@nureineexe Wir haben noch genügend Nazis übrig in Deutschland. Schau mal allein wie viele wieder eine Partei verbieten wollen in bester Nazi Manier
Deutsch
0
0
1
8
EXE
EXE@nureineexe·
Kommen eigentlich die Nazis, die nach Ungarn ausgewandert sind, wieder zurück, wenn Orbán verliert? Können wir vorher die Grenzen schließen?
Deutsch
76
56
725
11.8K
henning
henning@henningberz·
@ChristofferBN But what if I have ldl 26, apob 130,cac 0 and all other blood markers in excellent range ?
English
2
0
0
25
Christoffer Baustad Nilsen 🐈‍
@henningberz Depends on the individual. If your BP is sky-high (say, >190/110) and your ApoB is moderatly high (say ~120 mg/dL), BP matters more than ApoB. This is where "medicine as an art" comes in. Treat whatever risk factor(s) that is more urgent and/or easier to do something with.
English
1
0
0
56
Christoffer Baustad Nilsen 🐈‍
The response-to-injury hypothesis was discussed on page 43-49 and 175-178 in "The Cholesterol Wars: The Skeptics vs the Preponderance of Evidence" by D. Stenberg. amazon.com/Cholesterol-Wa… Countless animal models and autopsy studies over the decades have debunked it. 🧵 1/9
Christoffer Baustad Nilsen 🐈‍ tweet media
Bret Scher, MD@bschermd

Your veins and arteries carry the same blood. Same LDL. Same ApoB. Same everything. Yet veins almost never get plaque. Arteries constantly do. Maybe you've seen the recent discussions about this. It's an interesting question that provides clues in cardiovascular science, and could challenge how we think about LDL and ApoB. 🧵

English
11
4
21
3.6K
henning
henning@henningberz·
@Herr_Kaleun Weil der Wunsch aus diesem korrupten Konstrukt auszutreten und es zu beenden großer ist als alles andere. Er stoppt ja auch die Zahlungen an die Ukraine - da sparen wir wieder was ein :)
Deutsch
0
0
0
19
Kaleun Thomsen
Kaleun Thomsen@Herr_Kaleun·
Ich kann der rechten Begeisterung für Orbans Ungarn nichts abgewinnen. Er wettert bei jeder Gelegenheit gegen die EU (zu Recht), nimmt aber gleichzeitig gerne das von der EU bereitgestellte Geld. Geld, das man u. a. uns Deutschen abgepresst hat. Wie kann man das beklatschen?
Deutsch
37
0
28
2.2K
henning
henning@henningberz·
@ChristofferBN So maybe ldl and apob do not play such a critical role as we thought and maybe endothelial damage plays a bigger part in that story ?
English
1
0
0
44