Iain Cooke

@DrAseemMalhotra errm: x.com/recusant_raja/…

Well done Andy. I also know that this a precursor to getting justice for the Covid vaccine injured including for one of your best mates, my father. A full independent inquiry under your watch will determine whether this gene therapy should have been injected into a single human.

@andyburnham Question for you Andy. Will the Hillsborough Law help see politicians in prison for their role in the cover up of the rape gangs? x.com/recusant_raja/…

@ancientcontent/note/c-291538254?r=2wxv0" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@ancientconten… @FoMaHun I just wondered if waterglass could do anything like this without the crushed stone?

redwallandtherabble.co.uk/make-daddy-tal… more cover up of the rape gangs ongoing...

@Jikkyleaks @gavi haha - their link saying this claim is "backed by decades of testing and safety monitoring." references not a paper, but a WHO site, which itself references GAVI as the experts. Turtles all the way down, yet again

@gavi Do you have a long term randomised controlled trial to demonstrate this? And can we see the data?

❓“Will giving my baby multiple vaccines at once overload their immune system?” 💬 The quick answer: No. Decades of studies confirm that multiple vaccines don’t overwhelm immunity, don’t increase infection risk and don’t cause chronic illness. The data, on VaccinesWork: bit.ly/44tF0Iv

@SHomburg They sure look like they are having fun, especially the drummer :-)

𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑊𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 haben ein Foto gepostet, auf dem Sie mich links erkennen. Die Drummerin schreibt, es gehe ihr wieder gut. Sie war nicht die einzige, die beim Hitzekonzert in Münster umkippte. Als kleinen Dank spendiere ich hier noch „Hell of a Dream”. Hintergrund: Während viele Metalbands keinen richtigen Sänger haben, hat diese dreiköpfige Gruppe sogar drei. Sie verfügen über eine außergewöhnliche Atemtechnik und spielen zugleich die Instrumente. Zwei von ihnen drehen ihre Stimmen am Ende des Songs bis in die 6. Oktave hoch.

I am having a drink this evening with a friend in a Chiswick pub. Two policemen have just come into the pub and asked me to step outside. I have stepped outside and they have threatened me because I tweeted about a councillor banning seating outside pubs in Chiswick. They admit on video (watch it!) that I did not break the law at all. They came to threaten me. To warn me off tweeting about councillors and the council. This is modern Britain. This is the police state. Please, please, please watch this video. It does involve me using very bad language, but this has got to be seen. Police coming out to threaten someone who hasn’t committed a crime. I’m fuming.

And now I’m here and I’m very angry. I mean fuming. Strand on the Green in Chiswick and the councillor Rick Rowe of Hounslow council has said that the pubs here; the Bell and Crown, The City Barge and The Bulls Head, aren’t allowed outside seating anymore. They’ve had that seating forever and people love to relax outside in the sunshine by the river, but now, the council has said that must stop. Hounslow council govern Chiswick. Hounslow is an absolute third world shithole. All the taxes from Chiswick pay for Hounslow to survive and these idiots want to make it even harder for businesses to survive. I have no say in these pubs and they certainly haven’t asked me to post, in case someone thinks that. I’m posting because I know how hard it is to run a business. I know how hard pubs work to survive and I know how terrible councillors are. Disgusting

The technocrats are all ‘on message’ and it’s all the same message. The latest script being parroted by all the Technocrats rather like robots ! I find this uncomfortable to listen to, do you ?

Why Will The Media Not Ask Andy Burnham About Operation Hexagon? There is an operation Greater Manchester Police will not name. The press will not name it either. It has a name. Operation Hexagon. A police operation was built to hunt the people who exposed the rape of children in Oldham. The man who held authority over it is walking towards Downing Street. They Built An Operation To Hunt The Whistleblowers Operation Hexagon was a joint enterprise between Greater Manchester Police, Oldham Council and Labour Party politicians. The grooming gangs were never its target. Neither were the men who shielded them. The machinery was aimed at the whistleblowers, and at the ordinary people who dared to ask how children came to be raped in Oldham. Read that back slowly. A police force and a political party, working in concert, turned on the citizens who demanded accountability. The abusers were left untouched. The people exposing them were placed under the lens. I can speak to Hexagon because Hexagon came for me. Officers were sent to build cases against me that had no foundation. They repeatedly raided my house at dawn. The Crown Prosecution Service was turned into an instrument for manufacturing evidence to put me in the dock. Every charge collapsed. Every allegation was dismissed. That is what an official police operation was made into. A machine for assembling false cases against a man whose only offence was refusing to look away while children were raped. The Authority Ran Straight To Andy Burnham Hexagon did not run in a vacuum. It ran under a chain of command, and that chain ends at Andy Burnham. As Mayor of Greater Manchester, Burnham holds the powers of the police and crime commissioner. He has held authority over Greater Manchester Police since 2017. Oldham is the epicentre of the scandal and the focus of Hexagon, and Oldham sits inside his remit. An operation of this kind, run in his force, in his region, against the critics of a cover up, does not happen beyond the reach of the man who commands the force. He has never answered for it. He stood in election after election and said nothing. The silence of the man who held the authority is itself the answer. They Buried The Whole Thing You have not read about Operation Hexagon in your newspaper. That is by design. Freedom of Information requests are refused with practised ease. The press that rushes to report every other case of police misconduct keeps its distance from this one. An operation confirmed to exist is reported as though it never happened. The blackout is the cover up that guards the cover up. The Man Who Oversaw It Is Walking Into Downing Street Here is why this matters now beyond anything it mattered before. Andy Burnham is on the road to Number Ten. The man who held authority over a police operation aimed at the whistleblowers of a child rape scandal is about to become the most powerful figure in the country. Operation Hexagon should have finished his career. It has been allowed to sit as a footnote that no one in Westminster and no one in the press will read aloud. Which is why it is left to us. Imagine this, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom dragged kicking and screaming in front of a national inquiry into the cover up of the Pakistani Rape Gangs where he is forced to testify under oath and defend his own actions. You don't have to imagine it. You just need to help me make it happen. For 8 years I've exposed how politicians and police covered up the gang rape of working-class White girls by Pakistani grooming gangs. I, with the support of the people of Oldham, led the campaign that forced the National Inquiry. Now, with your help, we will force this inquiry to a place it does not want to go. As Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham fronted a series of Assurance Reviews of which one was in my hometown of Oldham. It was a cover-up of a cover-up. It tried to bury the truth. Don't believe me? Ask Maggie Oliver. Even she has come to the same conclusion. Despite Burnham's efforts to help hide what took place, we forced a national inquiry. Whilst previously defending the robustness of his now exposed cover up, Burnham is now trying his best to rewrite the truth of what he really did. Unfortunately, as of yet, the national inquiry will not investigate Burnham or his actions and his deceit will go unchallenged. We hope to change this before the investigation starts in Oldham. Once Burnham is in Downing Street, the pressure to protect him will be immense. The institutions that failed these girls will try everything possible not to hold a PM accountable. Much of the press will look away, as always. This is why it is up to us to carry the truth. Which is why I'm turning this community of readers into something more than what I can manage on my own. We need to grow and become an independent investigative outlet with: - A professional website to reach larger audiences - Video editing to make this work accessible to millions - Research support so no lead goes cold - In-person events to train people - Resources to gather evidence and report from failed communities Before Burnham reaches Number 10, Red Wall and the Rabble needs 2,000 more paid subscribers to help grow and become more than a one man operation. With your help, we can do in towns and cities across the country what we have done in Oldham. Sign Up Here 👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk Should we succeed, politicians will go to prison. It is as simple as that. Surely, on this prospect alone, it is worth your support. Raja 🙏

@RudyHavenstein Fair. I guess that would mean your date is either Ben himself or just possibly Janet 😊

Ben Bernanke's "The Courage to Act"

@CraigMurrayOrg Nothing to see here. Well - there was quite something to see, that would have revealed thruths we would rather keep hidden. So we destroyed the documents, and now there is nothing to see. Simples.

Yes. They also destroyed all the records of interactions with Sweden in the Assange case. We had to get from Sweden the evidence that Sweden wished to drop the sexual assault charges as unfounded, but the CPS under Starmer insisted they did not. All internal CPS records destroyed.

@DrAseemMalhotra Sounds like you've spent a long time scraping the bottom of the politician barrel. Unless they recently redefined integrity and I did not notice.

Absolutely. And more importantly of all the politicians I’ve interacted with ( and there’s been many) he has the highest integrity

@chrismartenson @ENERGY @SecretaryWright I think that must be the new normal :-)

@ENERGY @SecretaryWright "Returned to normal?"

.@SecretaryWright on energy prices: "Flows of oil and natural gas through the straits have already returned to normal and they will continue that way…Americans can expect continued declines in energy prices.”

@boriquagato @Devon_Eriksen_ I highly recommend reading "about the size of it" goodreads.com/en/book/show/1…

exactly correct. everyhting in the imperial system is "about how much of something you'd use." pint? about what you'd drink. pound, half, or quarter pound? about what you'd eat. yard? about 1 stride. temperature: all you really care about is the front number. 50's vs 80's. the brits take this further with "stone" whgich translates to "about a weight class." the impreial units use bases like 16 oz so they are highly divisible in halves. (same reason time uses base 60 and 24) metric sucks this way. 400 g steak is just "meh"

Okay, time to explain the Imperial system, the metric system, and why attempts to replace either with the other are all retarded. They have two different purposes. The metric system is designed around precise measurement of objects. Its goal is to make engineering and scientific calculations simple. The Imperial system is designed around humans. Its goal is to make calculation unnecessary. 100 degrees is really hot. 0 degrees is really cold. Anything that starts with a 5 is cool, anything that starts with an 8 is warm. No computation. 6 feet is tall, 5 feet is short. 100 pounds is light, 200 pounds is substantial, 300 pounds is heavy. A 1000 square foot house is small, a 2000 square foot house is medium, a 3000 square foot house is large. 1 mile is a short walk, 2 miles is a medium walk, after that it takes a while. 1 acre of land is a homestead, 10 acres is an estate, 100 acres and up is a ranch or a farm. Do you see now why it is so strange and awkward to convert from miles to feet? It's because converting from miles to feet is not something you're supposed to do in the first place. Yes, they are both measures of length, so they are technically convertible, and yes, on rare occasions, you might need to do that. But feet are for measuring humans, and things built around humans, like doorways, and mattresses. Miles are for measuring travel distance. You wouldn't measure the distance between Seattle and Portland in feet for the same reason you wouldn't measure the distance between Tokyo and Osaka in mattress-lengths. It would be silly. This is why Americans so fiercely resistant to any notion of "conversion" to the metric system. Because it makes no sense. We already use the metric system for what it's good for, which is doing physics and chemistry and whatnot. But converting everyday measurements to the metric system would be less useful, generally inconvenient, and serve no purpose other than to make petty government bureaucrats happy that everything is now tidy, orderly, and worse, three qualities that bureaucrats love. I thought about this carefully when I wrote my first science fiction novel. In the world of the 22nd century, extraterrestrial settlers ("Orbitals") use three systems of measurement. They measure themselves in feet, inches, and pounds. They measure the spacecraft and habitats they build in meters and centimeters, grams and kilograms. And they measure space travel distances in light-seconds and light-minutes. Each system has its own natural scale. The sole exception to this is when Marcus doses himself with drugs for high-g resistance, Miranda objects that he has taken too much, and Marcus responds by stating his mass... in kilograms. Why? Because they're talking about drug doses, a engineering measurement. Drugs are dosed in milligrams per kilogram. So, yes, the Imperial system makes perfect sense when you understand what it's for, and no, we ain't changing. And, as a general rule, when an entire civilization of smart people does something for centuries, and it makes no sense to you, they're probably not being silly. It's more likely there's something you don't know.

@SimonElmer2022 @Facts_Matter55 A good deal of what I understand your position to be is that Britain has been sold down the river by a cross-party consensus. It's not a peculiarity of non-white / non-christian pols as far as I can see. Neither is corruption. Anyone breaking ranks even a little bit gets ejected.

That's the lie we've been sold for decades, and at every chance that a Black or Asian or Muslim or any other non-White MP has to vote or otherwise been in positions of power at municipal or local authority level, they have chosen the path of identity politics, no matter what parliamentary party they ostensibly represent. They know they've been elected by a non-White electorate either to promote anti-White, anti-British sectarian politics or to push through the policies of their globalists masters by playing the race card against anyone who opposes them, and that, without exception that I can think of over the last thirty or so years, is what immigrants politicians do. They had their chance, and they have unfailingly proved as untrustworthy and corrupt as we always thought people from such uncivilised countries would be. But since you're using the accusation of racism to make your point, it sounds like you're one of them, or so indoctrinated by woke to believe the rubbish you're spouting. Either way, it won't work. Some of us have memories. architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2023/11/17/wok…

The parliamentary constituency of Makerfield is an overwhelmingly English area. In 2021, it had a population of 98,833. Of these, 68.3 were Christian, 30% were atheist, and less than 1% were Muslim. Of this electorate, 58.75% voted yesterday in the bi-election. This was a considerable 6.35% increase from the 2024 General Election. 54.8% of votes were cast for Labour and Andy Burham, one of the key figures in the cover-up of the Muslim rape gangs. 34.5% of votes were for Reform UK; and just 6.8% were for Restore Britain. The votes for both Labour and Reform were up, respectively, by 9.6% and 2.7%. This suggests that the electorate were aware of the significance of this vote, which was triggered by the incumbent Labour MP resigning to allow Burnham to win the seat and thereby challenge Keir Starmer for the leadership of the Labour Party. What this Labour Government has done to the country since July 2024, including its historical and ongoing complicity in the gang rape and trafficking of upwards of a quarter of a million English girls, not only didn’t stop 24,927 English people from voting Labour, but actually increased those who did by nearly 10%, a huge electoral swing. What was pitched as an expected upset turned out to be a resounding win for the Labour Party. How do we account for this? Makerfield is in Greater Manchester, where Burnham has been Mayor since 2017, and is one of the safest Labour seats in the country, with the predecessor seat (before the current constituency was created in 1983), held by Labour since 1903. This is, of course, why it was chosen for Burnham. The Labour Party rightly identified the voters of Makerfield as the electorate that would vote their candidate into the House of Commons. These are, in other words, died-in-the-wool Labourites who place their Party above the country, the British people, even their own children. They believe, or perhaps hope, that we’re back in 1992 and Neil Kinnock is about to lead them to victory over Margaret Thatcher. There’s an additional indication that, between the Census of 2011 and that of 2021, a mere decade, the Christian population of Makerfield dropped by 16% from 80,953 to 67,544. Presumably, it’s even lower today. Part of that, undoubtedly, would be because of the older generation dying out; but over the same decade the atheist population increased by an almost equivalent 15.4% from 13,977 to 29,614. That’s 15,637 atheists replacing 13,409 Christians. I don’t know whether Christians would have voted or did vote for a Party that has sold hundreds of thousands of English girls into sex slavery for Muslim rape gangs in return for votes, but I think it’s an indication that Woke, rather than Methodism, is now the religious foundation of the Labour Party, and even when not aligned with Islam it will place its own parliamentary success and access to power above the interests and even the safety of the British people. The other indication of how this happened is that 41.25% of the electorate of Makerfield, 31,853 people, didn’t vote, not for Labour, not for Reform UK, and not for Restore Britain. They didn’t not vote because they were presented with a choice between indistinguishable Labour and Conservative candidates. They didn’t vote, I would guess, because they never have voted. Even if, under the blanket media ban, they have never heard of Restore Britain, they undoubtedly would have heard of Farage and Reform UK, yet they didn’t vote for him either. The split in the so-called Right-wing vote between Reform and Restore never happened. 3,111 voters who may have voted for Reform voted Restore, but even combined these two parties were over 6,000 votes short of beating Labour. What lessons can we draw from this? This week I went to my first Restore Britain meeting. I came back from a cushy life in Hong Kong to fight for my country, and yet I walked out of this meeting in disgust. I have sat in many political meetings and am more than familiar with the rhetoric of political parties, which is almost indistinguishable between the Left and the Right. We mustn’t be divisive. We must be inclusive. Everyone’s welcome. We condemn violence. And for Christ’s sake don’t mention Islam. I expected, or at least hoped, that this meeting would be different. It wasn’t. The presenter, a woman who said she worked ‘in the City’ and spent an hour taking us through pie-charts, said several times that ‘we’ (meaning, presumably, the official position of Restore Britain) don’t condone what happened in Belfast (meaning the response by the people of Northern Ireland, not the beheading of one of them by a Muslim, which she didn’t mention). That ‘we’ don’t want to outrage people. That ‘we’ must be inclusive and appeal to everyone. That ‘we’ musn’t be divisive. She had swallowed and was regurgitating every cliche of the woke handbook. It was like listening to Sadiq Khan. The last straw for me was when, displaying the racial demographic of my constituency, which is 43% Black and Asian, she said, for the second time, that she doesn’t like such data being divided by race and that she was didn’t like the category of ‘White’. This meeting was held two days after The Rape Gang Inquiry Report was published, documenting the grooming, drugging, gang-rape, torture and trafficking of at least 250,000 British girls who were targeted by Muslim men specifically because they were White. For decades now, since at least the New Labour Government of Tony Blair, the existence of the British as a White race has been denied as racist, and British citizenship has been handed to every race that arrives in our country, legally or illegally. Over the same period, the culture and unparalleled achievements of White people, not only in Britain but across Europe and the Western world, has been under relentless and increasing attack by the ideology of Woke. And as a result of immigration policies enforced on the White British people against our will on the basis of virulently anti-White Woke and Islamist ideology, the White British are set to become a minority in our own country by 2063 at the latest. Yet in a meeting of Restore Britain, a party formed to oppose all this and much more, the lead speaker and organiser didn’t want to use the word White. Moreover, like every parliamentary party in history, it was already according itself the right to tell the White working class how it should respond to the attacks on us, what is permitted and what isn’t, what violence we are meant to tolerate and what violence we are permitted to use in return. This branch of Restore Britain, in other words, was indistinguishable from the Labour Party, the Green Party, even the Conservative Party. Now, partly this is because this meeting was held in London, which is the UK’s centre of White guilt and self hatred, into which this speaker and the room of largely (but not exclusively) White Britons that sat listening to her had clearly been indoctrinated. But if Restore Britain repeats the DEI rhetoric and ineffectual tactics of the other parliamentary parties, it will repeat the results of the Makerfield bi-election in 2029, always supposing a General Election is held. Let me say this very clearly. The voters which Restore Britain has to target are not the 25,000 Labourites or 15,000 Reformers who voted against their country and people in the Makerfield bi-election, but the 31,000 White English people who didn’t vote and the White British share of the 20 million people who didn’t vote in the 2024 General Election. And we don’t get them to vote for Restore Britain by the kind of DEI crap I heard at the meeting I attended this week. What we say to them, quite clearly and without fear, is that Restore Britain is a political party for the British people. That the British people are a White race. That no-one who is not White British can hold office in Restore Britain, as no-one who is not White British will be an MP in a Restore Britain Government or in a Restore Britain council. That the British people are in a religious war with Islam and a racial war with the millions of immigrants from South Asia, the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa brought here to rape, murder and replace us. That unless we restore Britain to the British people we will become a subject people in our own homeland under Sharia law. That the British people are right to be enraged by what has been done and is being done to them. That every Muslim is an enemy of the British people and should be treated as such. And that only a political revolution by the British people that is not limited to a Restore Britain Government but which will de-Islamise and de-woke British society from top to bottom will ensure the success of such a government. This is what the 20 million Britons who didn’t vote, and the millions more who did but for a party they chose as the least worse option, want to hear from Restore Britain. We won’t get the British people to vote for us by talking to them in the language that has reduced the British people to our current servile state as dhimmis in what is already a country under Sharia law. We do that by increasing their anger, by increasing the sense of outrage they have kept locked in their chests their whole lives, by validating, celebrating and rewarding their patriotism, and by making them understand, loudly and clearly and by every means possible, just how close we are to the ethnicide of the British people. We are at war. Pretty women mouthing platitudes about inclusivity and diversity and British values are not what the British people want to hear. They are looking for leaders of men in the Battle for Britain we still haven’t started fighting. If you want to know how we, the British people, can start to bring this about now, rather than sitting at home watching the football and posting on social media about how many followers we have; or if you still don’t understand fully the extent of the existential threat we face as a people, a culture, a nation and a race; you may want to read my recently banned but now republished book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. The link is below. architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2026/02/26/the…

@Adrian_Hilton Once the state has killed an actually innocent person, the chances of them being exonerated are substantially less (and obviously of no practical use to the person). Is life in prison better than getting executed if actually guilty? That depends on religion & personality I think

I am a whisker away from this: Jamie Varley tortured and murdered little Preston Davey, and clearly made his short life an absolute misery. Hanging might be too good for him. And yet.. ..and yet.. If baby-killers should hang, Lucy Letby was found guilty of killing seven of them. But three years later, there's some considerable doubt about the safety of those convictions, which were absolute and certain in August 2023. If capital punishment for baby-killing had been an option, a judge would have sentenced her to hang. In wielding the sword, the state is not infallible. But I hope Jamie Varley finds his time in prison as tortuous and as miserable (if not as brief) as he made the life of Preston Davey. RIP.

@DocAhmadMalik Suporting Andy Burnham is just as willfully blind as supporting "traditional" vaccines. redwallandtherabble.co.uk/the-establishm…

"Traditional vaccines are by far the safest" Aseem Malhotra. He has always been who he is. And now he is giving his support to WEF fabian puppet pro jabbing, pro Iraq war zionist Andy Burnham. You should never have put your trust in this man. Oh, and to top it off, he supports the social media ban on kids, in other words, digital ID for all adults.... It's fascinating to see how people will ignore obvious red flags in their desire to have a saviour.

I have now read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report in full. I've been following this story quite closely for something like a decade so I'm not exactly surprised by its contents, but three elements stand out to me amongst the horror. The first is that a large majority of the victims who provided testimony describe some kind of troubled or disrupted home life. Some were molested by family members before the rape gangs ever got ahold of them. Others faced physical abuse, neglect, drug addicted parents, housing instability, and so on. Their testimony often describes a kind of "screening" process where a girl's particular vulnerability was evaluated with more moderate boundary pushing before escalation to full on rape and abuse. This isn't necessarily surprising given the nefarious intentions the gangs had for these girls, but their willingness to explicitly target the absolute most vulnerable children who were already struggling sickens me. These girls, more than anyone, needed some kind of adult guidance in their lives, and this vulnerability was cynically exploited to initiate them into an even more egregious Hell. Which brings me to the second detail, which is the extreme violence these girls were subjected to. "Grooming Gang" is an unacceptable euphemism that may accurately describe common initiatory tactics employed against these girls, but which criminally downplays the behavior of their abusers once initiated. These girls were not "merely" groomed into sex. They were not "merely" raped. They were not "merely" trafficked. They were subjected to a program of overtly racialized sexual torture and humiliation designed to maximally degrade them and kill them in their souls. And this was "acceptable" because they were White and not Muslims. This detail fundamentally alters the character of these crimes. This was not horny men out of control or even cross-cultural understanding gaps around the age of consent. This was a targeted program of ritualized torture and subjugation as a means of ethnic domination. In other words, these gangs are conducting war against the White British using serial child rape and torture as a form of conquest. These are not crimes in the conventional sense. These are war crimes being conducted by one civilization against another, and they need to be treated as such. And finally, the third point (encapsulated in the excerpt below) is that every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable. It's one thing when you have no physical evidence and are confronted with a "he said / she said" situation with respect to a rape allegation. It's another thing entirely when you have a pre-teen frequent flier at the NHS back again for her Nth sexually transmitted disease treatment, a 13 year old with broken glass shards embedded in her vagina, or a pregnant 13 year old. These are cases with obvious alarming physical evidence that no one addressed in any meaningful way. Politicians (Labour in particular) covered it up and suppressed action into investigations in order to maintain the Islamic bloc vote. Police suppressed investigations, dismissed accusations and evidence, intimidated victims into silence, arrested victims for the crimes of their abusers, dismissed proven cases of rape with impotent warning letters, and in some cases directly raped the girls themselves. Care homes disregarded obvious signs of abuse (including outright confessions), and enabled their abusers to maintain consistent access to the girls, in some cases acting more like pimps than caregivers. Social workers addressed victims' needs so incompetently they recommended victims audition for a TV show role about being a child prostitute because it was "relatable" and even attended a victim's coerced sham marriage to her abuser. NHS staff consistently failed to do anything in the face of overt medical evidence of obvious, undeniable sex crimes against these girls, treating the acute problem and sending them on their way with no protection whatsoever. And teachers, much like the social workers, routinely delivered their students into the predatory arms of their abusers as they waited outside the schools, and utterly failed to appropriately address signs or confessions of abuse. Virtually every arm of the state is directly complicit in exacerbating the abuse. Not one single institution at any level reliably offered protection or recourse to these girls. As far as I am concerned I Restore government would be entirely justified in firing every single person in the employ of the state. If they are not a documented whistleblower they are complicit and thus compromised, and none of them have any business retaining their roles or their pensions. On the contrary large numbers of state officials deserve severe penalties for criminal negligence or outright complicity in these crimes. Justice for these crimes will necessarily take place at a scale that will shock the pacified sensibilities of the over-socialized Liberal West, but nothing short of a biblical level reckoning will be sufficient to qualify as justice in this case. @RupertLowe10 is not wrong to draw comparisons to the Holocaust. It is the only appropriate frame of reference in the popular zeitgeist that articulates the actual magnitude of what was allowed to take place under successive British governments. Nor is he wrong to propose the reinstatement of the death penalty as the appropriate restitution for these crimes. The rapists and state officials who enabled this atrocity both deserve to hang. And I pray that the British public will entrust Rupert with the power to deliver justice long overdo. In any case I am deeply appreciative of his efforts to bring this to light. He is the hero Britain needs right now. Vote Restore. Deliver these girls justice.

@mattvanswol But, but.. Keir Starmer is on the case protecting children. If the victims had just not had access to social media, none of this would have happened, right? Oh wait. Didn't the politicians, particularly Starmer do everything they could to keep those under wraps? 🤔

I have just finished reading The Rape Gang Inquiry Report. It is, without a doubt, the most horrifying document I've ever read in my life. There is no close second... and it's worse than you could ever imagine. Here's everything you need to know 🧵