IMRΛN

18.6K posts

IMRΛN banner
IMRΛN

IMRΛN

@imrane

Privacy maximalist. ZK everything or bust.

Multiverse Katılım Mart 2009
2.8K Takip Edilen3.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
IMRΛN
IMRΛN@imrane·
@colludingnode @ThinkingUSD We’re all competing on SOV now. All time and value compresses to that singular question. Where does humanity store their time?
English
1
1
8
1.4K
vittorio
vittorio@IterIntellectus·
the mushrooms want you to live longer but they dont want you to reproduce. parasitic alien species confirmed
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson

Two doses of magic mushrooms degraded my sperm count from the 99.6th percentile to the 77.7th. This may be a first-in-human observation. Context: we ran the most quantified magic mushroom (psilocybin) experiment ever conducted. We were asking if psilocybin is a longevity therapy. After seeing the data, we think it is (see reply post for the experiment summary). Also, like most things biology: the results are complicated. My data suggests that the magic mushrooms (psilocybin) negatively impacted my fertility markers. Before the first psilocybin dose my motile sperm count was at 99.6th percentile for men under 25 years of age, it dropped to 77.7% and partially recovered to 89.3% following the first dose, and second doses, compared to the same age cohort (numbers compare similarly to my age cohort as well). 3 days following my second dose (first dose 25 mg, second dose 28 mg) . Motility: dropped 51% . Total count: almost unchanged, dropped by 2% . Total motile count: dropped 52% . Normal morphology: dropped by 50% 20 days post 2nd dose, the pattern continued, with typical latent effects on total sperm counts Motility: recovered back to -2% of pre-psilocybin baseline: . Total count: dropped by 38%, latent effect. . Total motile count: remained inhibited at -39% of pre-psilocybin baseline, (despite motility normalizing, due to the total count drop) . Morphology normalized to -10% of baseline levels. Reduction in free testosterone might have contributed to the effect. While total serum testosterone increased by 30% 3 days following the 2nd dose (neither FSH or LH were meaningfully affected either), and continued to be at 11% above baseline, SHBG increased by 37%, SHBG binds testosterone and reduces its bioavailability and activity. My free testosterone (direct) showed 24% and 23% drops at 3 and 20 days post 2nd dose. In light of the neuroplastic, well-being, brain reset, and systemic metabolic and anti-inflammatory benefits, the trade-off is probably worth it. Especially considering that the magnitude of inhibition has no meaningful effect on actual fertility (total motile counts above 50 million are still on the safe side). This is a first-in-human observation, to our knowledge there is no published human clinical study demonstrating that psilocybin diminishes male fertility markers. General mechanistic evidence exists for recreational and psychoactive drugs possibly inhibiting fertility markers due to their effects on the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and general hormonal reset.  Yet no direct evidence for psilocybin or other similar psychedelics inhibiting fertility markers exist. A potential mechanism for the immediate inhibition of motility could involve direct serotonergic signaling in sperm. Human sperm express multiple serotonin receptors, including 5-HT2A, and one recent study found that a 5-HT2A antagonist reduced sperm motility, suggesting that 5-HT2A may regulate motility. Psilocybin is known to bind 5-HT2A with high affinity.

English
34
19
478
28K
Ulrik Sparboe
Ulrik Sparboe@ulriksparboe·
@iamgingertrash The agents that win won't care about chain loyalty. They'll route to whatever settles fastest and cheapest. The middleware tax is going to zero whether protocols like it or not.
English
1
0
2
1.1K
simp 4 satoshi
simp 4 satoshi@iamgingertrash·
Everyone ~building for agents~ Is underestimating 2027 capabilities You think a hyperintelligent machine > that communicates at 10k tok/s > needs to settle in microseconds > uses nano cents per transaction Is going to use a Proprietary Middleman Chain ™ (?)
English
56
37
862
66.1K
Christian Catalini
Christian Catalini@ccatalini·
1/ This is a great description of what verification infrastructure looks like in practice. In our new paper we argue this is the binding constraint on the AI economy — the same bottleneck textile mills hit when they scaled looms faster than weavers could check them.
Rohit@rohit4verse

x.com/i/article/2028…

English
8
27
213
56.7K
Rand
Rand@rand_longevity·
money will not exist in 10 years, stop worrying about it
English
397
94
1.1K
64.5K
Kevin Xu
Kevin Xu@kevinxu·
friend’s kid asked what they should major in college i almost cried what do you even say anymore
English
1.7K
221
19.5K
910.3K
Boyd Bischke
Boyd Bischke@BoydBischke·
@kevinxu Law, Medical, Industrial Engineering, Robotics, basically anything that requires certification or has any real world physical component.
English
17
0
62
11K
lorenz0x.eth
lorenz0x.eth@lorenzodoteth·
@gmoneyNFT yeah I was on the verge of quitting on agents, but then came through the other end with ONE golden agent built on NanoClaw But do I wanna spend weeks configuring another one? Nope lol I'm good Sticking to CC/OpenCode + Venice API for max privacy
English
1
0
5
622
gmoney.eth
gmoney.eth@gmoneyNFT·
i gave it a shot, but can't do this anymore. hermes sucks ass. all these agents suck ass. they just stop working all the time and then take forever to debug. sticking to claude code and codex in terminal. far and away better than messing with this productivity porn
English
136
9
461
37.6K
ŦØM₥Ɏ²
ŦØM₥Ɏ²@t0xmmy2·
@Vorioo Perplexity Computer is very good, it’s that step beyond what Claude offers, and is closer to that idea of multiple agents working together we were probably all attracted to with Openclaw. But it’s also very expensive. Seriously 😆
English
2
0
0
80
Vorio
Vorio@Vorioo·
2 months with OpenClaw. I've built dashboards, systems and automated a lot. However, 75% of my time is in Claude Code fixing something that has randomly broken? Am I just wrapping Claude? Perplexity Computer looks quite interesting, need to look into it. I understand the appeal of a Mac Mini etc. for keeping your data local but it doesn't seem worth it to me. So am I paying all these API and VPS costs for no real benefit? I need to think about this across the weekend. This cosntant tinkering might be losing its appeal.
English
3
1
5
831
IMRΛN
IMRΛN@imrane·
@barneyxbt It was inevitable. The humans behind it are spiritually broken and weak. Chasing hedonism and dopamine hits. We don’t fix it until we fix ourselves.
English
0
0
0
2
barney
barney@barneyxbt·
people are leaving crypto in numbers i’ve never seen in 9 years on this space and I get it. we turned this space into the exact thing it was built to destroy. institutions own it now. etfs, kyc, regulated everything. the 100x is dead. that era is gone. you’ll be lucky to pull a 2x going forward and you’ll be grateful for it like a boomer staring at their 401k statement. that’s what institutional adoption actually looks like. nobody told you the tradeoff was giving up everything that made crypto worth being early to and the last window for real money was memes. but memes are also ironically the final nail in the coffin. we allowed every dollar to be drained out of the ecosystem and funneled it to insiders while retail held bags and pretended it was still fun lmfao we literally destroyed the greatest financial revolution of our lifetime from the inside and now everyone’s shocked it doesn’t feel the same it doesn’t feel the same because it isn’t
English
603
215
1.8K
239.5K
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
@Whiplash437 If even one person takes this advice, abandons traditional treatment, then dies of the cancer it didn’t cure, you should be charged with manslaughter.
English
5
3
43
2.3K
Whiplash347
Whiplash347@Whiplash437·
CANCER HAS BEEN CURED Ivermectin & Fenbendazole cure cancer. Pass it on. BREAKING NEWS: First-in-the-World Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Protocol in Cancer has been peer-reviewed and published on Sep.19, 2024! The future of Cancer Treatment starts NOW. My thanks to lead authors Ilyes Baghli and Pierrick Martinez for their incredible inspired work, FLCCC’s Dr.Paul Marik for his extensive work on repurposed drugs and every co-author who worked hard to bring this paper to life. I hope that this peer-reviewed paper lays the groundwork for a brand new future for Cancer Treatment. Many of you know that I have been helping thousands of Cancer patients with high dose Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole
Whiplash347 tweet media
English
584
12K
31.2K
866.7K
Tuki
Tuki@TukiFromKL·
🚨 Let me tell you why this Goldman Sachs headline is the most dangerous one you'll read today.. Companies spent $450 billion on AI last year.. fired tens of thousands of people to "restructure around AI".. replaced entire departments with chatbots.. And Goldman Sachs just said it contributed basically zero to economic growth.. so where did the money go? > It went to Nvidia.. $130 billion in GPU sales.. Jensen is the only man on earth who got rich from AI that hasn't produced anything yet.. > It went to stock buybacks.. companies fired people, cut costs, reported "record profits" and bought back their own shares.. the money went UP not OUT.. Jesus! > It went to a bubble.. the same way crypto money went to Lamborghinis and not infrastructure.. AI money is going to valuations and not productivity.. here's the part that should terrify you.. They already fired the people.. Atlassian 1,600.. Meta 21,000.. Block 40%.. Amazon warehouses.. the jobs are already gone.. But the growth didn't come.. the productivity didn't come.. the revenue didn't come.. they burned the village to build a city that doesn't exist yet.. and Goldman Sachs just looked at the empty lot and said "there's nothing here"
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

"Massive investment in AI contributed basically zero to US economic growth last year," per Goldman Sachs

English
453
7.5K
30.5K
2.1M
IMRΛN
IMRΛN@imrane·
@agingroy @NIHAging Come on man. Geez
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson

On September 28th, I decided to stop rapamycin, ending almost 5 years of experimentation with this molecule for its longevity potential. I have tested various rapamycin protocols including weekly (5, 6, and 10 mg dose schedules), biweekly (13 mg) and alternating weekly (6/13mg) to optimize rejuvenation and limit side effects. Despite the immense potential from pre-clinical trials, my team and I came to the conclusion that the benefits of lifelong dosing of Rapamycin do not justify the hefty side-effects (intermittent skin/soft tissue infections, lipid abnormalities, glucose elevations, and increased resting heart rate). With no other underlying causes identified, we suspected Rapamycin, and since dosage adjustments had no effect, we decided to discontinue it entirely. Preclinical and clinical research has indicated that prolonged rapamycin use can disrupt lipid metabolism and profiles [1], as well as induce insulin and glucose intolerance [2] as well as pancreatic Beta-cells toxicity [3]. Despite anecdotal evidence of rapamycin slowing down tumor growth, its effect in inhibiting natural killer cells [4]  do raise concern for anti-cancer immune surveillance and cancer risk in the longer run. Additionally, on October 27th, a new pre-print [5] indicated that Rapamycin was one of a handful of supposed longevity interventions to cause an increase/acceleration of aging in humans across 16 epigenetic aging clocks. This type of evaluation is the first of its kind, as most longevity interventions up to date have been tested against one or two aging clocks, leading to invisible biases and potential intended “cherry picking” of favorable clocks for the tested interventions. Longevity research around these experimental compounds is constantly evolving, necessitating ongoing, close observation of the research and my biomarkers which my team and I do constantly. Sources: [1] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12177161/ [2]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC33…. [3]diabetesjournals.org/diabetes/artic… [4]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC40….

English
1
0
0
686
Avi Roy
Avi Roy@agingroy·
We spent weeks building the most complete public database of every longevity drug ever tested by the @NIHAging's Interventions Testing Program. 54 compounds. 30,000+ mice. 20 years of data. 3 independent sites. Seven drugs extended life. Most popular supplements failed completely. Here’s the ranked data, the mechanisms, and the database:
Avi Roy@agingroy

x.com/i/article/2034…

English
18
50
296
62.5K
Nathan Flurry 🔩
Nathan Flurry 🔩@NathanFlurry·
🤘 Securely execute AI-generated Node.js code without a sandbox - 17.9ms coldstarts p99 - 3.4 MB RAM - 56x cheaper than sandboxes - Built on the same tech as Cloudflare Workers - Just a library, no external vendor - Our most metal website yet
Nathan Flurry 🔩 tweet media
Rivet@rivet_dev

Introducing the Secure Exec SDK Secure Node.js execution without a sandbox ⚡ 17.9 ms coldstart, 3.4 MB mem, 56x cheaper 📦 Just a library – supports Node.js, Bun, & browsers 🔐 Powered by the same tech as Cloudflare Workers $ 𝚗𝚙𝚖 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚎-𝚎𝚡𝚎𝚌

English
18
6
183
17.1K
IMRΛN
IMRΛN@imrane·
@DCinvestor We had our chance but chose shitcoins and stablecoins. Only thing to make these nut jobs heel is to wrestle back control of the money. We failed.
English
0
0
0
28
DCinvestor
DCinvestor@DCinvestor·
as i've been saying since this conflict started: destroying oil and gas infrastructure at scale, with the implied reciprocal attacks we will see from a regime who knows they are dead anyway if they lose could very well usher in a global depression and create unimaginable and widespread human suffering we have never seen in the modern era marginal buyers who cannot afford to pay the resulting higher prices due to extreme supply constraints will be impacted hardest. everyone else will pay more everything, resulting in tremendous demand destruction and economic slowing and it's not just oil, it's all of the critical byproducts which come from oil production which are essential for modern life unfortunately, it seems that the parties prosecuting this war don't care if that happens. one might even argue that one side of it may want for that to happen we need to stop this shit, now. at a minimum, touching energy infrastructure should be an inviolable redline
English
42
91
829
53.4K
IMRΛN
IMRΛN@imrane·
The only option left is crypto and not the shit stablecoins they peddle you with. Durable Bitcoin & Ethereum
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__

⚡️The professional middle is entering a slow liquidation. That is what is coming. A lot of six figure workers still think they own scarce cognition. They do not. What they actually own is a seat inside an organizational diagram that is about to be rewritten. For twenty years, companies paid armies of people to summarize, coordinate, package, analyze, report, reassure, sell, recruit, and administratively maintain complexity. AI is about to reveal how much of that layer was never true scarcity. It was overhead wearing prestige. That is why this gets dangerous. The people in that layer built expensive lives around the illusion that their salaries were durable. Big mortgages. daycare. two income households. private schools. lifestyle debt. identity fused to title. So when the compression starts, it does not feel like a normal labor shock. It feels like your class position is being revoked. A person loses the job and suddenly realizes the house was never a fortress. It was a fixed-cost trap financed by continuity. The next 12 to 18 months are likely to be ugly because companies have finally been handed a believable excuse to thin the white collar herd. They can say AI. They can say efficiency. They can say macro caution. They can say market conditions. The language does not matter. The result does. Fewer seats. Longer hiring cycles. More ghosting. Lower offers. Higher bars. More people with impressive resumes chasing jobs beneath prior status. The market will keep telling itself this is temporary. A lot of it is structural. And the cruelest part is that this probably will not arrive as one cinematic crash. It will arrive as social downgrading. The title gets softer. The comp gets cut. The search takes longer. The savings get chewed through. The role accepted is smaller than the last one. The family says it is fine. The person knows something has broken. That kind of decline is much more psychologically destructive than one violent break because it makes people live inside the decay of their own ranking. Housing is where this becomes visible. The professional class was supposed to be the stable bid under the market. If enough of them lose income security while carrying large mortgages, the house stops being optionality and becomes a restraint device. People stop moving. Listings freeze. Spending contracts. Families become geographically trapped because leaving means crystallizing loss or taking a much worse payment elsewhere. The labor shock and the housing shock start feeding each other. Society is about to discover how much of the tax base, consumption base, and institutional calm sat on a white collar class whose value was inflated by a pre-AI information economy. That class thought it had made it because it was paid well. A lot of them were just being temporarily overcompensated to keep the administrative machine running. When the machine needs fewer humans, the paycheck premium gets repriced hard. Bottom line: A lot of six figure jobs are going away. A lot of the people in them will not get equivalent replacements. The pain will concentrate in the salaried professional class with high fixed costs and no ownership cushion. The official data will lag the lived reality. The social mood will get darker long before the statistics fully admit why. The real truth is simple: The next phase is the collapse of professional security. The middle is about to learn that income is not the same thing as safety.

English
0
0
0
52
dex
dex@dexhorthy·
damn this is so good and encapsulates everything I've been seeing/saying in the last few months - a spec that is sufficiently detailed to generate code with a reliable degree of quality is roughly the same length and detail as the code itself - so don't review those things, just review the code at that point, if you care enough about that level of abstraction - unless you're vibing side projects or prototypes (yes, even zero-to-one software), you ABSOLUTELY SHOULD care about the code at that level of abstraction - you need to find SOME way to get more leverage over coding agents though, because just reading all that code is a pain, esp when a lot of it is slop - the default/dare-i-say-decel way is to go back to "i own the execution, and give little things to the agent, check it along the way" - the accel-but-safe-way is to find something - NOT A SPEC (the word "spec" is broken anyway) - NOT 3 INVOCATIONS OF AskUserQuestion - that lets you resteer the model *before* it slops out N-thousand LOC
gabby@GabriellaG439

New blog post: "A sufficiently detailed spec is code" I wrote this because I was tired of people claiming that the future of agentic coding is thoughtful specification work. As I show in the post, the reality devolves into slop pseudocode haskellforall.com/2026/03/a-suff…

English
31
30
531
250.7K