Mr. Hack

Like if you are student. Retweet if a teacher #speakup #SpeckUpForSSCRailwaysStudents #TeachersDay2020 #RRBExamDates #BiharBole_RozgarDo

@shashank_ssj Hey Bar counsil This man is impersonating as an advocate. Look into the matter. I have doubts about his degree.

Hello gyani, how is river getting dirty if milk is poured in river?

@Pivot2Centre तालाब का मेंढ़क @Pivot2Centre

Nepal will go into chaos in next 3yrs. Nayak was an amazing movie. But it was a movie. Real life is very different

@_KajalKushwaha To bharosewalo Rajkumar Rajkumar ka RR kyu rote rahte ho

लोकतंत्र में राजा कोई भी नहीं है। ये तो विपक्ष के दिमाग की ही उपज है।

@shashank_ssj Aur ye admi khud ko adv kahta h jise basic rule nahi pata

Why is Vaibhav Sooryavanshi not playing for Indian Cricket yet?

@ECISVEEP @airnewsalerts @DDNewsHindi @DDNewslive @PIB_India Bhai log comment me mat bolo kuch Ye log case kar dete h ....

चुनाव आयोग की तृणमूल कांग्रेस को दो टूक पश्चिम बंगाल में इस बार चुनाव: भय रहित, हिंसा रहित, धमकी रहित, प्रलोभन रहित, छापा रहित, बूथ एवं सोर्स जामिंग रहित होकर ही रहेंगे ECI's Straight-talk to Trinamool Congress This time, the Elections in West Bengal would surely be : Fear-free, Violence-free, Intimidation-free, Inducement-free and without any Chappa, Booth Jamming and Source Jamming.

@Dinesh5patel @revathitweets @tnpoliceoffl is it not a threat?

ALL NINE COPS TO BE HANGED!!! In a landmark judgement, the honourable First Additional District and Sessions Judge of Madurai, G Muthukumaran pronounced death penalty for all nine policemen in the Jeyaraj and Beniks custodial torture and death case. Inspector S Sridhar, sub-inspectors P Ragu Ganesh & K Balakrishnan, head constables S Murugan and A Samidurai and constables M Muthuraja, S Veil Muthu, S Chelladurai & X Thomas Francis have all been found guilty of the double murder. On 19th June 2020, Jeyaraj went to his son’s mobile shop in at Sathankulam in Thoothukudi. Police arrested him for violating Covid rules. Following the father’s arrest, Beniks went to the police station and requested for his father’s release. Beniks apparently had an argument with the cops. They arrested him also and tortured him and his father through the night and later sent to judicial remand. Beniks died at Kovilapatti Government Hospital on 22nd June, 2020, and Jeyaraj passed away the next day. The investigation later revealed that the mobile shop wasn’t open beyond the permissible hours. Basically a false case was slapped. Later, a female constable, Revathi came forward to tell the truth of their torture. Not only were the son & the father beaten brutally throughout the night but were also made to clean up their blood off the police station floor and walls with their clothes. Beniks sustained 13 external injuries and Jeyaraj had 17 wounds that ultimately led to their deaths. They were bleeding from their rectums when they were sent to jail!!! Following a huge social media uproar and protests, there was pressure on the then Tamil Nadu government to conduct a fair investigation into their deaths. If you go through the whole case, you will realise that 59 year old Jeyraj and 31 year old Beniks were killed purely because the ego of the policemen was hurt. They were angry that Beniks questioned why his father was arrested and being beaten up. Family of the victims hope this will be a lesson to all policemen who think they can get away with any crime. But unfortunately in our country most police don’t play by the rules. It is either their ego or orders from above or corruption that drives them. Hoping for better policing and a system that stands for victims, especially the voiceless ones.

@ndtvindia I hope the Government will deport them to their respective nations within 6 months of election.

🔴#BREAKING | पश्चिम बंगाल में SIR की फाइनल लिस्ट आई, 90 लाख से ज्यादा लोगों के नाम कटे, बांग्लादेश सीमा से सटे इलाकों से ज्यादा नाम कटे

@chitraaum Btao .... Godi media bhi chunav nahi jeeta pa rhi exit poll me to real me to bhool hi jao

@SonOfBharat7 @amitmalviya @TheDeepak2020 Amit malviya kis government post par hai ?? B&D

@ANI I was waiting ki kab pakistan or Bangladesh angle leke aata h ye admi ... Here we come

#WATCH | Guwahati: Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma says, "Yesterday, Pawan Khera and Gaurav Gogoi did two press conferences, one in Delhi, one in Guwahati...During our research, we found that the entire material of the press conference, which took place yesterday, was supplied by a Pakistani social media group. In the last 10 days, Pakistan channel has done at least 11 talk shows regarding the election in Assam, which never happened earlier. And in every talk show, the conclusion is that Congress should win. Pakistan's link to yesterday's press conference has also now become very, very apparent. I am sure that this will be taken into consideration by the law enforcement agency." "...Normally, when you raise a certain issue before the public with fraudulent documents, it attracts 420 and 468 of the IPC. Of course, there is a correspondence provision in new BNS. When you use these allegations with fabricated documents to influence a result or outcome of an election, then it attracts higher penalty provisions, and the punishment for that is life imprisonment. Yesterday, my wife filed an FIR, and I am sure that the police will register the case in the appropriate section of law and take necessary action."

Adhar card is the proof of adhar card. Nothing else

@khuchrep 1,2,3. - Corruption 4- Ministers and babus 5,6. Mafia

मुझे एक बात नहीं समझ आ रही है, सरकारों को, 1- साफ सड़के, 2- अच्छा ड्रेनेज सिस्टम 3- गड्ढा मुक्त सड़के, 4- भ्रष्टाचार मुक्त सिस्टम 5- अच्छे हॉस्पिटल 6- अच्छी एवं सस्ती शिक्षा ये सब करने से कौन रोक रहा है?

@PetroleumMin @HardeepSPuri @neerajmittalias @Secretary_MoPNG @BPCLimited @DirectorM_BPCL @cmdbpcl I will share request id in DM

I applied for a gas connection at my residence on 20/03/2026. It has been 14 days and no one connected with me in this regard. KYC is still pending? Why does it take so much time? @PetroleumMin @HardeepSPuri @neerajmittalias @Secretary_MoPNG @BPCLimited @DirectorM_BPCL @cmdbpcl

@i_mandhata Sell it as Sharbat not as DRINK OF INDIA. How can a sharbat be refreshing??

It's sherbet. What did the idiot expect to find in it - protein?

@shashank_ssj Aise ni banega govt lawyer... Padh likh ke banega

Bengaluru is ruled by incompetent Congress Party.

@news24tvchannel Kobra 🐍🐍🐍🐍

"कोई माई का लाल पश्चिम बंगाल को बांग्लादेश नहीं बना सकता" ◆ भारतीय जनता पार्टी के नेता और बॉलीवुड अभिनेता मिथुन ने कहा #MithunChakraborty #WestBengalElection

@ANI You may not understand but this is an old practice of deleting data from records.

Delhi Police have lodged an FIR following a major data breach and official document leakage at the FSSAI. Investigations by the Delhi Police are currently underway to identify those responsible for leaking sensitive official documents: Sources

@prernabhardwaj_ @airindia Beyond time to haryana roadways wale intezaar ni karte station par to tumhe lagta h airline wale karege ?? Poor acting, boarding gates must be or should be closed before 25 minutes of departure.

Statement by the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) on Delhi Police Notices to X (formerly Twitter) Seeking User Data in FIR No. 135/2026 The Internet Freedom Foundation is deeply concerned by reports that Delhi Police has written to X seeking expansive identifying information for multiple social media accounts. The demand is in connection with with FIR No. 135/2026 registered at PS IP Estate, Central Delhi (dated 24.03.2026) under Sections 316(4) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. These notices publicly shared and now under scrutiny target several X handles, including @khurpenchh, @YTKDIndia, @gemsofbabus_, @IamTheStory__, and @NalinisKitchen (among others). They seek not just basic subscriber information but highly intrusive details including, mobile numbers and emails used for registration, full IP logs with ports for all active sessions since account creation, recovery emails, and “any other information”. Such sweeping demands go far beyond what is necessary or proportionate for any legitimate investigation such as basic subscriber information that may be legitimately requested. The FIR itself raises serious concerns about misuse of criminal law against online expression. From information available in the public domain it alleges that posts on X by these handles were published with “malicious intent to defame” a victim (referred to as “her”), causing “chaos before the public,” and that certain “highly confidential” details were “stolen” and disclosed. The invoked sections, BNS 316(4) (criminal breach of trust by a clerk/servant, carrying up to 7 years’ imprisonment) read with 3(5) (common intention/joint liability), and IT Act 72A (disclosure of information in breach of lawful contract) appear stretched and ill-suited to the facts. A prima facia analysis of the specific posts referenced in the notices (e.g., content from @khurpenchh dated around 10 March 2026) shows they involve public-interest exposes alleging irregularities in appointments at FSSAI (Food Safety and Standards Authority of India). Far from baseless defamation, these appear to be critical commentary and allegations of possible malpractices in public employment, which are protected forms of speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. Resorting to criminal provisions meant for breach of trust by employees or contractual disclosures to unmask critics sets a dangerous precedent. If the core grievance is reputational harm then a statement by the government body or even perhaps in extreme situation civil remedies (such as a defamation suit) would suffice. Instead, the police have chosen the criminal route, which carries the threat of arrest, investigation, and chilling effects. This is a classic case of weaponising criminal law to suppress scrutiny of public officials and institutions. The data demands pose grave privacy risks under Article 21 of the Constitution. Requiring IP logs, port details, and session history since account creation enables not just identification but comprehensive tracking of users’ digital footprints. In an era of pervasive surveillance, this could expose critics, journalists, or whistleblowers to harassment, doxxing, or retaliation especially when the accounts appear to be anonymous voices highlighting alleged systemic issues. Further, X (as an intermediary) is being asked to hand over data without adequate judicial oversight or necessity demonstration, echoing patterns IFF has repeatedly flagged in cases involving Section 69 of the IT Act or CrPC/BNSS notices. Such bulk, open-ended requests (“any other information”) violate the principles of necessity, proportionality, and minimal intrusion laid down by the Supreme Court in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) and subsequent digital rights jurisprudence. We must remember that anonymous or pseudonymous accounts play a vital role in India’s online discourse, enabling fearless criticism of power without fear of reprisal. By pursuing these handles through police notices and FIRs, the authorities send a clear message that you question the system at your peril. The affected users have rightly described this as a “witch hunt.” IFF echoes that concern. At a time when digital spaces are among the few remaining avenues for robust public debate, such actions erode the foundational guarantee of free speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). They also undermine trust in law enforcement, turning routine criticism into criminal investigations that drain resources better spent on real crimes. IFF will continue monitoring this case. Freedom of expression on the internet is not a privilege but a constitutional right that must be fiercely protected against overreach. Internet Freedom Foundation New Delhi 02 April 2026