Jackson Hole

People who voted for Trump because they feel he is an actionable proxy for their grievances are going to be in for a long four years.

@waitwhichmike @AB84 How so? Do you even know what narcissism is?

@jacksonholio @AB84 Voting for kamala is as narcissistic as you can get

What’s a phrase a narcissist says that instantly gives them away?

@RonFilipkowski More corn socialism!

How many times do we have to give farmers billions of dollars because Trump’s policies screw them over constantly? They overwhelmingly voted for this guy 3 times. Ask him for the money - maybe he can sell some crypto.

@Bludogblog @carlquintanilla @gtconway3d @CNN Go fuck yourself. Ignorant asshole.

@jacksonholio @carlquintanilla @gtconway3d @CNN At least he's present for it which is more than can be said for the last one.🤣

There is absolutely no bottom. @CNN cnn.com/2026/03/13/pol…

@libsoftiktok @BonginoReport @SecofWar What a pathetic little man.

.@secofwar Pete Hegseth: "We’ve decided to share the ocean with Iran. We’ve given them the bottom half” 🔥

@SenateGOP @SenJonHusted You fuckers are cooked. Maybe take a break from the socials.

LYIN’ CHUCK: less than a week ago, Senator Schumer said Senate Democrats support voter ID. Yet, Senate Democrats just blocked @SenJonHusted’s standalone voter ID provision.

@RealDeanCain Whatever amount you say, if Trump doesn’t last, donate to charity of your choosing.

@RealDeanCain How much money would you put on Trump finishing the term? And I mean actual money not a flippant answer like “everything I have”.

What he is really means, is that grifters like him are "f*cked" if President Trump serves out his term. Americans will rejoice! 🇺🇸

@bennyjohnson Isn’t that the podcaster dude that died?

Keep Fighting. Never Surrender.

FYI - this is Iran in 1979. When this comes back, then someone can claim “victory”.

@DUNBAR74 @PhillipsPOBrien Hey buddy. Any idea what this is a collage of? I’d say with near 100% certainly, your syphilis-riddled MAGA brain doesn’t know this was Iran in 1979. When it goes back to this, then someone can get a cookie. Until then, STFU you ignorant asshole.

@PhillipsPOBrien You think that's a side effect. It is the goal. Maybe one of these days you'll figure out what's really going on.

Watching Trump teeter on the edge of blowing up the world economy because of a combination of hubris, strategic incoherence, mendacity and outright stupidity, might be the most extraordinarily depressing thing I have observed in my entire life, or read about in any other period.

@elpasser1 @PhillipsPOBrien Great victory? The dude was going to be dead in a few years regardless. The son was always next up. Foolish to think otherwise. Nothing has changed. If Iran goes back to looking like this, then victory can be declared. (This is pre Revolution Iran. Guessing you had no clue…)

@PhillipsPOBrien Only TDS can cause a person to reframe a great victory against the evil Iranian regime into a disaster. The oil shock will quickly pass, and then you'll have to find another fly in the ointment.

@SenateGOP @SenEricSchmitt That’s not what this bill does. It disenfranchises millions.

The Save America Act is just common sense. 83% of Americans support voter ID.

@SpeakerJohnson @GOP Why post this? Just do your duty and STFU.

Today, I had the solemn honor of attending the dignified transfer of six American heroes who gave their lives in selfless service to our nation. Freedom is never free. It is carried on the shoulders of the brave. We will never forget their courage and sacrifice. Our prayers and hearts are with their families.

Well that’s unfortunate.

@PatchFace3 @bennyjohnson Go fuck yourself. Ignorant shit.

@jacksonholio @bennyjohnson So you are the definition of a loser

I am hiring someone who is: - monitoring the situation - terminally online - locked into the news cycle - functional at ai prompts - can read and write dm me

The **SAVE Act** (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, also referred to in some contexts as the SAVE America Act) is a bill that amends the National Voter Registration Act to require **documentary proof of U.S. citizenship** (such as a passport, birth certificate, certain military records, or specific other documents) when registering to vote in federal elections. It prohibits states from accepting or processing registration applications without this proof, often requiring in-person submission for many methods. This would effectively eliminate or severely restrict online registration, mail registration, DMV-based registration, and voter registration drives in their current forms, as those typically rely on sworn attestation of citizenship under penalty of perjury rather than physical documents. Critics (including organizations like the Brennan Center for Justice, Center for American Progress, ACLU, League of Women Voters, and others) argue that if the SAVE Act passes and voters take no additional action (e.g., no effort to obtain required documents or register in person), it could **disenfranchise** or create barriers for millions of eligible U.S. citizens. Key estimates from analyses include: - More than **21 million** American citizens lack ready/easy access to the required documentary proof of citizenship (e.g., passport or matching birth certificate), per Brennan Center and related studies. This figure is commonly cited across sources as a core potential impact, with many of these being active voters who would struggle to register or update registration. - Up to **millions more** (potentially tens of millions) could face effective barriers due to the overhaul of registration methods — one analysis from the Voter Participation Center indicates that **83% of voters** in recent cycles relied on registration methods (online, mail, automatic/DMV) that would be restricted or unusable without major changes, preventing them from registering or updating in the same way. - Other estimates reference **tens of millions** overall impacted by combined documentation and process changes, with disproportionate effects on groups like younger voters, elderly, people of color, naturalized citizens, married women with name changes (up to 69 million potentially affected by name mismatches), rural residents, and low-income individuals. - Precedents from state-level similar laws (e.g., Kansas blocked ~31,000 eligible registrants, mostly citizens; Arizona has ~250,000 in a separate status) suggest high rates of eligible citizens blocked rather than noncitizens. Proponents argue the bill ensures only citizens vote and that noncitizen voting (though extremely rare) is prevented, with public polls showing support for proof-of-citizenship requirements. The exact number who would ultimately be **disenfranchised** (i.e., unable to vote due to inability or failure to comply) depends on implementation, state responses, voter efforts to obtain documents, and whether the bill becomes law and survives challenges — no precise nationwide figure exists for "if voters take no action," but analyses consistently point to **millions** (often 21+ million as a baseline for documentation access issues alone) facing significant new hurdles that could prevent registration or updates for future elections. Note: The bill has passed the House in various forms (including versions in 2025-2026) but faced Senate hurdles and debate over its impacts. Noncitizen voting in federal elections remains illegal and exceedingly rare based on available data.

@jacksonholio @CareYouMust @SenKevinCramer @SenateGOP Answer the simple question. Who is disenfranchised?

We’re required to show an ID to board a plane, open a bank account, or pick up a package, none of which are fundamental to preserving our democracy. The American people should be confident in the security of our elections. Today, we start debate on the SAVE America Act and make our case directly before the American people.

@healybaum Whatever happened to the 45 Energy Group? That shady thing with Rudy and you. Ukraine? Corrupt AF you are.

Yezzz

@MissouriCorn @BobOnderMO @RepJasonSmith @SenEricSchmitt CORN SOCIALISM - MORE SUBSIDIES FOR CORN GASOLINE AND CORN SYRUP.

MCGA was back in D.C. this week, sharing concerns over cost of fertilizer, pushing for access to all markets including E15, and urging support of USMCA renewal. @BobOnderMO @RepJasonSmith @SenEricSchmitt