J429

@cfryant TBH I cancelled my sub, it just wasn't that good better models out there now

Midjourney v8 alpha is out now. Here are 20 examples using their new native HD, no SREFS, text only. My thoughts @ the end, plus 3 exclusive prompts for subscribers from these 3 below.

@fluffy_trex @neutron_org Thanks so much for the guide!

$maxBTC is no longer yield bearing, and you can redeem it using this guide: x.com/StructuredFi/s… the other wBTC denoms can be bridged out using skip or the neutron app. Remember that the wBTC used in bitcoin summer is wBTC.eureka, so it needs to be bridged to cosmos hub first and then can be bridged anywhere (another cosmos chain like osmosis to swap, OR directly to Ethereum).

With the conclusion of Phase III, the BTCFi campaign on Neutron has come to an end. Rewards and unlocked boosts are now live and claimable. You may now move positions without risk of reward forfeiture. Thank you to everyone who participated. app.neutron.org

@IsThisA3DModel Just block straight away, don't feed the engagement farm

no you didnt

@jaybtc Blocked for engagement farming

used too much ai and threejs lately, so i've decided to touch some grass and learn blender properly

@AirdropGlideApp Isn't that the same across pretty much 98% of DEX

@jay4291 *Was. It's declining rapidly month on month.

My personal view? $20m is too much for Osmosis, but you've got to start somewhere right? If you remember, Stargaze originally asked for $15m and did a deal at ~$1.5m. Maybe something around $5m is the correct price. Remember, if a deal doesn't go through, there's little doubt that OSMO will just behave like every other Cosmos token, and trend to zero. And the team will then have to decide between staying in maintenance only mode, or just migrating for free to save themselves.

@osmosis Let’s go!!

Today we’re proposing something big for the Cosmos ecosystem. We’re bringing Osmosis directly into the Cosmos Hub. If approved by governance of both chains, the Osmosis DEX will be migrated natively on the Hub — unifying liquidity, governance, and security under one chain. This proposal reflects a natural evolution for Cosmos: sovereign experimentation followed by consolidation once infrastructure has matured. Osmosis has served as the primary liquidity venue of Cosmos since 2021. Now it has the opportunity to become native infrastructure of the Hub itself. OSMO holders would have the ability to convert to ATOM through a structured migration process, allowing the Cosmos to finally align around a single coordination asset. Finally, ATOM will have its first true revenue stream and direct exposure to the liquidity engine of Cosmos. For years the question has been: how does ATOM capture value from ecosystem activity? This proposal is our answer. Governance discussion begins today. Forum proposal ↓ forum.cosmos.network/t/proposal-dra…

@neutron_org Let’s go! Astro back online

The Neutron orderbook and Supervaults are live again. Swaps, deposits, and withdrawals are all operational.

@MarcelDeneuve @Apple I’ve got every MacBook from M1–M4 for work + a 4090 gaming rig. Every new M chip drop brings the same hype posts… but in daily use? For heavy stuff, it still doesn’t touch the 4090

"YE3" - pretty heavy scene running real-time on my base M4 Pro Macbook. These things are beasts for 3D work already. Imagine an M5 Max + 128 GB… new era for 3D graphics? @Apple

@neutron_org lol that's shameless!

🤔 Where have we seen this website before?

@AlexFinn this account is getting boring ngl

Apple just won the AI war They announced the MacBook Pro M5 Max What would have cost $40,000 to do with Nvidia chips, now costs $3,000 with a laptop • 4x faster AI speeds • Up to 128gb of unified memory • Frontier intelligence on the go The biggest complaint about Apple before was their AI speeds You get insane memory to run big models, but the inference was super slow Not anymore Apple played the long game by not spending trillions on AI researchers. They decided to just focus on building the best AI computers possible That strategy worked. It's over.

@_tonylewis @dariusdan get a windows gaming PC + 42inch Oled LG Tv, never look back

@dariusdan What a disaster. I've been meaning to upgrade from an ultra-wide LG that I've owned for 5 years or so. The colors just never quite worked out for me... What I see on my screen never matches hex-codes displayed on figma or WP. Any suggestions of what I should upgrade to?

The new studio display you all have been waiting for it only has better mic and speakers. 😁 But there is a new called Studio Display XDR, 120hz & mini-led. Same 27inch body and it’s $3299. I don’t regret I got my 2x studio displays before this!

@DeRonin_ This is the perfect example of why you don't hire people on twitter/x

@objective_cfc with a €5m loss cap next year. Year 4 of “setting up the model” and the losses are getting bigger, not smaller. That’s why people say the cash went up in smoke.

@objective_cfc @objective_cfc Respect the optimism mate, but today’s UEFA report directly proves the exact problem you flagged. Chelsea posted a record £350m+ pre-tax loss (the biggest in English football history) ->

People talk about Chelsea’s spending like the money has gone up in smoke. We’re holding assets man. We didn’t set fire to the cash ffs. If the assets are stable or even appreciating then there isn’t an issue. Long term contracts key. If the assets are like sterling then there is a massive problem with what we’re doing. (Depreciating asset that’s expensive to hold) Last summer net spend was zero. I predict £150m of sales this summer, so again the net spend won’t be that big even if we go out and drop £200m. Every signing is basically on low risk trial. Setting up the model was always going to be expensive - needs you to front up a lot of cash. Keep what works. Move on what doesn’t. Compound with time and quality of squad will go up and up and up. Keep it stepping.

@objective_cfc while making it almost impossible to sell the flops without taking another hit.“Net spend zero” last summer is nice for the headlines, but it doesn’t fix £600m+ in total squad costs against ~£490m revenue, or the fact Chelsea are already under a UEFA settlement agreement

@objective_cfc (Depreciating asset that’s expensive to hold)” Well… that’s exactly what just happened on a squad-wide scale. Those “assets” aren’t stable or appreciating for a lot of them. Long contracts only work if the player performs. Otherwise they lock you into huge wages + amortisation

@objective_cfc A huge chunk of that came from massive player impairments the club had to write down the book value of multiple players because their real/market value has dropped hard. You literally said: “If the assets are like Sterling then there is a massive problem with what we’re doing. ->

@slbsn Thanks again!