JD Pavek

188 posts

JD Pavek

JD Pavek

@jdpavek

Pro small gov, big citizens, school choice, and honest transparent elections. @COSProject @edchoice @CauseAmerica @Unite4Freedom #EdChoice #ElectionIntegrity

Oregon Katılım Şubat 2024
218 Takip Edilen178 Takipçiler
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
Let them talk talk talk, and then pass the SAVE America Act.
Cleta Mitchell@CletaMitchell

In the SOTU, @POTUS called on the GOP controlled Senate to pass the SAVE America Act.   Here is a primer of the Senate rules re how the GOP Senate can pass the SAVE America Act with a simple majority. 51 votes. NOT 60. 1.  @chiproytx and @BasedMikeLee, with support of @SpeakerJohnson put the entire content of the SAVE America Act into a Senate bill (S1383) that had already passed the Senate and was at the HOUSE awaiting consideration.  2.  The House passed S1383 containing the SAVE America Act language. 3.  S1383 SAVE America Act is now back to the Senate, awaiting Senate action.  It can be called up and moved to floor by simple MAJORITY vote.  Not 60 votes.  Any time. 4.  Once the bill is on the floor, it is ready for consideration. Sen Thune is in charge of it.   5.  It faces a filibuster.  Thune can then do one of two things: - try to cut off the filibuster which requires 60 votes and will kill the bill.   WE DONT WANT HIM TO DO THAT. That is a deliberate move to kill the bill.   - the other option is to simply allow the Democrats to filibuster the bill.   THATS WHAT WE WANT 6.  There are 50 GOP Senators pledged to vote yes.  So if we can get to the other side of the filibuster, SAVE America Act can pass with 51 votes.   7. Make the Democrats actually DO the filibuster.  Make them talk about the bill. 8.   Why do they oppose proof of citizenship for registering to vote? 9.  Why do they oppose photo idea to vote? 10. Why do they oppose requiring states to clean voter rolls? 11.  Let the filibuster run its course.  Let the toddlers have their tantrum  12.  Then, when that’s over or when they are tired, the SAVE America Act can pass with a simple majority.  51 votes.  THAT is what we want Sen Thune to do. It is all within his control.  He just needs to stand up, look the Democrats in the eye and say “okay, guys, let’s go.  Let’s have a filibuster” That’s what the American people want.  Don’t get sucked into the false narrative that the SAVE America Act must have 60 votes to pass.  Not true.  What is required is a leader who’s not afraid to lead and a Republican majority who’s not afraid to work.  And to fight for something that matters to the American people.   We are watching and pushing.  A cloture motion before any debate is intended to kill the bill.  Is that what Sen Thune wants- to be the one who kills the SAVE America Act?   @EIwatchdogs

English
0
0
0
24
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
Murkowski's line was so busy it took me a couple of tries to get through and leave a msg. Collins was only one try. McConnell - yeah, he doesn't even give you an opportunity to leave a msg - ya think his voice mailbox is full. Kept it up.
Cecilia Calabrese@CeceCalabrese

@TrumpDailyPosts @SenFettermanPA Pound the phones of Murkowski, Collins, and McConnell! We got the others.

English
0
0
1
31
Babe
Babe@voguebabe35·
@ColoradoCa38720 Here, for your further edification, is the resume of Unite4Freedom's Esteemed Chairman, Harry Haury! ENJOY! 👀😉❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Babe tweet media
English
1
9
18
99
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@DoderoHaxtun @atensnut That's a great question. Sadly we'll never know the answer because the validity of our elections is unknown and unknowable. No post audit can give us the answer. The one thing we do know - she wants to keep it that way.
English
1
4
9
30
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@Unite4Freedom @drabek370296 States have ignored law that in a normal world would help safeguard elections. We need a full stop and reboot - pass the SAVE America Act.
English
0
0
2
10
Unite4Freedom
Unite4Freedom@Unite4Freedom·
ID is already standard across daily life because it protects accuracy, accountability, and trust. Elections should meet at least that same standard. When voter rolls contain outdated or duplicate records, or identity verification is inconsistent, confidence in outcomes naturally erodes — regardless of intent. Federal law already emphasizes accurate voter registration lists (NVRA), secure election administration standards (HAVA), and record retention safeguards under the Civil Rights Act. Those frameworks exist because verification matters.
English
2
13
27
151
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@PeterBernegger when I watch this, and I come back to it every now and then, I don't see any extra weight, just a lean mean fighting machine with all the ammunition clean logic provides. Thank you for your patriotic efforts.
Peter Bernegger@PeterBernegger

Bernegger (me) testifies to issue, cast and count the ballots in the same room! Testifies against absentee mail-in ballots. Hammers the corrupt politicians who want to continue to facility the stealing of our elections. 6 min video - remember the camera adds 20 pounds: rumble.com/v718rsm-democr… @PatrickByrne @AbsoluteWithE @EmeraldRobinson @HarmeetKDhillon @honestpollster @Rasmussen_Poll @realDonaldTrump - thank you for listening and taking immediate action to make our roads safer. #SeizeTheTrucks

English
1
1
2
23
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@Beardvet If those elected to the US Senate don't want to have fair and transparent valid elections what does that say about how they got elected?
English
0
0
1
6
JD Pavek retweetledi
Beard Vet
Beard Vet@Beardvet·
Only Americans should decide American elections. The Save America Act is just Common Sense 🪪 A Valid ID to Vote in a Federal Election 🇺🇸 Proof of Citizenship 🚫 No Mail-in Ballots (Except for Illness, Disability, Military or Travel)
Beard Vet tweet media
English
22
71
260
7.2K
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@DoderoHaxtun @MAGAVoice It is about freedom for the people. For the elites it's about retaining power. But just like no one is above the law, no one should be above being drafted to fight in this battle.
English
0
0
3
22
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
BREAKING 🚨 The U.S. Senate is about to vote on ending Sanctuary Cities. This needs to get passed "You would face punishment. That will STOP illegal sanctuary policy” I VOTED FOR THIS
English
218
2.4K
14.4K
124.2K
Babe
Babe@voguebabe35·
@DoderoHaxtun @ksorbs SHAME ON YOU, Illinois District 7 & District 8 Candidates!!! Hypocrisy Much???
GIF
English
1
0
10
44
Kevin Sorbo
Kevin Sorbo@ksorbs·
Show a fricking ID!!
English
66
306
1.9K
21.9K
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@Unite4Freedom Of course the math is not right. There still in the woke realm where 2 + 2 does not equal 4. And remember even if it did, math is racist.
English
1
1
9
23
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@TheArcticPossum @lisamurkowski Yeah, she doesn't mind disenfranchising me by allowing non-citizens to vote against my choice for senator. But she does have good reason. It would require election officials to scramble to adhere to new policies. Oh my gosh, wouldn't want to inconvenience those incompetents.
English
0
2
5
23
Possum
Possum@TheArcticPossum·
So you were for Federal Overreach, when you supported the Democrats plan to pass an election bill that weakened election integrity in 2021, but now you oppose the SAVE Act because it would be Federal Overreach. Lisa, your logic escapes me. You must be getting your marching orders from Chuck Schumer. You need to understand that you are there to represent Alaskans who overwhelmingly support the SAVE Act. @elonmusk @catturd2 @GuntherEagleman @lisamurkowski
English
2
4
12
83
Sen. Lisa Murkowski
Sen. Lisa Murkowski@lisamurkowski·
When Democrats attempted to advance sweeping election reform legislation in 2021, Republicans were unanimous in opposition because it would have federalized elections, something we have long opposed. Now, I’m seeing proposals such as the SAVE Act and MEGA that would effectively do just that. Once again, I do not support these efforts. Not only does the U.S. Constitution clearly provide states the authority to regulate the "times, places, and manner" of holding federal elections, but one-size-fits-all mandates from Washington, D.C., seldom work in places like Alaska. Election Day is fast approaching. Imposing new federal requirements now, when states are deep into their preparations, would negatively impact election integrity by forcing election officials to scramble to adhere to new policies likely without the necessary resources. Ensuring public trust in our elections is at the core of our democracy, but federal overreach is not how we achieve this.
English
11.3K
991
4.2K
1.7M
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@DoderoHaxtun @GoodDog84 @Unite4Freedom You're right, businesses are quite capable of checking for dups. They have to be effective/efficient in order to stay in business. But, election officials are in the business of staying in office and handing out favors to those that aide them. So, the voter dups will continue.
English
0
0
2
7
Sassy Gal 🇺🇸
Sassy Gal 🇺🇸@DoderoHaxtun·
@GoodDog84 @Unite4Freedom How difficult can it actually be for a state election office to check for duplicates and handle updates? Every other business I know of is quite capable of doing it.
GIF
English
2
4
18
70
Unite4Freedom
Unite4Freedom@Unite4Freedom·
Claims that Documented Proof Of Citizenship (DPOC) would disenfranchise married women is the latest desperate attempt for those who want to continue to cheat in our elections to explain their position against ID and against proving you are a citizen before you can vote. For example, the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act (e.g., S.128 / H.R.22) would amend federal voter registration rules to require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections. That means an applicant must present a document that demonstrates citizenship before a state can process their voter registration. The bill lists acceptable documents such as: •A U.S. passport, •A U.S. birth certificate, •Other documentation indicating U.S. citizenship consistent with REAL ID standards. However, the text of the bill does NOT explicitly say that the name on the document must be the same as the person’s current legal name — nor does it explicitly prohibit marriage certificates or other name-change documentation from being used in combination with these documents. It simply requires documentary proof of citizenship. This process would be no different than getting a passport or changing your name on government ID if you change your name after getting married, divorced or just legally change your name. Once again, this is a distraction from the reality that the Constitution states that you must be a citizen in order to vote, and our current system demonstrates that we cannot accept self-attestation. Demand certifiable elections where one eligible voter = one vote. Nothing else is acceptable Join Unite4Freedom and become a volunteer today!
Unite4Freedom tweet media
English
12
26
45
578
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@DoderoHaxtun @Unite4Freedom Sad state of affairs when lead investigations need to be conducted by citizen patriots because oversight committees fail to provide oversight and administrative agencies are allowed to ignore fraudulent activity. This is rule by man not rule by law. It has to stop.
English
3
6
15
70
Unite4Freedom
Unite4Freedom@Unite4Freedom·
If you thought the 2020 election questions were over, think again. An explosive new affidavit from FBI Special Agent Hugh Raymond Evans has just been made public, and it is DEVASTATING. The FBI established probable cause to seize 700 BOXES of ballots from a warehouse in Atlanta. Here are some highlights: MISSING EVIDENCE: Fulton County admits they DON'T have the scanned images for over 528,000 ballots from the original count. How do you "lose" the digital trail for half a million votes? DOUBLE SCANNING: The affidavit confirms that during the recount, ballots were scanned multiple times. IMPOSSIBLE BALLOTS: Audit workers reported stacks of absentee ballots that were NEVER FOLDED. If they were mailed in envelopes (as required by law), how are they perfectly flat? PHANTOM VOTES: On the recount deadline, Fulton reported 511,343 ballots. Suddenly, the very next day, that number jumped to 527,925. Where did those 16,000+ votes come from overnight? This isn't a "conspiracy theory"—this is an FBI AFFIDAVIT. The receipts are all here. Read the full warrant for yourself before they try to scrub it: documentcloud.org/documents/2692… SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE. The truth is finally coming out! #BreakingNews #ElectionIntegrity #FultonCounty #Georgia #FBI
English
20
54
70
1.3K
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@PDXReal1 @robfororegon You legislators are agents of the people. You work for us. An historical effort put this on the Nov ballot. Changing that to May shows utter disregard for us, those that grant you power. Make no mistake, this bill spits in the face of we the people. Just do you job.
English
0
0
0
7
PDX Real
PDX Real@PDXReal1·
Just as predicted, the legislature has introduced HB 1599 to move the referendum from the November ballot to May. This isn’t accidental — it’s a strategic move that leadership has already acknowledged gives them political advantage. If you live in Oregon, here’s what you can do. Contact your House and Senate legislators and let them know the people have already spoken and this belongs on the November ballot. For good measure, you can also email Rep. Julie Fahey and Sen. Rob Wagner directly. Rep.JulieFahey@oregonlegislature.gov Sen.RobWagner@oregonlegislature.gov If you want to go a step further, sign up to provide testimony at the Capitol on Monday at 1 PM. You can also submit written testimony this weekend — the link is below. Find your legislators: oregonlegislature.gov/FindYourLegisl… Submit testimony: olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2026R1/Tes… If you’re new to this or unsure how to start, check the links above. And if you’re still confused, ask in the comments and we will help you through it. What matters most is that you participate. No perfection necessary!
English
19
104
282
5.7K
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@JackInTully @Real_RobN And where is the legacy media. Wasn't the freedom of the press placed in the 1st Amendment by the founders as a check against a fraudulent government? Can't at least one of the networks get back to investigative coverage instead of covering up government fraud?
English
1
1
9
37
Jack Terrier 🇺🇸
Jack Terrier 🇺🇸@JackInTully·
Zitko Allegations - This broke in 2024. The current story is burying of the voter fraud. There have been ZERO legitimate state-level probes or formal investigation. No follow-up action, resolutions, NOTHING. THESE CLAIMS REMAIN TOTALLY UNADDRESSED Suppression of action on fraud...2025 US DOJ demanded IL full voter database based on law suit by Judicial Watch. ISBE (IL State Board of Elections) refused. Have you noticed, everywhere you look everything and everyone is saturated with Fraud.
English
1
16
77
1.2K
🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸@Real_RobN·
And here is: The One Corrupt Party State of Chicago: An Illinois citizens group files a formal complaint with the State Board of Elections after discovering how Democrats cheat and steal elections. A couple from Illinois, Jodie and Ken Zitko, have formed a group of concerned citizens who have been analyzing the Illinois state voter database. Here are some of the crimes they have discovered: • Over 300,000 votes mysteriously deleted post-election. • Over 2.5 million votes cast before voters were even registered. They analyzed over 1,300 Illinois residents across the state and—with their consent—reviewed their 20-year voting histories. They discovered over 57% corruption. Including: — Votes cast when voters did not vote. — Votes missing when they did vote. — Voters registered and voting at addresses where they did not reside. — Registrations with incorrect registration dates. Basically the same types of crimes they overthrew the U.S. government with on November 3, 2020. Source: americanthinker.com/blog/2024/01/i
English
584
10.8K
23K
249K
𝔉🅰𝒏 Karoline Leavitt
President Trump has requested a survey to tag @LeaderJohnThune, so he can see your support. Do you support: A. Watermarked Paper Ballot B. Same Day Voting C. Voter Photo ID D. Proof of Citizenship E. In-person voting F. All of the above.
English
13.7K
8.3K
31.4K
488.2K
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@TheArcticPossum @McFaul Common sense and critical thinking will point to fixing our elections so they become verifiable and trusted again. Not knowing who voted in elections that are far from being transparent is the now-normal and that needs to be understood and reversed.
English
0
0
5
14
Possum
Possum@TheArcticPossum·
You have it backwards. Historians will study the normalization of transgenderism, media’s complicity with the elitist left wing ruling class, big Pharma’s, big Ag’s, and big Governments role in poisoning us. And how we have been duped into trusting an election system with no checks and balances and one that is so insecure it could be hacked by a teenager. We must wake up and understand this. To mend our country we must protect and secure our most fundamental right. Our voting rights. Learn how to do this and join our effort at unite4freedom.com
English
3
8
13
63
Michael McFaul
Michael McFaul@McFaul·
The normalization of Trump will be studied by historians. How did this happen? Who contributed to it? This tragic episode in American history will be compared to McCarthyism or the rise of American fascists in 1930s. For those still excusing Trump's behavior, maybe now is a good time to get on the right side of history.
English
659
2.5K
10.7K
177.5K
JD Pavek
JD Pavek@jdpavek·
@TheArcticPossum @McFaul The de-normalization of child transgenderism is already happening by action of court settlements and the reversal of recommended practices by medical associations. Historians will conclude that greed and corruption turned the world upside down and that common sense righted it.
English
0
1
4
17