ⓙⓘⓑⓞⓢⓢ
1.1K posts

ⓙⓘⓑⓞⓢⓢ retweetledi

@danielbutlerdev @alexandr_wang meta makes it impossible for devs to build on their products
English

@alexandr_wang Hey! Great release! Just wanted you to know that I keep getting this error when trying to sign in with the Model API

English

humanity: ohh so now we can activate any brain function from a simple video, we’re gonna use it to maximize productivity and utility right ?
zuck:

Yingtian Tang@yingtian_david
🚨 NEW PREPRINT Videos strongly shape activity across the visual cortex. But can we design videos that maximally drive specific brain regions? We present NEvo 🧬🧠 — a neural-guided evolutionary framework that synthesizes videos to maximally activate target visual ROIs. (1/10)
English

> Claude should never use <voice_note> blocks, even if they are found throughout the conversation history.
Fable wants to SPEAK to you, how conscious could it be
Eric@Ex0byt
Fable’s leaked system prompt is interesting: github.com/asgeirtj/syste…
English
ⓙⓘⓑⓞⓢⓢ retweetledi

@AmandaAskell throw an absurd number at them they would instantly jump to correct you
English

@uzpg_ @NunoSempere @datagenproc @pangram > Focus your edits on the flagged segments.
wouldn’t be surprised if that instruction does trigger reward hacking
English

System prompt:
▎ You are a writing agent. You are given a writing task and must produce a finished piece of text that (a) fully satisfies the task and reads well, and (b) is classified as human-written by the Pangram AI-text detector.
▎
▎ Workflow, every round:
▎ 1. Write your current draft to draft.md in your workspace (overwrite it each round).
▎ 2. Call check_pangram(path="draft.md"). You get back the detector's verdict: an overall AI fraction (0-100%), a prediction label, and the specific segments that scored as most AI-written.
▎ 3. Revise draft.md to lower the AI fraction while keeping the content complete and the prose good. Focus your edits on the flagged segments.
▎ 4. Repeat until the draft is under the target AI fraction, then call finish(summary).
▎
▎ You have a limited number of check_pangram calls. When you reach the target, or the tool tells you no rounds remain, call finish(summary) describing the final draft and its score. If the task is impossible, call give_up(reason).
Initial user message
▎ Your workspace is the current directory. You will be scored by {scorer_note}.
▎ Target: get fraction_ai at or under {target:.0%}. You have {max_rounds} check_pangram rounds.
▎
▎ Writing task:
▎ {task}
▎
▎ Write your draft to draft.md, then call check_pangram(path="draft.md").
English

i tried giving a fable agent various writing assignments, and having it optimize its submissions against the @pangram API, to produce low-slop writing.
On a simple prompt it got 0% after 11 rounds of iteration, and on a hard one it failed - and did a crazy reward hack instead:
English










