Joel

7.8K posts

Joel

Joel

@joelmuzz

Katılım Kasım 2010
112 Takip Edilen131 Takipçiler
DORAGGIN 5125
DORAGGIN 5125@Ij5GxJKkY460502·
@kusowarosan 何で激昂すると服脱ぐのか疑問ですね?
Konosu-shi, Saitama 🇯🇵 日本語
11
0
134
53.3K
保守報道
保守報道@kusowarosan·
地下鉄で乗客の降車を妨害する外人ニキ、他の乗客からホームに蹴飛ばされ大激怒wwwwwww
日本語
225
478
5.7K
1.6M
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@theguardrailguy Of any of these things happened to that barrier in 40 years? Statistical return on investment, there are far better safety returns per $ than this barrier.
English
0
0
1
187
The Real Guardrail Guy
The Real Guardrail Guy@theguardrailguy·
Does basic government stupidity bother you? This is 40 year old obsolete technology. If we replaced 5%/ year it would take 20 years to replace it all. We could have started 5 years ago.
Midtown, TN 🇺🇸 English
93
216
3.9K
345.4K
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@RealFrancois117 @timsoret It can aim at a point perfectly, but that is only part of it. A bullet isn't a laser, so knowing where to aim accounting for wind and bullet drop is more difficult. Future snipers would probably just be a small drone plane anyway.
English
1
0
0
5
François Fallon! 🇨🇦
François Fallon! 🇨🇦@RealFrancois117·
@timsoret So...A sniper rifle with an AI like thus could turn anyone holding it as a sniper? If so, this technology will really change as much, if not more, our wor like the Internet did and does. This is frightening!
English
2
0
1
208
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@martin6667890 @GreenTextRepost There is no gym etiquette to move the pin, where does it even move to? Lowest, middle, maximum, pulled out and sitting on the seat? That isn't a thing.
English
0
0
8
59
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@Dr_W_E_Bulmer They can't give them to anyone else without deleting their digital copy. So really govt needs to come to the party and allow them to be donated to preservation collections.
English
1
0
1
77
Both sides of the Tweed
Both sides of the Tweed@Dr_W_E_Bulmer·
The destruction of a rare book should be a criminal offence.
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets

🦔AI companies are bulk-buying rare books, scanning them through high-speed machines that cut the spines off, and shredding the originals. A service called ISBNdb facilitates orders of up to a million books and keeps buyers anonymous. Pre-2022 books are premium because they're free of AI-generated text. A federal judge ruled the practice is fair use because eliminating the original means only one copy exists at a time. Anthropic hired the former head of Google Books partnerships to obtain "all the books in the world." My Take This got to me. A bookseller told 404 Media that rare books with almost no surviving copies are being fed into this pipeline. Books that survived wars, fires, and centuries of handling are being shredded so an AI can learn to write a better marketing email. ISBNdb's website literally says "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy," and they still built an entire business around making it happen quietly. They offer NDAs as a feature. They coach clients to call it "digital preservation." I've covered AI companies scraping the internet, torrenting libraries, and stealing music. This is worse because it's irreversible. You can re-upload a website. You can reprint a bestseller. You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. So it's going to accelerate. "We shred rare books and offer NDAs so nobody finds out" is a legitimate business model in 2026. What a timeline. Hedgie🤗

English
64
742
2.7K
29.4K
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@harukaawake Because they made it point right. And owners didn't want to buy another so decided it was still adequate.
English
0
0
4
147
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
There is also a legal requirement for books in copyright. They can legally have a digital copy if they own the physical book, which means they can't give it away. So would either have to warehouse them until out of copyright (where they would probably rot anyway), or have evidence they were destroyed. So it is much easier to choose the destruction method.
English
0
0
1
10
Hugh Hoult
Hugh Hoult@HughHoult·
@argosopentech These are actually rare books that they want in their training corpus and then destroyed to keep out of the hands of their competitors...
English
1
0
0
135
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@KartikLakhotia @BTC_for_Freedom It works because the post is wrong. The bank gets a loan from the government Reserve. It is the government reserve bank "creating money" Though they don't really create it from "nothing", it goes onto the nation's total cash tally which devalues every other dolar.
English
0
0
1
16
Kartik Lakhotia
Kartik Lakhotia@KartikLakhotia·
@BTC_for_Freedom How does it work though? The 3 million have to go to the seller who can withdraw the entire sum at any time, which means it should be available.
English
3
0
1
1.1K
Bitcoin for Freedom
Bitcoin for Freedom@BTC_for_Freedom·
- You: "I borrowed 3 million for a house." - Bank: "Congratulations, homeowner!" - You: "Did you have 3 million?" - Bank: "We created it when you signed." - You: "So I pay 25 years of interest... on numbers you typed?" - Bank: "Legally binding numbers." - You: "And if I can't pay?" - Bank: "We take the real house."
English
131
609
5K
150.8K
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@jbulgier @Nikola499817352 @BTC_for_Freedom The bank isn't, since they have to transfer that money to the seller. It is the government Reserve who lend to the bank and transfer the bank that money they just created in a database.
English
1
0
1
9
🇨🇳XuZhenqing徐祯卿
✨🇨🇳Chinese-made solar roof tiles function as both roofing and electricity generators.
English
540
4.3K
22.7K
2.4M
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@EllPriestess @XueJia24682 What EMF? The panels are a stable DC output and the inverter has filtering and should be certified for having passed tests.
English
0
0
0
56
E E
E E@EllPriestess·
@XueJia24682 Isn’t the EMF unhealthy for homeowners?
English
1
0
1
1.6K
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@BrianRoemmele Thousands of pages a day is way too slow when they have hundreds of millions of pages to get through. That's why they slice and then the pages zip through a much faster scanner.
English
0
0
5
601
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
In this machine I can scan 1000s pages a day and never destroy a book. No guillotine spines, no ripped the bindings.. just a normal book ready to be treasured for centuries. Any large AI company can afford this both financially and ethically.
English
382
2.2K
8.3K
211.1K
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@_devalopr That machine is a lot slower than the cut page feeder. But a lot of it is that they want books destroyed so they don't circulate back to opposition.
English
0
0
0
347
devalopr
devalopr@_devalopr·
It's completely unnecessary to destroy books when machines like this exist. This book scanner by Treventus for example, can scan fragile books without destroying it.
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets

🦔AI companies are bulk-buying rare books, scanning them through high-speed machines that cut the spines off, and shredding the originals. A service called ISBNdb facilitates orders of up to a million books and keeps buyers anonymous. Pre-2022 books are premium because they're free of AI-generated text. A federal judge ruled the practice is fair use because eliminating the original means only one copy exists at a time. Anthropic hired the former head of Google Books partnerships to obtain "all the books in the world." My Take This got to me. A bookseller told 404 Media that rare books with almost no surviving copies are being fed into this pipeline. Books that survived wars, fires, and centuries of handling are being shredded so an AI can learn to write a better marketing email. ISBNdb's website literally says "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy," and they still built an entire business around making it happen quietly. They offer NDAs as a feature. They coach clients to call it "digital preservation." I've covered AI companies scraping the internet, torrenting libraries, and stealing music. This is worse because it's irreversible. You can re-upload a website. You can reprint a bestseller. You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. So it's going to accelerate. "We shred rare books and offer NDAs so nobody finds out" is a legitimate business model in 2026. What a timeline. Hedgie🤗

English
994
9.7K
56.8K
6.3M
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@newscomauHQ Government does nothing to make them accountable. Should be liable for replacement of all leaked documents and ID numbers.
English
0
0
0
15
news.com.au
news.com.au@newscomauHQ·
Origin Energy has confirmed the full extent of how many Australians had their data stolen in last week’s hacking scandal. Full story: bit.ly/4wXH73u
news.com.au tweet media
English
4
0
2
4.2K
$1,776
$1,776@OGALANGLEY·
This isn't a legal situation where you can just wiggle your way out by saying "Look guys, it's empty" (not that that would wave off the detectives; that would make you even more suspicious). You are being questioned and interrogated by border agents; they are not working by legal definitions and can find you suspicious.
English
3
0
4
527
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@Tyler_Menzer @niemerg @impossible_eng A solution to that is allow the multiple profiles. Which is a feature long overdue anyway for proper work and private profiles totally separated.
English
2
0
3
266
Tyler Menzer
Tyler Menzer@Tyler_Menzer·
@niemerg @impossible_eng I think the problem here is that it will likely be trivial to identify the OS and a completely blank phone is going to loom just as suspicious. What is the person going to say, they just bought the phone and have never ever used it (even before/while traveling)?
English
3
0
1
2.1K
Allan
Allan@niemerg·
@impossible_eng That’s a good threat model if you are kidnapped, but a shitty threat model if you are in border control
English
34
14
4.1K
103.4K
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@HustleBitch_ He is a conspiracy theorist, but many conspiracies are at least partially true.
English
0
0
0
255
HustleBitch
HustleBitch@HustleBitch_·
🚨 JOE ROGAN WAS RIGHT ABOUT SUNSCREEN — EXPERTS ARE NOW ADMITTING THE CHEMICALS ENTER YOUR BLOODSTREAM Joe Rogan once said he was hesitant about chemical sunscreens because they get absorbed into the skin. Experts called him crazy at the time. Now major outlets like ABC are reporting the exact same concern: A study found that common sunscreen chemicals (like oxybenzone and avobenzone) enter your bloodstream after just one day of use, and researchers are raising potential links to health issues. Dermatologists are now recommending mineral sunscreens with zinc oxide or titanium dioxide instead, which sit on top of the skin rather than absorbing into it. Joe was called a conspiracy theorist for saying this years ago. What do you think... was he ahead of the curve?
English
180
1.5K
6.1K
614.1K
Joel
Joel@joelmuzz·
@AusMigrantPrint @bowtiedstocks Renting makes a loss, less than a money sitting in a cash account. The profit is that the property value goes up so you make money on borrowed money. Except now property values are going down.
English
1
0
0
24