kingtan
11.9K posts

Sabitlenmiş Tweet

this meeting could’ve been an email
Disclose.tv@disclosetv
NOW - Trump meets Xi at the Great Hall of the People, in Beijing, with a smile and a handshake.
English
kingtan retweetledi
kingtan retweetledi

Sorry for ma two cents, but here's the ugly true:
> You don't twerk your butt after the herogasm is over. That's the main rule I guess
> If u guys would be much faster with explanation and instead u or Bryan blame others, I don't think it would end up with migrating of $3b TVL to @chainlink...
> I was always bullish on ya tech n still using it very often, but incident left me feel very sad same as your late response where u made everyone sure THAT IT WASN'T YOUR FAULT... Hm, doubtfully ofc
> So here we witness @KelpDAO, @tydrohq, @re n @SolvProtocol are waving bye-bye to ya
GIF
LayerZero@LayerZero_Core
English
kingtan retweetledi

kingtan retweetledi

Please @elonmusk convince @Qantas to switch to starlink, I cannot believe in 2026 most of their fleet still has zero or negative wifi coverage 😭😭😭
Elon Musk@elonmusk
Starlink on Singapore Airlines! 🇸🇬
English
kingtan retweetledi

On January 2nd, I was added to a group chat with the @intodotspace team.
On January 4th, I got on a call with the founder, “Zero.” He pitched me directly and promised strong returns based on the valuation he gave.
By January 5th, I sent $50,000 USD. At the time, it felt like a no-brainer.
Over the next couple of months, FUD started circulating. I reached out and was reassured that everything was fine.
Fast forward to launch day.
The second TGE goes live and the tokens are claimable. I connect the wallet I had registered…
“Wallet not eligible.”
At first, I thought it was my mistake. I checked everything six times. Same result.
I messaged them at 11:00 AM. Again at 12. Then at 1:30
No response.
Three hours later, after the TGE, when the price had already dropped 90%, they finally replied.
By that point, the damage was done.
They claimed I was wrong.
After I confronted them my allocation suddenly appeared but my $50,000 had already turned into roughly $1,300.
I told them and showed proof, including their own post admitting it was their fault.
I asked for a refund or I’d pursue legal action.
They responded briefly… then went silent for over 48 hours now
I’m now prepared to spend whatever it takes to hold them accountable. I don’t care if it costs more than the original $50,000.
They are doxxed especially @aceatath and I will be taking this as far as it needs to go.
Be careful who you trust.
If you know any info or know anyone who was scammed by them please let me know
Not going to rest till they’re all in jail




English
kingtan retweetledi

A reminder to take your money off defi platforms. Ht @Legendaryy who reminded me of that 3 weeks ago or this would have been worse.
English
kingtan retweetledi

"who shilled this shit?" is live... started with a few random projects
what projects should I add? it's pretty fun to see tbh
ꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜꜜ
who-shilled-this-shit.up.railway.app
ꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛꜛ


Serpin Taxt@serpinxbt
introducing: who shilled this shit? a visual wall of shame showing who wrote positively/promoted a project that rugged w links to all of the tweets for you to go see sorted by highest @ethos_network score first ofc! vibe coded, u can visit at 127.0.0.1:8039
English
kingtan retweetledi

I wanted to weigh in on the closure of Foundation and what’s happening across NFT platforms.
I used to think sending royalties to zero was the biggest rug pull in this space.
Turns out giving platforms a percentage of every sale was bigger.
Artists onboarded because we were promised perpetual royalties.
We stayed because our sales lived on-chain, surfaced through platforms that gave our work web3 “credibility.”
But that credibility was rented.
Now platforms we paid millions to are shutting down. Others are raising fees. Auction histories are disappearing.
And suddenly “provenance” depends on whether a company still exists to display it.
All the data is on Ethereum.
But the visibility, trust, and market access were not.
Those were controlled by the platforms.
We already knew “not your keys, not your wallet.”
Now it’s clearer: not your gallery, not your legacy.
Web3 was supposed to break the traditional gallery model.
Instead, we rebuilt it on new rails and handed the power right back.
In the traditional art world, galleries promote artists because their revenue depends on it. They have limited space, they have no other option. Curation comes with support, it has to. In web3, platforms scaled curation without this responsibility. They can essentially have unlimited amounts of art with no real obligation to help them succeed.
That’s not a partnership. That’s extraction dressed as opportunity.
But imo this isn’t the end of the story, it’s the beginning.
If this space is actually different, then artists need to act like it. Not waiting for small-team ultra curated platforms to validate our work, but owning identity, provenance, and relationships directly.
Most of us believe in what we’re doing here for the future generations of artists, it’s why we haven’t left, but If anything is going to change, it definitely WILL NOT come from platforms.
It comes from us… 🖤
English
kingtan retweetledi

wow, i want to re-iterate here, the @wasabi_protocol exploit isn't really a story about a stolen key. It's a story about what happens when one EOA controls a batch of upgradeable vaults with no multisig, no timelock, and no DAO governance as @evilcos and @zachxbt both pointed out within an hour of the drain (it should have never happen)
The mechanics: deployer EOA grants ADMIN_ROLE to an attacker contract → UUPS upgrade replaces the perp vaults & LongPool with malicious logic → strategyDeposit() called on 7 vaults → drain(). 3 minutes, $5M+ across Ethereum, Base, Berachain & Blast. Largest single hit: 840.9 WETH (~$1.9M) from wWETH.
Wasabi has acknowledged the issue and asked users not to interact with contracts. @blockaid_ flagged that all Wasabi/Spicy LP-share tokens minted by these vaults should be treated as compromised the underlying assets are gone.
If you have funds anywhere in the protocol: withdraw and revoke approvals via @RoscoKalis's @RevokeCash. Big shoutout to him, the tool everyone reaches for on days like this.
34th major incident this month. April 2026: 30+ exploits, ~$630M drained. The recurring pattern keeps writing itself: privileged EOAs over upgradeable contracts, no governance friction, one phished signature away from zero.

English
kingtan retweetledi

@maruushae Bitunix is a sketchy bucket shop exchange on par with WEEX, Jucoin/Ju, KCEX, Toobit

English













