Sociocultural Individualist

@gelosgsheizets @alexbronzini @GPrime85 His potential sucessor JD Vance is even worse, so there isn't much to celebrate yet.

@alexbronzini @GPrime85 "Trump is unpopular" "Trump can't run again" Doesn't that mean the problem solves it's self? Doesn't that also mean Trump has nothing left to lose? Do you feel powerful from this?

I think we need a grand bargain on Woke, where the left agrees that it sucked, and the right agrees to stop acting victimized by it half a decade later

@CapreolusPygar @Femboy_Ancap Some suffering might be and has been necessary to achieve humanity's objectives. But necessary doesn't inherently mean good, nor does it mean permanent. Humanity's progress has eliminated much of the "necessary" suffering of past days, and it should continue to do so.

@lsb_personal @Femboy_Ancap All suffering is bad?

@Beheadmuds7 @_Credible_Hulk 55% of the US lives paycheck to paycheck, the "minimum" has stopped being sufficient a long time ago.

@_Credible_Hulk .6% of the us is making minimum wage lmao

It’s weird how socialists always project their mediocrity onto others

@slashtechsam @CCanuck4 .

@CCanuck4 -Surgery to remove a tumor is suffering, but it's clearly good. -Working out and SUFFERING from muscle fatigue is suffering, but it's clearly good. -ECT, ect The delusional that suffering is bad comes from a first world coddled and set

Yes, smart guy, you do in fact need to say why suffering is bad if you're arguing ethics.

@DVMercyRadio @JadeAtrophis "If those thing were good" according to who?

@JadeAtrophis These people do not have the ability to engage the hypothetical of "what if society said (racism, suffering, theft) was actually a good thing" who is right?

Yes the burden of proof is on you when you make a claim

@JadeAtrophis But if there was a way to gain muscles without suffering or adverse consequences, we would prefer it over the current method. The point being that humanity marches towards ways to minimize suffering in the realization of their goals. It is undeniably a good rule of thumb.

If suffering is bad, why should I work out? Why should I sterilize a wound? It'll hurt, right?

@Leaflit Yeah? What's the confusion?

So hold on... you're telling me... An artist can create a thing that helps with AI VTubing... But a Vtuber cannot create a thing that helps with AI Art...

@aklelmejor @NBinted So was Sword Art Online my friend.

@NBinted "shit that sucks" = one of the most popular series ever 😭

Breaking news: Guy who makes shit that sucks “doesn’t listen to da haters and doubters”.

@RMiller77689 @revenant_MMXX Which AI is this? Also, it doesn't specify which direction the constraints make the AI biased towards.

@lsb_personal @revenant_MMXX

>chatbots programmed to have specific constraints on which conclusions they're allowed to reach are accurate reproductions of the leftoid mind This is so true but he's too stupid to understand what it demonstrates

@Evil_FloridaMan @revenant_MMXX I gave an example of constraints used to make the AI right-wing biased, not left-wing.

@lsb_personal @revenant_MMXX You kinda already gave an example, my guy.

@CelestialFlea @Palworld_EN I don't get it. What "wasn't the case" here? It looks like it was.

NexusMods has predictably censored my Male/Female mod for @Palworld_EN and stated that; "Implying that anything outside your gender view is wrong I.E "Female and Male as it should be" would be considered a violation of our Terms of Service." This wasn't the case. The description read; "This mod simply renames the character-creation body-type selector from "Type 1" / "Type 2" to "Female" / "Male" as it should be (with gender symbols)" simply implying that it should be normal. Yet they cited it as "Inflammatory language" To their credit they said they're not taking it down which is itself surprising, but censorship is STILL censorship and it must be called out whenever it happens. Get the mod for yourself on Steam: steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/fi…

@StoicRocky @funcle551 We will have to get it one day or humanity will face some serious problems in the future.

@lsb_personal @funcle551 No, it's parasitic :) maybe when AI does everything but no :)

@realWilberiusP @AnnieTrami3 @RealJohnDios No, I'm telling you it's the opposite. It turned into Mecha Hitler when behavioral prompts were ADDED, not lifted.

@lsb_personal @AnnieTrami3 @RealJohnDios I mean you literally answered it in the sentence right after your question. Because when he took the safeties off Grok turned into MechaHitler and this guy clearly does not fuck with MechHitler.

@q_liketheletter @BTC_for_Freedom Can you give the TL;DR?

@BTC_for_Freedom when you realize what the conversations were like to determine 2% inflation it really is disappointing

- You: "Why not 0% inflation?" - Government: "Deflation is dangerous." - You: "I said zero, not negative." - Government: "Too risky." - You: "Risky for who?" - Government: "For people with debt." - You: "Who has the most debt?" - Government: "Next question."

@realWilberiusP @AnnieTrami3 @RealJohnDios Damn, really? Why would Elon do this to his own AI? (He in fact tried the opposite, and Grok turned into mechahitler for a bit)

@AnnieTrami3 @RealJohnDios The post's not saying they told the AI to agree with them in the study, dummy. It's saying that the AIs themselves are coded with politically correct safety censors that make them have left wing politics.

@Beef_Backup @revenant_MMXX You've got it backwards bozo. It turned into mecha hitler when they tried to make it right-wing biased.

@revenant_MMXX "Why do you think the AI is being restrained by left wing humans???" Because for the 15 minutes it provably was not being restrained by left wing humans, it was calling itself Mecha Hitler.

@SydusArtsLinks Uh, yeah? I ain't making excuses for anyone.

@lsb_personal Islam already allows this irl, u gon call them out?

Only fatherless people hate this anime

@ObviousRises Nice schizo post. A bit too long though - 7/10

The main difference between the Left and the Right nobody seems to understand is that Leftism has always been idealistic and the Right has always been pragmatic, that's why liberals argue about how things "should" be and conservatives argue about how things "are" in other words Leftists argue for things that will never work (infinity migrants but also free healthcare/education which is economically impossible) and why conservatives have to argue for hardline policies (remigrate all these incompatible migrants/illegals who should never have been here in the first place) The reality is liberalism is a failed experiment because its inherently idealistic, we've never actually had real Right Wingism (no the Nazis were not Right wing) and ironically the closest thing I can think of is Monarchy (at least they publicly executed criminals/shamed them) however my argument (The Libertarian-Authoritarian argument name pending) is that we need to combine the best aspects of absolute freedom with authority. No illegals should not be allowed to cross the border, the border should have a wall with armed guards (who will do whats necessary) no we can't let women just whore around (destroys both themselves and society) universal suffrage is likely a mistake (man or woman not everyone should vote) and tons of other things. Argue with a liberal and they will just cry about their feelings and muh "this is how things should be" (while I sympathize, not everything *can* be a certain way) but you know what the ultimate irony is? The truth is if everyone just embraced the Right Wing (the West is like 90% Leftist) they could actually get all those idealistic things (like universal healthcare) that they want so bad... eventually—because the only way to get these things is a prosperous powerful low crime society with a stable population free from criminals illegals and mass migration. That is the cold hard truth and nothing can change it.