mah

156 posts

mah

mah

@m4h_he

Katılım Mayıs 2015
349 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
mah
mah@m4h_he·
@KyleSamani The deal structure will be curcial. A US-US merger may be taxable for non-US shareholders. With Tesla needing >50% yes-votes, long-term holders might block it.
English
0
0
1
15
mah
mah@m4h_he·
@amy787 @grok Wow, apparently that came around totally different than intended. Not trying to dunk on you at all. Didn't even consider the geopolitics, but more the technological and supply chain side of the endevour. Just food for thought. FWIW, I'm a tsla investor myself and very pro-Elon.
English
0
0
1
10
mah
mah@m4h_he·
@amy787 @grok What does the book chip war by chris miller say about ASML and why it can not be copied by other countries and competitors?
English
2
0
0
28
mah
mah@m4h_he·
@elonmusk @grok It is still weird. It doesn't know how a dice and a ruler works
mah tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
mah
mah@m4h_he·
@amy787 Directed share programs (DSP) would be difficult to follow through for many international shareholders. I wonder if the SPARC idea would be more feasible
English
1
0
1
480
Amy
Amy@Amy787·
Neat idea that would allow Tesla shareholders priority on the SpaceX IPO.
Bill Ackman@BillAckman

.@elonmusk, what if we took @SpaceX public by merging it with Pershing Square SPARC Holdings, Ltd. (SPARC) a new form of acquisition company that was approved by the @SECGov. We could distribute SPARC special purpose acquisition rights (SPARs) to @Tesla shareholders so that all Tesla shareholders would have the right to invest in the SpaceX IPO, or they could choose to sell their SPARs to someone else. This would reward loyal Tesla shareholders with the opportunity to invest in SpaceX (or with cash for their SPARs), while totally democratizing the IPO process. In addition to receiving common stock in SpaceX, exercising SPAR holders would also receive Pershing Square SPARC Holdings II SPARs, which we could use to take @xai public at the time of your choosing. Pershing Square would due diligence on behalf of all shareholders and would commit $4 billion of capital to the IPO at a fixed price per share. SPARC has no underwriting fees, founder stock or shareholder warrants, and we would waive our right to receive SPARC sponsor warrants. The result would be an IPO without any underwriting fees or dilutive securities issued. @SpaceX would go public with a 100% common stock capital structure and it would not incur any transaction costs other than modest legal fees which SPARC would pay from its cash on hand. We could raise whatever amount of capital you would like by adjusting the exercise price of the SPARs. Assuming we issue 0.5 SPARs for each share of Tesla, there would be 1.723 billion SPARs outstanding including the 61.1 million SPARs that are already outstanding. Since one SPAR would be exercisable for two shares of SpaceX, the SPARs would be exercisable for 3.446 billion total SpaceX shares. So, if we set the SPAR exercise price at $11.03, SpaceX would raise $42.0 billion, $38 billion from the exercise of SPARs and $4 billion from Pershing Square, or if we set the SPAR exercise price at $42.0, SpaceX would raise $148.7 billion, $144.7 billion from the SPAR exercise and $4 billion from us. SPARC is indifferent to how much of the shares are primary versus secondary shares giving the company maximum flexibility. We could do due diligence and enter into a definitive agreement committing to the transaction within 45 days, at which point it would be certain that SpaceX would go public at a fixed valuation subject only to SEC approval of the merger proxy/registration statement. Our commitment to the transaction would not be subject to market conditions. We could start work right away and announce the transaction by mid- February. It only seems appropriate that the most innovative and efficient rocket company in the world should go public in the most innovative, efficient, and fairest-to-Tesla-shareholders manner possible. To Mars and beyond! What do you say?

English
40
16
744
111.3K
mah
mah@m4h_he·
@RomainHedouin @massiTI @MattsterT3 Portfolio theory teaches that by diversification, you can eliminate the risks of individual stock picks, but you will not eliminate the market risk. By eliminating the risk of individual companies, you also eliminate their upside potential. You won't get very rich with ETFs alone
English
2
0
3
44
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Please provide examples where @Grok needs to improve in replies. Showing how another AI does it better would be helpful. These examples should be of Grok going wrong today, as we fixed many bugs from earlier in the week.
English
23.4K
6.5K
59.2K
28.4M
phil beisel
phil beisel@pbeisel·
Optimus is connected. Optimus is a connected device. Connectivity to the Internet allows fleet control, over-the-air updates, backup/restore, and real-time knowledge of the world. It is not an option. Optimus will connect via Wi-Fi and cellular just like a Tesla vehicle. But will also get 5G connectivity via Starlink's DTC (direct-to-cell) capability. It can roam onto Starlink as needed, preferentially or as a backup. Additionally, Tesla will like work with SpaceX to provide a more native Starlink transceiver built-in— smaller form factor— at some point. (Same could be said for Tesla's other robots, namely its vehicles.)
phil beisel tweet media
English
86
129
1K
130.3K
Romain Hedouin 🇫🇷 Unit Police
Time to fix what is clearly broken Time to bring back masculinity Time to bring back style Time to fix Europe 🇪🇺🇫🇷
Romain Hedouin 🇫🇷 Unit Police tweet media
English
24
5
252
11K
mah
mah@m4h_he·
@garyblack00 @wholemars It's funny WS would only start to value RT business prospects, when they are literary seeing them driving past their windows 😂
English
0
0
0
41
Gary Black
Gary Black@garyblack00·
Just saying - Austin is where $TSLA headquarters is so we all knew that city would be first for autonomy. Bay Area as second area makes sense since so much of TSLA’s technical expertise is there. New York is a whole different animal, and if TSLA can launch there without a safety monitor, many investors would go from being skeptical to believing.
English
8
2
36
4K
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
Tesla doesn’t need to “show high confidence”. Anyone can go test drive FSD in New York City and see how it performs for themselves. I wouldn’t read too much into the job posting.
Gary Black@garyblack00

If true, this could be a huge positive catalyst for $TSLA since it would show high confidence that FSD can work with minimal supervision in the urban jungle of jungles, NYC. Tesla Hints at NYC Ride-Hailing With New Autopilot Job Posting bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

English
42
52
560
87.2K
mah
mah@m4h_he·
@RomainHedouin Big balls isn't just a name. It's a way of life!
English
0
0
2
119