gadoblade
2.3K posts

gadoblade
@marlino22
Gamer/Basketball/Sports/Investor/ Top NBA Analyst/Sports Pickem Expertice
Panglao, Central Visayas Katılım Kasım 2012
3K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
gadoblade retweetledi

ETHEREUM MAXIS ARE YOU WATCHING:
BlackRock just filed to put a $7,000,000,000 money-market fund on Ethereum.
Five years. One asset. One conclusion.
The adoption curve nobody believed:
2021: First tokenized fund. Experimental.
2024: BlackRock enters. Institutional.
2025: JPMorgan follows. Systemic.
2026: $7B fund as ERC-20. Infrastructure.
71.9% of tokenized funds on Ethereum.
$30B RWA market. Growing daily.
Vitalik called it the secure chain.
The data just confirmed it.
Again.

English
gadoblade retweetledi

Join us for an update on $MSTR financial results, digital credit instruments like $STRC, and the state of the digital asset marketplace, followed by live Q&A with equity analysts and industry leaders.
x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English

🚨BREAKING: Polymarket shows a 76% probability that Trump’s tariffs will be ruled illegal.
The Supreme Court is expected to issue its decision on Friday.
If the Supreme Court rules against the tariffs, there are 2 big issues.
FIRST: REFUNDS.
Tariffs already collected may have to be returned to importers. That removes cash from the system and worsens government finances.
SECOND: THE DEFICIT.
These tariffs were projected to reduce the U.S. deficit by nearly $3 trillion over the next decade. If the ruling goes against them, that reduction disappears.
A ruling against Trump does not mean tariffs are permanently banned. It only blocks the current legal structure being used.
The President still has other legal tools to impose tariffs, but:
• they are slower
• more limited
• and less efficient than the current setup
This creates near term uncertainty.
Trump has repeatedly argued that tariffs are supporting economic strength and stock market performance.
If the Court rules against the tariffs, that will be affected badly.
Over time, removing tariffs would reduce government revenue, ease inflation pressure and increase the likelihood of rate cuts.


English

@PeterSchiff @saylor If people want to get 11% in monthly dividends.. let them..
English

@saylor How desperate can you be? You can’t even afford to pay 10%, since Strategy is losing money—so now you’re going to pay 11%. This just proves your preferred is junk. I wonder how much more you’ll be forced to pay by year-end. $MSTR will likely deliver even worse returns in 2026.
English
















