Matt
11.8K posts


@mattyice2207 @_jessbogie Yeah but that’s not Montreal, I’m you guys aren’t good at geography tho, I said Carolina, not usa.
English

The Carolina Hurricanes are undefeated in series’ against fanbases that create mocking lil jingles… not calling it early but I’m certainly not ruling it out
HFTV@HFTVSports
Sweep Caroline has a nice ring to it 🎶
English

@HabsWagon @_jessbogie This is actually hilarious considering one of Canada’s most popular sitcoms and pop culture staples is a show called “trailer park boys”
English

@DevronAlistar @HoenheimOfLight Clearly not lmao they still found him guilty
English

@HoenheimOfLight When a member of the jury admitted to being biased based solely on race, it invalidates the decision, FYI.
English

That’s what defensively suffocating teams do. They suffocate you defensively. Call it boring if you want but boring wins games.
x - ema@514baby
@HardRTard5 they could sit on ice all game and it would be more exciting than the nothing bullshit type of hockey carolina plays
English

@mattyice2207 @TresWinn I mean he won the popular vote. So, there’s more people like me than like you. But I’ll go ahead and humor you anyway. Say Trump runs a 3rd term. He’d win it too. Mostly because your side is putting up the dumbest politicians on the planet to oppose him (Kamala, AOC, Newsome).
English

The same folks will tell you Donald Trump hasn’t talked about sleeping with his daughter, doesn’t have his name all over the Epstein files, and he’s not literally laundering US taxpayer dollars..
All while he pays $4.89 a gallon.
upstate_Vol@c_hubbb
@TresWinn Waging war on children? Like leftists pushing gender ideology on elementary kids? Like leftists inviting cross-dressers to read to kids in drag? Like leftists giving their children hormone blockers to attempt to alter their kid’s gender?
English

@mattyice2207 @TresWinn I’m sorry you have zero ability to understand sarcasm. That’s a you problem though. He’s not going to run for a third term.
English

@Diikweek @brendanfratis13 @BryanLords Digging a hole how?
The narrative that the rapist defenders are running with is that EM claimed raped after a consensual encounter when she wasn’t even the one who spoke up. Her parents did after they saw how she was afterwards. London police took it from there.
English

@mattyice2207 @brendanfratis13 @BryanLords You're trying so hard to seem smart, yet you're just digging a hole deeper into ignorance.
Before quoting other people's work, try reading up on it first.
English

You won’t let people comment so I’ll say it this way. Carter Hart is NOT a rapist.
Brendan@brendanfratis13
“Say what you want” Ok, I will. He shouldn’t be in the league. He’s a sick individual and if you defend him online, he won’t see it, but the women in your life that have been victims of Sexual Assault will.
English

@mattyice2207 @TresWinn Lol it’s actually hilarious there are people like you that believe he’s going to try to stay a third term
English

@Diikweek @brendanfratis13 @BryanLords No, it’s Schrödinger’s definition.
Also I don’t see what the judge being a woman has to do with anything. EM wasn’t even the one who initiated the investigation. London Police did after her parents came to them and they looked into it.
English

@mattyice2207 @brendanfratis13 @BryanLords I think you mean "Occam's razor", and mine is the simplest solution.
Yours involves ignoring facts, like a female judge's very thorough and detailed ruling that exonerated Carter Hart and named Emily Manka as the aggressor in their interactions.
English

@Diikweek @brendanfratis13 @BryanLords Shrodinger’s definition
Yeah, I’ll believe THATS what you actually meant instead of the more likely meaning.
English

@mattyice2207 @brendanfratis13 @BryanLords They mean they hope you get your life destroyed by false accusations.
That's the Carter Hart treatment - dumbass.
No one wants a shitty half bowjob from you. I can guarantee you that.
English

@TresWinn I assume so much? Like your original post quoting me wasn’t making assumptions?
I’m ignorant, but you’re reposting Alex Jones and actually think Trump is going to try to stay for a third term?
Your hypocrisy and delusion is astounding.
English

@brendanfratis13 @Diikweek @BryanLords They’ll insist he’s NOT a rapist and then say “I hope you get the Carter Hart treatment” when anyone criticizes him
These people are beyond saving
English

@Diikweek @BryanLords That’s actually exactly why I turned them off, because when I defended the point, I was simply called slurs, insulted, my mother was threatened, oh and then someone actually said they want my future daughter to get raped, so no, I won’t be dealing with you “people” anymore.
English

@LEHK0NEN Ah I see. Fantilli was shuffled around the lineup for the first half of the season because of Evason. I don’t think that’s a Fantilli issue as much as it is a coaching issue. If he’s placed on the 2nd or 3rd line when he doesn’t deserve it that’s not really his fault.
English

@mattyice2207 1-12 = # of forward
1-6 = # of dman
Also, maybe... players on teams that play in stronger divisions can play against weaker competition overall by playing against middle/bottom 6 guys compared to guys who don't in weaker divisions? If only something adjusted for this...



English

Stick to being a parody account cause you obviously don’t know puck #CBJ
alex@LEHK0NEN
Shit says Fantilli
English

@mattyice2207 What about their drastic difference in o-zone shifts & QoC/QoT?
English

@mattyice2207 Yes I think Carlsson & Gauthier are much better, and Fantilli is being sheltered as he has good QoT/bad QoC and extremely favorable zone usage. Carlsson & Gauthier get their share of course, but they get harder minutes than Fantilli. They are in different tiers as players



English

@mattyice2207 Or, stay with me now, he might be getting sheltered with good players vs bad competition and favorable zone usage which leads to a better relative xG%?


English

@mattyice2207 Have you considered Adam Fantilli may not play all 82 games with the exact same linemates and defenseman pairings?
English

@mattyice2207 Let me explain it to you in a way you might understand:
RAPM/sG/WAR - how good is this player in a vacuum
rel xG% - what does this player's team's xG% look like when he's on the ice vs. when he's off
Do you see how rel xG% may be susceptible to outside variables?
English
