Mike89

5K posts

Mike89 banner
Mike89

Mike89

@michael_Kan89

Somewhere on Earth Katılım Eylül 2015
366 Takip Edilen71 Takipçiler
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@OsherFeldman It’s a good thing. At least now ASIO can compare the list and see if they missed any on their terrorist watchlist.
English
0
0
0
118
Osher Feldman
Osher Feldman@OsherFeldman·
WATCH: The moment an ‘ISIS bride’ and child emerge at Melbourne Airport, greeted by literal ISIS supporters packing the arrivals lounge. Why are ISIS supporters roaming free in our country? A clear national security risk and shocking betrayal. Pray for Australia. 🇦🇺
English
779
1K
5.1K
247.3K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@DrewPavlou Good, put every one of them on the Terrorist watch list.
English
0
0
0
7
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
ISIS supporters just swarmed one of Australia’s main airports to welcome the return of ISIS members to Australia. ISIS supporters - thugs dressed in all black - outnumbered police presence at the airport. My God. The left have totally fucking wrecked Australia.
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 tweet media
English
355
1.1K
4.4K
111.5K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@DrewPavlou They are Australian citizens. They have every right to come back to this country and be fairly prosecuted and sentenced for their past choices.
English
0
0
1
168
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
One of the worst moments in Australian history: ISIS members touch down in Melbourne and Sydney We are literally importing ISIS members to Australia What the fuck is wrong with us
English
1.3K
5.4K
41.5K
2.1M
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@JimThom90458694 So you believe a soldier can do whatever they want and make whatever decision they like on a battlefield as long as it’s within their power? War crime is a thing and has to be punished seriously. For Ben, the best thing is to be cleared of any wrong doings through a fair trial.
English
0
0
0
16
Australian Patriot.
Australian Patriot.@JimThom90458694·
If a soldier can be put on trial for decisions made during their deployment "in country, in combat”, politicians should be put on trial for decisions made during their term in office. Here’s the hard truth: if you start putting politicians on trial for “decisions,” you risk turning politics into a legal battlefield where every tough call gets second-guessed in court. That would paralyse decision-making, especially in crises. Politicians operate with time, distance, and layers of bureaucracy to hide behind They say their decisions were made by vote, and therefore all are accountable —accountability diluted by design. Soldiers don’t get that luxury, we don’t afford our soldiers and defense personnel the same level of impunity We expect, we order, our soldiers to make split second life and death decisions under extreme pressure, in environments most will never understand. And when they come home, we subject them to years of legal pursuit and public judgment. We hunt them through civil actions when they return allowing low IQ sub humans such as so called journalist, to freely write hit pieces on them. We Australians trained and sent him, We Australians should now stand by him and protect him Today we will see how truly broken and captured we are a nation Today Ben Roberts-Smith and his legal team will apply for bail I hope for everyone’s sake this goes well, as this could be a dividing fork in the road for Australia Good luck today, to Ben, family and his team (his team I count as being most of Australia) #IStandWithBen
Australian Patriot. tweet media
English
66
365
1.3K
8.1K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@Ryandally08 I don’t think NRA or Trump will have our best interests at heart either.
English
0
0
0
6
Ryan Dally
Ryan Dally@Ryandally08·
Senator Ralph Babet: “The people that you elect to run your country are puppets. They are not the true wielders of power." "The people behind the scenes... that control the levers of power—they don't have your best interests at heart." Vote One Nation
English
302
301
1.2K
20K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@hasper0604 澳大利亚和澳大利亚人? 你确定不是跨国企业和全美步枪协会?
中文
0
0
0
11
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@mubeitech 澳洲不是北约国家也不是招之即来挥之即去的狗,开打之前别说询问这位“盟友”的意见看法了,连通知都没有,澳洲完全措手不及,受到沉重的经济打击都没地方说理去。不顺利了想起了这些“盟友”了。这位“总统”把美军当作了自己的私兵,至今国会没有授权还是一意孤行。现在还要盟友一起当他的私人打手?
中文
0
0
0
85
墓碑科技
墓碑科技@mubeitech·
美国军费的新及格线是5%。 澳大利亚现在只交了3%。 川普直接对着镜头开火了。 记者问他对澳大利亚的立场满不满意。 他连说了两遍“我很不满意”。 挨骂的是美国的铁杆盟友。 火气从哪来? 两笔账没算清楚。 第一笔是真金白银。 美国对北约的要求已经是5%了,澳大利亚的3%差得太远。 第二笔是关键时刻的行动。 霍尔木兹海峡局势紧张时,美国要求盟友出面站台。 美国明确喊了澳大利亚。 结果澳大利亚根本没露面。 “需要他们在场的时候,他们不在。” 川普连外交辞令都省了,直接把旧账翻了出来。 安全伞的标价已经变了。 钱得交够,事得办到。 单方面蹭保护的时代结束了。
中文
4
18
103
15.6K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@TruthPulseReal @DrewPavlou I’m not against his arrest or future trial, but I believe the verdict should only be from ppl who has first hand experience with the field, not us who can not even imagine what it was like.
English
0
0
0
8
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@TruthPulseReal @DrewPavlou The rules were designed in hope to wind the ever more common “total wars” back to the more “professional only” and more “civil” European style princes’ wars. Unfortunately this was not what in Afghanistan and Gaza, there r no clear lines separating “innocent” from combatants.
English
1
0
0
44
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
This is the part to the Ben Roberts-Smith story that makes my blood boil. On the night of August 29th, 2012 a Taliban sleeper agent in the Afghan National Army massacred three Australian soldiers in cold blood as they prepared to sleep on their own base. Their names were Private Robert Poate, Sapper James Martin and Lance Corporal Rick Milosevic. The rogue Afghan soldier was named Hekmatullah. It was the fourth insider, or ''green-on-blue'' attack by Taliban sleeper agents in the Afghan National Army against Australian soldiers in 15 months. Out of the 41 Australians who died in Afghanistan, 7 died by way of these insider attacks - attacks which technically constitute the war crime of perfidy. Hekmatullah's attack was a war crime under Article 37 of Additional Protocol I (1977) to the Geneva Conventions which prohibits perfidy as an act of war. By enlisting in the Afghan National Army and wearing its uniform, Hekmatullah presented himself as a co-belligerent fighting alongside Australian forces - not against them. He invited the confidence of Australian soldiers so as to lead them to believe that they were entitled to protection under international law, and then betrayed that confidence to massacre them as they prepared to sleep. Ben Roberts-Smith was one of the first on base after the attack. He was ordered to find and apprehend Hekmatullah in order to bring him to justice. Acting on intelligence, Roberts-Smith and his men were led to the village of Darwan, where Roberts-Smith is then alleged to have committed a war crime, supposedly kicking a farmer named Ali Jan off a cliff and ordering his execution. Roberts-Smith has always maintained that Ali Jan was a Taliban spotter in a village that was a Taliban stronghold. It is a matter of historical fact that there was confirmed armed Taliban presence in the village of Darwan the day of the raid. Robert Poate's father Hugh defended Ben Roberts-Smith and his actions: ''These citizens in the village could well have been a civilian one day and pulling the trigger the next, that‘s the way the Taliban operated. This perspective should have been included to provide some balance and context.'' The Taliban fought by blending into the civilian population. They pushed sleeper agents into the Afghan National Army and murdered our soldiers in moments of vulnerability. Where is Hekmatullah today? He lives in Afghanistan as a free man, feted as a hero by the Taliban. They don't give a fuck about international law or human rights or war crimes. They openly boast about the way they slaughtered our soldiers through acts of betrayal and perfidy. So my proposal is this: Australia can put Ben Roberts-Smith on trial when the Taliban hand over Hekmatullah, preferably dead, his head on a silver platter. Until that time, FREE BEN ROBERTS-SMITH.
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 tweet mediaDrew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 tweet mediaDrew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 tweet media
English
522
3.5K
17.6K
467K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@DrewPavlou As much as I dislike this policy, citizen only or not, this is not how the scheme works and it is not a subsidy. It does not actually cost the gov or our tax money unless the borrower decided to default the loan and after the bank sold the property, there was still a shortfall.
English
1
0
4
218
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
HOLY SHIT, the Australian government has subsidised more than 48,000 non-citizen migrants to buy homes in Australia since 2023. The government is subsidising non-citizens to buy homes in Australia even if they have property overseas. The First Home Owner scheme allows non-citizens to purchase homes in Australia with a 5% deposit, regardless of whether they own a home overseas. The Australian government acts as a guarantor for the remaining 15 per cent of the deposits, allowing the first homebuyer to avoid paying lenders mortgage insurance (LMI) Last week, Housing Australia announced that since eligibility for the 5% Deposit Scheme was expanded in mid-2023 to include permanent residents and joint applicants, “more than 48,000 permanent residents have been supported, along with over 2700 family and friend group applicants purchasing a home together - demonstrating the Scheme’s responsiveness to the needs of modern households” This is actually an incomprehensible disaster, I think we can pretty much say that Australia is one of the worst run Western developed economies
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 tweet media
English
220
1.1K
3.9K
162.4K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@Lisa9Sophia Our way of life did not need ur poor 18 yo to defend til ur genius president ambushed everyone with this illegal war. In fact, since the end of WWII, it has always been our “18 yo boys” getting dragged into your conflicts in NKorea, in Vietnam, in Iraq, and in Afghanistan.
English
0
0
0
63
Lisa
Lisa@Lisa9Sophia·
TRUMP ADDRESS: Who’s tuning in today at 12? Before I’m attacked by any more Australians on X I want you all to consider this…. Why should poor 18 year old kids from places like Detroit be forced to put their lives on the line to defend you and your way of life? That’s the reality of life now - and many here are ungrateful for it! Particularly Greens and Labor voters The whole veneer Australian society and it’s economic prosperity has been protected by the US Defence force and paid for largely by US taxpayers for seventy years. The US is now saying it’s time to grow up and play your part
Lisa tweet media
English
193
27
265
12K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@jackprandelli yea, only u geniuses forgot that China is Iran’s friend and it does not need war ships to escort its tankers.
English
0
0
0
19
Jack Prandelli
Jack Prandelli@jackprandelli·
Trump's number is wrong. The strategy behind it is genius. China doesn't get 90% of its oil from Hormuz. The real number is closer to 50-55%. For reference maybe he was thinking about Iran that's selling 90% of it's oil to China. But here's why the exaggeration doesn't matter. The strategic move is real Think about what Trump is actually doing If China has to guard Hormuz: → Chinese naval assets move to the Middle East → The Taiwan Strait gets less covered → Beijing has to choose between its oil supply and its Taiwan ambitions → China either lets Iran lose a key protector or gets pulled into the conflict It's a forced choice. Guard your oil or guard your future. You can't do both. Trump isn't giving Hormuz to China. He's handing Beijing a problem that drains its military focus, its diplomatic capital and its budget. And the 90% number? Doesn't need to be accurate. It just needs to make China feel responsible. Have a look at my latest article, where i explain the deeper strategy behind all of this🔗 Link 👇 themerchantsnews.substack.com/p/what-is-the-…
English
432
232
1.5K
518.4K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@helen_maga99 😂 “尊重司法” -> dozens cases全败诉,依然坚持“大选被盗”; “正常离开” — Jan.6 是大家集体幻觉了?
中文
0
0
0
60
Helen MAGA🇺🇸❤️💪
Helen MAGA🇺🇸❤️💪@helen_maga99·
历史上你很难找到比川普总统更尊重司法的总统。2020大选被盗,他可以拒绝交接的,但他还是正常的离开了。即使受尽冤枉,他依然遵守司法。这难道还不足以证明吗? 没有一件事是司法以外做的。不过对于中国人来说,你们的司法是个笑话,自然是不懂的。
DIY@um9527

@helen_maga99 @Kimilaikening19 川普尊重司法???这是我今年听过最好笑的笑话,没有之一!

中文
40
19
276
9.2K
artur
artur@artur2522145·
@ClaireGree45210 @__Inty__ 你这不就是承认用行政命令剥夺出生公民权违宪吗?这是妥妥打你川爹的脸啊。修改宪法不是不可以,但你跟法官说个毛?人家的职责就是维护宪法的权威。你要修宪去国会提啊。司法权和立法权你不会傻傻分不清吧
中文
2
0
13
452
Inty News
Inty News@__Inty__·
索尔引用生育旅游数据——中国大陆有505家公司专门送人来美国生娃,媒体估计超百万人。 首席大法官罗伯茨直接追问:"你也承认这对法律分析毫无影响,对吧?" 索尔回应说我们身处新世界,八十亿人搭一趟飞机就能让孩子成为美国公民。 罗伯茨一句经典回击:"是新世界,可宪法还是那部宪法。"
中文
62
32
265
86.4K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@AlboMP The world is changing and we need to be prepared. We need to have a plan B for our national security. We, our ppl, industries, and economy as well as defense force, need to be prepared for a world where we can no longer trust US as an ally or even worse.
English
0
0
0
102
Anthony Albanese
Anthony Albanese@AlboMP·
JUST ANNOUNCED: Another cut in the fuel tax to save you a total 32c a litre.
English
800
300
3.6K
365.3K
王海滨的财经闲谈
王海滨的财经闲谈@wangwatchworld·
其实在拜登时期,中国是真的难受。 布林肯这种老牌技术官僚,深知美国的神话叙事,是建立在盟友跟随之上的。 拜登的技术官僚们联合了五眼联盟、欧洲、日本、印度,对中国经济全面围堵。 那真的是惊魂不定。 欧洲日本印度澳大利亚等实际上已经准备追随美国,蠢蠢欲动,来遏制中国。 你想象一下,当所有国家围堵中国后,中国当下还能从容的绕道东南亚,布局全球市场吗? 川普上来后,展示了世界上最大流氓的形象,起码欧洲加拿大澳大利亚印度等立即改善了与中国的关系。 这对于中国经济渡过房地产熊市带来的资产负债表通缩至关重要。 川普当政这四年过掉后,中国经济的风险应该小很多了。
中文
192
85
1.2K
397.7K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@fromorient2023 允许使用基地相当于参战,北约是防御性同盟而不是进攻性的。何况这次开战连美国国会都没有批准。一个防御性同盟中的盟国完全没有义务参与到一场主动挑起的非法进攻战争中。另外挑起战争之前,无论是川普还是卢比奥,都没想过要至少知会一下同盟国,让各国可以有所准备,真把想盟友当狗使唤?
中文
1
0
1
608
東方來
東方來@fromorient2023·
這才是最大的新聞! 美國國務卿盧比奧接受福克斯新聞的採訪,放出震驚信息; “我們數十年來,投入數十億,上千億美元和駐軍,到頭來卻只能保衛歐洲。而在我們需要時,還沒要他們參加空襲,只是使用一下基地都被拒絕,那麼,我們為什麼還要留在北約”? 別猶豫,退出北約,勢在必行!
中文
180
427
3.4K
299.3K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@Qiqi7877 “胜利”?你比川普还delusional
中文
0
0
0
162
taga | 暮山暖叙
taga | 暮山暖叙@Qiqi7877·
经过一个马不停蹄的周末,特朗普总统已安全走下空军一号,前往白宫。 在红色 45-47 美国帽子🇺🇸👌 特朗普推翻伊朗政权,为世界带来了安全,数千万人为此感激不尽!继续胜利! 🇺🇸 简单调查。请诚实作答!截至今日,您对特朗普总统的所有政绩仍有多信任和支持? A. 100% B. 50% C. 25% D. 0% 让这条消息在网上疯传𝕏 。冲啊👏
中文
385
51
666
28.4K
Mike89
Mike89@michael_Kan89·
@Kunluntalk 加拿大就一个邻国,也没有争夺国际霸权的目标,你想让它跟谁来对标军备?
中文
0
0
0
96
KUNLUN昆侖
KUNLUN昆侖@Kunluntalk·
看完加拿大和美国的军事力量对比图,我才明白,加拿大的政治,为什么这么左?因为他们纯粹是吃饱了撑的没事做,自个往死了作!作为G7国家,加拿大是唯一一个,国防完全依靠美国的大国。就因为有美国的保护,加拿大的左疯才因吃的太多而天天反美!战斗机,加拿大有34架,美国拥有超过13000架飞机。 加拿大的坦克,只有74辆坦克,可笑吧?美国4666辆。军舰?加拿大所有加起来,12艘战舰,美国465艘。 这就是为什么大陆防御是美国的责任,也是为什么北约分担责任的争讨论,应该落实到实处的原因……
KUNLUN昆侖@Kunluntalk

这位美男子,如此智慧,何许人也?今天已经火遍全美!这位亚洲智者男子,向“没有国王”的共产主义者抛出了红色药丸! 问:有人说美国需要社会主义? 男:如果他们不喜欢美国,那就去社会主义国家! 问:他们为什么不去? 男:因为他们又喜欢自由,这通常自相矛盾!

中文
68
91
582
303.9K
Martin Davies
Martin Davies@CausalCapital·
Nice dreams … if Australia could achieve 5% of those directives in the next decade, it would be an amazing miracle. More likely, inflation, recession, deep recession, the loss of national identity, and a hope to reclaim the country. [Two nuclear power stations] or [the acceptance of a split state legal system western + sharia law] … which is more likely?
English
1
0
3
406
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
This is how I would save Australia: - Crush communists and Islamists, Lee Kuan Yew style crackdown on crime, social decay. - Completely redesign NDIS, save $30 billion a year. Use savings to: - Build 150 subway stations across the five major Australian cities. Bring the Paris/London/NYC metro to Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane. - Build high speed rail down entire eastern seaboard. Brisbane to the Gold Coast in 15 minutes. Sydney to Melbourne in 1.5 hours. - Build 50 nuclear power plants like France - decarbonise our entire energy grid while making ourselves completely self sufficient in energy for the next 100 years. - Drastically lower migration, redefine national identity to emphasise that we are a Western country. Per capita GDP $130,000. Significantly cheaper energy, housing and transport. Decarbonised electricity grid and way less travel emissions but we refuse deindustrialiation and we refuse far-left efforts to dissolve the nation.
English
396
219
2.5K
103.6K