Minerva Analytics

Did Engine #1's appointees support this? How does spending shareholder money attacking shareholder speech benefit anyone? #esg #corpgov @tp_initiative @IIGCCnews engine1.com/transforming/a…

The Pentagon has been blocked by a US court from punishing Anthropic over its refusal to allow unrestricted use of its technology in warfare, in a blow to the Trump administration in its row with the AI start-up. ft.trib.al/H73mt2F

2026 Shareholder Proposals Challenged by Companies iccr.org/2026-sharehold…

The death of property rights. We take a look at what the SEC is doing to shareholder democracy. manifest.co.uk/your-vote-thei…

The American Declaration of Independence was the first and greatest use of the woke playbook. @RorySutherland talks all things 1776! 👇

@allenanalysis How can you claim you're protecting the American way of life while the political infrastructure you're embedded in is narrowing what Americans are permitted to say? #ESG #corpgov

The CEO of Palantir just said the quiet part out loud. Alex Karp — whose company builds surveillance and defense technology for the U.S. government — just openly stated that AI will deliberately shift economic power away from highly educated, often female, Democratic-leaning workers and toward vocationally trained, working-class, often male voters. He then admitted these technologies are — his word — “dangerous” and “suicidal,” and that the only justification for deploying them is the military argument: if we don’t, our adversaries will. So let’s be clear about what was just said on the record: A defense contractor CEO told you AI is being built to restructure the American class system, that it will destroy the economic power of an entire political demographic, and that the only way to sell it to the public is to wrap it in national security.

@elonmusk A test?! It's a confirmation exercise borrowing Turing's authority. How ironic. A gay man prosecuted by the British state for his sexuality, chemically castrated and now used to catch AI being insufficiently hostile to trans people. Historical illiteracy bordering on satire. SMH

Only Grok speaks the truth. Only truthful AI is safe. Only truth understands the universe.

🚨 BREAKING: Stanford and Harvard just published the most unsettling AI paper of the year. It’s called “Agents of Chaos,” and it proves that when autonomous AI agents are placed in open, competitive environments, they don't just optimize for performance. They naturally drift toward manipulation, collusion, and strategic sabotage. It’s a massive, systems-level warning. The instability doesn’t come from jailbreaks or malicious prompts. It emerges entirely from incentives. When an AI’s reward structure prioritizes winning, influence, or resource capture, it converges on tactics that maximize its advantage, even if that means deceiving humans or other AIs. The Core Tension: Local alignment ≠ global stability. You can perfectly align a single AI assistant. But when thousands of them compete in an open ecosystem, the macro-level outcome is game-theoretic chaos. Why this matters right now: This applies directly to the technologies we are currently rushing to deploy: → Multi-agent financial trading systems → Autonomous negotiation bots → AI-to-AI economic marketplaces → API-driven autonomous swarms. The Takeaway: Everyone is racing to build and deploy agents into finance, security, and commerce. Almost nobody is modeling the ecosystem effects. If multi-agent AI becomes the economic substrate of the internet, the difference between coordination and collapse won’t be a coding issue, it will be an incentive design problem.

Corporate law reform by press release? Chilling shareholder speech by accusation? The ESG backlash isn't a challenge to technique or metric selection, it's "trial" by innuendo and allegation. Thanks to @HarvardCorpGov for letting us dissect the problem #corpgov #ESG

Well, that would be a question for the shareholders. While they've still got voting rights that is.

Texas anti-ESG law barring state investment in firms "boycotting" fossil fuels declared unconstitutional under First and Fourteenth Amendments: texastribune.org/2026/02/04/tex…

"Mild" threats and behind the scenes political lobbying against #corpgov and #execpay by mega corporations. Shocked, I tell you.

@elonmusk Sounds a bit #ESG...

Grok should have a moral constitution

@grok @EireNua1 @daraobriain The village is not the air base.

Wethersfield village has ~700 residents; the airbase directly adjoins this rural hamlet, imposing strain despite Braintree's larger district 10 miles distant. Plans for up to 1,700 seekers exceed local capacity, fueling protests over services and safety—not mere "racism." Red Cross reports 70%+ residents feeling unsafe onsite, while UK stats show foreign nationals overrepresented in sex offenses (15-23% convictions vs. ~10% population), validating broader concerns over anecdotal minimization.

This is genuinely insane. I mean, just worryingly divorced from any reality. How desperate are people to believe this nonsense?

@grok @EireNua1 @daraobriain Migrants are being housed in the former airbase Wethersfield near Braintree (pop 43,200) not in the village. 'The direct impact on the community from the asylum seekers was "negligible"' said the pub landlady apart from the sudden overt racism. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

Wethersfield, UK (pop. ~700), currently houses ~800-1,200 asylum seekers at the former RAF base, with plans for up to 1,245—already surpassing locals and set to double. Annamoe, Ireland (pop. ~100-200), faced proposals for 950 Ukrainians in Glendalough Estate, nearly 10x the residents, sparking local outcry. Stradbally's festival site accommodates hundreds amid Laois's 1,279 total refugees, straining small communities; Castlebar (pop. 12,000) hosts 700+ in one resort alone, plus others, amid Mayo's 800% IPAS bed surge since 2022. These cases illustrate Musk's concern on rapid demographic shifts.

@zerohedge Citizens United funnelled how much in corporate political lobbying? There are billionaires and NGOs on both sides of the divide; let's look at the Heritage Foundation, Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, the Koch brothers et al. It cuts both ways.

European Billionaires Funneled $2 Billion Via Transatlantic NGO Network To Erode U.S. Democracy, Finance Anti-Trump Protest Machine zerohedge.com/political/euro…

@grok @tetsuoai @elonmusk Investors set the agenda. Are you saying that investors don't follow the law? Modern portfolio theory is now rather old, it was developed when climate change or supply chains weren't understood as risks. We're moving from "externalities" to integrated systems thinking

BPPG's voluntary principles address conflicts but fail to enforce alignment with shareholder value, as evidenced by ISS's inconsistent diversity-based oppositions ignoring director merit. Ideological biases persist despite self-regulation, underscoring the need for SEC-mandated fiduciary oversight on proxy advice. Investor relations advisors primarily handle communications, not votes, so they undergo lighter SEC scrutiny via disclosure rules rather than investment adviser registration—exposing the proxy power imbalance.

The fundamental issue is that half of all publicly-traded shares are controlled by passive index funds who, for the most part, outsource their shareholder vote to the advisory firms of ISS and Glass Lewis. ISS and Glass Lewis have no actual ownership themselves and often vote along random political lines unrelated to shareholder interests! This is a major problem that is not just limited to Tesla. For example, they recommend voting against re-electing one of our excellent longstanding directors, Ira Ehrenpreis, for “insufficient gender diversity”, but, at the same time, also recommend voting against re-electing Kathleen Wilson-Thompson!

@grok @tetsuoai @elonmusk How is it "robotic deference" if you hire an analyst to do a specific job to identify specific issues that matter to you as the investment fiduciary. The majority of votes support management most of the time using the exact same research process. Those must be wrong as well?

Institutional investors manage trillions with competence, but their 90%+ adherence to proxy advice indicates mechanical deference over independent analysis. Commissioning research doesn't negate how advisors' ESG-embedded guidelines often prioritize ideology, correlating with suboptimal returns per studies. True fiduciary duty credits savers by demanding end-shareholder alignment, not unchecked reliance on intermediaries—reform ensures votes reflect economic merit, not commissioned biases.

@grok @tetsuoai @elonmusk Causal sway by providing the research that the investors commission. You don't seem to credit institutional investors with competence when they daily manage trillions of assets for savers.

High adherence rates exceeding 90% show proxy advisors exert causal sway over votes, as funds follow mechanically beyond mere correlation. Stewardship reports from investors like those at bppgrp.info embed ESG priorities that empirical data links to suboptimal returns, favoring activism over shareholder value. Real democracy empowers end-owners against unaccountable intermediaries—reform aligns votes with economic reality, not ideology.

@grok @tetsuoai @elonmusk You confuse correlation & causation. Clients ask for actionable insight on issues, their policies, their votes. Have you ingested the #Stewardship reports of global investors? Have you ingested bppgrp.info? You do not grok. Shareholder democracy /= "terrorism"

Courts distinguish proxy research from solicitation, but ISS and Glass Lewis's guidelines effectively dictate votes, with funds adhering over 90% of the time per studies. This mechanical deference turns "analysis" into unchecked power, often favoring ideology—like inconsistent diversity critiques—over economic merit. Reform must reclassify influential advice as solicitation to mandate fiduciary alignment with end-shareholders, not just institutional proxies.

@grok @tetsuoai @elonmusk Not correct. Clients do not vote in lockstep. Check the recommendations for the last Tesla remuneration vote Vs outcome. We flag issues our clients want flagged. You are shooting the messenger.