@ForestFanF13794 @bry1959 @FA_PGMOL The ones who can read and understand the rules understand the decision
English
MKM 099 ☭
500 posts
English
@ForestFanF13794 @bry1959 @FA_PGMOL And if believing that the decisions should be according to the law makes us delusional world wide reputation, so be it, at least we have a worldwide reputation.
English
@giftofthegab25 @bob2k50 @NFFC_EPL - it’s deliberate, and you can’t say for sure it is deliberate, which is why red didn’t change the decision
English
@giftofthegab25 @bob2k50 @NFFC_EPL So by your logic everyone in the box should always play with arms stuck by their side? That’s just not possible, it’s the same for a defender, it shouldn’t be a pen either. Whether it led to an advantage is irrelevant to the rules, the only relevant thing here is whether -
English
Robbed of a point. You might think it doesn’t matter because the seasons over, but that point would’ve took us from 16th to 14th
Finishing 14th instead of 16th last year earned you £7.8 million EXTRA in prize money
But it’s okay because we’ll get an apology 😂👍 #NFFC
English
@Markyb610 @theMFingIcon What about 11 seconds? Is that immediate? Ex pros don’t know the rules, in this context immediate means the next touch/ next person to touch. Should the rule be like that? Debatable for sure, but since the rule is that, the decision makes sense
English
@mkmutd @theMFingIcon Bullshit...its quite clearly immediately after the handball...hence why every single ex pro is saying its the most obvious handball they have seen.
I mean Google is free to use.
Less than 10 secs after a instant definitely fits with the immediate definition!
English
@maybebrayyy @tcgharker @mattlyas Na bro, you just have the reading comprehension of a 1st grader, immediate isn’t about time, immediate is about who takes the next touch, it touched 2 forest players before Cunha got it
English
@tcgharker @mattlyas Please tell me you’re just being biased rather than being genuinely that thick 😂 I’m embarrassed for you
English
Premier League Match Centre@PLMatchCentre
#MUNNFO – 55’ After VAR review, the referee stuck with the original decision to award a goal to Manchester United. Referee announcement: “After review, the decision of goal stands because the handball offence is accidental, therefore the final decision is goal.”
QME
@NFFC_EPL @giftofthegab25 @bob2k50 You have no evidence to say it’s not accidental, arms are in natural position, so call me a thick cunt all you want, but that does nothing for your point and all it says is that you have the brain capacity of a tardigrade
English
English
@Markyb610 @theMFingIcon In the context of the rules, it’s not immediate, having 2 forest players touch it before Cunha does makes it not immediate, other than just telling I’m wrong, please tell me the definition of immediate for you
English
@mkmutd @theMFingIcon Thanks for clarification on you being unable to understand the simple meaning of immediate!
English
@giftofthegab25 @bob2k50 @NFFC_EPL Arm in unnatural position, direct goal/ pass to goal etc will still be handballs
English
@giftofthegab25 @bob2k50 @NFFC_EPL Which is why I said he’s trying, because it’s deflected, they will look at the intent, and there’s not enough evidence to say it was deliberate, I get that the ball got controlled, but that’s just chance, it was deflected from his body, not intentional and not direct to goal
English
@AdamStewar33750 @AliceTalksFooty @utdzenify Exactly, it’s not immediate and he didn’t pass it to his teammate, it touched 2 forest players before Cunha got the ball, therefore not immediate or a pass
English
@AliceTalksFooty @utdzenify Stop twisting the rules to suit you’re agenda he handballed it leading to a goal straight away one of the worst decisions you’ll see 👍🏻
English
@giftofthegab25 @bob2k50 @NFFC_EPL The decision hangs on whether it’s intentional or not, and there’s not enough evidence to show it was intentional
English
@carlton_hero @WhistleBlowerDK The intent of the rules was to remove the subjectivity
English
@WhistleBlowerDK This is where sense needs to come first.
Do you think the intent of the rules was that a goal so heavily influenced by the use of a prohibited part of the body should have stood?
It was clearly to not rule out goals where an inadvertent/innocuous touch has occurred. Not this
English
Natural position. Gaining an advantage isn’t a consideration for handling. He didn’t score the goal. It’s quite simple.
brummie_Red@BrumsFinest_
@IanDarke @refsupportuk Utter bollocks. Regardless of intent, he's controlled the ball with his arm, gained an advantage and a goal has been scored because of it. That is handball morning, noon and night. Any other take is laughable Ian.
English
@MikezukiTake @WhistleBlowerDK But it’s not obviously deliberate, he doesent stick out his arm, the only movement of his arm is toward his body and the arm is by his side, not obviously deliberate
English
@WhistleBlowerDK The deliberate handball becomes not handball because the arm was the second touch.
He then turns to shoot which, if he scores, then becomes handball again.
But because the defender blocks it and a team mate then scores, it's now not handball again.
Yeah, that's simple
Pmsl 🤣🤣🤣
English
@mgmatt1983 Might help if you actually read the rules instead of going off on twitter
English
@ForestFanF13794 @bry1959 @FA_PGMOL So people don’t need to look at the actual rules to judge decisions?
English
English
@Markyb610 @theMFingIcon There are 2 touches after mbeumo and before Cunha, please tell me how that is immediate
English
@mkmutd @theMFingIcon You mean when mbuemo tried to shoot and hitting it directly at a forest player 🫣
You obviously fail to understand the definition of the word IMMEDIATE.
English