Meme Reserve

17.9K posts

Meme Reserve banner
Meme Reserve

Meme Reserve

@mmrsrv

Exploring value creation, expression and exchange in a so-called "post-truth society."

Temara, Morocco and Cheswold, Delaware Katılım Kasım 2018
1.2K Takip Edilen713 Takipçiler
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
Triple-entry accounting (TEA), conceived by Ijiri (1986) as momentum accounting and reframed cryptographically by Grigg (2005), proposes that each bilateral exchange produces not two but three entries: one in each party’s books, and a third, shared entry that is jointly attributable and recorded on an immutable medium. The third entry is not an additional account; it is a new class of evidence — a tamper-evident anchor for the assertions the two private entries represent. The promise is non-repudiation of obligation and settlement, automated reconciliation, an audit trail independent of either party’s systems, and a foundation for continuous rather than periodic assurance (Dai and Vasarhelyi 2017; Rozario and Vasarhelyi 2018). But the prior literature, while making the conceptual case, leaves the central design questions unanswered.
English
3
10
92
2.6K
Meme Reserve
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv·
@chamath First the horse, then the harness, THEN the rider. Inference is value, not cost.
English
0
0
0
17
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
Microsoft pulling Claude is the first, but not the last. The issue isn't that the tool isn't useful. The issue is that without context and oversight, the tool can spin forever and generates an enormous cost burden that, when cascaded across an entire employee population, makes using the tool economically untenable. 8090's Software Factory is the control plane that is becoming increasingly used by Enterprises to get the job done but do it in a smart and scaleable way.
8090@8090_Factory

Most engineering leaders are past the honeymoon with AI coding IDEs. They see how many tokens their agents burn. The reason is rework. The agent gets a vague prompt and a "make no mistakes" instruction, guesses at an architecture that isn't the one you run, and ships the wrong thing. Then engineers spend round after round correcting it. Rework is what the token bill actually measures. An agent builds correct code when it knows two things: what to build, and what to build it against. Software Factory's modules captures the full business intent and engineering architecture for all operators to reference in a unified multi-player environment, so everyone shares the same context. Then, we pass off the coding tasks to your IDE agent of choice execute against them (Claude, Cursor, Copilot - whatever you prefer). Today, your agents write the code well. The question is what they're writing it against. What is the unified system to reference context your teams are using today?

English
228
141
2.3K
1.1M
Meme Reserve
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv·
@OwlyPosting these aged well…
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv

@HazardHarringto I don’t “work in Big Tech” per se, but as someone who provides Honor System Snack Boxes to MAMAA, I WILL say that there’s been an uptick in WFH software engineers who have not been paying for their snacks. They know the snacks aren’t free, but they just stop paying.

English
1
0
0
60
OwlyPost
OwlyPost@OwlyPosting·
HOOT: A former Meta employee says panic gripped offices before major layoffs, with staff reportedly stuffing bags with free snacks, drinks and chargers and calling the eve "doomsday". Anxiety persists as Meta prepares further cuts; some hope to be laid off, others fear losing
OwlyPost tweet media
English
57
3
150
6.3K
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
This is how Bitcoin is really designed. Alice sends to Bob. Alice also sends to nodes. Bob sends to nodes. Bob returns a separate proof — a receipt — showing that he has sent. The nodes are not decorative little saints sitting in a chapel of theory; they are densely interconnected economic actors, passing information through a web so robust that failure becomes not a drama but an edge case. Notice what is not being said. Alice is not a node. Bob is not a node. A spectator with software is not a node merely because he enjoys the costume. The nodes are the competitive parties that build, validate, propagate, and settle. Alice and Bob are peers. That is peer-to-peer: not a mystical commune of hobbyists, but a direct exchange between parties, with the network serving as the machinery of settlement. The elegance is that trust is not required. Trust is the tax paid by badly designed systems. In Bitcoin, Alice does not need to trust Bob to behave nobly. Bob does not need to trust Alice to remain honest. The system is constructed so that proof, propagation, economic interest, and record replace sentiment. And if someone reneges, the parties with an actual interest in the transaction still act. They propagate. They evidence. They settle. They do not need sermons on virtue, because incentives have already done what sermons pretend to do. That is the architecture: direct exchange, proof returned, nodes interconnected, incentives aligned, failure reduced, trust displaced by evidence. Bitcoin was not designed as a theatre for slogans. It was designed to work.
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) tweet media
English
26
122
312
13.6K
Meme Reserve
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv·
@CsTominaga In low-friction systems, productive edges dominate symbolic nodes. Censorship resistance comes from access to block production, not theatrical verification. #NodeLTD
English
0
0
0
26
Meme Reserve
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv·
@Truthcoin If sufficiently low friction may reverse Gresham’s law, is it fair to say Metcalfe-style network effects become overstated when friction falls and edge quality becomes economically dominant? #NodeLTD
English
0
0
0
47
PaulBarron
PaulBarron@paulbarron·
The old bank run is officially obsolete. 🏦🚫 Fractional reserve banking means your bank only keeps ~10% of your cash on hand. If panic hits, the vault is empty. Under the GENIUS Act, 1:1 Stablecoins must hold 100% liquid reserves (Treasuries/Cash). No lending out your money for risky mortgages. You get 24/7 access, instant settlement, and the peace of mind that a "run" is mathematically impossible. Why be a bank’s creditor when you can be a digital bearer owner? 💸✨
PaulBarron tweet media
English
55
263
1.3K
33.5K
Jonas Hernlund
Jonas Hernlund@jonashernlund·
@aakashgupta Panel math checks out. Real failure mode is the residential ISP. Home plans cap upload at 35Mbps and ban commercial workloads in TOS. 16 Blackwells pushing inference traffic gets the node throttled or the homeowner kicked off Comcast.
English
5
0
16
3.1K
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Nvidia just figured out how to put an AI data center on the side of your house. And pay you to host it. Each XFRA node packs 16 Blackwell RTX Pro 6000 GPUs, 4 AMD EPYC CPUs, and 3TB of RAM in a Dell PowerEdge rack mounted next to the AC condenser. The homeowner pays nothing for the hardware. They get discounted electricity and internet in exchange for letting Span tap unused capacity on their electrical panel. This sounds insane until you look at the actual constraint blocking AI infrastructure. Hyperscalers are not GPU-limited. Nvidia ships them on schedule. They are not capital-limited. They are sitting on hundreds of billions in capex. What they cannot get is grid interconnection. A 100MW data center requires a substation upgrade that takes 4 to 7 years in most US markets. US grid operators have over 2,600 gigawatts stuck in their interconnection queues per Lawrence Berkeley Lab. The wait, not the silicon, is the bottleneck. Span solved this by going behind the meter. A new Pulte home has 200A service. That's 48kW of capacity. The home uses 1 to 3kW most hours. The headroom never gets touched. Span's smart panel measures real-time consumption and dynamically routes whatever the home isn't using to the XFRA node. No substation upgrade. No queue. Just slack capacity sitting on the residential side of the meter, already cleared. Span claims it can deploy 8,000 nodes for one fifth the cost of a comparable 100MW centralized facility, six times faster. PulteGroup is the wedge. They delivered 29,000 homes in 2025. The XFRA unit goes in during construction next to the smart meter. No retrofit. Pulte gets a feature on the spec sheet and revenue share on the compute that flows through the wall. The grid was the bottleneck. Pulte just became the workaround.
Aakash Gupta tweet mediaAakash Gupta tweet media
English
154
297
1.6K
352.2K
Meme Reserve
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv·
If GameStop succeeds in buying Ebay, then I’m bringing Radio Shack back.
English
0
0
0
32
Meme Reserve
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv·
@CsTominaga Would the @Truthcoin “StorkFork” be considered a clear illustration of permissionlessness as an abstraction, and if so, what role might nodes actually play in the coordination layer that determines which rules persist?
English
0
0
0
115
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
There are moments in one’s intellectual life when the world, having taken an unconscionably long time to recognise the obvious, finally concedes—though never without conditions, for even truth must pass through committee. My paper, The Redundancy of Full Nodes in Bitcoin, has now been accepted following peer review, which is to say that five independent minds have examined it with due seriousness and, in a rare outbreak of coherence, arrived at agreement. One is tempted to call this unanimity a triumph of reason, though experience suggests it is more often an accident of clarity. The acceptance, as is customary, comes draped in the polite fiction of conditionality. A few revisions have been suggested—minor embellishments rather than substantive corrections. They do not wound the argument; on the contrary, they strengthen it, as a well-placed epigram strengthens a conversation. These adjustments will be completed by Tuesday, and with them the final form will be sharper, not altered. The paper is to appear in an IEEE publication later this year. Such timelines are, of course, glacial. Academia has always preferred the dignity of delay to the vulgarity of immediacy. One must wait, as one waits for recognition in any refined society—not because it is uncertain, but because it insists on being ceremonious. The work itself concerns network topography and the persistent mythologies surrounding full nodes—those curious artefacts elevated beyond their functional necessity into articles of near-religious belief. The analysis is neither theatrical nor indulgent; it is structural, technical, and, I suspect, inconvenient to those who have mistaken repetition for truth. That all five reviewers accepted the paper is, in its way, the most amusing detail. Consensus is so often praised in systems where it is least meaningful. Here, however, it serves merely as confirmation of what was already evident: that clarity, once properly expressed, requires very little defence. One does not celebrate such things with noise. One notes them, adjusts the cuffs, and proceeds.
English
8
32
160
5K
Meme Reserve
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv·
@Truthcoin Why not just make it a roll-up exile chain and upload all the junque… start with ordinals and work your way down? “Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost…”
English
0
0
0
43
Meme Reserve
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv·
@Truthcoin Do you mind if we fork “Jubilee Coin” every 7 years? Deuteronomy 15:1-2 1 At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release. 2 And this is the manner of the release: Every creditor that lendeth ought unto his neighbour shall release it; he shall not exact it of his…
English
0
0
0
21
Paul Sztorc
Paul Sztorc@Truthcoin·
Also, as time goes on, we will surely see many copycat "eCash"s x.com/i/status/20480… All of that will enhance overall confusion, and *increase* the prestige of the .com over time Why not sell @eCash and e.cash , and give the proceeds to the community?
Joel Valenzuela@TheDesertLynx

@JardineCash @vinisilveira016 @Adam_Ogilvie_ @Truthcoin @eCash Without proof otherwise I would default to believing him, but either way, it doesn't matter. You know how many Bitcoins there are? You know how many Dashcoins, Dash Green, Bitcoin Dash, whatever there are? Welcome to the thunderdome!

English
3
0
10
4.6K
Paul Sztorc
Paul Sztorc@Truthcoin·
Last summer, when our group bought eCash.com for$170,000 The pre-existing XEC @eCash altcoin was ranked #160 on CoinMarketCap. I thought "no way is that a serious project". Yesterday, I singlehandedly gave XEC more attention than they have ever gotten before -- or ever will get again... ...and they have since crept **down** to #164 . They are lower now than when we got the .com domain. I have barely even started to build up the eCash.com brand. I literally sent just one single tweet. It was a completely secret site until yesterday. If you own the @eCash twitter account or e.cash domain , I would very seriously consider selling... to us. While you still can get something for it!
Paul Sztorc tweet media
English
45
88
89
24.1K
Meme Reserve
Meme Reserve@mmrsrv·
@Truthcoin Is Polymarket liquid for “John Nash was Satoshi?” Askin for a friend…
English
2
1
2
63
Paul Sztorc
Paul Sztorc@Truthcoin·
@mmrsrv I don't think anything will be funnier than Slockit, but I will try
English
1
0
1
71
Paul Sztorc
Paul Sztorc@Truthcoin·
@Sizzouu Trust me -- that would do absolutely nothing whatsoever to appease the critics who complained about it yesterday They will complain no matter what -- that's why we should monetize their complaints, and double down on whatever makes them angry
English
3
0
9
225
Paul Sztorc
Paul Sztorc@Truthcoin·
This is part of why I gave 4 months advance warning... ...by month 3 I will have a monopoly on all smart people.
Joel Valenzuela@TheDesertLynx

The reactions to this show were wild 😅 I had @Truthcoin on years ago to discuss drivechains, which I thought were the only sensible L2 idea for Bitcoin. He said he was launching a new coin, so I had him back on the show. This generated outrage, and the hypocrisy has been astounding. First, I have never been accused of being paid to do a show before. This time, I was accused twice. Second, people are freaking out over stealing the eCash name even though he got the .com domain, even though these very same people launched a project with the Bitcoin name, had the Bitcoin dot com domain on their side, and that very site called their coin just "Bitcoin" while the actual Bitcoin was called "Bitcoin Core." Unreal levels of hypocrisy. How does it feel now! 😂🫵 Finally, people are freaking out over "stealing Satoshi's coins." Satoshi doesn't own any eCash! And is probably dead anyway. In creating a new coin, Paul is "airdropping" coins to all existing Bitcoin holders, except only around half to the dead Satoshi person. To say that a dead (or missing keys) person who never showed interest in moving their funds is going to feel cheated out of an airdop of some random shitcoin is mind-bogglingly dumb. But, again, this is the Bitcoin space. People are more nonsensical here than anywhere else in crypto. Watch the show, or don't, I don't care. But for your own personal reputations, save yourself the embarrassment of speaking into reality the dumb outrage thoughts you have on this. 😁

English
5
2
26
5.8K