Moises Villegas
1.1K posts

Moises Villegas
@moivillegas
Son of the King / Architectural Designer









No it’s not. It’s literal history. Every parable is indicated by the term “parable” whereas this story is not. Only apostates insist it’s a parable.






Kirk Cameron reveals he no longer believes in 'eternal conscious torment' for the wicked, which he suggests is "cruel and unusual punishment." Instead, he leans heavily towards annihilationism, saying: "It fits the character of God."



With @KirkCameron announcing his position on conditionalism I’m seeing a lot of people attempting to critique it. I hold to ECT, but I do understand the topic of conditional immortality and I have yet to see anyone actually give a rebuttal that shows me they’ve interacted with the arguments and biblical reasoning from the other side. To condemn conditionalism/annihilationism as heresy is to say that John Stott, Edward Fudge, F. F. Bruce, potentially even Athanasius of Alexandria, are all heretics. This is, with all due respect, ridiculous. While the position might be unorthodox it is not heresy. If you actually want to interact with someone who knows the topic reach out to my friends @datechris and/or @DanPaterson7. Both are solid, fair minded, well educated and articulate holders of conditionalism.

Kirk Cameron reveals he no longer believes in 'eternal conscious torment' for the wicked, which he suggests is "cruel and unusual punishment." Instead, he leans heavily towards annihilationism, saying: "It fits the character of God."



Sorry to see Cameron go the way of the apostate. Was better off a dispy, which is saying something! WLC 90 – What shall be done to the wicked in the day of judgment? “The wicked…shall be cast into hell, to be punished with unspeakable torments, both of body and soul, with the devil and his angels for ever.”












