Michael Stevenson

@Wendy_Rooke ... a seriously HAPPY looking dog! *He's posing!

Just me and a dog named "boo" sailing north

@Bamboozler_Nate @ChrisCryptic4 @WWURD_Official My apologies, the graphic was expanded. Also, I tried to include this in my response but I don't have a lot of room. But they would have preached that the Kingdom of Heaven was at Hand, at that point and that Jesus of Nazareth was the source of their healing power.

@mstevens73 @ChrisCryptic4 @WWURD_Official You just ignored Luke 9 all together… ok… have a good day.

I get it ... you're a well-intentioned #Christian who is sincere and is following the instructions provided to you on Sunday mornings. BUT, have you considered👇? #Bible #Jesus

@Ron_Anderson65 @JLnanDavis Ron it's abstract, but wanted 2 share an experi. I 1st listened carefully 2 Handel's "MESSIAH" choruses abt 8mons aft being saved. It was during that hearing that I pictured GOD sent His Son N2 t\world as an offering of His love, & what did we do? Physically nail Him 2 a wooden✝️

@JLnanDavis When Jesus dies on cross. It was hard to read.

Good choices!!! 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 What’s been something that has stirred your heart most in your reading?

@Wendy_Rooke Ah how lovely and cute in such a beautiful surrounding!

@Bamboozler_Nate @ChrisCryptic4 @WWURD_Official Nothing as they were *listening at that time. Yeshua was their Master & they were His disciples- He did t/preaching. T/conclusion of their Gospels revealed t/entire story; salvation, God's love for us, & Who Jesus was. T/commission to preach t/Gospel was given at it's conclusion.

@mstevens73 @ChrisCryptic4 @WWURD_Official Good morning to you and they didn’t understand it when he told them at the end of his ministry. So tell me what they was preaching at beginning of the four gospels. Is it possible to preach something that you’re ignorant of?

@ItsRobbAllen Yes, the came a point where I felt worst in my spirit upon leaving, than I did when arriving. I am truly thankful to God for the fellowship that I am blessed with in the body of Christ.

@mstevens73 Exactly. I'm not there to have my political opinions confirmed. I'm not there to have my sins accepted. I'm there to learn His word and get closer to Him. Sin is what takes me away from Him. A sermon that does more to divide the church & move people away feels like heresy.

Yesterday sucked. It was my last day at my church of 20 years. I played in the praise band for over 12 of those years. I enjoyed doing so because it was how I got to use my talents to serve God. But the sermon *literally* was about AI datacenters using all our water, mass animal farming, and how environmental racism was causing disproportionate harm to minorities. I'll miss playing, but the UMC is completely lost.

@ItsRobbAllen I say to you sincerely, that must have been difficult to endure. I mean CLEARLY, it is not the Gospel of Jesus-Christ (the one He said would be preached MT 24:14) and that is really the ONLY reason I seek to attend fellowship. I want to see Jesus.

@mstevens73 It was prefaced with "God commands us to be stewards of the Earth" and thus any ridiculous leftist opinions must be taken as gospel.

@KeithTorbik @AbrahamShepard I think I'll go take a look.

@AbrahamShepard You should read Acts 15:10

Anyone without the Law of Moses, has the doctrine of demons. The law is perfect. The law is the highest ideal. Anyone else is man's ideal or distortion of the bible. It's the Duty of ALL Mankind.

@Danielle_Ln7 It did.

Concerning homosexuality: This once brought hell out of heaven on Sodom ~Spurgeon

@Bamboozler_Nate @ChrisCryptic4 @WWURD_Official Good morning, Nate. How many times, as recorded in the four Gospels did the LORD Jesus tell His disciples directly, that He would die at the hands of men and be resurrected the third day? (several) x.com/Bamboozler_Nat…

@ChrisCryptic4 @mstevens73 @WWURD_Official What gospel was preached in MMLJ? Death, burial, resurrection? Couldn’t be.

@J17apologetics Well, Dr. Sproul definitely said something [T]rue. I find no fault in his statement.

@Truthseeker59 @byroncarroll Peter did not know the day or the hour. He was simply preaching the message that he was suppose to preach, the coming of the Lord Jesus. We don't the day or hour either, yet we faithfully echo His Gospel that He will come again.

Who was Peter speaking to? Was he purposely misleading them telling them those things were coming and to be ready when if what you are saying is true he could have said seal up these words for its not for your time. Audience relevance is critical and can never be projected to the future as if the people to whom the letters were written did not understand the covenanantal nature of the first century age ending events playing our then...not now. Those were the days of vengeance that all that was written concerning the Son would be fulfilled. Not now.

Think it not strange the Bible says the end of the world/Christ's return is in the first century AD.

@Truthseeker59 @byroncarroll He did not say (in Matthew 16:28) "...with his reward".

@mstevens73 @byroncarroll That is not coming in his kingdom with his reward....is it.

@Truthseeker59 @byroncarroll No, He was quite correct as it was only 6 days later that He ascended the mountain to be transfigured into His Reigning glory, (while taking three of those were standing in His midst as He made that declaration). (no chapter break between Matthew 16 & 17) x.com/Truthseeker59/…

@mstevens73 @byroncarroll Good luck untwisting that verse ....consider the time statements. Did Jesus get it wrong when he said some standing there would still be alive when they saw him coming in his kingdom. Did he lie was the Son of God mistaken

@alisa_childers ☺️

I just saw Disclosure Day, and I have to confess I’ve lost my faith….. …in Hollywood’s ability to make a good movie.

@BrysonGray "...can't" and "any" are strong terminologies. John 3:16 has a way of speaking to the hearts of many that were lost. They call it 'the mini-Gospel'.

You can’t understand any of what Jesus said in the New Testament without understand the “Old Testament”.

@Soteriology101 Romans 3:10-18

Calvinists, can you provide a straightforward answer to this question? Mustn’t your desires be changed by God before you can voluntarily accept the gospel? If so, doesn’t that mean you are incapable of desiring to accept the gospel unless and/or until God changes your desires?