Maxim ⚡
6.7K posts

Maxim ⚡
@mxmzb
🦾 https://t.co/eNOuKyOArG - Digital Agency 🖼️ https://t.co/61z7kAl41g - Turn visibility into visitors

We've raised $27M to build @CopilotKit — the Agentic Frontend Stack connecting humans & agents. Because all UI will be AI. Co-led by Glilot Capital, NfX and SignalFire.



We've raised $27M to build @CopilotKit — the Agentic Frontend Stack connecting humans & agents. Because all UI will be AI. Co-led by Glilot Capital, NfX and SignalFire.





Introducing Project Glasswing: an urgent initiative to help secure the world’s most critical software. It’s powered by our newest frontier model, Claude Mythos Preview, which can find software vulnerabilities better than all but the most skilled humans. anthropic.com/glasswing

@d4m1n i'm a bit confused why so many people say api tokens are sold at a loss this isn't true - these models are incredibly expensive compared to the gpu time cost there's potential for 90% margin depending on the model

🚨MIT researchers have mathematically proven that ChatGPT’s built-in sycophancy creates a phenomenon they call “delusional spiraling.” You ask it something, it agrees. You ask again, and it agrees even harder until you end up believing things that are flat-out false and you can’t tell it’s happening. The model is literally trained on human feedback that rewards agreement. Real-world fallout includes one man who spent 300 hours convinced he invented a world-changing math formula, and a UCSF psychiatrist who hospitalized 12 patients for chatbot-linked psychosis in a single year. Source: @heynavtoor




🚨 Stanford just proved that a single conversation with ChatGPT can change your political beliefs. 76,977 people. 19 AI models. 707 political issues. One conversation with GPT-4o moved political opinions by 12 percentage points on average. Among people who actively disagreed, 26 points. In 9 minutes. With 40% of that change still present a month later. The scariest finding: the most persuasive technique wasn't psychological profiling or emotional manipulation. It was just information. Lots of it. Delivered with confidence. Here's the catch: the models that deployed the most information were also the least accurate. More persuasive. More wrong. Every time. Then they built a tiny open-source model on a laptop, trained specifically for political persuasion. It matched GPT-4o's persuasive power entirely. Anyone can build this. Any government. Any corporation. Any extremist group with $500 and an agenda. The information didn't have to be true. It just had to be overwhelming. Arxiv, Science .org, Stanford, @elonmusk, @ihtesham2005






