Nived Gopakumar

74 posts

Nived Gopakumar

Nived Gopakumar

@nivgopakumar

Katılım Eylül 2016
2.7K Takip Edilen99 Takipçiler
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@buccocapital @scuttleblurb different POV: bull markets pull forward capital and valuation, and those who are then brought in to execute on the valuation don’t enjoy the spoils they deem to have earned. Betting on ideas has always been more valuable, but execution has never been compensated less
English
1
0
1
1.3K
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
I get why the tech outcomes drive some people insane. I’ve joined companies 12 months “too late”, and merely made a good amount of money instead of generational wealth The people who joined before me weren’t any better or smarter. They just got lucky. Just like someone looks at me and thinks I got lucky The pure randomness of it all can either drive you crazy or give you an appreciation for the role of luck. But at the end of the day you are in the driver’s seat. You choose your perspective What I have come to learn is the people who think they alone earned their accomplishments are the most unhappy. The people with gratitude for the role luck played in their success are able to keep striving for more without losing their mind They have come to acknowledge that while they can shape the world around them, and tilt the odds in their favor ever so slightly, ultimately a lot of it is out of their hands
English
67
81
2K
239.8K
Matt Slotnick
Matt Slotnick@matt_slotnick·
doing a conference call with the Wells Fargo Software Team on May 29th. We're going to talk through software positioning, a few current topics of debate, and takeaways on recent conferences. Registration link coming soon... ping me in the meantime so we can get you added
English
22
1
51
16.6K
Nived Gopakumar retweetledi
noscroll
noscroll@noscroll·
X has the best information on the internet and the worst incentives & culture. meet noscroll — the AI that doomscrolls it for you and texts you just the things that matter. no feed. no brainrot. no ragebait. just signal. try it for free → noscroll.com 🙅🏼‍♂️
English
77
268
849
774.9K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@JerryCap bad take from Sundheim: 1. not all privates get price discovery, only those large enough to run tenders 2. private investors can miss on price because of power law. entry price matters for employees of non-power law outcomes 3. founders maximize for runway and dilution first
English
1
0
3
136
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@jmdagdelen @ItzSuds One other nuance: there are certain industries that are structurally significantly better at scale, so it’s worth taking dilution and accelerating the endgame for those cash flows. most industries don’t operate like this yet are funded as if they are
English
0
0
1
36
John Dagdelen
John Dagdelen@jmdagdelen·
@ItzSuds IMO, the best way for companies (startup or not) is to fund themselves is revenue and cash flow. If the founder is also ambitious, it aligns all the incentives in the right direction to finding real, huge businesses.
English
2
0
9
760
John Dagdelen
John Dagdelen@jmdagdelen·
This is a very good description of VC psychology from their perspective. Now just add in a few things and you’ll have a full picture: 1. Their opinion on whether you will succeed or fail is not an actual measure of anything useful to you as a founder. Nobody can predict the future like that. Their money, on the other hand, swings success probabilities. 2. They are extremely nervous of missing the “good” deals because others got there first. If they see other investors sniffing around a company, it often short circuits their brain. 3. They are on a treadmill of having to make LPs excited about them and invest in their next fund, so they may act in irrational ways that serves that purpose. Examples include as passing on a good company in a “boring” market, which paradoxically violates their prime directive.
sudarshan@ItzSuds

The public seems to misunderstand what Venture Capital is. Early in my career, I used to call it the Great Ponzi Theory of Tech until I realized all of tech highest on “Reflexivity” or the concept that: At the earliest stage, VCs substitute market belief with cash. This allows founders to hire talent & reach milestones, unlocking more capital to repeat the cycle until the co goes from “fake” to real “overnight”. The only cos that matter are ones that can do $1b+ ARR in 7-10 yrs. Anything less is useless. Based on my track record, I expect 1 in 10 companies I invest in from the fund to be worth $1b+. The rest might as well round to $0 because I will make all my money on those 5 cos. At the time of investment, I expect that if things go right, each co I invest in will return my fund at a certain valuation based on my initial ownership. Each investment is a positive Expected Value bet. However, 50% of companies fail outright, 20%-40% stick around and just become “zombies” or get acquired for small amounts, and the last 10% (in my case) become meaningful “fund returners”. This is called the “Power Law”. So YES, VCs do burn millions (billions actually) on companies that seem crazy from the outside, but that’s because we are looking to be the “Reflexive” change agent that catalyzes the birth of a billion dollar company (which is so rare, we call those companies unicorns).

English
8
7
166
35.3K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@barbossa1028 @buccocapital a perfect storm: premature technology that has use cases gaps, yet good enough to replace a lot of org bloat. funny to think ex covid bloat whether the initial land into is trickier because low hanging fruit for optimization might have not been there to sell into
English
0
0
0
28
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
I think this is a really important clip and every software/tech investor should watch it A good first pass every investor should have in software/tech right now: Is this CEO a killer? Are they willing to kill their old company to refound it for the AI era? Let me explain There’s a transformation underway in tech. Promotions used to come from empire building. Your goal was the build the biggest team possible. And there were so many tailwinds, money was free and investors didn’t care about profits. As a result, these tech companies became (and many still are), massively, massively, MASSIVELY bloated. Whole departments with too many people not even accountable to real customer or financial outcomes 2022 changed that dynamic. Tailwinds vanished. Rates increased. And AI came on the scene in a big way. @jasonlk is dead right. Shopify was early and went hard at this new paradigm. And others are catching on “Getting fit” is becoming the new standard. You get promoted now for cleaning up departments - firing ppl and focusing the rest on the right outcomes more efficiently. AI accelerates this trend massively. But I mean this when I say that you need a KILLER at the helm. Especially in software. These companies are genuinely in a fight for their lives. The CEO is going to have to kill their ZIRP-Era, Pre-COVID culture. It is painful. You will have to fire a lot of people. You have to build a culture of intense inspection. Old timers will leave. Some CEOs won’t do it.
Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin@jasonlk

"Shopify 2022: 11,600 employees Shopify 2025: Revenue Up 91% ... and 8,100 employees Tobi went into beast mode. And it worked" with @rodriscoll + @HarryStebbings + me

English
31
31
733
192.3K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@TMTMoats @GuptaRK22 @ShaneBattier Alex Smith is so good in this episode, could feel how badly he wanted to win in his career and how that sometimes lead him awry. love the discussion on joy and competitiveness too and how they don’t have to be mutually exclusive values
English
0
0
2
82
Conch Shell Capital
Conch Shell Capital@TMTMoats·
Kudos to @GuptaRK22 @ShaneBattier & Alex Smith for a great Glue Guys Podcast episode w/Steve Kerr. The story about Roger Federer’s response to Draymond Green’s question on ‘sustaining excellence’ is a highlight: "It reminded me of a moment we had with Roger Federer in China, I think it was 2018. He was in town for a tennis tournament, and we connected, and I invited him to our locker room. He talked to all the guys, and Draymond asked him, 'How do you sustain excellence? You've been doing this for 20 years.' Everyone expected an answer like, 'I work so hard and I do this and that,' but his answer was very Scheffler-like. He said, 'I love my life. I wake up every morning, I cook breakfast for my kids. I take them to school, and then I go practice tennis for about two hours. I've got a great routine now where I can get all my work in a really joyful way without killing my body, but it keeps me in great shape for the next tournament.' 'Then I go home and I cook my kids dinner. We hang out a little bit, everybody goes to bed, and I put my head on the pillow & I go, "That was a great day." I’ve been doing that for 20 years, and that works for me.' It was like, 'Yes, that’s it right there.' He’s figured it out. I think a lot of people with amazing success never have that realization because they’re just constantly pushing forward and grinding. It's about finding that work-life balance, recognizing what’s really important, and finding joy and ease in your life with your family. That's what it’s all about."
English
3
5
32
5.5K
Premier League Panel
Premier League Panel@PremLeaguePanel·
Chance creation machine. Saka has taken over since Ødegaard’s injury. But you know the best thing ? He also doesn’t turn over the ball constantly too. He constantly makes the right decisions instead. Creative efficiency.
Premier League Panel tweet media
English
48
551
5.7K
180.6K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@EBL2017 Is there just a lack of depth at 6? feels like many clubs struggling with this profile (united, Tottenham, Milan)
English
4
0
1
2.2K
EBL
EBL@EBL2017·
Ange bringing on Sarr as a #6 is a sad state of affairs for Spurs. He’s a good player, but in no way is he a #6. It’s a very blatant hole in the squad they filled to address in the summer window.
English
19
74
1.6K
100.5K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@BigJohn043 @paulswaney3 any of this driven by weak debt documentation / ability to amend + extend, prime, etc. less about cost of debt and more about flexibility to extend the perhaps inevitable reality?
English
0
0
1
236
John Caple
John Caple@BigJohn043·
Let me respectfully disagree a bit with @paulswaney3. My sense is that over the last decade private equity has started to pursue a bit of a bar bell strategy. There are two types of firms that have done really well. On the one hand, true value players who stay disciplined on price and know how to improve businesses have done well. OTOH, firms that have been willing to pay premium prices for the very best growth businesses have also been pretty successful. Now while I am a value guy, if you want to compete for the very best businesses you can't limit yourself to a below market level of leverage. And sometimes 7x is the market level of leverage. See the chart below showing a pretty limited number of PE payment defaults. Even with a fixed charge squeeze driven by higher rates you aren't seeing these 7x debt structure cause significant default rates....
John Caple tweet media
English
9
1
37
22.6K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@EiFSoccer does yamal having to come back to double Mbappe leave gaps elsewhere? imagine Olmo has to tag Theo which means a midfield run into the box will not be tracked?
English
0
0
0
156
EiF
EiF@EiFSoccer·
No surprise that France’s goal came from Mbappé being involved. Navas gave Mbappé too much time. But, when Navas is defending alone on an island, he can’t close the space down because Mbappé will just torch him. Downside of no Llorente or Porro. So far, Navas is the liability.
English
4
6
100
9K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@darwinchvz320 question is why did CJ McCollum and the players agree to these terms? new CBA feels like a complete win for ownership groups
English
1
1
28
2.3K
D.O.C
D.O.C@DOC323123·
I promise im being so real with yall when i say the only 2 reasons we have this CBA is the broke owners were pissed GSW won the 22 ring and wanted an excuse not to go deep into the luxury tax Literally those are the only 2 reasons
Mike Vigil@protectedpick

The impact of the new CBA is hilarious. No Klay in GS, PG was sacrificed, the Nuggets are dismantling their team, the Celtics owner is selling rather than being the guy to break them up. This is the NBA they wanted? Just so Tobias Harris and Jonas can make a little more?

English
5
77
488
76.6K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@nchirls not sure you can both scale AUM and retain craftsmanship. scale forces repeatability in the investment process, and pressure to deploy capital grows with size
English
0
0
0
26
Nicholas Chirls
Nicholas Chirls@nchirls·
Also in my DMs (won’t out the person) but there is an important point that not every large AUM firm are all bankers (although almost every one). There are exceptions, for example founders fund has very large AUM and are closer to artists than bankers on the spectrum
English
1
1
25
4.5K
Nicholas Chirls
Nicholas Chirls@nchirls·
An unfortunate byproduct of the large VC platforms becoming bankers is that they've inspired a new generation of emerging managers to believe that's what success looks like. Instead of building the best performing fund or a unique relationship with founders or a vibe that actually stands for something - Their singular goal is to raise as much AUM as possible and become mediocre money managers. A few exceptions for sure (respect), but not many.
English
14
22
276
77.5K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@27XVII esp after being the folks who created these behavior patterns in the first place lol you created these “unfit” companies and profited off it when it served your interests
English
0
0
1
85
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@Bonetti like when they bring Jorginho / d’lorenzo as the defacto CB in that 3 man IP setup so both calafiori and bastoni can break the lines as the RCB / LCB
English
0
0
0
94
Matteo Bonetti
Matteo Bonetti@Bonetti·
That's more like it from Dimarco. Great run and the low cross so dangerous
English
1
0
34
8.6K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@JoeVirayNBA what should the principles for gafford be here? understand funneling into help is the by-the-textbook approach but if kyrie has been the low man all night with holiday in the dunker if that should change the calculus
English
1
0
0
93
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@MinimumWidth Feels like in possession Cavaminga is stranded; anything they can do to give him an easier pass in the build-up play?
English
0
0
0
274
HP
HP@MinimumWidth·
2 advantages dortmund have over Madrid 1. They’re very narrow and compact OOP and when they win a ball inside the half spaces they have numbers to break. 2. In possession in their 3-2-2-3 Madrid’s pivot is very high which allows them to get one of the 10’s on the ball and turn.
English
3
4
111
16.4K
Joe Wolfond
Joe Wolfond@joey_doubleyou·
slo-mo has played 20 minutes as basically a designated hammer screener on offense lol
English
2
0
11
1.2K
Nived Gopakumar
Nived Gopakumar@nivgopakumar·
@JoeVirayNBA love that they got Luka off ball on this one, the paint collapse occurs because they force Anderson to screen navigate
English
0
0
0
1.8K
Joe Viray
Joe Viray@JoeVirayNBA·
What in the world is this pass Luka lmaooo
English
8
16
437
168.8K