neuroblast

375 posts

neuroblast banner
neuroblast

neuroblast

@nrblast

▫️So many currencies in a brain▫️AI in the decentralized substrate 🔻🔺 Agent based simulator. ▫️▫️

Katılım Aralık 2024
592 Takip Edilen76 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
neuroblast
neuroblast@nrblast·
Whatever shapes the retrieval, shapes the reality.
English
0
0
0
185
neuroblast
neuroblast@nrblast·
Even if imperfect, Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) are the first viable option for the AI decentralization. To be taken seriously, it would also require a decentralized adoption. The guarantees are too weak once the compute power gets concentrated.
NEAR Protocol@NEARProtocol

Verifiably private AI is NEAR AI. Major platforms and nation-scale systems like Venice, Brave, Abound, and the Government of Bermuda are integrating NEAR AI to bring confidential inference to their users 🧵

English
0
0
0
18
neuroblast retweetledi
Mathelirium
Mathelirium@mathelirium·
What happens when you take a polynomial and keep changing its coefficients every frame? You get a resonant root field in the complex plane where clusters, arcs and outer flares form, dissolve, and reappear as the system evolves in time.
English
10
54
384
16.7K
neuroblast
neuroblast@nrblast·
Large language models, despite their limitations, will serve as an excellent coping mechanism in the face of the collapses they themselves help to precipitate. People can retrieve and learn information much more rapidly and so adapt more rapidly.
Gary Marcus, MIT PhD and NYU Professor Emeritus@GaryMarcus

As one of the first people to warn about a possible AI backlash—years ago—let me tell you this: it’s going to get much, much worse. It breaks my heart that AI—something I spent my whole life thinking about—is likely to become a dirty word, and that it has been subverted so deeply by arrogance and greed.

English
0
1
1
34
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
Future books will be written monk-mode, by hand, completely offline, in digital monasteries purpose-built for focus.
English
253
379
4.5K
241K
neuroblast
neuroblast@nrblast·
@davthewave Exit liquidity (short term) and make the cost of surveillance drop in the chaotic world.
English
0
0
0
17
dave the wave🌊🌓
dave the wave🌊🌓@davthewave·
Do you think the current AI bubble is a psyops/ psychological operation to usher in the brave new world of technocracy?
English
3
2
10
2.7K
neuroblast
neuroblast@nrblast·
@0xGarci @ByzGeneral NEAR is great! What about onchain data and compute costs available in a single transaction? Are they dropping?
English
1
0
1
24
Byzantine General
Byzantine General@ByzGeneral·
I'm not saying that $NEAR can't go higher, but this OI increase on high volume is a little sketchy. "Crowded" is the word that comes to mind.
Byzantine General tweet media
English
23
6
194
17.9K
Terminal Trove
Terminal Trove@terminaltrove·
wrkflw is a CLI and TUI tool for testing and running CI jobs locally. You can validate GitHub / GitLab CI workflows, run jobs, watch logs, manage secrets, use Docker, Podman runtimes and more. @bahdotshx made wrkflw using @ratatui_rs and is Terminal Tool of the Week! ⭐️
English
4
27
183
16K
neuroblast
neuroblast@nrblast·
@Fabien_Mikol L'amélioration est spectaculaire. Mais si ils peuvent dépenser moins d'énergie en générant un script, ils le feront.
Français
1
0
0
44
Fabien
Fabien@Fabien_Mikol·
On me dit souvent que les LLM ne savent pas vraiment multiplier, sinon par un appel masqué d'outils formels (typiquement du Python). Dans le test ci-dessous, on voit qu'en mode raisonnement ils peuvent très bien réussir de longues multiplications (50x50 chiffres) sans tool call.
Fabien tweet media
cozyblaze@cozyblaze265065

I redid the multi-digit multiplication experiment, now with gpt-5.5. With medium reasoning and 7 samples each cell, it pretty much aced the test with 99.46% accuracy. The model had no tools to call and had to rely on its reasoning. Can it go further? (1/4)

Français
12
0
36
6K
Vini B |「 thecoding 」
Vini B |「 thecoding 」@vinibarbosabr·
📊 near:native has just crossed the $3B market cap mark continuing its mcap rank's climb on @CoinMarketCap + NEAR (#32) is currently trading at $2.31 |--+ up 50% in a week and 32% in the last 24 hours + just passed UNI, XAUt, and USDG + CRO, TAO, and SHIB are next in line NEAR is a top-10 coin, fundamentally speaking + confidential swaps and transfers via a private shard + pioneering private and secure cloud AI + recently improved tokenomics |--+ inflation halving & revenue-sharing buybacks + about to implement dynamic sharding (increasing scalability) We are just getting started, here! If you just bought some NEAR, considering delegating it to my validator: thecoding.pool.near (5% pool fees)
Vini B |「 thecoding 」 tweet media
Vini B |「 thecoding 」@vinibarbosabr

📈 near:native continues climbing market cap ranks! After passing Trump's WLFI, NEAR Protocol has already conquered three more spots against Mantle and Polkadot, eyeing Uniswap and TAO, while challenging gold-backed stablecoins (PAX and Tether) NEAR (#35) + has a $2.15B market cap + at $1.65/token, up 8% in 24h WLFI (#39), MNT (#38), DOT (#37), and PAXG (#36) + are all behind, now, from $2.12B to $1.90B mcap UNI (#34), XAUt (#33), and TAO (#32) + could be next, from $2.20B to $2.83B mcap First slowly, then suddenly -- Study NEAR

English
4
6
93
1.9K
Geoffrey
Geoffrey@frizzaud·
@MoonOverlord @mert crypto in general yes. btc and saylor issues are turning pretty negative quickly imo. Seems like market is maturing and good coins are getting bids regardless of btc
English
2
0
3
125
mert
mert@mert·
idk i feel some signs of life in crypto again time to pay attention
English
413
94
1.8K
231.8K
neuroblast
neuroblast@nrblast·
@davthewave Just the normal stuff happening at the top of a giant bubble
English
0
0
1
26
dave the wave🌊🌓
dave the wave🌊🌓@davthewave·
Breaking: Man Without Hope Goes Insane
Big Brain AI@realBigBrainAI

Theoretical physicist Michio Kaku on why aging is simply an accumulation of errors that AI can now identify: He opens with a bold claim about what artificial intelligence might finally make possible: "Artificial intelligence may give us something that the kings and queens of old could never conquer and that is the aging process." For @michiokaku, the science behind why we age is no longer a mystery. It comes down to one thing: errors building up inside our cells over time. "We now know why things age. Things get old and die because they accumulate error. Error in the form of DNA mistakes. Accumulation of errors inside cells." The challenge, until now, has been the sheer scale of the problem. Identifying exactly where and how these errors occur across the human genome has been beyond what conventional research could handle. That's where artificial intelligence changes everything: "But now we have artificial intelligence. We can analyze millions of genomes of old people, compare them to millions of genomes of young people, and identify where aging takes place in the body."

English
2
0
12
6.3K
Machine Learning Street Talk
Machine Learning Street Talk@MLStreetTalk·
Rich might end up right eventually, but we need to add human understanding constraints into AI now because it doesn't yet understand anything, and generally isn't subject to physical constraints either
Richard Sutton@RichardSSutton

The bitter lesson in 26 words: Don’t be distracted by human knowledge, as AI has been historically. Instead focus on methods for creating knowledge that scale with computation, like search and learning.

English
5
5
42
6.4K
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
The CEO of Take-Two, the company behind GTA, just said something the entire AI industry doesn't want to hear. And he said it without being anti-AI. Strauss Zelnick's argument is precise. AI is built on datasets. Datasets are backward-looking. Creativity is forward-looking. A model trained on everything that already exists cannot, by definition, produce something genuinely unexpected. And all hits, by their very nature, are unexpected. Asset creation and hit creation are not the same thing. AI is getting very good at the first one. The second one is what actually makes money, builds franchises, and changes culture. Nobody has shown AI can do that yet. The derivative property problem is real. You can clone GTA with existing technology. You could do it before AI. It would take 3 years and look identical. It still wouldn't sell. Because it isn't GTA. It's a clone of GTA. And consumers, despite what the industry occasionally pretends, can feel the difference between something genuinely new and something assembled from the residue of things that already worked. Thousands of mobile games ship every year. 0 to 5 hits get made. The same studios make them every time. The technology to make more games has been commoditized for years. It didn't democratize hit creation. It just flooded the market with more forgettable product. The Silicon Valley thesis that AI unlocks game creation for everyone is true in the same way that cheap cameras unlocked filmmaking for everyone. They did. And the same 5 studios still make the movies everyone watches. What Zelnick is saying, without quite saying it, is that the thing AI cannot replicate is taste. The instinct for what hasn't been done yet. The cultural antenna that detects the gap in the market before the data can see it. Data tells you what people wanted. Hits tell people what they want next. Those are different jobs.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇺🇸 Tucker lays out the deepest critique of AI yet, and it's not about jobs... His argument: writing produces thinking. You can't formulate a thought without first articulating it. If kids never write because AI writes for them, the quality of human thinking collapses. That's the surface problem. The deeper one is purpose: "The point of living is to create. That's the point of being a human being. It's necessary for joy. There is no joy without creation." If the machine creates everything and humans just consume, you don't get utopia. You get despair, mass unemployment, and eventually political revolution.

English
437
1.2K
9.5K
1.6M
neuroblast
neuroblast@nrblast·
@StachAlex @nico_dufrene @BitcoinPolicyFr Je pense que ça arrivera plus vite que les problématiques du quantique. À ce(s) moment(s) là, on ralentira/inversera l'accroissement de la difficulté par un vote?
Français
0
0
0
26
neuroblast
neuroblast@nrblast·
@StachAlex @nico_dufrene @BitcoinPolicyFr Un jour la concurrence sera rude pour cette électricité dont on ne peut rien faire aujourd'hui. Qu'est ce qui se passera au moment où d'autres machines viendront s'attaquer au monopole de Bitcoin?
Français
1
0
0
41
Alexandre Stachtchenko
Alexandre Stachtchenko@StachAlex·
C'est un jugement moral parfaitement subjectif. Fournir un système monétaire stable à l'humanité me semble assez intelligent comme objectif :) Sinon, y'a plein de contenus @BitcoinPolicyFr pour comprendre pourquoi dans les faits, on ne mine que quand on ne peut rien faire d'autre 😁 inbi.fr/blog/
Français
1
0
2
118