odbol

25.3K posts

odbol banner
odbol

odbol

@odbol

A11y designer, new media artist, photographer, cybertechnician, dodecahedonist pursuing new styles of interfaces through the body.

San Francisco, CA Katılım Ağustos 2009
2.5K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
odbol
odbol@odbol·
Do you like Spotify Wrapped? What about "Netflix Wrapped"?
odbol tweet mediaodbol tweet mediaodbol tweet mediaodbol tweet media
English
2
0
4
1.7K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@justinenlawson @JDWenzel If you assume his career was about 25 years, that's 100 papers a year—two papers a week. I'm gonna guess he wasn't the one writing or conducting those studies
English
0
0
0
4
Justine N Lawson🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈
@JDWenzel Incorrect. Professors are the real experts. They examine their field from many angles, do research, know others’ research & in contact with their peers globally. My father was a top pathologist, had over 2500 published research studies & taught MDs who were working on their PhDs
English
1
1
17
721
Farmerboy Jakir 👨🏾‍🌾
People who excel and are real experts in a field are rarely teaching professors those profs usually get research gigs now calm down and go grade some papers bc you literally work for students who pay your bills and the schools bills and maybe you should recognize that 😂😂😂😂
English
31
0
14
86.8K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@rishabhm And it was super easy to test: just give the old system the same scenario as the new one, and compare outputs to make sure they match
English
0
0
0
11
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@rishabhm Another example: I wanted to make our debugging tool compatible with the proto format our library uses. Gemini wrote the XML converter in 30s. Would have been a few days work without it, and would have never been done. We'd just spend 1000s of eng hours debugging in worse ways.
English
1
0
0
74
Rishabh Mukherjee
Rishabh Mukherjee@rishabhm·
I can share an interesting experience from last week. We have a person who is incharge of buying hardware, software and data sets. This might sound stupid but when you are buying 100s of servers, workstations and laptops a month, it's complicated. This dude used Claude to create an entire tracking and maintanence portal that inventoried everything. He even managed to integrate the portal with our monitoring software to display the status of every server vm. He then modified it to store invoices and so on. He's been at it for a couple of weeks and we've been able to identify wastage and needs. Without Claude, this would have been a maze of spreadsheets and a lot of manual labor. But we wouldn't have hired a developer for this. To me, this kind of software is the killer use case for AI. Enough to simplify your life, but not enough to justify hiring someone or buying a product. Is the code great? Is it scalable? Is it good software engineering? No, no and no. But that's besides the point.
Priyansh Agarwal@Priyansh_31Dec

Peak delusion. People who can’t code, think they’re now as good as people who can code, because apparently AI tools can code very well now.

English
62
83
1.3K
398.6K
Jesse S
Jesse S@JesseStojan·
@raysan5 Not to shit on anyone's parade, but this API is generic and commonly used structure. At least from a skim over, I don't use Raylib, but I've made plenty of game engines to go, "Yeah, looks pretty common", from what's shown in this thread.
English
4
0
14
3.8K
Ray
Ray@raysan5·
Wow! It seems somebody already vibe-coded a game-engine with an extremely similar API to raylib... unfortunately no mention to raylib, at all... 😓
Ray tweet media
English
83
43
1.5K
218.2K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@yishan @lauriewired Firearms, maybe. But there's startups out there making gauss rifles (aka rail guns): using magnets to accelerate a slug instead of gunpowder.
English
0
0
0
47
Yishan
Yishan@yishan·
@lauriewired Guns are like this. Almost all advances in the past 50+ years have been centered around ergonomics or weight (materials science). But throwing lead using explosions in a tube is still the same thing.
English
3
0
60
1.9K
LaurieWired
LaurieWired@lauriewired·
How many technologies are stuck in a local optima? Big loudspeakers basically peaked in the 1970s. Obviously we’ve gotten somewhat better, but it’s a lot closer to: “a couple % more accurate” than “the average person immediately notices the +50-year technological progress” Miniaturization has improved a lot, so has digital signal processing, amplification. But take a high end setup from 50 years ago, sit in the sweet spot at the same volume…it won’t feel radically different. I’m trying to think of other fields where the underlying principles were so mature that half a century of progress in materials/software/electronics is underwhelming. Camera Lenses seem like a good candidate. Non-electronic instruments is another; it’s not like cellos have gotten that much better in the last ~300 years.
LaurieWired tweet mediaLaurieWired tweet media
English
467
230
3.5K
292.2K
Car 6 and 7/8ths 🇺🇸
Car 6 and 7/8ths 🇺🇸@Car6and7eighths·
@BradCLemley I hate to give YouTube any undue credit. Yes, I have fixed things based on their videos. But in the last year or so, I bet I have found even more solutions to miscellaneous issues by simply asking Grok first. Often I just need that one clue that hasn't occurred to me yet.
English
7
0
31
4.7K
Brad Lemley
Brad Lemley@BradCLemley·
Here is a huge positive to modern life that gets no press. I have an old 2009 Toyota, and the AUX port crapped out about a year ago. Went to YouTube. Young, enthusiastic guy explains how to fix it. It is not obvious - involves taking the dashboard apart in a counter-intuitive way, but once you see it, it's a 15 minute fix. There are actually dozens of videos showing how to do this, and they collectively have well over 200k views. Had this happened in 1995, I would have just lived with it. But the combo of the replacement AUX jack available from Amazon and the video of the simple (but not obvious) fix, I fixed it. I HAVE DONE THIS DOZENS OF TIMES. Replaced the control panel of my dishwasher. Replaced the ice maker in the fridge. Fixed a wonky sanding head on my drill press. Mastered a bandsaw technique that I use for my sculpture. On and on and on... I think it is likely no exaggeration to say billions of fixes and skill upgrades have been performed worldwide that would not have been performed if it were not for the instruction freely given peer-to-peer on YouTube. Take a moment to be happy about this. The busted item keeps performing, rather than going to the landfill. The person learning and doing the fix gains a sense of mastery and saves money. It's an unmixed blessing. Stop doomscrolling. Think of what is busted in your house, find the YouTube video on how to fix it, and fix it.
English
640
1.6K
14.3K
354.2K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@bendee983 To be fair, those points describe *all* C++ code, not just the AI-written stuff
English
0
0
0
5
Ben Dickson
Ben Dickson@bendee983·
One of the problems with AI coding is that the narrative on X (and other social media platforms) is mostly set by people who don't have the deep coding and software engineering experience of the likes of Bjarne Stroustrup. Meanwhile the fundamental problems remain unaddressed: 1- AI generates super-human volumes of code 2- The code can be buggy, have security holes, be inefficient, etc. 3- The person who owns the code can be mostly unaware that such problems exist, so they won't even go after fixing them 4- The people who can actually fix the code (i.e., the software engineers who understand design, architecture, security best practices, etc.) are so overwhelmed that some of them will give up Meanwhile, AI companies are constantly pushing the narrative that you don't need to look at the code and the AI will fix everything itself. What they don't tell you is that if your code fails, you'll be held accountable, not them.
Haider.@haider1

Creator of C++, Bjarne Stroustrup: AI-generated code isn't ready — it generates more bugs, more bloat, more security holes, and is nearly impossible to validate "senior developers are already retiring rather than deal with it" The problem is that even a small prompt change can shift the entire codebase in unpredictable ways

English
101
233
1.7K
167.2K
Ahmed Ehab
Ahmed Ehab@ahmedehab_01·
Maybe these kids don't like getting replaced with AI. Maybe there is more to AI than the pure cold technical aspects of it. AI is not going to improve these people's lives. Is it going to improve some other people's lives? Maybe entrepreneurs? Even solo founders? Yes, it will but these students? No it won't.
English
2
0
17
651
Ben Casnocha
Ben Casnocha@bencasnocha·
The kids are not alright. When @ericschmidt talks about AI, people should listen. He is a deep thinker, true innovator, and a truth teller about what's happening in tech -- and more tuned into AI's impact on society and cultural fabric than most of the ruling class. We can't let AI become yet another topic where people dig into their identity-informed polarized corners, and shout and jeer at those on the other side.
Power to the People ☭🕊@ProudSocialist

The kids are alright!! Former CEO of Google Eric Schmidt gets booed every time he mentions artificial intelligence during his commencement speech at the University of Arizona. This generation just may save humanity after all.

English
244
9
95
66.7K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
Turns out AI isn't rotting our brains, it's just computers in general
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

English
0
0
1
33
Peter Todd
Peter Todd@peterktodd·
@Aella_Girl Why hasn't Bitcoin fixed this? As you say, we're talking about legal content. Nothing should stop someone from setting up crypto accepting websites selling this stuff.
English
6
0
46
6.3K
Aella
Aella@Aella_Girl·
You can't exchange money for cnc content anymore. If you wanna draw a comic of some guy going 'nooo don't' as siren harpies suck his balls dry, then know it's systemically impossible to sell it, or even have it hosted on a platform that accepts money for anything.
English
115
75
2.2K
159.3K
Daniel Wortel-London
Daniel Wortel-London@dlondonwortel·
I just discovered the social surrealism of Irving Norman and...this guy needs a much wider audience. There was NOBODY painting like this in postwar america. We need his ferocious vision today. irvingnorman.com
Daniel Wortel-London tweet mediaDaniel Wortel-London tweet mediaDaniel Wortel-London tweet mediaDaniel Wortel-London tweet media
English
14
464
3.7K
89.2K
Lain on the Blockchain
Lain on the Blockchain@CryptoCyberia·
UI peaked here, unironically. Everything was so easy to read, even on low resolution monitors. Sure, it wasn't stable enough, and the search function (before they ruined it) is nice to have, but they really just focused on usability with the graphic design of Win2000.
Lain on the Blockchain tweet media
English
263
397
3.6K
156.2K
Vlonald Trutin
Vlonald Trutin@OGVlonaldTrutin·
When virtually the entire dating market for under 30’s is focused on casual sex (due, I believe, to female preferences against marriage when young), the “casual sex” rating matters a lot more than the “dating” rating. We are essentially predetermining that the “dating” market will be full of women ‘settling’ after losing interest in casual relationships when we separate casual sex from dating the way we have. I don’t think that a culture of casual sex is compatible with a high fertility rate.
English
3
0
18
4.3K
Aella
Aella@Aella_Girl·
I asked people to rate, on a 1-10 scale, the attractiveness of various naked people. Women got much higher scores than men did. The 6/10 bin was full of normal-cute ladies and absolute ripped godlike chads. Seems unfair, but my hypothesis is: This is not a dating looksmatch, this is a casual sex looksmatch. The raw # distribution shows roughly equivalent likelihood of casual sex occurring before one party would turn it down. I'm gonna test this hypothesis and give writeups (complete with images and an interactive explorer) on my substack aella.substack.com, which you should subscribe to so you get the email when I send it out!
Aella tweet media
English
243
59
2.6K
243K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@Aella_Girl 98% of these people were white. I counted like three black women and maybe one brown woman. I don't think the results will be very representative since the survey designer's biases are so strongly embedded in the photo choices
English
0
0
0
579
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@thoth_iv @Aella_Girl There were like 3 in the whole survey. The rest were pale af. Not a very representative sample
English
0
0
0
7
Thŏth
Thŏth@thoth_iv·
@Aella_Girl I honestly just said only the black girls with huge tits were attractive (they were the only ones with huge tits).
English
1
0
1
1.4K
Nedko
Nedko@speedom8·
@joshjhargreaves @fatih @PlanetScale How do we ensure test quality at scale? Without human review and putting flakiness aside there has to be a way to grade tests and provide feedback
English
2
0
1
62
Fatih Arslan
Fatih Arslan@fatih·
I was a huge unit test supporter, but honestly, it's no longer worth it. Agents are superb at writing extremely bad unit tests, and they still look good on paper. We're also shifting slightly to more and more e2e tests at @PlanetScale. Luckily with agents, that shift is also manageable.
Cindy Sridharan@copyconstruct

end-to-end testing > unit tests, in the vibecoding era. A massive, almost entirely agent-coded refactor passed all unit and pre-merge tests but broke a critical feature. It was only caught due to my own excessive paranoia making me run end-to-end tests before the prod deploy.

English
42
21
470
117.1K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@priestessofdada @CameronFoxly I love how all the replies to you are too dense to understand the analogy. Automation always moves us forward and destroys the old manual jobs
English
2
0
6
287
Lynn Cole
Lynn Cole@priestessofdada·
@CameronFoxly 3d animation is murdering cel animators. Why don't you learn how to draw every state instead of getting a machine to do it? Hm? You have blood on your hands, my friend.
English
13
1
64
11.3K
AloeWhale
AloeWhale@AloeWhale·
@anishmoonka Luckily in 2026, we have water that we can turn on. We dont have to pray for rain to water the crops.
English
1
0
5
1.8K
Anish Moonka
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka·
An El Niño is forming in the Pacific that could peak around +3°C by November. The last one that hot, in 1877, triggered famines that killed up to 50 million people, about 3% of everyone alive at the time. We’re not there yet. The Pacific only just crept across the El Niño line in mid-April, at +0.5°C above normal. That ended a brief La Niña that peaked over the winter. But the major forecast models in Europe, the US, and Australia have now lined up on the same trajectory. If their May projections hold, this would be the strongest El Niño since 1950, beating both 2015-16 and 1997-98. NOAA has issued an El Niño Watch. What has scientists worried sits a few hundred feet under the surface. A huge pool of warm water is sliding east across the Pacific, pushed by winds that have flipped direction. Between 300 and 500 feet down, the water is already 5°C hotter than normal. That hidden heat is the fuel. Once it surfaces, it powers everything that comes next. In 1877, the Pacific got so hot that droughts hit India, China, Brazil, and parts of Africa at the same time. Crops failed across multiple continents. The famine became the deadliest natural disaster in modern history. Florence Nightingale wrote of “such a hideous record of human suffering and destruction the world has never seen before.” 1877 had a second ingredient. The Indian Ocean was running in an unusual pattern that year, with its western side abnormally warm. The two oceans reinforced each other, locking droughts in place across multiple continents. Scientists are watching the Indian Ocean closely for the same setup in 2026. The 2026 effects roll out region by region. El Niño weakens Atlantic hurricanes by sending strong high-altitude winds across them, breaking them apart before they organize. Colorado State has cut its 2026 forecast to 13 named storms, below the 14-storm average. The southern US usually gets wetter winters, the Pacific Northwest drier ones. Indonesia and Australia tend to slip into drought. Global temperatures could climb another 0.1 to 0.2°C on top of the regular warming trend, and James Hansen’s team at Columbia projects the world could pass +1.7°C above pre-industrial levels by 2027. The picture in the original tweet is from a previous El Niño, not real-time data. The numbers worth tracking are the heat building under the equatorial Pacific and the central Pacific surface temperatures from September through November.
All day Astronomy@forallcurious

🚨: A super El Niño is forming in the Pacific - the biggest since the recorded history Get ready for extreme winters since 1877!

English
12
79
379
70.4K