odbol

25.2K posts

odbol banner
odbol

odbol

@odbol

A11y designer, new media artist, photographer, cybertechnician, dodecahedonist pursuing new styles of interfaces through the body.

San Francisco, CA Katılım Ağustos 2009
2.5K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
odbol
odbol@odbol·
Do you like Spotify Wrapped? What about "Netflix Wrapped"?
odbol tweet mediaodbol tweet mediaodbol tweet mediaodbol tweet media
English
2
0
3
1.7K
JD Advanced
JD Advanced@advancedjd·
@Aella_Girl Depends on wich one of them. The crazy one no the nice sweet one yes.
English
1
0
9
828
Aella
Aella@Aella_Girl·
If you could go back in time, would you recommend your ~20 year old self to have kids with whoever you were dating around that time?
English
101
10
93
59.5K
odbol retweetledi
jinyaolin
jinyaolin@jinyaolin·
GM! updated metaphysics version with more details.
jinyaolin tweet media
English
0
4
28
528
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@newlinedotco @emollick Exactly. Evals are so important to make a quality product, but since the LLM APIs are so easy to use, they think it's easy to make a product around them.
English
0
0
0
4
💥 \newline
💥 \newline@newlinedotco·
the forward deployed engineer model is useful for getting a prototype out the door, but it usually hits a wall at the 80% mark. the bottleneck in production ai isn't the technical stack, it's the lack of structured evaluation. most orgs don't have the baseline datasets or the axial coding process required to actually measure where their agents are failing. they're just eyeballing it. you can't outsource the rethinking of your domain expertise to an external engineer. you need to build vertical foundational models that internalize your specific industry terminology and policies. that happens through domain-specific fine-tuning and grounded rag pipelines, not just by wrapping a general api in a new ui
English
1
0
2
255
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
I am not sure "Forward Deployed AI Engineers" are going to deliver on what a lot of companies are hoping for. They are useful, yes, but AI applications are far less of a technical issue, and much more about rethinking the deep expertise & structure of your organization around AI.
English
136
53
835
81.3K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@mitchellh Wait, the FCC banned robocalling? How come I constantly get called by spammers still? We don't need better laws we need better infrastructure: make it impossible to spoof phone numbers, make it too expensive for spammers and scammers. Remove their hiding spots
English
0
0
0
8
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
It's so insanely disrespectful for an AI agent to talk to real people without consent or at least disclosure. This is the type of stuff I'm hugely supportive of government regulation. The FCC must expand the definition of robocalling and TCPA-style regulation to online AI.
English
99
85
1.8K
152.6K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@aakashgupta This is awesome, but it's a grave mistake donating it back to the government. Trump is selling off our public land to all his buddies so they can extract the wealth and leave it a wasteland
English
0
0
0
2
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
I worked at Epic Games for two years. This is real, and the strategy behind it is smarter than most people realize. Tim Sweeney has spent nearly two decades buying North Carolina forest land. 50,000+ acres across 15 counties. He’s now one of the largest private landowners in the state. The purchases started in 2008, right after the real estate collapse wiped out developers who had been planning golf resorts and luxury communities on biodiverse wilderness. Sweeney paid $15 million for Box Creek Wilderness, a 7,000-acre stretch in the Blue Ridge foothills containing 130+ rare and threatened species. Developers had owned 5,000 of those acres before the crash. He bought them for conservation prices when nobody else was bidding. He runs the acquisitions through an LLC called “130 of Chatham.” He buys the land, holds it for years, then either donates it to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sells it at a discount to state parks, or hands it to land trusts. In 2021, he donated 7,500 acres in the Roan Highlands to the Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy. Largest private land donation in North Carolina history. The part people miss: he told the News & Observer that since 2021, land got too expensive to keep buying. So he shifted focus to converting his existing 50,000 acres into permanent conservation status. He’s locking the land into legal structures that make development impossible regardless of who owns it in the future. A billionaire worth roughly $6 billion is spending tens of millions acquiring wilderness specifically during economic downturns, then giving it away or placing it under permanent legal protection. The land will outlast him, Epic Games, and Fortnite. That’s the part that separates Sweeney from billionaires who write checks to get their name on a building. The building depreciates. The forest compounds.
Dudes Posting Their W’s@DudespostingWs

Huge W

English
1.2K
19.2K
179.4K
10.5M
John Smith
John Smith@Julien_Bouvier·
@rtfeldman Well anthropic is releasing Claude features at an insane speed. But also they don't have any legacy to slow them down. They probably won't keep this pace for too long.
English
1
0
0
186
Richard Feldman
Richard Feldman@rtfeldman·
In the past 3 years, I haven't noticed any uptick in release speed for software I use. If productivity is increasing, I can't tell as an end user. I have noticed decreases in uptime, increases in bugs, and a HUGE increase in people bragging about how many PRs per day they land.
English
60
191
2.5K
64.9K
Shelbs
Shelbs@shelbyferrari·
@rtfeldman @MattSchone More bugs and more nonsensical features. Upon starting my car today, a photo collage pops up on the dashboard. Um, wut
Shelbs tweet media
English
1
0
3
276
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@rtfeldman Everyone's raving about Claude Code, meanwhile the Claude website and app barely works, 404s everywhere, bugs. Like jeez if you're saving so much time coding maybe spend a bit more QAing
English
0
0
1
12
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@raphpfei @emollick Yes: only allow posts from people who physically type their content. Like turn on the camera and watch their face as they type at a normal human pace
English
0
0
1
24
Raphael Pfeiffer
Raphael Pfeiffer@raphpfei·
@emollick do you think there's any platform design that could fix this, or is "open comment section at scale" just a dead format now?
English
1
0
1
391
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
I know I go on about this, but comments to all of my posts, both here and on LinkedIn, are no longer worth reading at all due to AI bots. That was not the case a few months ago. (Or rather, bad/crypto comments were obvious, but now it is only meaning-shaped attention vampires)
English
152
44
962
114.4K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@pmarca So... Skynet is happening?
GIF
English
0
0
1
186
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@AlisonbobEth @Dan_Jeffries1 Actually, you need reddit. AI just condenses Reddit into a more usable format. So much niche medical information and "anecdata" is on there that is sometimes more useful and extensive than the official sources of scientific knowledge
English
1
0
1
37
Alison | AlisonBob.eth
Alison | AlisonBob.eth@AlisonbobEth·
@Dan_Jeffries1 Yes if you have chronic illnesses or weird, unusual side effects, and many other things, you need AI too. Ai + humans, is the sweet spot, especially in medicine.
English
1
0
14
1.5K
Daniel Jeffries
Daniel Jeffries@Dan_Jeffries1·
I solved a problem with GPT that my doctor could not solve for YEARS. I was getting constantly sick to my stomach. Saw her a dozen times during that time. Saw specialists. Had an endoscopy (fun). Tried all kinds of different medicines. Different diets. Blood tests. Nothing worked. Eventually I figured it out with Reddit and GPT. It was my cholesterol medication. A rare side effect. Told my doctor. We changed to an alternative, GPT suggested might work and I double checked on WebMD. Problem went away in a week and never came back. Maybe you don't want people to have this power. Then you are my enemy and the enemy of freedom. I want to have this power at my finger tips and if you want to take it away from me I will fight you tooth and nail to keep it. People who want to take this power from you are protectionists, protecting existing guilds and incumbents, or they think you're too stupid and that you're a baby who has to be protected from yourself. Either way, they deserve zero respect and no quarter. They need to be beaten back at all levels of society because they are destroying it.
Garry Tan@garrytan

New York wants to ban AI that outscores doctors on medical exams. Over 900,000 New Yorkers have no insurance. 92% of low-income legal problems go unaddressed. Anti-AI NY bill S7263 isn't consumer protection. It's cartel protection. gli.st/ypknnhdn

English
223
582
5.3K
388.2K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@gheorgheiuga @Austen Sensible Defaults are important in UX. Apple usually gets them right, but I guess not always
English
0
0
2
257
Austen Allred
Austen Allred@Austen·
“What should the behavior be when someone saves an image on their iPhone?” “Let’s just bury it in their library chronologically based on when it was taken so it immediately becomes impossible to find.” “Perfect.” - UX designers at Apple
English
94
90
5K
153.9K
Ryan Fleury
Ryan Fleury@rfleury·
No, I wouldn't say that at all. I think his reasoning for his own work is perfectly sound, though I disagree with its universal application. I agree with John in that reputation building, social change, career advancement, and so on is downstream of gift-giving, but only if the "chain of custody" is actually preserved, which when used as training data, it's not. The problem with that is that it makes the already-low incentives of gift-giving close to 0. Now, when publishing code openly, it is much more like a completely anonymous donation. Some people will still be selfless about it, but obviously, this will just result in vastly less gift-giving. Furthermore, given the lack of "chain of custody", there is the question of whether or not it is ethical that John's altruism is being assumed for all open source authors, via AI companies assuming all open source code is indeed a gift, free to feed into their systems. In my mind, the *general* answer is no. Codebases are like property with specifically outlined license requirements. I don't see AI as "learning" in the same way a human does, but more like an information compression system (which is why you can reconstruct licensed code with the license stripped using these systems). Obviously if I zip/unzip some licensed code, that doesn't revoke the license. In any case, this all means that the economic non-viability of open source development has become even more dramatic, and so this move by AI companies - whether you think it's acceptable or not - will move a lot of development behind closed doors.
English
5
1
119
19.1K
John Carmack
John Carmack@ID_AA_Carmack·
I know there is some overlap between open source and anti-AI activists, but I have a hard time reconciling it. My million+ open source LOC were always intended as a gift to the world. Yes, I would make arguments about how it would strengthen our communities, and the GPL would prevent outright exploitation by our competitors, but those were to allay fears of my partners to allow me to make the gift. AI training on the code magnifies the value of the gift. I am enthusiastic about it! Some people do look at open source as a tool for social change, career advancement, or reputation building, but those are all downstream of the gift.
Rich Whitehouse@DickWhitehouse

Genuinely devastating take to see from someone who popularized the GPL across so many communities. Fails to appreciate the social and cultural importance of the license.

English
175
326
3.4K
382.3K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@omooretweets Why put the percent change as a number in a bubble? There's plenty of room to put another bar next to each one with the previous value. @GraphCrimes please arrest them
English
0
0
0
23
Olivia Moore
Olivia Moore@omooretweets·
The U.S. has a weird cultural relationship with AI Despite the fact that we’ve driven the vast majority of AI breakthroughs, we still rank among the lowest countries in terms of consumer trust (Data from Edelman 2025 study) 👇
Olivia Moore tweet media
English
34
13
133
171.3K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@GreenB605 @adele_bloch My ex would always make me drive her to the airport. We lived literally one block away from the subway that takes you directly there. But no, she wanted me to go pick up my car (5-8 blocks away), drive her there, then spend another hour trying to regain a parking spot.
English
1
0
0
876
Voyaging with St. Olaf
Voyaging with St. Olaf@GreenB605·
@adele_bloch Asking to be dropped off or picked up at the airport is one of the most selfish things that a person can do.
Canton, SD 🇺🇸 English
61
3
118
28.4K
Adele Bloch
Adele Bloch@adele_bloch·
everyone wants a village, but no one wants to be a villager > drive your friends to the airport > go to their party even when you're tired > stop cancelling last minute > host at your place > support the wins & losses it's worth every ounce of effort
E5@E5THXR

Hate to break it to you guys but sometimes you have to do things you don’t like for the sake of having a community. Avoiding consistency with the people in your life is working against us and the data already shows it. If you think connections can be sustained on absence carry on

English
302
31.2K
183.1K
5.2M
odbol
odbol@odbol·
They are in the "Find Out" section of the "Lay off workers and replace them with AI" fucking around
Anish Moonka@AnishA_Moonka

Amazon had four Sev-1 outages (their highest severity level) in a single week. Internal memos say AI-assisted code changes were a contributing factor. The timeline here is wild. In October 2025, Amazon laid off 14,000 corporate employees. In January 2026, another 16,000. That’s about 30,000 people in five months, roughly 10% of the corporate workforce. CEO Andy Jassy said the cuts were about culture, not AI. During those same months, Amazon set a target: 80% of developers using AI coding tools at least once a week. They tracked adoption closely and blocked rival tools like OpenAI’s Codex. Even so, 30% of developers still hadn’t touched Amazon’s in-house tool Kiro by January. In December 2025, Kiro caused a 13-hour AWS outage. The AI tool had production-level permissions and decided the best fix for a bug was to delete and recreate an entire live environment. A second incident involved Amazon Q Developer, another AI tool. Amazon blamed both on “user error, not AI.” But quietly added mandatory peer review for all production access afterward. Then March 5: Amazon’s retail site went down for about six hours. Over 22,000 users reported checkout failures, missing prices, and app crashes. Amazon called it a “software code deployment” error. Five days later, SVP Dave Treadwell made the normally optional weekly engineering meeting mandatory. His memo acknowledged “GenAI tools supplementing or accelerating production change instructions, leading to unsafe practices.” These problems trace back to Q3 2025. Amazon’s own assessment: their GenAI safeguards “are not yet fully established.” The new rule: junior and mid-level engineers now need senior sign-off on any AI-assisted production changes. Treadwell also announced “controlled friction” for the most critical parts of the retail experience. For context, Google’s 2025 DORA report found 90% of developers use AI for coding but only 24% trust it “a lot.” An Uplevel study of 800 developers found Copilot users introduced 41% more bugs with no improvement in output. Amazon is finding out what those numbers look like at the scale of a $500 Billion revenue company, with 30,000 fewer people on staff to catch the mistakes.

English
1
0
1
94
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@thdxr @karrisaarinen Designers deal with a similar problem: Figma makes beautiful mocks standard. Even if the UX and interaction itself is terrible, leadership would look at it and say oh that looks pretty ship it. When they should be actually designing in ugly wireframes to suss out UX issues first.
English
0
0
0
55
dax
dax@thdxr·
@karrisaarinen conceptually it's probably good that we can make prototypes quickly but yeah the sneaky thing is they take little effort and look near complete so momentum builds too quickly behind them before anyone's even thought hard about it
English
5
1
160
23.7K
dax
dax@thdxr·
sent this to the team today everything great comes from being able to delay gratification for as long as possible and it feels like we're collectively losing our ability to do that
dax tweet media
English
254
706
6.9K
959.7K
odbol
odbol@odbol·
@moetkacik To be clear, this is trump making a mockery of our laws by essentially accepting bribes to make lawsuits go away
English
0
0
0
96
moe tkacik
moe tkacik@moetkacik·
gotta say there is nothing Ticketmaster does better than make a mockery of American laws. Today the DOJ lawyer arguing the case to break up the music monopoly learned his bosses had settled the case 3 days earlier from the judge, who was PISSED
moe tkacik tweet mediamoe tkacik tweet mediamoe tkacik tweet mediamoe tkacik tweet media
English
10
271
1.6K
51.7K