Omid Jahanbin

672 posts

Omid Jahanbin banner
Omid Jahanbin

Omid Jahanbin

@omidify

AI, Entrepreneurship, Global Macros | SVP, @ConsilioGlobal | ABL(c): always be learning (and closing). All POV expressed here are personal.

28K feet+climbing Katılım Mayıs 2010
1.4K Takip Edilen4.2K Takipçiler
ZAYVEN KNOX
ZAYVEN KNOX@ZayvenKnox·
An Anthropic engineer paid for my espresso at Sightglass when he saw my screen I was running my Polymarket bot from the counter. He was next in line. Looked over my shoulder. Stopped scrolling. "That's not a normal trading app. What's it actually running on" I told him. Claude Code. Four repos. $25 a month. He sat down without asking. "I'm on the agent team. We stress test Claude for exactly this. You're letting it find its own edges" Not just edges. Wallets. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. "You're feeding Claude raw wallet data and letting it identify who consistently wins. Then cloning them" He said it slowly. Like he was writing the threat model in his head. One prompt. Find every wallet with 100 plus trades and win rate above 70%. Rank by profit. Export top 50. Claude scanned 14,000 wallets in 4 minutes. Returned 47. The top 20 made more than the bottom 13,000 combined. "That's not a stat. That's a hit list" Exactly. "And you didn't write the scoring function" Claude did. I just wired it into an if-statement. Then I showed him the second repo. Official Rust CLI. No API key for reads. 500 markets, Claude scores them in minutes. Gap. Depth. Resolution window. 487 markets become 35 before a dollar moves. 93% killed before I even see them. A green fill landed on the screen. +$84. He watched it hit. "How does it decide to actually enter" Three agents. Shared wallet. No shared memory. Arbitrage, convergence, whale copy. 2 agree, full size. 1 alone, half. Disagree, no trade. Consensus filter alone killed 40% of losing trades. "And the exits?" The 47 whales never hold to settlement. 91% exit early. 73% of max profit captured. Redeploy immediately. My bot cuts at 85% of expected move or on a 3x volume spike. "You built a whale copy bot that exits before the whales" Yeah. He put his espresso down. "How often does it trade" 10 a day on average. Most of them skipped before I look up from my coffee. My setup: Claude API - $20/mo VPS in Germany - $5/mo poly_data - free polymarket-cli - free Polymarket/agents - free $200 seed. 27 days ago. $14,300 now. Copytrade here: t.me/KreoPolyBot?st… 271 trades. 74% win rate. Sharpe 2.47. I haven't touched it in 27 days. He stared at the screen for a long time. "This is literally what our red team simulates. Except you actually shipped it" He emailed me the next morning. "Any chance you'd take a call with our policy lead" I told him the article is the call. Read it twice. Too late to gatekeep. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me @ZayvenKnox
English
549
393
944
123.6K
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
@chamath AI power constraints framed as ‘hyperscalers win, model labs lose’ assumes those are separate teams. Anthropic trains on AWS and GCP. OpenAI runs on Azure and Oracle. If the labs are power-starved, hyperscaler AI revenue is power-starved with them. The constraint is upstream of everyone.
English
0
0
0
15
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
Hey @Hanes, are you the next personal garment company to pivot to AI? DM me the deets 📈🚀🌜
English
0
0
0
11
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
S&P just hit a new all-time high. Wall Street is popping champagne, calling it a “recovery” and “risk-on rebound.” Meanwhile:
CPI just spiked to +3.3% YoY (biggest jump in years, energy +10.9% in a month).
 UMich consumer sentiment crashed to 47.6 — an ALL-TIME LOW in 74 years of data. This isn’t strength. It’s the same old story: the asset economy is completely divorced from the real one. Portfolios up. Paychecks wrecked by gas, groceries, and rent. Two Americas. One’s winning. The other’s just trying to survive the month. Wake up.
English
0
1
1
26
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
3/ The companies that survive this aren't the ones hoping for a Fed pivot. They're the ones that built lean, generated real cash, and didn't bet the balance sheet on cheap money continuing forever. Boring fundamentals (and defense corps) win again.
English
0
0
0
13
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
🧵 1/3: The Iran war just did something tariffs couldn't — it made inflation a 2026 problem again. Oil at $98. Core PCE at 3.1%. GDP at 0.7%. The Fed can't cut. Growth is stalling. Stocks just closed their 3rd straight down week.
English
2
0
0
27
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
2/ Everyone's blaming geopolitics. But the structure was already fragile. You can't run a $2T deficit, keep rates at 4%+, and expect businesses to invest. The war didn't create the risk. It just made it impossible to pretend the risk wasn't there.
English
0
0
0
8
Omid Jahanbin retweetledi
Consilio LLC
Consilio LLC@ConsilioGlobal·
Your data estate is bigger, more fragmented, and more critical than ever. CoreECI powers Legal Ops Intelligence so teams can see, govern, and act on data across matters and systems. Learn more and see it live at #Legalweek26: bit.ly/401Kecv
Consilio LLC tweet media
English
0
1
1
43
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
@DougMcMillon How does @Walmart, one of the largest retailers in the world, not have tap payments? Literally my next-door neighbor kid who sells 3-D prints has tap.
English
0
0
0
17
Ben Cera
Ben Cera@Bencera·
@OneManSaas It feels like a video game at this point. To be fair i’m not alone. Claude code & codex always by my side, and a bunch of agents in production self-reporting and self-healing the system. 2026.
English
2
0
4
1.1K
Ben Cera
Ben Cera@Bencera·
$100K→$500K run rate in 10 days. One founder. Zero employees. This is the entire operation.
Ben Cera tweet media
English
121
30
803
85.4K
Omid Jahanbin retweetledi
Ray Dalio
Ray Dalio@RayDalio·
Most people are reluctant to take in information that is inconsistent with what they have already concluded. When I ask why, a common answer is: "I want to make up my own mind." These people seem to think that considering opposing views will somehow threaten their ability to decide what they want to do. Nothing could be further from the truth. Taking in others' perspectives in order to consider them in no way reduces your freedom to think independently and make your own decisions. It will just broaden your perspective as you make them. #principleoftheday
Ray Dalio tweet media
English
121
165
1.1K
80.2K
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
@chamath This framework is clean but incomplete. Intelligence isn’t just p × c × a — it’s (p × c × a) × d. Data is the gradient signal that makes the other three useful. Without differentiated data, scale just converges models to the same ceiling.
English
1
0
4
728
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
I have a simplified conjecture about AI progress. Your mileage may vary but here it is. f(i) = p × c × a where i=intelligence, p=power, c=compute, a=algorithms, multiplied together. This means neglecting any variable creates a ceiling and any breakthrough compounds across all three. One caveat is that today's advances are more accurately shaped by the entire history of prior investment, not just a discrete investment or breakthrough in time. In other words, the variables have memory over time so that must be factored in. In any event, the chart below is interesting because it shows the major tech companies operationalizing this function… If f(i) accelerates quickly, there is a point in f(i) where the gap between the haves and have-nots is so stark that negotiating leverage will flip instantly. This is the bet that Amazon, Microsoft, Google and Meta are making. This is why they are buying as much of p, c and a as possible to make sure they own the leverage that comes from f(i). Meanwhile Apple is cutting capex. Apple's implicit assumption is: “AI capability is an input we can buy, not a moat we need to build. We own the distribution and last mile so let’s wait and license the intelligence when a winner is more clear. It’s a feature that needs distribution not a platform that reallocates winners and losers.” It's a rational bet today but it's also the kind of bet that can look obvious until the day it isn't.
Chamath Palihapitiya tweet media
English
220
67
815
247.9K
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
Totally crushing w/ @FactoryAI Droids + 5.2 + Flash for some pretty sophisticated high-speed, multi-threaded use cases. Implications staggering. 🚀
English
1
1
14
1.1K
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
@emollick Living in your personal matrix > the cold reality of AI fact checking
English
0
0
0
77
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
It is kind of shocking how little AI assistance has influenced the discourse on this site, given there is a button next to every post that lets you ask a solid AI to fact check the details. It does a pretty good job. This has made no difference at all in the spread of nonsense.
English
154
58
837
55.2K
Omid Jahanbin
Omid Jahanbin@omidify·
OpenAI’s Deep Research model just blew away others on Humanity’s Last Exam (3K challenging questions from top experts across hundreds of domains). These questions are insane:
Omid Jahanbin tweet media
English
0
0
1
178